Matilda

#364 for girls in 2025, 838 births · Last seen for boys in 1922 at #4,307
Given to girls >99.9% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1880 · 210 births
Debut · girls
210 births
In top 100 · girls
1 yr
of 146 years
Total births · girls
37,270
since 1880

Matilda over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201963peak #100, 1880girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#364838—
2024#410773—
2023#438708—
2022#417758—
2021#465673—
2020#478640—
2019#448696—
2018#489643—
2017#521599—
2016#496631—
2015#534583—
2014#581523—
2013#647437—
2012#657433—
2011#770353—
2010#797343—
2009#760375—
2008#825344—
2007#1,233201—
2006#1,299180—
2005#1,624124—
2004#1,97294—
2003#1,786105—
2002#1,654111—
2001#1,777100—
2000#2,08978—
1999#2,07374—
1998#1,72192—
1997#1,81682—
1996#2,63047—
1995#2,78843—
1994#3,16836—
1993#3,98726—
1992#3,68029—
1991#3,63329—
1990#3,71428—
1989#3,67327—
1988#2,86736—
1987#2,78035—
1986#3,45925—
1985#2,74934—
1984#2,73033—
1983#2,51636—
1982#1,96553—
1981#2,34242—
1980#2,48638—
1979#1,87456—
1978#2,39037—
1977#1,77457—
1976#1,74754—
1975#1,52766—
1974#1,46468—
1973#1,49663—
1972#1,48864—
1971#1,40575—
1970#1,32080—
1969#1,27677—
1968#1,25876—
1967#1,32468—
1966#1,13587—
1965#1,07994—
1964#932127—
1963#940126—
1962#1,074101—
1961#1,057108—
1960#980119—
1959#950122—
1958#1,000108—
1957#1,06795—
1956#948113—
1955#883121—
1954#905113—
1953#871116—
1952#825122—
1951#779129—
1950#723140—
1949#722138—
1948#728135—
1947#741133—
1946#711129—
1945#81985—
1944#677121—
1943#673127—
1942#653131—
1941#620130—
1940#554155—
1939#591128—
1938#552152—
1937#507168—
1936#457196—
1935#458194—
1934#457201—
1933#464200—
1932#410251—
1931#415239—
1930#390304—
1929#354342—
1928#336396—
1927#328419—
1926#323417—
1925#304474—
1924#287531—
1923#270570—
1922#259626#4,3075
1921#273606—
1920#261635—
1919#253645—
1918#243690—
1917#239685—
1916#240665—
1915#231682—
1914#240494—
1913#230432—
1912#223398—
1911#221321—
1910#227281—
1909#204280—
1908#196284—
1907#173322—
1906#173295—
1905#187268—
1904#172285—
1903#187245—
1902#165290—
1901#165275—
1900#161348—
1899#149312—
1898#144349—
1897#146326—
1896#141339—
1895#135339—
1894#148295—
1893#130328—
1892#129332—
1891#120336—
1890#133293—
1889#118320—
1888#112328—
1887#114266—
1886#104309—
1885#107260#9365
1884#108244—
1883#124167—
1882#103242—
1881#106187—
1880#100210—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Matilda was already there! It came in at #100, and was given to 210 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1983–1994, when fewer than 37 girls a year got the name.

Where Matilda is popular in 1963

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Matilda, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Matilda, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Matilda, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Matilda, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Matilda, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Matilda, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Matilda, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Matilda, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Matilda, so not publishedMNIllinois: fewer than 5 girls named Matilda, so not publishedILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Matilda, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 girls named Matilda, so not publishedMINew York: #917 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 16,327 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Matilda, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Matilda, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Matilda, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Matilda, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Matilda, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Matilda, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Matilda, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Matilda, so not publishedINOhio: fewer than 5 girls named Matilda, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: #905 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 20,356 girlsPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Matilda, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Matilda, so not publishedCTCalifornia: fewer than 5 girls named Matilda, so not publishedCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Matilda, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Matilda, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Matilda, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Matilda, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Matilda, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Matilda, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Matilda, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Matilda, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Matilda, so not publishedDEArizona: #257 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 1,158 girlsAZNew Mexico: #163 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 612 girlsNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Matilda, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Matilda, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Matilda, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: #666 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 9,272 girlsNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Matilda, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Matilda, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Matilda, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Matilda, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Matilda, so not publishedMSAlabama: #470 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 4,009 girlsALGeorgia: #631 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 7,269 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Matilda, so not publishedHITexas: #677 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 6,699 girlsTXFlorida: fewer than 5 girls named Matilda, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. New Mexico#163 · 1 in 612
  2. Arizona#257 · 1 in 1,158
  3. Alabama#470 · 1 in 4,009
  4. Georgia#631 · 1 in 7,269
  5. North Carolina#666 · 1 in 9,272

Best ever in a state: #84 in Rhode Island, 1912.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
New Mexico#163181 in 612
Arizona#257131 in 1,158
Alabama#47081 in 4,009
Georgia#63161 in 7,269
North Carolina#66651 in 9,272
Texas#677161 in 6,699
Pennsylvania#90551 in 20,356
New York#917101 in 16,327
Alaska———
Arkansas———
California———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Illinois———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
North Dakota———
Ohio———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Matilda
Momentum · girls
Rising
  • 46 spots since 2024 (#410 → #364)
  • 114 spots since 2020 (#478 → #364)
  • 170 spots since 2015 (#534 → #364)
  • Biggest jump: 408 spots in 2008 (#1,233 → #825)
  • Biggest drop: 147 spots in 1965 (#932 → #1,079)
Rise & fade · girls
Peaked on debut
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1880 at #100 (210 births)
  • Births halved by 1945, 65 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 1 yr
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 1 yr · 1880
  • Top 1,000: 100 yrs · run 1880–1956
Share of babies · girls
1 in 433
  • Highest: 1 in 433 girls born in 1880 were named Matilda (0.23%)
  • Latest: 1 in 1,918 girls born in 2025 (0.05%)
Era · girls
The 1910s
  • 14.2% of all girls named Matilda (5,293) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s2,533#100 (1880)#110
1890s3,249#120 (1891)#138
1900s2,892#161 (1900)#178
1910s5,293#221 (1911)#235
1920s5,016#259 (1922)#300
1930s2,033#390 (1930)#470
1940s1,284#554 (1940)#690
1950s1,179#723 (1950)#895
1960s983#932 (1964)#1,106
1970s620#1,320 (1970)#1,649
1980s359#1,965 (1982)#2,757
1990s486#1,721 (1998)#2,921
2000s1,712#760 (2009)#1,502
2010s5,241#448 (2019)#594
2020s4,390#364 (2025)#429

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Matilda in 1963

girls
#940
126 births · 1 in 15,298 girls

Top girls' names in 1963

  1. #1Lisa56,047
  2. #2Mary41,546
  3. #3Susan33,991
  4. #4Karen32,492
  5. #5Linda27,727
  6. #6Donna25,405
  7. #7Patricia25,374
  8. #8Lori23,899
  9. #9Sandra21,621
  10. #10Cynthia21,589
  11. #940Matilda126
More about 1963

girls

1,927,507 girls got a published name in 1963; 1 in 15,298 of them was named Matilda, which outranked 87.7% of the 7,661 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 16.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Matilda
  1. #934Kyle128
  2. #938Babette127
  3. #938Vikki127
  4. #940Matilda126
  5. #940Jayme126
  6. #940Maricela126
  7. #940Sherryl126
  8. #944Estelle125
  9. #944Germaine125
  10. #944Mavis125

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1962
Risers
  1. ↑ 631Zena#1,323 → #692
  2. ↑ 623Zina#992 → #369
  3. ↑ 540Trisha#1,020 → #480
  4. ↑ 457Shirl#1,304 → #847
  5. ↑ 396Glynis#992 → #596
Fallers
  1. ↓ 1,195Marnita#727 → #1,922
  2. ↓ 255Velvet#623 → #878
  3. ↓ 235Delphine#904 → #1,139
  4. ↓ 224Rosita#934 → #1,158
  5. ↓ 197Lindy#885 → #1,082

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1963 →