Marcos
Last seen for girls in 2004 at #14,179 · #516 for boys in 2025, 579 births
Given to boys 99.7% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1996 · 1,350 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 53,580since 1888
Marcos over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Marcos has never cracked the top 200 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #516 | 579 | |
| 2024 | — | #479 | 643 | |
| 2023 | — | #475 | 640 | |
| 2022 | — | #491 | 619 | |
| 2021 | — | #490 | 602 | |
| 2020 | — | #480 | 621 | |
| 2019 | — | #454 | 658 | |
| 2018 | — | #432 | 706 | |
| 2017 | — | #425 | 732 | |
| 2016 | — | #431 | 722 | |
| 2015 | — | #408 | 762 | |
| 2014 | — | #405 | 769 | |
| 2013 | — | #362 | 870 | |
| 2012 | — | #344 | 893 | |
| 2011 | — | #340 | 891 | |
| 2010 | — | #312 | 1,027 | |
| 2009 | — | #280 | 1,212 | |
| 2008 | — | #261 | 1,349 | |
| 2007 | — | #254 | 1,388 | |
| 2006 | — | #248 | 1,386 | |
| 2005 | — | #246 | 1,360 | |
| 2004 | #14,179 | 6 | #244 | 1,369 |
| 2003 | — | #241 | 1,379 | |
| 2002 | — | #247 | 1,328 | |
| 2001 | — | #240 | 1,415 | |
| 2000 | #15,031 | 5 | #239 | 1,407 |
| 1999 | #14,411 | 5 | #242 | 1,316 |
| 1998 | — | #236 | 1,341 | |
| 1997 | #13,724 | 5 | #234 | 1,320 |
| 1996 | #9,581 | 8 | #224 | 1,350 |
| 1995 | #9,553 | 8 | #249 | 1,144 |
| 1994 | #6,672 | 13 | #253 | 1,139 |
| 1993 | #11,780 | 6 | #257 | 1,113 |
| 1992 | #11,738 | 6 | #263 | 1,077 |
| 1991 | #11,509 | 6 | #264 | 1,028 |
| 1990 | #9,247 | 8 | #273 | 963 |
| 1989 | #9,681 | 7 | #300 | 805 |
| 1988 | #8,391 | 8 | #310 | 727 |
| 1987 | #6,788 | 10 | #306 | 705 |
| 1986 | #10,912 | 5 | #284 | 738 |
| 1985 | #8,318 | 7 | #284 | 725 |
| 1984 | #8,153 | 7 | #300 | 665 |
| 1983 | #9,015 | 6 | #295 | 672 |
| 1982 | #7,469 | 8 | #316 | 623 |
| 1981 | #8,128 | 7 | #304 | 632 |
| 1980 | — | #308 | 630 | |
| 1979 | #6,189 | 10 | #339 | 531 |
| 1978 | — | #332 | 528 | |
| 1977 | — | #339 | 527 | |
| 1976 | — | #359 | 451 | |
| 1975 | — | #334 | 521 | |
| 1974 | — | #357 | 463 | |
| 1973 | #8,423 | 5 | #362 | 454 |
| 1972 | — | #390 | 406 | |
| 1971 | — | #426 | 362 | |
| 1970 | — | #427 | 367 | |
| 1969 | — | #446 | 308 | |
| 1968 | — | #467 | 265 | |
| 1967 | — | #478 | 248 | |
| 1966 | — | #544 | 199 | |
| 1965 | — | #490 | 245 | |
| 1964 | — | #527 | 220 | |
| 1963 | — | #578 | 187 | |
| 1962 | — | #575 | 186 | |
| 1961 | — | #593 | 177 | |
| 1960 | — | #609 | 165 | |
| 1959 | — | #623 | 153 | |
| 1958 | — | #678 | 126 | |
| 1957 | — | #714 | 109 | |
| 1956 | — | #720 | 103 | |
| 1955 | — | #708 | 107 | |
| 1954 | — | #725 | 99 | |
| 1953 | — | #738 | 94 | |
| 1952 | — | #721 | 95 | |
| 1951 | — | #775 | 82 | |
| 1950 | — | #706 | 94 | |
| 1949 | — | #749 | 84 | |
| 1948 | — | #789 | 75 | |
| 1947 | — | #975 | 53 | |
| 1946 | — | #793 | 70 | |
| 1945 | — | #864 | 52 | |
| 1944 | — | #1,018 | 41 | |
| 1943 | — | #998 | 45 | |
| 1942 | — | #970 | 47 | |
| 1941 | — | #1,019 | 40 | |
| 1940 | — | #919 | 48 | |
| 1939 | — | #1,015 | 39 | |
| 1938 | — | #977 | 42 | |
| 1937 | — | #1,288 | 27 | |
| 1936 | — | #989 | 40 | |
| 1935 | — | #1,098 | 35 | |
| 1934 | — | #1,059 | 38 | |
| 1933 | — | #1,013 | 40 | |
| 1932 | — | #1,035 | 41 | |
| 1931 | — | #869 | 54 | |
| 1930 | — | #1,053 | 43 | |
| 1929 | — | #975 | 48 | |
| 1928 | — | #927 | 53 | |
| 1927 | — | #937 | 54 | |
| 1926 | #4,306 | 6 | #1,242 | 34 |
| 1925 | — | #1,012 | 46 | |
| 1924 | — | #1,071 | 44 | |
| 1923 | — | #930 | 54 | |
| 1922 | — | #1,333 | 30 | |
| 1921 | — | #939 | 56 | |
| 1920 | — | #987 | 48 | |
| 1919 | — | #1,159 | 36 | |
| 1918 | — | #1,286 | 30 | |
| 1917 | — | #1,062 | 39 | |
| 1916 | — | #1,549 | 21 | |
| 1915 | — | #1,372 | 24 | |
| 1914 | — | #1,101 | 27 | |
| 1913 | — | #1,497 | 13 | |
| 1912 | — | #1,417 | 12 | |
| 1911 | — | #1,387 | 7 | |
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | #1,113 | 7 | |
| 1907 | — | #1,200 | 6 | |
| 1906 | — | #1,004 | 7 | |
| 1905 | — | #1,002 | 7 | |
| 1904 | — | #1,064 | 6 | |
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | #1,031 | 5 | |
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1888
The first year at least five boys were named Marcos! It came in at #1,031, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1888–1903, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Marcos is popular in 2008
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- New Mexico#67 · 1 in 254
- California#167 · 1 in 735
- Texas#175 · 1 in 745
- Arizona#176 · 1 in 678
- New Jersey#203 · 1 in 1,140
Best ever in a state: #64 in New Mexico, 2000.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Mexico | #67 | 44 | 1 in 254 |
| California | #167 | 346 | 1 in 735 |
| Texas | #175 | 254 | 1 in 745 |
| Arizona | #176 | 64 | 1 in 678 |
| New Jersey | #203 | 40 | 1 in 1,140 |
| Florida | #233 | 80 | 1 in 1,256 |
| Oklahoma | #235 | 21 | 1 in 1,021 |
| Colorado | #240 | 28 | 1 in 1,060 |
| Illinois | #240 | 59 | 1 in 1,267 |
| Nevada | #244 | 14 | 1 in 1,078 |
| Washington | #244 | 34 | 1 in 1,095 |
| Oregon | #249 | 20 | 1 in 1,007 |
| Utah | #254 | 21 | 1 in 1,129 |
| Nebraska | #293 | 8 | 1 in 1,292 |
| New York | #299 | 61 | 1 in 1,789 |
| Kansas | #326 | 11 | 1 in 1,538 |
| Idaho | #339 | 6 | 1 in 1,532 |
| Maryland | #356 | 14 | 1 in 2,136 |
| Georgia | #365 | 30 | 1 in 2,040 |
| North Carolina | #383 | 24 | 1 in 2,321 |
| Massachusetts | #396 | 11 | 1 in 2,911 |
| Tennessee | #410 | 15 | 1 in 2,514 |
| Indiana | #415 | 15 | 1 in 2,553 |
| Virginia | #430 | 15 | 1 in 2,865 |
| Minnesota | #451 | 10 | 1 in 2,983 |
| Alabama | #481 | 9 | 1 in 2,789 |
| South Carolina | #489 | 8 | 1 in 2,875 |
| Mississippi | #499 | 6 | 1 in 2,622 |
| Arkansas | #502 | 5 | 1 in 3,042 |
| Wisconsin | #535 | 8 | 1 in 3,670 |
| Michigan | #624 | 11 | 1 in 4,673 |
| Pennsylvania | #759 | 9 | 1 in 7,096 |
| Louisiana | #775 | 5 | 1 in 5,030 |
| Missouri | #813 | 5 | 1 in 6,904 |
| Ohio | #849 | 8 | 1 in 8,054 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Marcos
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
- 37 spots since 2024 (#479 → #516)
- 36 spots since 2020 (#480 → #516)
- 108 spots since 2015 (#408 → #516)
- Biggest jump: 403 spots in 1923 (#1,333 → #930)
- Biggest drop: 394 spots in 1922 (#939 → #1,333)
Rise & fade · boys
108 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1888
- Peaked 1996 at #224 (1,350 births)
- Births halved by 2019, 23 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 93 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 93 yrs · run 1945–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 1,373
- Highest: 1 in 1,373 boys born in 2001 were named Marcos (0.07%)
- Latest: 1 in 2,950 boys born in 2025 (0.03%)
- Its best rank, #224 in 1996, was only 1 in 1,403 (0.07%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · boys
The 2000s
- 25.4% of all boys named Marcos (13,593) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 5 | #1,031 (1888) | #1,031 |
| 1890s | 0 | — | — |
| 1900s | 33 | #1,002 (1905) | #1,077 |
| 1910s | 209 | #1,062 (1917) | #1,314 |
| 1920s | 467 | #927 (1928) | #1,035 |
| 1930s | 399 | #869 (1931) | #1,040 |
| 1940s | 555 | #749 (1949) | #909 |
| 1950s | 1,062 | #623 (1959) | #711 |
| 1960s | 2,200 | #446 (1969) | #531 |
| 1970s | 4,610 | #332 (1978) | #367 |
| 1980s | 6,922 | #284 (1986) | #301 |
| 1990s | 11,791 | #224 (1996) | #250 |
| 2000s | 13,593 | #239 (2000) | #250 |
| 2010s | 8,030 | #312 (2010) | #391 |
| 2020s | 3,704 | #475 (2023) | #489 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Marcos in 2008
boys
#261
1,349 births · 1 in 1,512 boys
Top boys' names in 2008
More about 2008
boys
2,040,150 boys got a published name in 2008; 1 in 1,512 of them was named Marcos, which outranked 98.2% of the 14,625 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.5% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Marcos
Biggest movers since 2007
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.