Oaklee
#535 for girls in 2025, 565 births · #2,006 for boys in 2025, 75 births
Given to girls 84.6% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2023 · 687 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 5,576since 1999
Oaklee over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #535 | 565 | #2,006 | 75 |
| 2024 | #515 | 598 | #1,938 | 81 |
| 2023 | #445 | 687 | #1,608 | 108 |
| 2022 | #465 | 682 | #1,504 | 120 |
| 2021 | #487 | 645 | #1,658 | 100 |
| 2020 | #623 | 470 | #1,922 | 76 |
| 2019 | #756 | 371 | #1,790 | 86 |
| 2018 | #856 | 316 | #1,856 | 81 |
| 2017 | #942 | 280 | #2,154 | 63 |
| 2016 | #1,197 | 208 | #2,518 | 50 |
| 2015 | #1,454 | 158 | #2,528 | 49 |
| 2014 | #1,876 | 107 | #2,847 | 41 |
| 2013 | #1,834 | 110 | #3,661 | 28 |
| 2012 | #2,401 | 77 | #4,686 | 20 |
| 2011 | #2,695 | 65 | #4,509 | 21 |
| 2010 | #3,203 | 51 | #6,698 | 12 |
| 2009 | #3,409 | 48 | #10,994 | 6 |
| 2008 | #4,006 | 39 | — | |
| 2007 | #7,733 | 16 | — | |
| 2006 | #6,840 | 18 | — | |
| 2005 | #9,452 | 11 | — | |
| 2004 | #7,077 | 16 | — | |
| 2003 | #11,325 | 8 | — | |
| 2002 | #15,432 | 5 | — | |
| 2001 | #7,317 | 14 | — | |
| 2000 | #15,031 | 5 | — | |
| 1999 | #12,688 | 6 | — | |
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Oaklee! It came in at #12,688, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1999–2000, when fewer than 7 girls a year got the name.
Where Oaklee is popular in 2021
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- West Virginia#120 · 1 in 391
- Utah#141 · 1 in 564
- Idaho#147 · 1 in 494
- Iowa#180 · 1 in 615
- Montana#200 · 1 in 527
Best ever in a state: #28 in Wyoming, 2023.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| West Virginia | #120 | 14 | 1 in 391 |
| Utah | #141 | 30 | 1 in 564 |
| Idaho | #147 | 13 | 1 in 494 |
| Iowa | #180 | 19 | 1 in 615 |
| Montana | #200 | 5 | 1 in 527 |
| Oklahoma | #201 | 19 | 1 in 783 |
| Mississippi | #234 | 12 | 1 in 817 |
| Arkansas | #263 | 12 | 1 in 907 |
| Indiana | #266 | 27 | 1 in 1,051 |
| Louisiana | #271 | 18 | 1 in 1,034 |
| Missouri | #274 | 23 | 1 in 1,075 |
| Tennessee | #300 | 26 | 1 in 1,201 |
| Arizona | #310 | 21 | 1 in 1,321 |
| Nebraska | #316 | 7 | 1 in 1,037 |
| Ohio | #318 | 36 | 1 in 1,350 |
| Michigan | #339 | 27 | 1 in 1,420 |
| Washington | #351 | 20 | 1 in 1,476 |
| Kentucky | #363 | 12 | 1 in 1,418 |
| Alabama | #364 | 14 | 1 in 1,363 |
| Pennsylvania | #399 | 29 | 1 in 1,682 |
| Minnesota | #478 | 11 | 1 in 2,025 |
| Nevada | #512 | 5 | 1 in 1,950 |
| Wisconsin | #542 | 9 | 1 in 2,386 |
| Oregon | #568 | 6 | 1 in 2,290 |
| Kansas | #575 | 5 | 1 in 2,316 |
| Georgia | #595 | 17 | 1 in 2,664 |
| South Carolina | #609 | 7 | 1 in 2,532 |
| Florida | #612 | 28 | 1 in 2,986 |
| Texas | #617 | 52 | 1 in 2,990 |
| Virginia | #682 | 11 | 1 in 3,143 |
| North Carolina | #727 | 13 | 1 in 3,467 |
| New Jersey | #733 | 10 | 1 in 3,643 |
| Colorado | #759 | 6 | 1 in 3,689 |
| Illinois | #794 | 12 | 1 in 4,033 |
| California | #1,103 | 25 | 1 in 6,981 |
| New York | #1,226 | 11 | 1 in 7,386 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Oaklee
- 20 spots since 2024 (#515 → #535)
- 88 spots since 2020 (#623 → #535)
- 919 spots since 2015 (#1,454 → #535)
- Biggest jump: 255 spots in 2017 (#1,197 → #942)
- Biggest drop: 70 spots in 2024 (#445 → #515)
- Debuted 1999
- Peaked 2023 at #445 (687 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 9 yrs · run 2017–2025
- Highest: 1 in 2,336 girls born in 2023 were named Oaklee (0.04%)
- Latest: 1 in 2,845 girls born in 2025 (0.04%)
- 65.4% of all girls named Oaklee (3,647) were born in this decade
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6 | #12,688 (1999) | #12,688 |
| 2000s | 180 | #3,409 (2009) | #8,762 |
| 2010s | 1,743 | #756 (2019) | #1,721 |
| 2020s | 3,647 | #445 (2023) | #512 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Oaklee in 2021
Top girls' names in 2021
Top boys' names in 2021
More about 2021
girls
1,640,861 girls got a published name in 2021; 1 in 2,544 of them was named Oaklee, which outranked 97.2% of the 17,676 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 7.7% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,749,482 boys got a published name in 2021; 1 in 17,495 of them was named Oaklee, which outranked 88.2% of the 14,096 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 7.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #1,645Mahir101
- #1,645Syrus101
- #1,645Virgil101
- #1,658Oaklee100
- #1,658Archibald100
- #1,658Jordi100
- #1,658Josh100
- #1,667Earl99
- #1,667Elvin99
- #1,667Ezio99
Tied with 8 names at #1,658; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.