Micheal
Last seen for girls in 2010 at #16,992 · #1,401 for boys in 2025, 130 births
Given to boys 98.8% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1956 · 4,732 births
- Debut · boys
- 20 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 9 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 154,719since 1880
Micheal over time
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #1,401 | 130 | |
| 2024 | — | #1,332 | 144 | |
| 2023 | — | #1,244 | 156 | |
| 2022 | — | #1,300 | 146 | |
| 2021 | — | #1,152 | 174 | |
| 2020 | — | #1,046 | 193 | |
| 2019 | — | #1,127 | 173 | |
| 2018 | — | #1,012 | 204 | |
| 2017 | — | #885 | 243 | |
| 2016 | — | #897 | 242 | |
| 2015 | — | #838 | 268 | |
| 2014 | — | #810 | 281 | |
| 2013 | — | #685 | 349 | |
| 2012 | — | #658 | 360 | |
| 2011 | — | #591 | 423 | |
| 2010 | #16,992 | 5 | #548 | 461 |
| 2009 | — | #502 | 540 | |
| 2008 | — | #475 | 584 | |
| 2007 | #12,676 | 8 | #435 | 647 |
| 2006 | #15,152 | 6 | #417 | 690 |
| 2005 | #16,462 | 5 | #407 | 684 |
| 2004 | #9,264 | 11 | #390 | 695 |
| 2003 | #15,784 | 5 | #356 | 771 |
| 2002 | #15,432 | 5 | #347 | 791 |
| 2001 | #7,317 | 14 | #322 | 875 |
| 2000 | #9,163 | 10 | #302 | 994 |
| 1999 | #8,223 | 11 | #279 | 1,055 |
| 1998 | #8,016 | 11 | #271 | 1,053 |
| 1997 | #9,802 | 8 | #265 | 1,068 |
| 1996 | #5,771 | 16 | #262 | 1,068 |
| 1995 | #5,677 | 16 | #247 | 1,156 |
| 1994 | #7,097 | 12 | #233 | 1,273 |
| 1993 | #5,206 | 18 | #226 | 1,308 |
| 1992 | #5,051 | 19 | #208 | 1,484 |
| 1991 | #5,949 | 15 | #192 | 1,635 |
| 1990 | #4,523 | 21 | #175 | 1,771 |
| 1989 | #4,358 | 21 | #164 | 1,833 |
| 1988 | #3,805 | 24 | #156 | 1,785 |
| 1987 | #2,972 | 32 | #159 | 1,765 |
| 1986 | #2,420 | 41 | #153 | 1,769 |
| 1985 | #2,362 | 42 | #155 | 1,758 |
| 1984 | #3,069 | 28 | #149 | 1,833 |
| 1983 | #2,047 | 49 | #140 | 1,909 |
| 1982 | #2,451 | 39 | #148 | 1,908 |
| 1981 | #2,409 | 40 | #136 | 2,023 |
| 1980 | #1,886 | 57 | #132 | 2,152 |
| 1979 | #1,952 | 53 | #127 | 2,137 |
| 1978 | #1,824 | 55 | #125 | 2,059 |
| 1977 | #1,483 | 74 | #122 | 2,215 |
| 1976 | #1,747 | 54 | #116 | 2,181 |
| 1975 | #1,756 | 53 | #104 | 2,441 |
| 1974 | #1,630 | 57 | #102 | 2,491 |
| 1973 | #1,666 | 54 | #106 | 2,476 |
| 1972 | #1,771 | 49 | #108 | 2,609 |
| 1971 | #2,296 | 34 | #124 | 2,557 |
| 1970 | #1,952 | 43 | #126 | 2,632 |
| 1969 | #1,955 | 41 | #120 | 2,720 |
| 1968 | #1,749 | 45 | #114 | 2,604 |
| 1967 | #1,783 | 42 | #115 | 2,700 |
| 1966 | #1,982 | 34 | #115 | 2,647 |
| 1965 | #1,887 | 37 | #118 | 2,763 |
| 1964 | #2,071 | 33 | #112 | 3,086 |
| 1963 | #1,839 | 40 | #106 | 3,537 |
| 1962 | #1,732 | 43 | #104 | 3,772 |
| 1961 | #2,117 | 31 | #103 | 4,017 |
| 1960 | #2,013 | 32 | #105 | 4,133 |
| 1959 | #1,881 | 35 | #96 | 4,369 |
| 1958 | #2,117 | 28 | #91 | 4,569 |
| 1957 | #1,989 | 30 | #85 | 4,831 |
| 1956 | #1,968 | 30 | #83 | 4,732 |
| 1955 | #2,839 | 16 | #87 | 4,530 |
| 1954 | #1,836 | 32 | #88 | 4,178 |
| 1953 | #2,431 | 19 | #88 | 3,987 |
| 1952 | #2,671 | 16 | #94 | 3,613 |
| 1951 | #4,385 | 7 | #97 | 3,276 |
| 1950 | #2,436 | 17 | #104 | 2,823 |
| 1949 | #2,410 | 17 | #122 | 2,381 |
| 1948 | #2,828 | 13 | #148 | 1,801 |
| 1947 | #2,637 | 15 | #159 | 1,629 |
| 1946 | #2,880 | 12 | #168 | 1,238 |
| 1945 | — | #173 | 951 | |
| 1944 | #2,762 | 11 | #204 | 732 |
| 1943 | #3,040 | 10 | #224 | 657 |
| 1942 | #2,537 | 13 | #256 | 521 |
| 1941 | #3,954 | 6 | #287 | 411 |
| 1940 | — | #332 | 298 | |
| 1939 | — | #358 | 245 | |
| 1938 | — | #412 | 189 | |
| 1937 | — | #472 | 143 | |
| 1936 | — | #500 | 128 | |
| 1935 | — | #505 | 129 | |
| 1934 | — | #576 | 105 | |
| 1933 | — | #572 | 101 | |
| 1932 | #3,901 | 6 | #540 | 118 |
| 1931 | — | #523 | 122 | |
| 1930 | — | #537 | 123 | |
| 1929 | — | #564 | 110 | |
| 1928 | — | #571 | 116 | |
| 1927 | — | #516 | 140 | |
| 1926 | — | #539 | 127 | |
| 1925 | #4,973 | 5 | #475 | 163 |
| 1924 | #5,061 | 5 | #458 | 179 |
| 1923 | — | #489 | 157 | |
| 1922 | — | #559 | 128 | |
| 1921 | — | #475 | 166 | |
| 1920 | — | #459 | 174 | |
| 1919 | — | #474 | 159 | |
| 1918 | — | #422 | 190 | |
| 1917 | — | #396 | 204 | |
| 1916 | — | #414 | 181 | |
| 1915 | — | #410 | 172 | |
| 1914 | — | #435 | 123 | |
| 1913 | — | #430 | 98 | |
| 1912 | — | #510 | 59 | |
| 1911 | — | #471 | 38 | |
| 1910 | — | #569 | 25 | |
| 1909 | — | #473 | 29 | |
| 1908 | — | #553 | 21 | |
| 1907 | — | #511 | 21 | |
| 1906 | — | #472 | 22 | |
| 1905 | — | #370 | 31 | |
| 1904 | — | #417 | 25 | |
| 1903 | — | #470 | 20 | |
| 1902 | — | #556 | 15 | |
| 1901 | — | #536 | 14 | |
| 1900 | — | #534 | 20 | |
| 1899 | — | #438 | 18 | |
| 1898 | — | #701 | 10 | |
| 1897 | — | #473 | 17 | |
| 1896 | — | #722 | 10 | |
| 1895 | — | #795 | 8 | |
| 1894 | — | #502 | 16 | |
| 1893 | — | #615 | 11 | |
| 1892 | — | #641 | 11 | |
| 1891 | — | #841 | 6 | |
| 1890 | — | #566 | 12 | |
| 1889 | — | #722 | 8 | |
| 1888 | — | #430 | 19 | |
| 1887 | — | #583 | 10 | |
| 1886 | — | #512 | 13 | |
| 1885 | — | #577 | 11 | |
| 1884 | — | #450 | 17 | |
| 1883 | — | #497 | 13 | |
| 1882 | — | #489 | 14 | |
| 1881 | — | #416 | 17 | |
| 1880 | — | #381 | 20 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Micheal was already there! It came in at #381, and was given to 20 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1891, when fewer than 7 boys a year got the name.
Where Micheal is popular in 1905
The SSA only publishes names by state from 1910 on.
See more about Micheal
- 69 spots since 2024 (#1,332 → #1,401)
- 355 spots since 2020 (#1,046 → #1,401)
- 563 spots since 2015 (#838 → #1,401)
- Biggest jump: 263 spots in 1899 (#701 → #438)
- Biggest drop: 293 spots in 1895 (#502 → #795)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1956 at #83 (4,732 births)
- Births halved by 1976, 20 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 9 yrs · run 1951–1959
- Top 1,000: 138 yrs · run 1880–2017
- Highest: 1 in 447 boys born in 1957 were named Micheal (0.22%)
- Latest: 1 in 13,139 boys born in 2025 (0.01%)
- Its best rank, #83 in 1956, was only 1 in 447 (0.22%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 26.4% of all boys named Micheal (40,908) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 142 | #381 (1880) | #506 |
| 1890s | 119 | #438 (1899) | #629 |
| 1900s | 218 | #370 (1905) | #489 |
| 1910s | 1,249 | #396 (1917) | #453 |
| 1920s | 1,460 | #458 (1924) | #511 |
| 1930s | 1,403 | #358 (1939) | #500 |
| 1940s | 10,619 | #122 (1949) | #207 |
| 1950s | 40,908 | #83 (1956) | #91 |
| 1960s | 31,979 | #103 (1961) | #111 |
| 1970s | 23,798 | #102 (1974) | #116 |
| 1980s | 18,735 | #132 (1980) | #149 |
| 1990s | 12,871 | #175 (1990) | #236 |
| 2000s | 7,271 | #302 (2000) | #395 |
| 2010s | 3,004 | #548 (2010) | #805 |
| 2020s | 943 | #1,046 (2020) | #1,246 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Micheal in 1905
Top boys' names in 1905
More about 1905
boys
132,306 boys got a published name in 1905; 1 in 4,268 of them was named Micheal, which outranked 74.0% of the 1,421 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 32.1% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #365Francisco32
- #365Newton32
- #365Sammie32
- #370Micheal31
- #370Dominick31
- #370Dudley31
- #370Ellsworth31
- #384Basil30
- #384Burton30
- #384Irwin30
Tied with 13 names at #370; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.