Melvin
Last seen for girls in 1991 at #13,147 · #958 for boys in 2025, 243 births
Given to boys 99.1% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1926 · 4,194 births
- Debut · boys
- 103 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 55 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 244,936since 1880
Melvin over time
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #958 | 243 | |
| 2024 | — | #871 | 277 | |
| 2023 | — | #820 | 299 | |
| 2022 | — | #827 | 300 | |
| 2021 | — | #798 | 307 | |
| 2020 | — | #752 | 323 | |
| 2019 | — | #758 | 314 | |
| 2018 | — | #718 | 334 | |
| 2017 | — | #727 | 328 | |
| 2016 | — | #727 | 337 | |
| 2015 | — | #687 | 365 | |
| 2014 | — | #664 | 386 | |
| 2013 | — | #617 | 402 | |
| 2012 | — | #618 | 393 | |
| 2011 | — | #614 | 390 | |
| 2010 | — | #556 | 456 | |
| 2009 | — | #505 | 535 | |
| 2008 | — | #467 | 592 | |
| 2007 | — | #443 | 633 | |
| 2006 | — | #423 | 673 | |
| 2005 | — | #424 | 627 | |
| 2004 | — | #426 | 613 | |
| 2003 | — | #397 | 656 | |
| 2002 | — | #315 | 908 | |
| 2001 | — | #452 | 534 | |
| 2000 | — | #455 | 525 | |
| 1999 | — | #425 | 555 | |
| 1998 | — | #413 | 577 | |
| 1997 | — | #398 | 590 | |
| 1996 | — | #395 | 598 | |
| 1995 | — | #365 | 657 | |
| 1994 | — | #351 | 699 | |
| 1993 | — | #341 | 729 | |
| 1992 | — | #324 | 784 | |
| 1991 | #13,147 | 5 | #299 | 853 |
| 1990 | #9,247 | 8 | #277 | 941 |
| 1989 | #8,761 | 8 | #275 | 900 |
| 1988 | #6,277 | 12 | #263 | 892 |
| 1987 | #7,353 | 9 | #264 | 824 |
| 1986 | #5,757 | 12 | #258 | 862 |
| 1985 | #6,031 | 11 | #249 | 907 |
| 1984 | #5,899 | 11 | #241 | 908 |
| 1983 | #8,047 | 7 | #236 | 948 |
| 1982 | #4,945 | 14 | #226 | 1,035 |
| 1981 | #8,128 | 7 | #227 | 1,052 |
| 1980 | #4,148 | 18 | #218 | 1,103 |
| 1979 | #4,231 | 17 | #204 | 1,158 |
| 1978 | #4,931 | 13 | #197 | 1,162 |
| 1977 | #4,425 | 15 | #199 | 1,144 |
| 1976 | #3,407 | 20 | #190 | 1,165 |
| 1975 | #4,370 | 14 | #187 | 1,208 |
| 1974 | #2,835 | 25 | #190 | 1,197 |
| 1973 | #4,871 | 11 | #170 | 1,380 |
| 1972 | #4,523 | 12 | #171 | 1,456 |
| 1971 | #2,955 | 23 | #172 | 1,578 |
| 1970 | #2,577 | 28 | #171 | 1,678 |
| 1969 | #3,012 | 20 | #162 | 1,770 |
| 1968 | #3,456 | 15 | #150 | 1,798 |
| 1967 | #2,781 | 20 | #150 | 1,844 |
| 1966 | #2,668 | 21 | #142 | 2,044 |
| 1965 | #2,538 | 23 | #138 | 2,230 |
| 1964 | #2,412 | 26 | #134 | 2,432 |
| 1963 | #2,306 | 27 | #133 | 2,545 |
| 1962 | #1,947 | 35 | #137 | 2,577 |
| 1961 | #2,359 | 26 | #128 | 2,842 |
| 1960 | #2,150 | 29 | #125 | 3,011 |
| 1959 | #2,678 | 19 | #122 | 3,170 |
| 1958 | #2,376 | 23 | #122 | 3,149 |
| 1957 | #2,067 | 28 | #113 | 3,397 |
| 1956 | #2,194 | 25 | #101 | 3,638 |
| 1955 | #1,839 | 33 | #95 | 3,646 |
| 1954 | #1,702 | 36 | #92 | 3,711 |
| 1953 | #1,834 | 30 | #91 | 3,811 |
| 1952 | #1,611 | 36 | #91 | 3,920 |
| 1951 | #2,064 | 23 | #88 | 3,837 |
| 1950 | #1,524 | 37 | #87 | 3,886 |
| 1949 | #1,564 | 35 | #82 | 3,972 |
| 1948 | #1,901 | 25 | #81 | 4,057 |
| 1947 | #1,633 | 34 | #85 | 4,169 |
| 1946 | #1,583 | 31 | #86 | 3,742 |
| 1945 | #1,660 | 25 | #78 | 3,408 |
| 1944 | #1,401 | 33 | #67 | 3,745 |
| 1943 | #1,442 | 33 | #63 | 4,069 |
| 1942 | #1,592 | 27 | #60 | 4,188 |
| 1941 | #1,446 | 29 | #56 | 3,951 |
| 1940 | #1,218 | 36 | #53 | 3,935 |
| 1939 | #1,327 | 31 | #51 | 3,853 |
| 1938 | #1,547 | 24 | #54 | 3,818 |
| 1937 | #1,493 | 25 | #50 | 3,890 |
| 1936 | #1,115 | 40 | #53 | 3,730 |
| 1935 | #1,606 | 22 | #57 | 3,600 |
| 1934 | #1,292 | 31 | #55 | 3,702 |
| 1933 | #1,197 | 35 | #51 | 3,588 |
| 1932 | #1,237 | 34 | #51 | 3,776 |
| 1931 | #1,199 | 36 | #51 | 3,700 |
| 1930 | #1,084 | 46 | #50 | 4,048 |
| 1929 | #1,174 | 40 | #49 | 4,100 |
| 1928 | #947 | 62 | #48 | 4,249 |
| 1927 | #1,172 | 43 | #48 | 4,202 |
| 1926 | #1,357 | 34 | #47 | 4,194 |
| 1925 | #1,409 | 33 | #50 | 4,146 |
| 1924 | #1,069 | 53 | #48 | 4,168 |
| 1923 | #1,158 | 44 | #48 | 4,012 |
| 1922 | #1,168 | 43 | #50 | 3,908 |
| 1921 | #1,222 | 40 | #53 | 3,887 |
| 1920 | #1,282 | 36 | #54 | 3,717 |
| 1919 | #1,481 | 28 | #56 | 3,384 |
| 1918 | #1,411 | 30 | #56 | 3,469 |
| 1917 | #1,552 | 24 | #57 | 3,155 |
| 1916 | #1,581 | 23 | #57 | 2,984 |
| 1915 | #1,800 | 18 | #60 | 2,780 |
| 1914 | #1,175 | 27 | #59 | 2,064 |
| 1913 | #1,601 | 14 | #61 | 1,642 |
| 1912 | #1,352 | 16 | #71 | 1,185 |
| 1911 | #1,450 | 11 | #73 | 594 |
| 1910 | #1,267 | 13 | #75 | 482 |
| 1909 | #1,471 | 9 | #71 | 448 |
| 1908 | #1,862 | 6 | #75 | 366 |
| 1907 | #1,639 | 7 | #78 | 331 |
| 1906 | — | #82 | 285 | |
| 1905 | #1,931 | 5 | #83 | 291 |
| 1904 | — | #92 | 234 | |
| 1903 | — | #88 | 230 | |
| 1902 | #1,594 | 6 | #86 | 248 |
| 1901 | — | #97 | 176 | |
| 1900 | — | #102 | 231 | |
| 1899 | — | #106 | 166 | |
| 1898 | — | #115 | 159 | |
| 1897 | #1,555 | 5 | #129 | 128 |
| 1896 | — | #115 | 158 | |
| 1895 | #1,592 | 5 | #111 | 158 |
| 1894 | — | #128 | 125 | |
| 1893 | — | #137 | 111 | |
| 1892 | — | #144 | 114 | |
| 1891 | — | #126 | 108 | |
| 1890 | — | #146 | 98 | |
| 1889 | — | #150 | 97 | |
| 1888 | — | #131 | 119 | |
| 1887 | — | #134 | 95 | |
| 1886 | — | #168 | 83 | |
| 1885 | — | #125 | 110 | |
| 1884 | — | #145 | 95 | |
| 1883 | — | #129 | 96 | |
| 1882 | — | #159 | 86 | |
| 1881 | — | #159 | 76 | |
| 1880 | — | #126 | 103 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Melvin was already there! It came in at #126, and was given to 103 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1887, when fewer than 120 boys a year got the name.
See more about Melvin
- 87 spots since 2024 (#871 → #958)
- 206 spots since 2020 (#752 → #958)
- 271 spots since 2015 (#687 → #958)
- Biggest jump: 137 spots in 2002 (#452 → #315)
- Biggest drop: 87 spots in 2025 (#871 → #958)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1926 at #47 (4,194 births)
- Births halved by 1966, 40 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 55 yrs · run 1901–1955
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
- Highest: 1 in 261 boys born in 1928 were named Melvin (0.38%)
- Latest: 1 in 7,029 boys born in 2025 (0.01%)
- Its best rank, #47 in 1926, was only 1 in 265 (0.38%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 16.6% of all boys named Melvin (40,583) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 960 | #125 (1885) | #143 |
| 1890s | 1,325 | #106 (1899) | #126 |
| 1900s | 2,840 | #71 (1909) | #85 |
| 1910s | 21,739 | #56 (1918) | #63 |
| 1920s | 40,583 | #47 (1926) | #50 |
| 1930s | 37,705 | #50 (1930) | #52 |
| 1940s | 39,236 | #53 (1940) | #71 |
| 1950s | 36,165 | #87 (1950) | #100 |
| 1960s | 23,093 | #125 (1960) | #140 |
| 1970s | 13,126 | #170 (1973) | #185 |
| 1980s | 9,431 | #218 (1980) | #246 |
| 1990s | 6,983 | #277 (1990) | #359 |
| 2000s | 6,296 | #315 (2002) | #431 |
| 2010s | 3,705 | #556 (2010) | #669 |
| 2020s | 1,749 | #752 (2020) | #838 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Melvin in 1962
Top girls' names in 1962
Top boys' names in 1962
More about 1962
girls
1,966,603 girls got a published name in 1962; 1 in 56,189 of them was named Melvin, which outranked 74.3% of the 7,584 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 15.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,917Tommy36
- #1,917Twanda36
- #1,917Twilla36
- #1,947Melvin35
- #1,947Brenna35
- #1,947Chantal35
- #1,947Charise35
- #1,989Adelaida34
- #1,989Annabel34
- #1,989Arletha34
Tied with 41 names at #1,947; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
2,068,772 boys got a published name in 1962; 1 in 803 of them was named Melvin, which outranked 97.0% of the 4,631 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 28.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.