Natalie
#89 for girls in 2025, 2,736 births · Last seen for boys in 2024 at #9,894
Given to girls 99.8% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2008 · 10,201 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 50 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 379,062since 1880
Natalie over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #89 | 2,736 | — | |
| 2024 | #73 | 3,127 | #9,894 | 7 |
| 2023 | #63 | 3,429 | — | |
| 2022 | #55 | 3,947 | — | |
| 2021 | #56 | 4,060 | — | |
| 2020 | #51 | 4,291 | — | |
| 2019 | #41 | 4,810 | #12,145 | 5 |
| 2018 | #39 | 5,127 | — | |
| 2017 | #35 | 5,554 | #9,696 | 7 |
| 2016 | #31 | 6,191 | — | |
| 2015 | #27 | 6,510 | #8,744 | 8 |
| 2014 | #23 | 7,115 | #9,642 | 7 |
| 2013 | #21 | 7,492 | #8,789 | 8 |
| 2012 | #17 | 7,908 | — | |
| 2011 | #14 | 8,646 | #7,009 | 11 |
| 2010 | #14 | 8,789 | #9,693 | 7 |
| 2009 | #16 | 9,421 | #8,985 | 8 |
| 2008 | #13 | 10,201 | #4,901 | 19 |
| 2007 | #17 | 10,443 | #6,622 | 12 |
| 2006 | #17 | 10,951 | #4,675 | 19 |
| 2005 | #18 | 10,742 | #5,278 | 15 |
| 2004 | #19 | 9,689 | #3,074 | 32 |
| 2003 | #23 | 9,151 | #4,815 | 16 |
| 2002 | #30 | 8,352 | #5,725 | 12 |
| 2001 | #32 | 8,049 | #6,013 | 11 |
| 2000 | #34 | 8,096 | #8,209 | 7 |
| 1999 | #34 | 8,079 | #5,317 | 12 |
| 1998 | #40 | 7,549 | #7,560 | 7 |
| 1997 | #48 | 6,539 | #5,642 | 10 |
| 1996 | #46 | 6,693 | #4,185 | 15 |
| 1995 | #51 | 6,424 | #5,124 | 11 |
| 1994 | #56 | 5,837 | #4,290 | 14 |
| 1993 | #62 | 5,484 | #6,816 | 7 |
| 1992 | #61 | 5,583 | #3,459 | 18 |
| 1991 | #64 | 5,557 | #4,231 | 13 |
| 1990 | #63 | 5,637 | #2,488 | 27 |
| 1989 | #62 | 5,630 | #2,106 | 33 |
| 1988 | #63 | 5,483 | #2,860 | 19 |
| 1987 | #56 | 5,331 | #2,057 | 29 |
| 1986 | #52 | 5,707 | #2,510 | 21 |
| 1985 | #58 | 5,535 | #2,171 | 25 |
| 1984 | #55 | 5,555 | #1,979 | 27 |
| 1983 | #52 | 5,723 | #1,748 | 32 |
| 1982 | #51 | 5,961 | #2,207 | 23 |
| 1981 | #60 | 4,858 | #2,138 | 24 |
| 1980 | #65 | 4,645 | #2,831 | 16 |
| 1979 | #68 | 4,445 | #3,168 | 13 |
| 1978 | #66 | 4,165 | #2,205 | 21 |
| 1977 | #69 | 4,043 | #5,123 | 6 |
| 1976 | #80 | 3,499 | #2,417 | 18 |
| 1975 | #110 | 2,637 | #3,941 | 8 |
| 1974 | #119 | 2,466 | #3,837 | 8 |
| 1973 | #140 | 2,059 | #3,445 | 9 |
| 1972 | #143 | 2,024 | #3,622 | 8 |
| 1971 | #154 | 2,093 | — | |
| 1970 | #142 | 2,370 | #3,521 | 8 |
| 1969 | #153 | 2,152 | #3,314 | 8 |
| 1968 | #171 | 1,886 | #3,107 | 8 |
| 1967 | #161 | 2,034 | #3,559 | 6 |
| 1966 | #150 | 2,309 | #3,948 | 5 |
| 1965 | #180 | 1,940 | — | |
| 1964 | #177 | 2,127 | #3,050 | 8 |
| 1963 | #190 | 1,993 | — | |
| 1962 | #191 | 1,949 | — | |
| 1961 | #213 | 1,625 | — | |
| 1960 | #216 | 1,550 | #4,038 | 5 |
| 1959 | #247 | 1,232 | — | |
| 1958 | #238 | 1,283 | — | |
| 1957 | #267 | 1,055 | — | |
| 1956 | #353 | 612 | — | |
| 1955 | #446 | 404 | — | |
| 1954 | #439 | 401 | — | |
| 1953 | #446 | 374 | — | |
| 1952 | #429 | 402 | — | |
| 1951 | #408 | 414 | — | |
| 1950 | #405 | 390 | — | |
| 1949 | #388 | 413 | — | |
| 1948 | #372 | 450 | — | |
| 1947 | #382 | 434 | — | |
| 1946 | #385 | 389 | — | |
| 1945 | #364 | 366 | — | |
| 1944 | #355 | 380 | — | |
| 1943 | #325 | 467 | — | |
| 1942 | #320 | 468 | — | |
| 1941 | #342 | 368 | — | |
| 1940 | #319 | 394 | — | |
| 1939 | #305 | 410 | — | |
| 1938 | #311 | 402 | — | |
| 1937 | #313 | 391 | — | |
| 1936 | #288 | 445 | — | |
| 1935 | #286 | 457 | — | |
| 1934 | #269 | 530 | — | |
| 1933 | #269 | 517 | — | |
| 1932 | #260 | 579 | — | |
| 1931 | #247 | 599 | — | |
| 1930 | #248 | 624 | #4,001 | 5 |
| 1929 | #248 | 634 | — | |
| 1928 | #238 | 687 | #3,357 | 7 |
| 1927 | #257 | 659 | #3,780 | 6 |
| 1926 | #255 | 669 | — | |
| 1925 | #249 | 708 | — | |
| 1924 | #249 | 713 | — | |
| 1923 | #247 | 694 | #3,467 | 7 |
| 1922 | #254 | 678 | #4,307 | 5 |
| 1921 | #247 | 729 | — | |
| 1920 | #278 | 548 | — | |
| 1919 | #279 | 520 | — | |
| 1918 | #297 | 465 | — | |
| 1917 | #280 | 484 | #3,545 | 6 |
| 1916 | #288 | 428 | — | |
| 1915 | #282 | 429 | — | |
| 1914 | #261 | 395 | — | |
| 1913 | #295 | 258 | — | |
| 1912 | #304 | 222 | — | |
| 1911 | #284 | 190 | — | |
| 1910 | #337 | 136 | — | |
| 1909 | #331 | 120 | — | |
| 1908 | #388 | 86 | — | |
| 1907 | #444 | 65 | — | |
| 1906 | #383 | 80 | — | |
| 1905 | #413 | 67 | — | |
| 1904 | #445 | 53 | — | |
| 1903 | #435 | 53 | — | |
| 1902 | #509 | 39 | — | |
| 1901 | #591 | 28 | — | |
| 1900 | #407 | 67 | — | |
| 1899 | #476 | 38 | — | |
| 1898 | #486 | 40 | — | |
| 1897 | #530 | 31 | — | |
| 1896 | #499 | 35 | — | |
| 1895 | #465 | 39 | — | |
| 1894 | #422 | 43 | — | |
| 1893 | #455 | 34 | — | |
| 1892 | #453 | 36 | — | |
| 1891 | #541 | 23 | — | |
| 1890 | #435 | 34 | — | |
| 1889 | #499 | 25 | — | |
| 1888 | #486 | 26 | — | |
| 1887 | #560 | 16 | — | |
| 1886 | #556 | 16 | — | |
| 1885 | #520 | 17 | — | |
| 1884 | #640 | 11 | — | |
| 1883 | #651 | 9 | — | |
| 1882 | #475 | 15 | — | |
| 1881 | #491 | 12 | — | |
| 1880 | #836 | 5 | — | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Natalie was already there! It came in at #836, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1880, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
See more about Natalie
- 16 spots since 2024 (#73 → #89)
- 38 spots since 2020 (#51 → #89)
- 62 spots since 2015 (#27 → #89)
- Biggest jump: 345 spots in 1881 (#836 → #491)
- Biggest drop: 184 spots in 1901 (#407 → #591)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 2008 at #13 (10,201 births)
- Births halved by 2019, 11 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 50 yrs · run 1976–2025
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
- Highest: 1 in 172 girls born in 2005 were named Natalie (0.58%)
- Latest: 1 in 587 girls born in 2025 (0.17%)
- Its best rank, #13 in 2008, was only 1 in 185 (0.54%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 25.1% of all girls named Natalie (95,095) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 152 | #475 (1882) | #571 |
| 1890s | 353 | #422 (1894) | #476 |
| 1900s | 658 | #331 (1909) | #435 |
| 1910s | 3,527 | #261 (1914) | #291 |
| 1920s | 6,719 | #238 (1928) | #252 |
| 1930s | 4,954 | #247 (1931) | #280 |
| 1940s | 4,129 | #319 (1940) | #355 |
| 1950s | 6,567 | #238 (1958) | #368 |
| 1960s | 19,565 | #150 (1966) | #180 |
| 1970s | 29,801 | #66 (1978) | #109 |
| 1980s | 54,428 | #51 (1982) | #57 |
| 1990s | 63,382 | #34 (1999) | #53 |
| 2000s | 95,095 | #13 (2008) | #22 |
| 2010s | 68,142 | #14 (2010) | #26 |
| 2020s | 21,590 | #51 (2020) | #65 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Natalie in 1980
Top girls' names in 1980
Top boys' names in 1980
More about 1980
girls
1,660,307 girls got a published name in 1980; 1 in 357 of them was named Natalie, which outranked 99.5% of the 12,161 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 17.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,783,951 boys got a published name in 1980; 1 in 111,497 of them was named Natalie, which outranked 61.2% of the 7,293 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.6% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #2,729Wendall17
- #2,729Zach17
- #2,729Zacharia17
- #2,831Natalie16
- #2,831Adriana16
- #2,831Agapito16
- #2,831Aloysius16
- #2,965Agustine15
- #2,965Albino15
- #2,965Amaury15
Tied with 133 names at #2,831; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.