Margie
#6,546 for girls in 2025, 17 births · Last seen for boys in 1962 at #3,041
Given to girls 99.6% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1933 · 2,409 births
- Debut · girls
- 31 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 4 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 106,004since 1880
Margie over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #6,546 | 17 | — | |
| 2024 | #6,167 | 19 | — | |
| 2023 | #4,873 | 27 | — | |
| 2022 | #5,465 | 23 | — | |
| 2021 | #8,024 | 13 | — | |
| 2020 | #6,629 | 17 | — | |
| 2019 | #5,612 | 22 | — | |
| 2018 | #6,792 | 17 | — | |
| 2017 | #8,776 | 12 | — | |
| 2016 | #7,988 | 14 | — | |
| 2015 | #6,452 | 19 | — | |
| 2014 | #10,955 | 9 | — | |
| 2013 | #7,748 | 15 | — | |
| 2012 | #7,144 | 17 | — | |
| 2011 | #8,196 | 14 | — | |
| 2010 | #5,771 | 23 | — | |
| 2009 | #6,544 | 20 | — | |
| 2008 | #5,574 | 25 | — | |
| 2007 | #4,944 | 29 | — | |
| 2006 | #4,358 | 33 | — | |
| 2005 | #4,487 | 30 | — | |
| 2004 | #5,377 | 23 | — | |
| 2003 | #4,418 | 29 | — | |
| 2002 | #3,730 | 35 | — | |
| 2001 | #5,009 | 23 | — | |
| 2000 | #3,334 | 40 | — | |
| 1999 | #3,718 | 32 | — | |
| 1998 | #3,015 | 42 | — | |
| 1997 | #3,626 | 31 | — | |
| 1996 | #3,302 | 35 | — | |
| 1995 | #3,220 | 35 | — | |
| 1994 | #2,323 | 56 | — | |
| 1993 | #2,068 | 66 | — | |
| 1992 | #1,928 | 72 | — | |
| 1991 | #1,689 | 87 | — | |
| 1990 | #1,657 | 89 | — | |
| 1989 | #1,769 | 76 | — | |
| 1988 | #1,477 | 92 | — | |
| 1987 | #1,349 | 101 | — | |
| 1986 | #1,392 | 92 | — | |
| 1985 | #1,310 | 102 | — | |
| 1984 | #1,238 | 104 | — | |
| 1983 | #1,120 | 120 | — | |
| 1982 | #938 | 159 | — | |
| 1981 | #987 | 148 | — | |
| 1980 | #902 | 167 | — | |
| 1979 | #851 | 183 | — | |
| 1978 | #822 | 182 | — | |
| 1977 | #872 | 165 | — | |
| 1976 | #803 | 173 | — | |
| 1975 | #728 | 202 | — | |
| 1974 | #644 | 237 | — | |
| 1973 | #621 | 246 | — | |
| 1972 | #578 | 284 | — | |
| 1971 | #502 | 378 | — | |
| 1970 | #504 | 393 | — | |
| 1969 | #477 | 409 | — | |
| 1968 | #465 | 425 | — | |
| 1967 | #420 | 492 | — | |
| 1966 | #386 | 552 | — | |
| 1965 | #347 | 695 | — | |
| 1964 | #311 | 883 | — | |
| 1963 | #282 | 1,041 | — | |
| 1962 | #236 | 1,344 | #3,041 | 8 |
| 1961 | #266 | 1,146 | #3,652 | 6 |
| 1960 | #260 | 1,174 | #4,038 | 5 |
| 1959 | #244 | 1,267 | #3,619 | 6 |
| 1958 | #235 | 1,292 | — | |
| 1957 | #237 | 1,286 | #2,822 | 9 |
| 1956 | #231 | 1,270 | — | |
| 1955 | #227 | 1,278 | — | |
| 1954 | #207 | 1,488 | — | |
| 1953 | #206 | 1,452 | #3,798 | 5 |
| 1952 | #204 | 1,409 | — | |
| 1951 | #198 | 1,461 | — | |
| 1950 | #184 | 1,470 | — | |
| 1949 | #169 | 1,690 | #3,690 | 5 |
| 1948 | #148 | 1,927 | #3,316 | 6 |
| 1947 | #139 | 2,169 | #2,251 | 12 |
| 1946 | #138 | 1,946 | #2,143 | 12 |
| 1945 | #138 | 1,764 | #3,338 | 5 |
| 1944 | #130 | 2,005 | #2,862 | 7 |
| 1943 | #128 | 2,148 | #2,563 | 9 |
| 1942 | #126 | 2,196 | #2,145 | 12 |
| 1941 | #122 | 2,149 | #2,333 | 10 |
| 1940 | #114 | 2,267 | #1,736 | 16 |
| 1939 | #113 | 2,266 | #1,879 | 14 |
| 1938 | #109 | 2,425 | #1,476 | 21 |
| 1937 | #111 | 2,287 | #1,627 | 18 |
| 1936 | #101 | 2,342 | #1,964 | 13 |
| 1935 | #100 | 2,368 | #2,529 | 9 |
| 1934 | #103 | 2,373 | #2,121 | 12 |
| 1933 | #95 | 2,409 | #2,738 | 8 |
| 1932 | #102 | 2,424 | #1,848 | 16 |
| 1931 | #107 | 2,206 | #1,458 | 23 |
| 1930 | #112 | 2,242 | #1,964 | 15 |
| 1929 | #108 | 2,336 | #2,096 | 14 |
| 1928 | #108 | 2,437 | #2,270 | 13 |
| 1927 | #104 | 2,681 | #2,298 | 13 |
| 1926 | #103 | 2,714 | #2,566 | 11 |
| 1925 | #99 | 2,868 | #2,193 | 14 |
| 1924 | #102 | 2,832 | #2,132 | 15 |
| 1923 | #101 | 2,724 | #2,224 | 14 |
| 1922 | #100 | 2,854 | #2,630 | 11 |
| 1921 | #106 | 2,696 | #3,869 | 6 |
| 1920 | #167 | 1,353 | — | |
| 1919 | #177 | 1,158 | #4,168 | 5 |
| 1918 | #188 | 1,064 | — | |
| 1917 | #193 | 951 | #3,981 | 5 |
| 1916 | #195 | 915 | — | |
| 1915 | #218 | 740 | — | |
| 1914 | #213 | 588 | — | |
| 1913 | #237 | 423 | — | |
| 1912 | #239 | 356 | — | |
| 1911 | #239 | 271 | — | |
| 1910 | #213 | 305 | — | |
| 1909 | #201 | 286 | — | |
| 1908 | #221 | 243 | — | |
| 1907 | #219 | 228 | — | |
| 1906 | #226 | 194 | — | |
| 1905 | #226 | 190 | — | |
| 1904 | #216 | 199 | — | |
| 1903 | #212 | 199 | — | |
| 1902 | #217 | 187 | — | |
| 1901 | #222 | 165 | — | |
| 1900 | #216 | 206 | — | |
| 1899 | #263 | 117 | — | |
| 1898 | #275 | 123 | — | |
| 1897 | #267 | 114 | — | |
| 1896 | #245 | 130 | — | |
| 1895 | #282 | 98 | — | |
| 1894 | #261 | 110 | — | |
| 1893 | #260 | 106 | — | |
| 1892 | #282 | 91 | — | |
| 1891 | #306 | 67 | — | |
| 1890 | #284 | 78 | — | |
| 1889 | #266 | 79 | — | |
| 1888 | #280 | 69 | — | |
| 1887 | #278 | 58 | — | |
| 1886 | #294 | 49 | — | |
| 1885 | #283 | 49 | — | |
| 1884 | #322 | 37 | — | |
| 1883 | #320 | 31 | — | |
| 1882 | #389 | 21 | — | |
| 1881 | #279 | 32 | — | |
| 1880 | #278 | 31 | — | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Margie was already there! It came in at #278, and was given to 31 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 2014, when fewer than 10 girls a year got the name.
Where Margie is popular in 1932
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Texas#35 · 1 in 203
- Oklahoma#39 · 1 in 209
- North Carolina#39 · 1 in 210
- Arkansas#42 · 1 in 202
- Louisiana#43 · 1 in 193
Best ever in a state: #26 in Nevada, 1937.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas | #35 | 277 | 1 in 203 |
| North Carolina | #39 | 175 | 1 in 210 |
| Oklahoma | #39 | 105 | 1 in 209 |
| Arkansas | #42 | 93 | 1 in 202 |
| Louisiana | #43 | 109 | 1 in 193 |
| Kentucky | #47 | 126 | 1 in 217 |
| South Carolina | #51 | 102 | 1 in 204 |
| Tennessee | #52 | 120 | 1 in 226 |
| Alabama | #55 | 123 | 1 in 243 |
| Georgia | #64 | 119 | 1 in 258 |
| Missouri | #70 | 84 | 1 in 329 |
| Mississippi | #71 | 78 | 1 in 282 |
| District of Columbia | #78 | 12 | 1 in 317 |
| Nebraska | #81 | 28 | 1 in 364 |
| Utah | #85 | 12 | 1 in 359 |
| South Dakota | #86 | 16 | 1 in 335 |
| Indiana | #87 | 54 | 1 in 422 |
| Idaho | #88 | 10 | 1 in 322 |
| Virginia | #88 | 69 | 1 in 355 |
| Ohio | #94 | 106 | 1 in 431 |
| Colorado | #95 | 23 | 1 in 342 |
| Kansas | #98 | 32 | 1 in 412 |
| California | #102 | 76 | 1 in 450 |
| Florida | #105 | 31 | 1 in 396 |
| Montana | #105 | 9 | 1 in 378 |
| West Virginia | #114 | 39 | 1 in 450 |
| Minnesota | #117 | 32 | 1 in 605 |
| Oregon | #119 | 9 | 1 in 550 |
| Wisconsin | #120 | 32 | 1 in 719 |
| Illinois | #122 | 77 | 1 in 656 |
| Iowa | #131 | 25 | 1 in 711 |
| Michigan | #135 | 45 | 1 in 816 |
| North Dakota | #142 | 9 | 1 in 637 |
| Arizona | #148 | 7 | 1 in 537 |
| Washington | #153 | 11 | 1 in 800 |
| Pennsylvania | #160 | 66 | 1 in 1,125 |
| Maryland | #170 | 11 | 1 in 1,105 |
| New Mexico | #182 | 7 | 1 in 676 |
| New York | #234 | 43 | 1 in 2,049 |
| New Jersey | #237 | 11 | 1 in 2,418 |
| Massachusetts | #337 | 5 | 1 in 5,983 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Margie
- 379 spots since 2024 (#6,167 → #6,546)
- 83 spots since 2020 (#6,629 → #6,546)
- 94 spots since 2015 (#6,452 → #6,546)
- Biggest jump: 69 spots in 1883 (#389 → #320)
- Biggest drop: 182 spots in 1983 (#938 → #1,120)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1933 at #95 (2,409 births)
- Births halved by 1960, 27 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 4 yrs · 1922–1935
- Top 1,000: 103 yrs · run 1880–1982
- Highest: 1 in 418 girls born in 1933 were named Margie (0.24%)
- Latest: 1 in 94,545 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 24.1% of all girls named Margie (25,495) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 456 | #266 (1889) | #299 |
| 1890s | 1,034 | #245 (1896) | #273 |
| 1900s | 2,097 | #201 (1909) | #218 |
| 1910s | 6,771 | #177 (1919) | #211 |
| 1920s | 25,495 | #99 (1925) | #110 |
| 1930s | 23,342 | #95 (1933) | #105 |
| 1940s | 20,261 | #114 (1940) | #135 |
| 1950s | 13,673 | #184 (1950) | #217 |
| 1960s | 8,161 | #236 (1962) | #345 |
| 1970s | 2,443 | #502 (1971) | #693 |
| 1980s | 1,161 | #902 (1980) | #1,248 |
| 1990s | 545 | #1,657 (1990) | #2,655 |
| 2000s | 287 | #3,334 (2000) | #4,778 |
| 2010s | 162 | #5,612 (2019) | #7,543 |
| 2020s | 116 | #4,873 (2023) | #6,284 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Margie in 1932
Top girls' names in 1932
Top boys' names in 1932
More about 1932
girls
1,067,148 girls got a published name in 1932; 1 in 440 of them was named Margie, which outranked 98.0% of the 5,098 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,044,157 boys got a published name in 1932; 1 in 65,260 of them was named Margie, which outranked 56.9% of the 4,284 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.6% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #1,777Wheeler17
- #1,777Wilhelm17
- #1,777Zachary17
- #1,848Margie16
- #1,848Alberta16
- #1,848Aloys16
- #1,848Ammon16
- #1,922Adell15
- #1,922Adron15
- #1,922Apolonio15
Tied with 73 names at #1,848; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.