Martez
Last seen for girls in 1993 at #11,780 · #4,857 for boys in 2025, 20 births
Given to boys 99.9% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1991 · 176 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 4,097since 1956
Martez over time
Rank among boys' names. Martez has never cracked the top 700 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #4,857 | 20 | |
| 2024 | — | #3,605 | 31 | |
| 2023 | — | #4,456 | 23 | |
| 2022 | — | #3,053 | 40 | |
| 2021 | — | #2,819 | 44 | |
| 2020 | — | #3,202 | 35 | |
| 2019 | — | #3,201 | 36 | |
| 2018 | — | #2,355 | 56 | |
| 2017 | — | #2,270 | 58 | |
| 2016 | — | #2,255 | 59 | |
| 2015 | — | #2,386 | 54 | |
| 2014 | — | #2,370 | 54 | |
| 2013 | — | #1,866 | 76 | |
| 2012 | — | #1,818 | 81 | |
| 2011 | — | #1,587 | 97 | |
| 2010 | — | #1,816 | 80 | |
| 2009 | — | #1,873 | 77 | |
| 2008 | — | #1,838 | 79 | |
| 2007 | — | #1,741 | 85 | |
| 2006 | — | #1,562 | 94 | |
| 2005 | — | #1,460 | 100 | |
| 2004 | — | #1,653 | 78 | |
| 2003 | — | #1,656 | 75 | |
| 2002 | — | #1,346 | 98 | |
| 2001 | — | #1,441 | 86 | |
| 2000 | — | #1,323 | 97 | |
| 1999 | — | #1,311 | 92 | |
| 1998 | — | #1,114 | 115 | |
| 1997 | — | #1,294 | 88 | |
| 1996 | — | #1,093 | 110 | |
| 1995 | — | #1,159 | 98 | |
| 1994 | — | #1,063 | 110 | |
| 1993 | #11,780 | 6 | #918 | 137 |
| 1992 | — | #775 | 181 | |
| 1991 | — | #774 | 176 | |
| 1990 | — | #783 | 168 | |
| 1989 | — | #819 | 146 | |
| 1988 | — | #890 | 115 | |
| 1987 | — | #1,016 | 87 | |
| 1986 | — | #1,058 | 77 | |
| 1985 | — | #975 | 87 | |
| 1984 | — | #1,084 | 68 | |
| 1983 | — | #1,239 | 55 | |
| 1982 | — | #1,107 | 68 | |
| 1981 | — | #1,456 | 43 | |
| 1980 | — | #1,449 | 43 | |
| 1979 | — | #1,089 | 67 | |
| 1978 | — | #1,410 | 43 | |
| 1977 | — | #2,270 | 20 | |
| 1976 | — | #1,781 | 28 | |
| 1975 | — | #1,530 | 34 | |
| 1974 | — | #2,199 | 19 | |
| 1973 | — | #1,782 | 25 | |
| 1972 | — | #2,158 | 18 | |
| 1971 | — | #2,558 | 14 | |
| 1970 | — | #3,282 | 9 | |
| 1969 | — | #2,682 | 11 | |
| 1968 | — | #2,445 | 12 | |
| 1967 | — | #3,966 | 5 | |
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | #3,930 | 5 | |
| 1964 | — | #4,039 | 5 | |
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | #3,942 | 5 | |
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Martez! It came in at #3,942, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1956–1967, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Martez is popular in 2005
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Missouri#461 · 1 in 3,403
- Michigan#480 · 1 in 3,421
- Tennessee#645 · 1 in 5,263
- Georgia#697 · 1 in 5,428
- Indiana#708 · 1 in 6,376
Best ever in a state: #172 in Michigan, 1990.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Missouri | #461 | 10 | 1 in 3,403 |
| Michigan | #480 | 16 | 1 in 3,421 |
| Tennessee | #645 | 7 | 1 in 5,263 |
| Georgia | #697 | 11 | 1 in 5,428 |
| Indiana | #708 | 6 | 1 in 6,376 |
| Illinois | #770 | 11 | 1 in 7,014 |
| North Carolina | #975 | 5 | 1 in 10,463 |
| Ohio | #1,049 | 5 | 1 in 13,105 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Martez
- 1,252 spots since 2024 (#3,605 → #4,857)
- 1,655 spots since 2020 (#3,202 → #4,857)
- 2,471 spots since 2015 (#2,386 → #4,857)
- Biggest jump: 126 spots in 1988 (#1,016 → #890)
- Biggest drop: 145 spots in 1994 (#918 → #1,063)
- Debuted 1956
- Peaked 1991 at #774 (176 births)
- Births halved by 1997, 6 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 7 yrs · run 1988–1993
- Highest: 1 in 11,035 boys born in 1992 were named Martez (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 85,404 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #774 in 1991, was only 1 in 11,479 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 31.1% of all boys named Martez (1,275) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 5 | #3,942 (1956) | #3,942 |
| 1960s | 38 | #2,445 (1968) | #3,412 |
| 1970s | 277 | #1,089 (1979) | #2,006 |
| 1980s | 789 | #819 (1989) | #1,109 |
| 1990s | 1,275 | #774 (1991) | #1,028 |
| 2000s | 869 | #1,323 (2000) | #1,589 |
| 2010s | 651 | #1,587 (2011) | #2,192 |
| 2020s | 193 | #2,819 (2021) | #3,665 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Martez in 2005
Top boys' names in 2005
More about 2005
boys
1,997,305 boys got a published name in 2005; 1 in 19,973 of them was named Martez, which outranked 89.1% of the 13,370 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 10.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #1,453Jericho101
- #1,453Keion101
- #1,453Raheem101
- #1,460Martez100
- #1,460Adalberto100
- #1,460Brandan100
- #1,460Chace100
- #1,471Aman99
- #1,471Angus99
- #1,471Hagen99
Tied with 10 names at #1,460; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.