Maggie

#294 for girls in 2025, 1,041 births · Last seen for boys in 2006 at #12,055
Given to girls 99.8% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1880 · 582 births
Debut · girls
582 births
In top 100 · girls
31 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
123,078
since 1880

Maggie over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020202018peak #46, 1880girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#2941,041—
2024#2991,057—
2023#318977—
2022#2931,076—
2021#2831,124—
2020#2931,091—
2019#2951,135—
2018#2941,128—
2017#2481,287—
2016#2421,324—
2015#2411,338—
2014#2381,356—
2013#2321,386—
2012#2471,308—
2011#2301,389—
2010#2251,409—
2009#2331,426—
2008#2141,607—
2007#1811,874—
2006#1891,853#12,0555
2005#2101,658#11,4725
2004#2051,631#6,13812
2003#1881,718—
2002#1901,697—
2001#1811,819—
2000#1981,614—
1999#2241,423—
1998#2481,237—
1997#2771,054—
1996#2561,103—
1995#2501,137—
1994#2331,225—
1993#281984#6,8167
1992#2711,040—
1991#296937—
1990#288958—
1989#308840—
1988#281888—
1987#279877#6,0896
1986#295828—
1985#264945—
1984#286843—
1983#313738—
1982#383602—
1981#439487—
1980#460460—
1979#438469—
1978#532342—
1977#472410—
1976#470404—
1975#461408—
1974#498353—
1973#504341—
1972#645236—
1971#716212—
1970#803172—
1969#786170—
1968#749175—
1967#659211—
1966#740178—
1965#756175—
1964#653245—
1963#604273—
1962#613267—
1961#570308—
1960#535325—
1959#523346—
1958#559306—
1957#558296—
1956#553287—
1955#485348—
1954#480346—
1953#464336—
1952#423407—
1951#425387—
1950#383444—
1949#385420—
1948#353482—
1947#346529—
1946#350469—
1945#326440—
1944#296516—
1943#291566—
1942#289546#3,5605
1941#276540#3,1336
1940#278511—
1939#260567#2,6098
1938#262580#2,8687
1937#251635#3,1756
1936#242661#3,5495
1935#240686—
1934#233729#3,2776
1933#233677#2,7388
1932#224734#2,8498
1931#222742#2,8648
1930#216794#2,7819
1929#212859#2,45211
1928#1981,020#2,8439
1927#1881,090#3,4517
1926#1891,092#3,7086
1925#1791,215#3,1558
1924#1811,259#2,64111
1923#1761,248#4,2395
1922#1701,313#3,8726
1921#1731,300#2,80410
1920#1721,299#3,4897
1919#1551,428#2,38512
1918#1581,394#2,39812
1917#1611,268—
1916#1571,277—
1915#1501,269—
1914#1411,055—
1913#1271,019#2,4966
1912#1151,013#2,5445
1911#111822—
1910#95940#1,5895
1909#98794—
1908#95772—
1907#91846—
1906#84839#79810
1905#84809#1,0916
1904#81805—
1903#80780—
1902#78853—
1901#80746—
1900#751,045#1,3105
1899#70814—
1898#72876#8857
1897#75760—
1896#69871—
1895#67890—
1894#66895—
1893#64886—
1892#64883#1,0665
1891#60841#7008
1890#61891#62910
1889#61825—
1888#57882—
1887#55740—
1886#53756—
1885#51716—
1884#48749—
1883#48663—
1882#50627—
1881#51532—
1880#46582—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Maggie was already there! It came in at #46, and was given to 582 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1964–1972, when fewer than 250 girls a year got the name.

Where Maggie is popular in 2018

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: #105 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 293 girlsAKMaine: #218 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 682 girlsMEVermont: #100 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 220 girlsVTNew Hampshire: #178 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 594 girlsNHWashington: #437 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 1,901 girlsWAIdaho: #231 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 749 girlsIDMontana: #135 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 390 girlsMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Maggie, so not publishedNDMinnesota: #268 for girls · 22 births · 1 in 1,068 girlsMNIllinois: #357 for girls · 33 births · 1 in 1,622 girlsILWisconsin: #270 for girls · 20 births · 1 in 1,113 girlsWIMichigan: #262 for girls · 36 births · 1 in 1,118 girlsMINew York: #461 for girls · 39 births · 1 in 2,223 girlsNYMassachusetts: #236 for girls · 24 births · 1 in 1,025 girlsMARhode Island: #190 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 558 girlsRIOregon: #310 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 1,166 girlsORNevada: #348 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 1,327 girlsNVWyoming: #85 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 193 girlsWYSouth Dakota: #179 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 510 girlsSDIowa: #226 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 818 girlsIAIndiana: #179 for girls · 38 births · 1 in 782 girlsINOhio: #230 for girls · 52 births · 1 in 981 girlsOHPennsylvania: #269 for girls · 45 births · 1 in 1,118 girlsPANew Jersey: #424 for girls · 19 births · 1 in 1,891 girlsNJConnecticut: #447 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 1,927 girlsCTCalifornia: #479 for girls · 80 births · 1 in 2,368 girlsCAUtah: #181 for girls · 23 births · 1 in 725 girlsUTColorado: #303 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 1,237 girlsCONebraska: #193 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 681 girlsNEMissouri: #185 for girls · 36 births · 1 in 736 girlsMOKentucky: #115 for girls · 36 births · 1 in 493 girlsKYWest Virginia: #105 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 375 girlsWVVirginia: #300 for girls · 28 births · 1 in 1,284 girlsVAMaryland: #374 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 1,459 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Maggie, so not publishedDEArizona: #503 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 2,261 girlsAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Maggie, so not publishedNMKansas: #278 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 1,005 girlsKSArkansas: #213 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 787 girlsARTennessee: #152 for girls · 46 births · 1 in 678 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #152 for girls · 63 births · 1 in 714 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #219 for girls · 20 births · 1 in 884 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Maggie, so not publishedDCOklahoma: #322 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 1,204 girlsOKLouisiana: #246 for girls · 21 births · 1 in 933 girlsLAMississippi: #110 for girls · 23 births · 1 in 467 girlsMSAlabama: #116 for girls · 36 births · 1 in 520 girlsALGeorgia: #314 for girls · 35 births · 1 in 1,322 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Maggie, so not publishedHITexas: #382 for girls · 85 births · 1 in 1,870 girlsTXFlorida: #530 for girls · 34 births · 1 in 2,503 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Wyoming#85 · 1 in 193
  2. Vermont#100 · 1 in 220
  3. Alaska#105 · 1 in 293
  4. West Virginia#105 · 1 in 375
  5. Mississippi#110 · 1 in 467

Best ever in a state: #10 in Alaska, 1917.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Wyoming#8551 in 193
Vermont#10051 in 220
Alaska#10571 in 293
West Virginia#105151 in 375
Mississippi#110231 in 467
Kentucky#115361 in 493
Alabama#116361 in 520
Montana#13571 in 390
North Carolina#152631 in 714
Tennessee#152461 in 678
New Hampshire#17861 in 594
Indiana#179381 in 782
South Dakota#17961 in 510
Utah#181231 in 725
Missouri#185361 in 736
Rhode Island#19051 in 558
Nebraska#193111 in 681
Arkansas#213141 in 787
Maine#21851 in 682
South Carolina#219201 in 884
Iowa#226151 in 818
Ohio#230521 in 981
Idaho#23181 in 749
Massachusetts#236241 in 1,025
Louisiana#246211 in 933
Michigan#262361 in 1,118
Minnesota#268221 in 1,068
Pennsylvania#269451 in 1,118
Wisconsin#270201 in 1,113
Kansas#278121 in 1,005
Virginia#300281 in 1,284
Colorado#303181 in 1,237
Oregon#310121 in 1,166
Georgia#314351 in 1,322
Oklahoma#322131 in 1,204
Nevada#34881 in 1,327
Illinois#357331 in 1,622
Maryland#374161 in 1,459
Texas#382851 in 1,870
New Jersey#424191 in 1,891
Washington#437161 in 1,901
Connecticut#44761 in 1,927
New York#461391 in 2,223
California#479801 in 2,368
Arizona#503131 in 2,261
Florida#530341 in 2,503
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Hawaii———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Maggie
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 5 spots since 2024 (#299 → #294)
  • 1 spot since 2020 (#293 → #294)
  • 53 spots since 2015 (#241 → #294)
  • Biggest jump: 141 spots in 1973 (#645 → #504)
  • Biggest drop: 103 spots in 1965 (#653 → #756)
Rise & fade · girls
Peaked on debut
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1880 at #46 (582 births)
  • Births halved by 1956, 76 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 31 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 31 yrs · run 1880–1910
  • Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 156
  • Highest: 1 in 156 girls born in 1880 were named Maggie (0.64%)
  • Latest: 1 in 1,544 girls born in 2025 (0.06%)
Era · girls
The 2000s
  • 13.7% of all girls named Maggie (16,897) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s7,072#46 (1880)#52
1890s8,607#60 (1891)#67
1900s8,289#75 (1900)#85
1910s11,485#95 (1910)#137
1920s11,695#170 (1922)#184
1930s6,805#216 (1930)#238
1940s5,019#276 (1941)#319
1950s3,503#383 (1950)#485
1960s2,327#535 (1960)#667
1970s3,347#438 (1979)#554
1980s7,508#264 (1985)#331
1990s11,098#224 (1999)#262
2000s16,897#181 (2007)#199
2010s13,060#225 (2010)#249
2020s6,366#283 (2021)#297

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Maggie in 2018

girls
#294
1,128 births · 1 in 1,508 girls

Top girls' names in 2018

  1. #1Emma18,824
  2. #2Olivia18,061
  3. #3Ava15,034
  4. #4Isabella14,575
  5. #5Sophia14,013
  6. #6Charlotte13,038
  7. #7Mia12,742
  8. #8Amelia12,405
  9. #9Harper10,646
  10. #10Evelyn10,433
  11. #294Maggie1,128
More about 2018

girls

1,701,074 girls got a published name in 2018; 1 in 1,508 of them was named Maggie, which outranked 98.4% of the 18,152 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Maggie
  1. #291Aniyah1,132
  2. #291Zuri1,132
  3. #293Daleyza1,130
  4. #294Maggie1,128
  5. #295Lucille1,125
  6. #296Leia1,120
  7. #297Adelaide1,118
Biggest movers since 2017
Risers
  1. ↑ 680Meghan#1,387 → #707
  2. ↑ 567Dior#1,360 → #793
  3. ↑ 367Palmer#1,042 → #675
  4. ↑ 361Adalee#1,217 → #856
  5. ↑ 346Oaklynn#888 → #542
Fallers
  1. ↓ 334Audrina#847 → #1,181
  2. ↓ 234Courtney#952 → #1,186
  3. ↓ 232Marjorie#938 → #1,170
  4. ↓ 228Anabelle#969 → #1,197
  5. ↓ 225Angelique#799 → #1,024

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 2018 →