Mark
Last seen for girls in 2023 at #15,194 · #244 for boys in 2025, 1,416 births
Given to boys 99.7% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1960 · 58,727 births
- Debut · boys
- 85 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 59 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 1,362,176since 1880
Mark over time
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #244 | 1,416 | |
| 2024 | — | #244 | 1,447 | |
| 2023 | #15,194 | 5 | #249 | 1,401 |
| 2022 | — | #247 | 1,434 | |
| 2021 | — | #252 | 1,408 | |
| 2020 | — | #235 | 1,552 | |
| 2019 | — | #223 | 1,685 | |
| 2018 | — | #210 | 1,874 | |
| 2017 | — | #203 | 1,948 | |
| 2016 | — | #195 | 2,066 | |
| 2015 | — | #196 | 2,078 | |
| 2014 | #11,931 | 8 | #189 | 2,194 |
| 2013 | #14,582 | 6 | #184 | 2,211 |
| 2012 | — | #176 | 2,204 | |
| 2011 | — | #159 | 2,433 | |
| 2010 | #14,959 | 6 | #162 | 2,415 |
| 2009 | — | #153 | 2,578 | |
| 2008 | — | #139 | 2,916 | |
| 2007 | #17,636 | 5 | #138 | 2,973 |
| 2006 | #15,152 | 6 | #128 | 3,252 |
| 2005 | #10,921 | 9 | #114 | 3,529 |
| 2004 | #9,264 | 11 | #113 | 3,770 |
| 2003 | #15,784 | 5 | #105 | 4,033 |
| 2002 | #8,837 | 11 | #93 | 4,222 |
| 2001 | #9,351 | 10 | #84 | 4,754 |
| 2000 | #8,027 | 12 | #79 | 5,230 |
| 1999 | #7,716 | 12 | #69 | 5,606 |
| 1998 | #7,104 | 13 | #64 | 5,893 |
| 1997 | #6,483 | 14 | #58 | 6,165 |
| 1996 | #6,392 | 14 | #55 | 6,599 |
| 1995 | #4,518 | 22 | #52 | 6,888 |
| 1994 | #4,521 | 22 | #48 | 7,488 |
| 1993 | #4,998 | 19 | #49 | 8,059 |
| 1992 | #4,849 | 20 | #49 | 8,745 |
| 1991 | #3,936 | 26 | #47 | 9,684 |
| 1990 | #2,695 | 43 | #47 | 10,689 |
| 1989 | #2,371 | 49 | #42 | 11,320 |
| 1988 | #1,564 | 84 | #39 | 11,715 |
| 1987 | #1,776 | 66 | #36 | 11,993 |
| 1986 | #1,484 | 84 | #35 | 12,615 |
| 1985 | #1,401 | 91 | #32 | 13,194 |
| 1984 | #1,535 | 74 | #32 | 13,214 |
| 1983 | #1,278 | 96 | #31 | 13,815 |
| 1982 | #1,302 | 97 | #32 | 13,865 |
| 1981 | #1,406 | 87 | #33 | 13,542 |
| 1980 | #1,502 | 79 | #30 | 14,169 |
| 1979 | #1,377 | 89 | #30 | 14,386 |
| 1978 | #1,314 | 91 | #26 | 14,851 |
| 1977 | #1,370 | 82 | #25 | 15,418 |
| 1976 | #1,384 | 77 | #25 | 15,508 |
| 1975 | #1,258 | 89 | #19 | 16,742 |
| 1974 | #1,063 | 111 | #16 | 18,905 |
| 1973 | #1,151 | 95 | #15 | 20,367 |
| 1972 | #1,280 | 80 | #18 | 21,490 |
| 1971 | #1,047 | 115 | #13 | 25,132 |
| 1970 | #929 | 138 | #9 | 31,461 |
| 1969 | #892 | 139 | #8 | 33,388 |
| 1968 | #804 | 157 | #7 | 35,401 |
| 1967 | #843 | 144 | #7 | 34,910 |
| 1966 | #900 | 125 | #7 | 34,801 |
| 1965 | #933 | 119 | #7 | 38,244 |
| 1964 | #969 | 119 | #6 | 45,261 |
| 1963 | #953 | 123 | #6 | 49,342 |
| 1962 | #934 | 129 | #6 | 53,520 |
| 1961 | #835 | 159 | #6 | 57,796 |
| 1960 | #920 | 133 | #6 | 58,727 |
| 1959 | #918 | 130 | #6 | 56,945 |
| 1958 | #973 | 113 | #7 | 52,698 |
| 1957 | #1,159 | 83 | #7 | 52,841 |
| 1956 | #1,129 | 84 | #8 | 48,828 |
| 1955 | #1,356 | 55 | #9 | 42,255 |
| 1954 | #1,422 | 50 | #12 | 36,198 |
| 1953 | #1,622 | 37 | #12 | 29,341 |
| 1952 | #1,540 | 39 | #17 | 25,678 |
| 1951 | #2,016 | 24 | #20 | 21,201 |
| 1950 | #1,679 | 31 | #23 | 16,604 |
| 1949 | #2,134 | 21 | #24 | 13,725 |
| 1948 | #2,589 | 15 | #29 | 10,267 |
| 1947 | #3,448 | 10 | #47 | 7,773 |
| 1946 | #2,597 | 14 | #58 | 5,331 |
| 1945 | #3,388 | 8 | #72 | 3,545 |
| 1944 | — | #93 | 2,742 | |
| 1943 | #3,040 | 10 | #101 | 2,520 |
| 1942 | #3,738 | 7 | #117 | 2,039 |
| 1941 | #4,420 | 5 | #122 | 1,624 |
| 1940 | #3,863 | 6 | #149 | 1,165 |
| 1939 | #3,145 | 8 | #170 | 867 |
| 1938 | — | #166 | 902 | |
| 1937 | #4,255 | 5 | #176 | 809 |
| 1936 | #3,701 | 6 | #182 | 712 |
| 1935 | #2,926 | 9 | #174 | 788 |
| 1934 | #2,187 | 14 | #185 | 702 |
| 1933 | — | #180 | 693 | |
| 1932 | #3,568 | 7 | #185 | 716 |
| 1931 | #2,205 | 14 | #197 | 664 |
| 1930 | #2,552 | 12 | #220 | 591 |
| 1929 | #2,921 | 10 | #222 | 576 |
| 1928 | #2,497 | 13 | #209 | 652 |
| 1927 | #2,552 | 13 | #200 | 701 |
| 1926 | #3,269 | 9 | #200 | 702 |
| 1925 | #2,119 | 18 | #211 | 651 |
| 1924 | #2,409 | 15 | #206 | 672 |
| 1923 | #2,917 | 11 | #203 | 659 |
| 1922 | #2,612 | 13 | #199 | 667 |
| 1921 | #2,941 | 11 | #211 | 626 |
| 1920 | #2,590 | 13 | #219 | 589 |
| 1919 | #2,515 | 13 | #212 | 587 |
| 1918 | #3,244 | 9 | #205 | 627 |
| 1917 | #2,100 | 16 | #212 | 528 |
| 1916 | #4,417 | 5 | #198 | 571 |
| 1915 | #2,050 | 15 | #204 | 529 |
| 1914 | #2,638 | 8 | #210 | 386 |
| 1913 | #2,164 | 9 | #192 | 349 |
| 1912 | #2,634 | 6 | #201 | 284 |
| 1911 | — | #207 | 142 | |
| 1910 | #1,935 | 7 | #199 | 131 |
| 1909 | — | #212 | 101 | |
| 1908 | #1,676 | 7 | #257 | 67 |
| 1907 | #1,639 | 7 | #199 | 97 |
| 1906 | #1,951 | 5 | #205 | 85 |
| 1905 | — | #189 | 94 | |
| 1904 | — | #165 | 113 | |
| 1903 | — | #195 | 81 | |
| 1902 | — | #167 | 104 | |
| 1901 | #1,679 | 5 | #163 | 92 |
| 1900 | #1,723 | 6 | #151 | 137 |
| 1899 | — | #166 | 89 | |
| 1898 | — | #158 | 108 | |
| 1897 | — | #149 | 104 | |
| 1896 | — | #139 | 119 | |
| 1895 | #1,592 | 5 | #151 | 102 |
| 1894 | #1,485 | 5 | #179 | 84 |
| 1893 | — | #159 | 92 | |
| 1892 | #1,450 | 5 | #181 | 86 |
| 1891 | — | #152 | 86 | |
| 1890 | — | #169 | 83 | |
| 1889 | — | #144 | 101 | |
| 1888 | — | #135 | 115 | |
| 1887 | — | #166 | 76 | |
| 1886 | — | #128 | 106 | |
| 1885 | — | #176 | 74 | |
| 1884 | — | #144 | 96 | |
| 1883 | — | #140 | 91 | |
| 1882 | — | #153 | 90 | |
| 1881 | — | #127 | 94 | |
| 1880 | — | #160 | 85 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Mark was already there! It came in at #160, and was given to 85 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1905–1908, when fewer than 98 boys a year got the name.
See more about Mark
- Held #244 since 2024
- 9 spots since 2020 (#235 → #244)
- 48 spots since 2015 (#196 → #244)
- Biggest jump: 48 spots in 1886 (#176 → #128)
- Biggest drop: 58 spots in 1908 (#199 → #257)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1960 at #6 (58,727 births)
- Births halved by 1971, 11 yrs later
- Top 10: 16 yrs · run 1955–1970
- Top 100: 59 yrs · run 1944–2002
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
- Highest: 1 in 36 boys born in 1960 were named Mark (2.8%)
- Latest: 1 in 1,206 boys born in 2025 (0.08%)
- 32.4% of all boys named Mark (441,390) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 928 | #127 (1881) | #147 |
| 1890s | 953 | #139 (1896) | #160 |
| 1900s | 971 | #151 (1900) | #190 |
| 1910s | 4,134 | #192 (1913) | #204 |
| 1920s | 6,495 | #199 (1922) | #208 |
| 1930s | 7,444 | #166 (1938) | #184 |
| 1940s | 50,731 | #24 (1949) | #81 |
| 1950s | 382,589 | #6 (1959) | #12 |
| 1960s | 441,390 | #6 (1960) | #7 |
| 1970s | 194,260 | #9 (1970) | #20 |
| 1980s | 129,442 | #30 (1980) | #34 |
| 1990s | 75,816 | #47 (1990) | #54 |
| 2000s | 37,257 | #79 (2000) | #115 |
| 2010s | 21,108 | #159 (2011) | #190 |
| 2020s | 8,658 | #235 (2020) | #245 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Mark in 1916
Top girls' names in 1916
Top boys' names in 1916
More about 1916
girls
1,044,334 girls got a published name in 1916; 1 in 208,867 of them was named Mark, which outranked 14.4% of the 5,161 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Tied with 744 names at #4,417; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
890,080 boys got a published name in 1916; 1 in 1,559 of them was named Mark, which outranked 95.6% of the 4,535 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 30.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.