Oakleigh
#666 for girls in 2025, 423 births · Last seen for boys in 2022 at #10,863
Given to girls 99.6% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2023 · 598 births
- Debut · girls
- 8 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 4,121since 2005
Oakleigh over time
Rank among girls' names. Oakleigh has never cracked the top 500 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #666 | 423 | — | |
| 2024 | #629 | 471 | — | |
| 2023 | #507 | 598 | — | |
| 2022 | #522 | 597 | #10,863 | 6 |
| 2021 | #605 | 495 | #10,799 | 6 |
| 2020 | #858 | 315 | — | |
| 2019 | #854 | 313 | — | |
| 2018 | #1,162 | 207 | #12,156 | 5 |
| 2017 | #1,291 | 182 | — | |
| 2016 | #1,550 | 144 | — | |
| 2015 | #1,793 | 116 | — | |
| 2014 | #2,351 | 78 | — | |
| 2013 | #3,218 | 50 | — | |
| 2012 | #3,169 | 52 | — | |
| 2011 | #5,063 | 27 | — | |
| 2010 | #8,701 | 13 | — | |
| 2009 | #9,379 | 12 | — | |
| 2008 | #10,807 | 10 | — | |
| 2007 | #17,636 | 5 | — | |
| 2006 | #17,168 | 5 | — | |
| 2005 | #11,834 | 8 | — | |
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Oakleigh! It came in at #11,834, and was given to 8 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 2006–2007, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
See more about Oakleigh
- 37 spots since 2024 (#629 → #666)
- 192 spots since 2020 (#858 → #666)
- 1,127 spots since 2015 (#1,793 → #666)
- Biggest jump: 308 spots in 2019 (#1,162 → #854)
- Biggest drop: 122 spots in 2024 (#507 → #629)
- Debuted 2005
- Peaked 2023 at #507 (598 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 7 yrs · run 2019–2025
- Highest: 1 in 2,683 girls born in 2023 were named Oakleigh (0.04%)
- Latest: 1 in 3,800 girls born in 2025 (0.03%)
- 70.3% of all girls named Oakleigh (2,899) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40 | #9,379 (2009) | #13,365 |
| 2010s | 1,182 | #854 (2019) | #2,915 |
| 2020s | 2,899 | #507 (2023) | #631 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Oakleigh in 2022
Top girls' names in 2022
Top boys' names in 2022
More about 2022
girls
1,640,131 girls got a published name in 2022; 1 in 2,747 of them was named Oakleigh, which outranked 97.1% of the 17,760 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 7.4% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
boys
1,746,008 boys got a published name in 2022; 1 in 291,001 of them was named Oakleigh, which outranked 24.2% of the 14,333 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 7.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #9,823Zy7
- #9,823Zyiel7
- #9,823Zymire7
- #10,863Oakleigh6
- #10,863Aadan6
- #10,863Aagam6
- #10,863Aahaan6
- #12,330Aadav5
- #12,330Aadhavan5
- #12,330Aadhrit5
Tied with 1,466 names at #10,863; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.