Marcia

#3,389 for girls in 2025, 45 births · Last seen for boys in 1989 at #7,905
Given to girls 99.8% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1951 · 5,299 births
Debut · girls
9 births
In top 100 · girls
13 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
133,320
since 1880

Marcia over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201968peak #74, 1951girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#3,38945—
2024#4,11435—
2023#4,19134—
2022#3,82739—
2021#4,09035—
2020#3,45044—
2019#3,66541—
2018#4,35732—
2017#4,22034—
2016#3,46445—
2015#3,84239—
2014#3,36947—
2013#4,07636—
2012#3,58344—
2011#3,40747—
2010#3,07554—
2009#2,89260—
2008#3,26751—
2007#2,43377—
2006#2,41977—
2005#2,48270—
2004#2,44669—
2003#2,61061—
2002#2,44765—
2001#2,12677—
2000#1,84593—
1999#1,87484—
1998#1,73491—
1997#1,73389—
1996#1,551102—
1995#1,401117—
1994#1,346124—
1993#983188—
1992#1,116159—
1991#965195—
1990#900213—
1989#871212#7,9055
1988#759246—
1987#661284—
1986#666277—
1985#584334—
1984#543350—
1983#532357—
1982#465453—
1981#415530—
1980#414535—
1979#365620—
1978#325706—
1977#328715—
1976#304753#4,9356
1975#295795#5,4645
1974#264957#5,2275
1973#267935—
1972#265995#4,9865
1971#2431,204#3,9637
1970#2441,285#4,7245
1969#2601,112—
1968#2421,144—
1967#2241,308#3,5596
1966#2141,418#3,5376
1965#2121,549—
1964#1901,932#3,6016
1963#1802,157#2,8589
1962#1682,428—
1961#1552,685#2,70610
1960#1562,694#3,0778
1959#1413,091#3,6196
1958#1283,353#3,2757
1957#1263,538#3,5526
1956#1104,069#3,9425
1955#984,412#3,2017
1954#904,744#3,1767
1953#845,062#2,39111
1952#805,210#3,7345
1951#745,299#3,3646
1950#774,955#2,7708
1949#784,651#2,6069
1948#794,640#2,02714
1947#814,472#2,49810
1946#893,946#2,40310
1945#883,206—
1944#893,140—
1943#962,970#3,2316
1942#1052,669#1,94614
1941#1052,430#2,33310
1940#1122,273#2,6718
1939#1092,346#2,4499
1938#1162,169#2,6468
1937#1241,948#2,19711
1936#1381,595#3,5495
1935#1491,339#3,6455
1934#1571,267—
1933#1621,140#2,7388
1932#191951—
1931#215799—
1930#231692—
1929#263584—
1928#281540—
1927#287538—
1926#302487—
1925#315448#3,7416
1924#312460—
1923#292492—
1922#313428—
1921#307451—
1920#347361—
1919#357325—
1918#409256—
1917#445208—
1916#491171—
1915#462178—
1914#478132—
1913#472113—
1912#47999—
1911#49669—
1910#53957—
1909#50954—
1908#46261—
1907#58839—
1906#50946—
1905#57936—
1904#68226—
1903#52238—
1902#59131—
1901#72320—
1900#57636—
1899#64423—
1898#55533—
1897#59426—
1896#59427—
1895#53031—
1894#59724—
1893#41442—
1892#45336—
1891#48328—
1890#57820—
1889#48626—
1888#48626—
1887#52418—
1886#50819—
1885#43823—
1884#44920—
1883#38623—
1882#59610—
1881#47013—
1880#5809—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Marcia was already there! It came in at #580, and was given to 9 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1880–1882, when fewer than 14 girls a year got the name.

Where Marcia is popular in 1968

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedAKMaine: #190 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 981 girlsMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: #181 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 950 girlsNHWashington: #367 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 2,351 girlsWAIdaho: #200 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 734 girlsIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: #136 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 511 girlsNDMinnesota: #237 for girls · 19 births · 1 in 1,480 girlsMNIllinois: #231 for girls · 64 births · 1 in 1,307 girlsILWisconsin: #160 for girls · 36 births · 1 in 905 girlsWIMichigan: #147 for girls · 96 births · 1 in 723 girlsMINew York: #249 for girls · 101 births · 1 in 1,349 girlsNYMassachusetts: #234 for girls · 26 births · 1 in 1,602 girlsMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedRIOregon: #253 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 1,311 girlsORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedSDIowa: #191 for girls · 20 births · 1 in 1,005 girlsIAIndiana: #253 for girls · 26 births · 1 in 1,531 girlsINOhio: #199 for girls · 75 births · 1 in 1,101 girlsOHPennsylvania: #209 for girls · 75 births · 1 in 1,123 girlsPANew Jersey: #350 for girls · 21 births · 1 in 2,298 girlsNJConnecticut: #375 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 2,909 girlsCTCalifornia: #309 for girls · 90 births · 1 in 1,709 girlsCAUtah: #325 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 1,806 girlsUTColorado: #239 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 1,111 girlsCONebraska: #210 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 1,104 girlsNEMissouri: #170 for girls · 38 births · 1 in 865 girlsMOKentucky: #210 for girls · 21 births · 1 in 1,141 girlsKYWest Virginia: #287 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 2,032 girlsWVVirginia: #214 for girls · 27 births · 1 in 1,221 girlsVAMaryland: #253 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 1,487 girlsMDDelaware: #168 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 719 girlsDEArizona: #367 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 1,846 girlsAZNew Mexico: #204 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 851 girlsNMKansas: #185 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 863 girlsKSArkansas: #216 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 1,083 girlsARTennessee: #256 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 1,620 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #241 for girls · 26 births · 1 in 1,511 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #290 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 1,692 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: #150 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 629 girlsDCOklahoma: #220 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 999 girlsOKLouisiana: #342 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 2,020 girlsLAMississippi: #271 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 1,503 girlsMSAlabama: #291 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 1,740 girlsALGeorgia: #206 for girls · 34 births · 1 in 1,108 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedHITexas: #396 for girls · 38 births · 1 in 2,472 girlsTXFlorida: #249 for girls · 33 births · 1 in 1,280 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. North Dakota#136 · 1 in 511
  2. Michigan#147 · 1 in 723
  3. District of Columbia#150 · 1 in 629
  4. Wisconsin#160 · 1 in 905
  5. Delaware#168 · 1 in 719

Best ever in a state: #31 in Iowa, 1948.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
North Dakota#13681 in 511
Michigan#147961 in 723
District of Columbia#150161 in 629
Wisconsin#160361 in 905
Delaware#16851 in 719
Missouri#170381 in 865
New Hampshire#18151 in 950
Kansas#185161 in 863
Maine#19071 in 981
Iowa#191201 in 1,005
Ohio#199751 in 1,101
Idaho#20061 in 734
New Mexico#20491 in 851
Georgia#206341 in 1,108
Pennsylvania#209751 in 1,123
Kentucky#210211 in 1,141
Nebraska#21091 in 1,104
Virginia#214271 in 1,221
Arkansas#216121 in 1,083
Oklahoma#220161 in 999
Illinois#231641 in 1,307
Massachusetts#234261 in 1,602
Minnesota#237191 in 1,480
Colorado#239141 in 1,111
North Carolina#241261 in 1,511
Florida#249331 in 1,280
New York#2491011 in 1,349
Indiana#253261 in 1,531
Maryland#253171 in 1,487
Oregon#253101 in 1,311
Tennessee#256181 in 1,620
Mississippi#271121 in 1,503
West Virginia#28761 in 2,032
South Carolina#290121 in 1,692
Alabama#291151 in 1,740
California#309901 in 1,709
Utah#32551 in 1,806
Louisiana#342151 in 2,020
New Jersey#350211 in 2,298
Arizona#36771 in 1,846
Washington#367101 in 2,351
Connecticut#37571 in 2,909
Texas#396381 in 2,472
Alaska———
Hawaii———
Montana———
Nevada———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Vermont———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Marcia
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 725 spots since 2024 (#4,114 → #3,389)
  • 61 spots since 2020 (#3,450 → #3,389)
  • 453 spots since 2015 (#3,842 → #3,389)
  • Biggest jump: 210 spots in 1883 (#596 → #386)
  • Biggest drop: 363 spots in 1994 (#983 → #1,346)
Rise & fade · girls
71 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1951 at #74 (5,299 births)
  • Births halved by 1962, 11 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 13 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 13 yrs · run 1943–1955
  • Top 1,000: 113 yrs · run 1880–1991
Share of babies · girls
1 in 340
  • Highest: 1 in 340 girls born in 1951 were named Marcia (0.29%)
  • Latest: 1 in 35,717 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 1950s
  • 32.8% of all girls named Marcia (43,733) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s187#386 (1883)#492
1890s290#414 (1893)#544
1900s387#462 (1908)#574
1910s1,608#357 (1919)#463
1920s4,789#263 (1929)#302
1930s14,246#109 (1939)#159
1940s34,397#78 (1949)#92
1950s43,733#74 (1951)#101
1960s18,427#155 (1961)#200
1970s8,965#243 (1971)#290
1980s3,578#414 (1980)#591
1990s1,362#900 (1990)#1,360
2000s700#1,845 (2000)#2,497
2010s419#3,075 (2010)#3,706
2020s232#3,389 (2025)#3,844

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Marcia in 1968

girls
#242
1,144 births · 1 in 1,434 girls

Top girls' names in 1968

  1. #1Lisa49,534
  2. #2Michelle33,223
  3. #3Kimberly31,906
  4. #4Jennifer26,853
  5. #5Melissa21,733
  6. #6Mary21,727
  7. #7Angela20,670
  8. #8Tammy20,058
  9. #9Karen19,560
  10. #10Susan19,503
  11. #242Marcia1,144
More about 1968

girls

1,640,389 girls got a published name in 1968; 1 in 1,434 of them was named Marcia, which outranked 97.0% of the 8,198 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 16.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Marcia
  1. #239Lee1,160
  2. #240Darla1,152
  3. #241Tonia1,148
  4. #242Marcia1,144
  5. #243Lauren1,140
  6. #244Marsha1,128
  7. #245Lynda1,115
Biggest movers since 1967
Risers
  1. ↑ 3,132Coretta#3,656 → #524
  2. ↑ 1,257Tamika#1,980 → #723
  3. ↑ 1,150Tamiko#1,702 → #552
  4. ↑ 607Chantel#1,348 → #741
  5. ↑ 490Chantal#1,441 → #951
Fallers
  1. ↓ 602Wende#857 → #1,459
  2. ↓ 545Zina#959 → #1,504
  3. ↓ 341Evonne#970 → #1,311
  4. ↓ 294Portia#902 → #1,196
  5. ↓ 285Mariann#973 → #1,258

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1968 →