Maud
Last seen for girls in 2024 at #13,477 · Last seen for boys in 1908 at #1,373
Given to girls 99.8% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1883 · 425 births
- Debut · girls
- 345 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 11 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 13,159since 1880
Maud over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | #13,477 | 6 | — | |
| 2023 | — | — | ||
| 2022 | #13,592 | 6 | — | |
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | — | — | ||
| 2018 | #15,682 | 5 | — | |
| 2017 | #15,902 | 5 | — | |
| 2016 | — | — | ||
| 2015 | — | — | ||
| 2014 | #14,558 | 6 | — | |
| 2013 | #14,582 | 6 | — | |
| 2012 | — | — | ||
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | — | — | ||
| 2009 | — | — | ||
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | — | — | ||
| 2005 | — | — | ||
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | #12,187 | 7 | — | |
| 2001 | #15,352 | 5 | — | |
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | #13,724 | 5 | — | |
| 1996 | #11,807 | 6 | — | |
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | #13,147 | 5 | — | |
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | #9,825 | 6 | — | |
| 1986 | #10,912 | 5 | — | |
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | #9,144 | 6 | — | |
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | #6,258 | 8 | — | |
| 1973 | #5,580 | 9 | — | |
| 1972 | #5,959 | 8 | — | |
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | #5,061 | 10 | — | |
| 1969 | #5,057 | 9 | — | |
| 1968 | #5,642 | 7 | — | |
| 1967 | #6,804 | 5 | — | |
| 1966 | #5,809 | 6 | — | |
| 1965 | #3,952 | 11 | — | |
| 1964 | #5,008 | 8 | — | |
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | #5,293 | 7 | — | |
| 1961 | #4,546 | 9 | — | |
| 1960 | #3,920 | 11 | — | |
| 1959 | #5,566 | 6 | — | |
| 1958 | #3,379 | 13 | — | |
| 1957 | #3,930 | 10 | — | |
| 1956 | #3,696 | 11 | — | |
| 1955 | #3,571 | 11 | — | |
| 1954 | #3,157 | 13 | — | |
| 1953 | #2,516 | 18 | — | |
| 1952 | #3,201 | 12 | — | |
| 1951 | #2,182 | 21 | — | |
| 1950 | #2,253 | 19 | — | |
| 1949 | #2,340 | 18 | — | |
| 1948 | #2,828 | 13 | — | |
| 1947 | #2,200 | 20 | — | |
| 1946 | #2,228 | 18 | — | |
| 1945 | #1,825 | 21 | — | |
| 1944 | #2,625 | 12 | — | |
| 1943 | #1,591 | 28 | — | |
| 1942 | #1,917 | 20 | — | |
| 1941 | #1,384 | 31 | — | |
| 1940 | #1,591 | 24 | — | |
| 1939 | #2,038 | 16 | — | |
| 1938 | #1,069 | 45 | — | |
| 1937 | #1,180 | 37 | — | |
| 1936 | #1,321 | 30 | — | |
| 1935 | #1,055 | 43 | — | |
| 1934 | #1,062 | 43 | — | |
| 1933 | #985 | 49 | — | |
| 1932 | #862 | 65 | — | |
| 1931 | #1,060 | 44 | — | |
| 1930 | #856 | 70 | — | |
| 1929 | #779 | 80 | — | |
| 1928 | #805 | 79 | — | |
| 1927 | #693 | 110 | — | |
| 1926 | #666 | 118 | — | |
| 1925 | #647 | 128 | — | |
| 1924 | #649 | 133 | — | |
| 1923 | #572 | 157 | — | |
| 1922 | #596 | 145 | — | |
| 1921 | #646 | 131 | — | |
| 1920 | #569 | 159 | — | |
| 1919 | #540 | 162 | — | |
| 1918 | #504 | 182 | — | |
| 1917 | #512 | 168 | — | |
| 1916 | #509 | 165 | — | |
| 1915 | #455 | 182 | — | |
| 1914 | #398 | 175 | — | |
| 1913 | #372 | 168 | — | |
| 1912 | #376 | 149 | — | |
| 1911 | #342 | 135 | — | |
| 1910 | #319 | 143 | — | |
| 1909 | #330 | 122 | — | |
| 1908 | #302 | 138 | #1,373 | 5 |
| 1907 | #290 | 143 | — | |
| 1906 | #239 | 181 | — | |
| 1905 | #224 | 192 | — | |
| 1904 | #249 | 159 | — | |
| 1903 | #224 | 176 | — | |
| 1902 | #198 | 218 | — | |
| 1901 | #186 | 221 | — | |
| 1900 | #184 | 286 | — | |
| 1899 | #175 | 244 | — | |
| 1898 | #177 | 262 | — | |
| 1897 | #165 | 270 | — | |
| 1896 | #157 | 298 | — | |
| 1895 | #145 | 305 | — | |
| 1894 | #129 | 333 | — | |
| 1893 | #119 | 366 | — | |
| 1892 | #111 | 402 | #1,066 | 5 |
| 1891 | #108 | 366 | — | |
| 1890 | #97 | 439 | — | |
| 1889 | #92 | 432 | #974 | 5 |
| 1888 | #86 | 469 | — | |
| 1887 | #83 | 402 | — | |
| 1886 | #74 | 478 | #959 | 5 |
| 1885 | #75 | 429 | — | |
| 1884 | #72 | 461 | — | |
| 1883 | #68 | 425 | #892 | 5 |
| 1882 | #69 | 432 | — | |
| 1881 | #71 | 328 | #781 | 6 |
| 1880 | #70 | 345 | — | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Maud was already there! It came in at #70, and was given to 345 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1963, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Maud is popular in 1915
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Louisiana#209 · 1 in 1,052
- Florida#245 · 1 in 1,399
- Oklahoma#285 · 1 in 1,867
- South Carolina#289 · 1 in 2,497
- Virginia#303 · 1 in 2,874
Best ever in a state: #172 in Tennessee, 1910.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Louisiana | #209 | 16 | 1 in 1,052 |
| Florida | #245 | 6 | 1 in 1,399 |
| Oklahoma | #285 | 9 | 1 in 1,867 |
| South Carolina | #289 | 7 | 1 in 2,497 |
| Virginia | #303 | 8 | 1 in 2,874 |
| Tennessee | #315 | 9 | 1 in 2,382 |
| Mississippi | #329 | 7 | 1 in 2,370 |
| Georgia | #337 | 10 | 1 in 2,902 |
| Massachusetts | #360 | 6 | 1 in 5,413 |
| Indiana | #382 | 5 | 1 in 4,570 |
| Kentucky | #389 | 7 | 1 in 3,370 |
| Arkansas | #394 | 5 | 1 in 3,097 |
| North Carolina | #395 | 7 | 1 in 4,139 |
| Pennsylvania | #439 | 10 | 1 in 8,724 |
| Texas | #462 | 14 | 1 in 3,080 |
| Illinois | #552 | 6 | 1 in 8,881 |
| New York | #563 | 7 | 1 in 13,078 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Maud
- Not published in 2025; last seen 2024
- Biggest jump: 198 spots in 1932 (#1,060 → #862)
- Biggest drop: 204 spots in 1931 (#856 → #1,060)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1883 at #68 (425 births)
- Births halved by 1903, 20 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 11 yrs · run 1880–1890
- Top 1,000: 53 yrs · run 1880–1930
- Highest: 1 in 250 girls born in 1882 were named Maud (0.40%)
- Latest: 1 in 270,032 girls born in 2024 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #68 in 1883, was only 1 in 264 (0.38%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 31.9% of all girls named Maud (4,201) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 4,201 | #68 (1883) | #76 |
| 1890s | 3,285 | #97 (1890) | #138 |
| 1900s | 1,836 | #184 (1900) | #243 |
| 1910s | 1,629 | #319 (1910) | #433 |
| 1920s | 1,240 | #569 (1920) | #662 |
| 1930s | 442 | #856 (1930) | #1,149 |
| 1940s | 205 | #1,384 (1941) | #2,053 |
| 1950s | 134 | #2,182 (1951) | #3,345 |
| 1960s | 73 | #3,920 (1960) | #5,115 |
| 1970s | 35 | #5,061 (1970) | #5,715 |
| 1980s | 17 | #9,144 (1984) | #9,960 |
| 1990s | 16 | #11,807 (1996) | #12,893 |
| 2000s | 12 | #12,187 (2002) | #13,770 |
| 2010s | 22 | #14,558 (2014) | #15,181 |
| 2020s | 12 | #13,477 (2024) | #13,535 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Maud in 1915
Top girls' names in 1915
More about 1915
girls
983,852 girls got a published name in 1915; 1 in 5,406 of them was named Maud, which outranked 90.8% of the 4,967 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #451Elvera186
- #453Glenna185
- #454Floy184
- #455Maud182
- #455Alpha182
- #455Jacqueline182
- #455Lucinda182
- #460Linnie179
- #460Marjory179
- #462Lura178
Tied with 4 names at #455; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.