Maggie
#294 for girls in 2025, 1,041 births · Last seen for boys in 2006 at #12,055
Given to girls 99.8% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1880 · 582 births
- Debut · girls
- 582 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 31 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 123,078since 1880
Maggie over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #294 | 1,041 | — | |
| 2024 | #299 | 1,057 | — | |
| 2023 | #318 | 977 | — | |
| 2022 | #293 | 1,076 | — | |
| 2021 | #283 | 1,124 | — | |
| 2020 | #293 | 1,091 | — | |
| 2019 | #295 | 1,135 | — | |
| 2018 | #294 | 1,128 | — | |
| 2017 | #248 | 1,287 | — | |
| 2016 | #242 | 1,324 | — | |
| 2015 | #241 | 1,338 | — | |
| 2014 | #238 | 1,356 | — | |
| 2013 | #232 | 1,386 | — | |
| 2012 | #247 | 1,308 | — | |
| 2011 | #230 | 1,389 | — | |
| 2010 | #225 | 1,409 | — | |
| 2009 | #233 | 1,426 | — | |
| 2008 | #214 | 1,607 | — | |
| 2007 | #181 | 1,874 | — | |
| 2006 | #189 | 1,853 | #12,055 | 5 |
| 2005 | #210 | 1,658 | #11,472 | 5 |
| 2004 | #205 | 1,631 | #6,138 | 12 |
| 2003 | #188 | 1,718 | — | |
| 2002 | #190 | 1,697 | — | |
| 2001 | #181 | 1,819 | — | |
| 2000 | #198 | 1,614 | — | |
| 1999 | #224 | 1,423 | — | |
| 1998 | #248 | 1,237 | — | |
| 1997 | #277 | 1,054 | — | |
| 1996 | #256 | 1,103 | — | |
| 1995 | #250 | 1,137 | — | |
| 1994 | #233 | 1,225 | — | |
| 1993 | #281 | 984 | #6,816 | 7 |
| 1992 | #271 | 1,040 | — | |
| 1991 | #296 | 937 | — | |
| 1990 | #288 | 958 | — | |
| 1989 | #308 | 840 | — | |
| 1988 | #281 | 888 | — | |
| 1987 | #279 | 877 | #6,089 | 6 |
| 1986 | #295 | 828 | — | |
| 1985 | #264 | 945 | — | |
| 1984 | #286 | 843 | — | |
| 1983 | #313 | 738 | — | |
| 1982 | #383 | 602 | — | |
| 1981 | #439 | 487 | — | |
| 1980 | #460 | 460 | — | |
| 1979 | #438 | 469 | — | |
| 1978 | #532 | 342 | — | |
| 1977 | #472 | 410 | — | |
| 1976 | #470 | 404 | — | |
| 1975 | #461 | 408 | — | |
| 1974 | #498 | 353 | — | |
| 1973 | #504 | 341 | — | |
| 1972 | #645 | 236 | — | |
| 1971 | #716 | 212 | — | |
| 1970 | #803 | 172 | — | |
| 1969 | #786 | 170 | — | |
| 1968 | #749 | 175 | — | |
| 1967 | #659 | 211 | — | |
| 1966 | #740 | 178 | — | |
| 1965 | #756 | 175 | — | |
| 1964 | #653 | 245 | — | |
| 1963 | #604 | 273 | — | |
| 1962 | #613 | 267 | — | |
| 1961 | #570 | 308 | — | |
| 1960 | #535 | 325 | — | |
| 1959 | #523 | 346 | — | |
| 1958 | #559 | 306 | — | |
| 1957 | #558 | 296 | — | |
| 1956 | #553 | 287 | — | |
| 1955 | #485 | 348 | — | |
| 1954 | #480 | 346 | — | |
| 1953 | #464 | 336 | — | |
| 1952 | #423 | 407 | — | |
| 1951 | #425 | 387 | — | |
| 1950 | #383 | 444 | — | |
| 1949 | #385 | 420 | — | |
| 1948 | #353 | 482 | — | |
| 1947 | #346 | 529 | — | |
| 1946 | #350 | 469 | — | |
| 1945 | #326 | 440 | — | |
| 1944 | #296 | 516 | — | |
| 1943 | #291 | 566 | — | |
| 1942 | #289 | 546 | #3,560 | 5 |
| 1941 | #276 | 540 | #3,133 | 6 |
| 1940 | #278 | 511 | — | |
| 1939 | #260 | 567 | #2,609 | 8 |
| 1938 | #262 | 580 | #2,868 | 7 |
| 1937 | #251 | 635 | #3,175 | 6 |
| 1936 | #242 | 661 | #3,549 | 5 |
| 1935 | #240 | 686 | — | |
| 1934 | #233 | 729 | #3,277 | 6 |
| 1933 | #233 | 677 | #2,738 | 8 |
| 1932 | #224 | 734 | #2,849 | 8 |
| 1931 | #222 | 742 | #2,864 | 8 |
| 1930 | #216 | 794 | #2,781 | 9 |
| 1929 | #212 | 859 | #2,452 | 11 |
| 1928 | #198 | 1,020 | #2,843 | 9 |
| 1927 | #188 | 1,090 | #3,451 | 7 |
| 1926 | #189 | 1,092 | #3,708 | 6 |
| 1925 | #179 | 1,215 | #3,155 | 8 |
| 1924 | #181 | 1,259 | #2,641 | 11 |
| 1923 | #176 | 1,248 | #4,239 | 5 |
| 1922 | #170 | 1,313 | #3,872 | 6 |
| 1921 | #173 | 1,300 | #2,804 | 10 |
| 1920 | #172 | 1,299 | #3,489 | 7 |
| 1919 | #155 | 1,428 | #2,385 | 12 |
| 1918 | #158 | 1,394 | #2,398 | 12 |
| 1917 | #161 | 1,268 | — | |
| 1916 | #157 | 1,277 | — | |
| 1915 | #150 | 1,269 | — | |
| 1914 | #141 | 1,055 | — | |
| 1913 | #127 | 1,019 | #2,496 | 6 |
| 1912 | #115 | 1,013 | #2,544 | 5 |
| 1911 | #111 | 822 | — | |
| 1910 | #95 | 940 | #1,589 | 5 |
| 1909 | #98 | 794 | — | |
| 1908 | #95 | 772 | — | |
| 1907 | #91 | 846 | — | |
| 1906 | #84 | 839 | #798 | 10 |
| 1905 | #84 | 809 | #1,091 | 6 |
| 1904 | #81 | 805 | — | |
| 1903 | #80 | 780 | — | |
| 1902 | #78 | 853 | — | |
| 1901 | #80 | 746 | — | |
| 1900 | #75 | 1,045 | #1,310 | 5 |
| 1899 | #70 | 814 | — | |
| 1898 | #72 | 876 | #885 | 7 |
| 1897 | #75 | 760 | — | |
| 1896 | #69 | 871 | — | |
| 1895 | #67 | 890 | — | |
| 1894 | #66 | 895 | — | |
| 1893 | #64 | 886 | — | |
| 1892 | #64 | 883 | #1,066 | 5 |
| 1891 | #60 | 841 | #700 | 8 |
| 1890 | #61 | 891 | #629 | 10 |
| 1889 | #61 | 825 | — | |
| 1888 | #57 | 882 | — | |
| 1887 | #55 | 740 | — | |
| 1886 | #53 | 756 | — | |
| 1885 | #51 | 716 | — | |
| 1884 | #48 | 749 | — | |
| 1883 | #48 | 663 | — | |
| 1882 | #50 | 627 | — | |
| 1881 | #51 | 532 | — | |
| 1880 | #46 | 582 | — | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Maggie was already there! It came in at #46, and was given to 582 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1964–1972, when fewer than 250 girls a year got the name.
See more about Maggie
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 5 spots since 2024 (#299 → #294)
- 1 spot since 2020 (#293 → #294)
- 53 spots since 2015 (#241 → #294)
- Biggest jump: 141 spots in 1973 (#645 → #504)
- Biggest drop: 103 spots in 1965 (#653 → #756)
Rise & fade · girls
Peaked on debut
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1880 at #46 (582 births)
- Births halved by 1956, 76 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 31 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 31 yrs · run 1880–1910
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 156
- Highest: 1 in 156 girls born in 1880 were named Maggie (0.64%)
- Latest: 1 in 1,544 girls born in 2025 (0.06%)
Era · girls
The 2000s
- 13.7% of all girls named Maggie (16,897) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 7,072 | #46 (1880) | #52 |
| 1890s | 8,607 | #60 (1891) | #67 |
| 1900s | 8,289 | #75 (1900) | #85 |
| 1910s | 11,485 | #95 (1910) | #137 |
| 1920s | 11,695 | #170 (1922) | #184 |
| 1930s | 6,805 | #216 (1930) | #238 |
| 1940s | 5,019 | #276 (1941) | #319 |
| 1950s | 3,503 | #383 (1950) | #485 |
| 1960s | 2,327 | #535 (1960) | #667 |
| 1970s | 3,347 | #438 (1979) | #554 |
| 1980s | 7,508 | #264 (1985) | #331 |
| 1990s | 11,098 | #224 (1999) | #262 |
| 2000s | 16,897 | #181 (2007) | #199 |
| 2010s | 13,060 | #225 (2010) | #249 |
| 2020s | 6,366 | #283 (2021) | #297 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Maggie in 1962
girls
#613
267 births · 1 in 7,366 girls
Top girls' names in 1962
More about 1962
girls
1,966,603 girls got a published name in 1962; 1 in 7,366 of them was named Maggie, which outranked 91.9% of the 7,584 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 15.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).