Noelle
#202 for girls in 2025, 1,507 births · Last seen for boys in 2024 at #9,894
Given to girls 99.7% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2025 · 1,507 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 44,457since 1927
Noelle over time
Rank among girls' names. Noelle has never cracked the top 200 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #202 | 1,507 | — | |
| 2024 | #213 | 1,444 | #9,894 | 7 |
| 2023 | #206 | 1,457 | — | |
| 2022 | #210 | 1,393 | #10,863 | 6 |
| 2021 | #202 | 1,479 | #9,714 | 7 |
| 2020 | #210 | 1,373 | #8,067 | 9 |
| 2019 | #221 | 1,401 | #12,145 | 5 |
| 2018 | #229 | 1,383 | #10,760 | 6 |
| 2017 | #238 | 1,347 | #7,546 | 10 |
| 2016 | #249 | 1,270 | #9,664 | 7 |
| 2015 | #252 | 1,284 | #8,744 | 8 |
| 2014 | #250 | 1,294 | #8,781 | 8 |
| 2013 | #294 | 1,083 | — | |
| 2012 | #313 | 1,028 | #9,709 | 7 |
| 2011 | #356 | 906 | — | |
| 2010 | #366 | 876 | — | |
| 2009 | #429 | 742 | — | |
| 2008 | #441 | 725 | — | |
| 2007 | #499 | 650 | — | |
| 2006 | #454 | 694 | #10,662 | 6 |
| 2005 | #467 | 653 | — | |
| 2004 | #445 | 686 | — | |
| 2003 | #403 | 750 | #10,894 | 5 |
| 2002 | #401 | 727 | — | |
| 2001 | #434 | 639 | — | |
| 2000 | #403 | 710 | — | |
| 1999 | #433 | 635 | — | |
| 1998 | #404 | 678 | — | |
| 1997 | #374 | 724 | — | |
| 1996 | #413 | 624 | — | |
| 1995 | #451 | 569 | — | |
| 1994 | #463 | 547 | — | |
| 1993 | #462 | 543 | — | |
| 1992 | #451 | 552 | — | |
| 1991 | #437 | 582 | — | |
| 1990 | #460 | 530 | — | |
| 1989 | #470 | 513 | #7,905 | 5 |
| 1988 | #409 | 579 | — | |
| 1987 | #397 | 581 | — | |
| 1986 | #486 | 441 | — | |
| 1985 | #444 | 493 | — | |
| 1984 | #470 | 441 | #6,315 | 5 |
| 1983 | #486 | 404 | — | |
| 1982 | #583 | 312 | — | |
| 1981 | #523 | 374 | #4,509 | 8 |
| 1980 | #474 | 446 | — | |
| 1979 | #447 | 457 | — | |
| 1978 | #455 | 436 | — | |
| 1977 | #449 | 445 | #5,123 | 6 |
| 1976 | #541 | 322 | — | |
| 1975 | #550 | 311 | — | |
| 1974 | #628 | 247 | — | |
| 1973 | #625 | 244 | — | |
| 1972 | #589 | 272 | — | |
| 1971 | #533 | 343 | — | |
| 1970 | #477 | 424 | — | |
| 1969 | #460 | 442 | — | |
| 1968 | #449 | 454 | — | |
| 1967 | #460 | 422 | — | |
| 1966 | #497 | 354 | — | |
| 1965 | #649 | 227 | — | |
| 1964 | #774 | 178 | — | |
| 1963 | #1,056 | 103 | — | |
| 1962 | #1,690 | 45 | — | |
| 1961 | #1,627 | 48 | — | |
| 1960 | #1,887 | 36 | — | |
| 1959 | #1,820 | 37 | — | |
| 1958 | #1,417 | 56 | — | |
| 1957 | #2,276 | 24 | — | |
| 1956 | #1,968 | 30 | — | |
| 1955 | #1,667 | 38 | — | |
| 1954 | #2,122 | 25 | — | |
| 1953 | #2,431 | 19 | — | |
| 1952 | #2,327 | 20 | — | |
| 1951 | #2,577 | 16 | — | |
| 1950 | #1,911 | 25 | — | |
| 1949 | #2,134 | 21 | — | |
| 1948 | #1,820 | 27 | — | |
| 1947 | #1,461 | 41 | — | |
| 1946 | #1,808 | 25 | — | |
| 1945 | #1,660 | 25 | — | |
| 1944 | #1,916 | 20 | — | |
| 1943 | #2,251 | 16 | — | |
| 1942 | #2,117 | 17 | — | |
| 1941 | #2,272 | 14 | — | |
| 1940 | #2,424 | 12 | — | |
| 1939 | #3,429 | 7 | — | |
| 1938 | #3,181 | 8 | — | |
| 1937 | #2,735 | 10 | — | |
| 1936 | #2,689 | 10 | — | |
| 1935 | #3,742 | 6 | — | |
| 1934 | #4,286 | 5 | — | |
| 1933 | #3,753 | 6 | — | |
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | #3,848 | 6 | — | |
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | #3,682 | 7 | — | |
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | #4,805 | 5 | — | |
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Noelle! It came in at #4,805, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1927–1928, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Noelle is popular in 1985
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Nevada#172 · 1 in 800
- North Dakota#189 · 1 in 919
- Montana#203 · 1 in 874
- Wisconsin#233 · 1 in 1,532
- New Jersey#238 · 1 in 1,497
Best ever in a state: #54 in Hawaii, 2025.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nevada | #172 | 6 | 1 in 800 |
| North Dakota | #189 | 5 | 1 in 919 |
| Montana | #203 | 5 | 1 in 874 |
| Wisconsin | #233 | 20 | 1 in 1,532 |
| New Jersey | #238 | 27 | 1 in 1,497 |
| Massachusetts | #245 | 22 | 1 in 1,591 |
| Hawaii | #249 | 5 | 1 in 980 |
| Connecticut | #275 | 9 | 1 in 1,893 |
| Colorado | #291 | 13 | 1 in 1,689 |
| Pennsylvania | #320 | 29 | 1 in 2,384 |
| Washington | #320 | 14 | 1 in 1,974 |
| New York | #347 | 48 | 1 in 2,227 |
| Minnesota | #351 | 10 | 1 in 2,854 |
| Maryland | #371 | 9 | 1 in 2,679 |
| California | #386 | 86 | 1 in 2,352 |
| Florida | #396 | 24 | 1 in 2,719 |
| Kansas | #405 | 5 | 1 in 2,930 |
| Michigan | #405 | 18 | 1 in 3,181 |
| Oregon | #406 | 6 | 1 in 2,606 |
| Ohio | #424 | 19 | 1 in 3,636 |
| Arizona | #459 | 8 | 1 in 2,874 |
| Illinois | #519 | 18 | 1 in 4,055 |
| Virginia | #555 | 7 | 1 in 4,707 |
| Indiana | #578 | 6 | 1 in 5,674 |
| Tennessee | #604 | 5 | 1 in 5,554 |
| Texas | #740 | 21 | 1 in 6,350 |
| Georgia | #803 | 5 | 1 in 7,419 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Noelle
- 11 spots since 2024 (#213 → #202)
- 8 spots since 2020 (#210 → #202)
- 50 spots since 2015 (#252 → #202)
- Biggest jump: 282 spots in 1964 (#1,056 → #774)
- Biggest drop: 61 spots in 1989 (#409 → #470)
- Debuted 1927
- Peaked 2025 at #202 (1,507 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 62 yrs · run 1964–2025
- Highest: 1 in 1,067 girls born in 2025 were named Noelle (0.09%)
- 26.7% of all girls named Noelle (11,872) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 12 | #3,682 (1929) | #4,244 |
| 1930s | 58 | #2,689 (1936) | #3,458 |
| 1940s | 218 | #1,461 (1947) | #1,986 |
| 1950s | 290 | #1,417 (1958) | #2,052 |
| 1960s | 2,309 | #449 (1968) | #955 |
| 1970s | 3,501 | #447 (1979) | #529 |
| 1980s | 4,584 | #397 (1987) | #474 |
| 1990s | 5,984 | #374 (1997) | #435 |
| 2000s | 6,976 | #401 (2002) | #438 |
| 2010s | 11,872 | #221 (2019) | #277 |
| 2020s | 8,653 | #202 (2025) | #207 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Noelle in 1985
Top girls' names in 1985
More about 1985
girls
1,720,828 girls got a published name in 1985; 1 in 3,491 of them was named Noelle, which outranked 96.4% of the 12,505 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 18.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.