Marcia

#3,389 for girls in 2025, 45 births · Last seen for boys in 1989 at #7,905
Given to girls 99.8% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1951 · 5,299 births
Debut · girls
9 births
In top 100 · girls
13 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
133,320
since 1880

Marcia over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201918peak #74, 1951girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#3,38945—
2024#4,11435—
2023#4,19134—
2022#3,82739—
2021#4,09035—
2020#3,45044—
2019#3,66541—
2018#4,35732—
2017#4,22034—
2016#3,46445—
2015#3,84239—
2014#3,36947—
2013#4,07636—
2012#3,58344—
2011#3,40747—
2010#3,07554—
2009#2,89260—
2008#3,26751—
2007#2,43377—
2006#2,41977—
2005#2,48270—
2004#2,44669—
2003#2,61061—
2002#2,44765—
2001#2,12677—
2000#1,84593—
1999#1,87484—
1998#1,73491—
1997#1,73389—
1996#1,551102—
1995#1,401117—
1994#1,346124—
1993#983188—
1992#1,116159—
1991#965195—
1990#900213—
1989#871212#7,9055
1988#759246—
1987#661284—
1986#666277—
1985#584334—
1984#543350—
1983#532357—
1982#465453—
1981#415530—
1980#414535—
1979#365620—
1978#325706—
1977#328715—
1976#304753#4,9356
1975#295795#5,4645
1974#264957#5,2275
1973#267935—
1972#265995#4,9865
1971#2431,204#3,9637
1970#2441,285#4,7245
1969#2601,112—
1968#2421,144—
1967#2241,308#3,5596
1966#2141,418#3,5376
1965#2121,549—
1964#1901,932#3,6016
1963#1802,157#2,8589
1962#1682,428—
1961#1552,685#2,70610
1960#1562,694#3,0778
1959#1413,091#3,6196
1958#1283,353#3,2757
1957#1263,538#3,5526
1956#1104,069#3,9425
1955#984,412#3,2017
1954#904,744#3,1767
1953#845,062#2,39111
1952#805,210#3,7345
1951#745,299#3,3646
1950#774,955#2,7708
1949#784,651#2,6069
1948#794,640#2,02714
1947#814,472#2,49810
1946#893,946#2,40310
1945#883,206—
1944#893,140—
1943#962,970#3,2316
1942#1052,669#1,94614
1941#1052,430#2,33310
1940#1122,273#2,6718
1939#1092,346#2,4499
1938#1162,169#2,6468
1937#1241,948#2,19711
1936#1381,595#3,5495
1935#1491,339#3,6455
1934#1571,267—
1933#1621,140#2,7388
1932#191951—
1931#215799—
1930#231692—
1929#263584—
1928#281540—
1927#287538—
1926#302487—
1925#315448#3,7416
1924#312460—
1923#292492—
1922#313428—
1921#307451—
1920#347361—
1919#357325—
1918#409256—
1917#445208—
1916#491171—
1915#462178—
1914#478132—
1913#472113—
1912#47999—
1911#49669—
1910#53957—
1909#50954—
1908#46261—
1907#58839—
1906#50946—
1905#57936—
1904#68226—
1903#52238—
1902#59131—
1901#72320—
1900#57636—
1899#64423—
1898#55533—
1897#59426—
1896#59427—
1895#53031—
1894#59724—
1893#41442—
1892#45336—
1891#48328—
1890#57820—
1889#48626—
1888#48626—
1887#52418—
1886#50819—
1885#43823—
1884#44920—
1883#38623—
1882#59610—
1881#47013—
1880#5809—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Marcia was already there! It came in at #580, and was given to 9 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1880–1882, when fewer than 14 girls a year got the name.

Where Marcia is popular in 1918

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedAKMaine: #169 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 805 girlsMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: #142 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 677 girlsNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedNDMinnesota: #365 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 3,753 girlsMNIllinois: #344 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 3,874 girlsILWisconsin: #392 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 4,997 girlsWIMichigan: #306 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 3,332 girlsMINew York: #227 for girls · 51 births · 1 in 1,984 girlsNYMassachusetts: #203 for girls · 19 births · 1 in 1,944 girlsMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: #229 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 1,291 girlsSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedIAIndiana: #269 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 2,596 girlsINOhio: #337 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 4,193 girlsOHPennsylvania: #402 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 7,112 girlsPANew Jersey: #308 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 4,520 girlsNJConnecticut: #197 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 1,469 girlsCTCalifornia: #306 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 2,561 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedNEMissouri: #468 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 5,123 girlsMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedNMKansas: #269 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 1,993 girlsKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedHITexas: #868 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 9,905 girlsTXFlorida: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. New Hampshire#142 · 1 in 677
  2. Maine#169 · 1 in 805
  3. Connecticut#197 · 1 in 1,469
  4. Massachusetts#203 · 1 in 1,944
  5. New York#227 · 1 in 1,984

Best ever in a state: #31 in Iowa, 1948.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
New Hampshire#14251 in 677
Maine#16981 in 805
Connecticut#197101 in 1,469
Massachusetts#203191 in 1,944
New York#227511 in 1,984
South Dakota#22951 in 1,291
Indiana#269101 in 2,596
Kansas#26981 in 1,993
California#30691 in 2,561
Michigan#306111 in 3,332
New Jersey#30871 in 4,520
Ohio#337131 in 4,193
Illinois#344161 in 3,874
Minnesota#36561 in 3,753
Wisconsin#39251 in 4,997
Pennsylvania#402141 in 7,112
Missouri#46861 in 5,123
Texas#86851 in 9,905
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Iowa———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maryland———
Mississippi———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Mexico———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Marcia
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 725 spots since 2024 (#4,114 → #3,389)
  • 61 spots since 2020 (#3,450 → #3,389)
  • 453 spots since 2015 (#3,842 → #3,389)
  • Biggest jump: 210 spots in 1883 (#596 → #386)
  • Biggest drop: 363 spots in 1994 (#983 → #1,346)
Rise & fade · girls
71 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1951 at #74 (5,299 births)
  • Births halved by 1962, 11 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 13 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 13 yrs · run 1943–1955
  • Top 1,000: 113 yrs · run 1880–1991
Share of babies · girls
1 in 340
  • Highest: 1 in 340 girls born in 1951 were named Marcia (0.29%)
  • Latest: 1 in 35,717 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 1950s
  • 32.8% of all girls named Marcia (43,733) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s187#386 (1883)#492
1890s290#414 (1893)#544
1900s387#462 (1908)#574
1910s1,608#357 (1919)#463
1920s4,789#263 (1929)#302
1930s14,246#109 (1939)#159
1940s34,397#78 (1949)#92
1950s43,733#74 (1951)#101
1960s18,427#155 (1961)#200
1970s8,965#243 (1971)#290
1980s3,578#414 (1980)#591
1990s1,362#900 (1990)#1,360
2000s700#1,845 (2000)#2,497
2010s419#3,075 (2010)#3,706
2020s232#3,389 (2025)#3,844

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Marcia in 1918

girls
#409
256 births · 1 in 4,522 girls

Top girls' names in 1918

  1. #1Mary67,365
  2. #2Helen36,148
  3. #3Dorothy32,030
  4. #4Margaret27,139
  5. #5Ruth25,535
  6. #6Mildred17,258
  7. #7Virginia16,421
  8. #8Frances16,132
  9. #9Elizabeth15,853
  10. #10Anna15,666
  11. #409Marcia256
More about 1918

girls

1,157,631 girls got a published name in 1918; 1 in 4,522 of them was named Marcia, which outranked 92.7% of the 5,585 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Marcia
  1. #406Earline260
  2. #407Garnet258
  3. #408Vesta257
  4. #409Marcia256
  5. #410Clare255
  6. #411Isabella254
  7. #411Rubye254
Biggest movers since 1917
Risers
  1. ↑ 547Jesse#1,507 → #960
  2. ↑ 494Liberty#1,079 → #585
  3. ↑ 389Marilynn#1,337 → #948
  4. ↑ 312Margueritte#1,281 → #969
  5. ↑ 306Syble#807 → #501
Fallers
  1. ↓ 447Valentine#964 → #1,411
  2. ↓ 428Ottie#952 → #1,380
  3. ↓ 354Delora#923 → #1,277
  4. ↓ 318Georgene#896 → #1,214
  5. ↓ 299Clifford#904 → #1,203

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1918 →