Maddux
#9,457 for girls in 2025, 10 births · #1,529 for boys in 2025, 113 births
Given to boys 93.5% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2018 · 222 births
- Debut · boys
- 12 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 3,833since 1996
Maddux over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #9,457 | 10 | #1,529 | 113 |
| 2024 | #7,251 | 15 | #1,397 | 134 |
| 2023 | #11,169 | 8 | #1,271 | 151 |
| 2022 | #9,056 | 11 | #1,237 | 159 |
| 2021 | #8,978 | 11 | #1,253 | 152 |
| 2020 | #8,953 | 11 | #1,111 | 177 |
| 2019 | #9,736 | 10 | #1,080 | 185 |
| 2018 | #9,151 | 11 | #942 | 222 |
| 2017 | #6,044 | 20 | #972 | 213 |
| 2016 | #6,663 | 18 | #985 | 207 |
| 2015 | #6,721 | 18 | #1,049 | 189 |
| 2014 | #7,636 | 15 | #991 | 209 |
| 2013 | #8,135 | 14 | #1,162 | 155 |
| 2012 | #16,869 | 5 | #1,212 | 147 |
| 2011 | #10,374 | 10 | #1,183 | 149 |
| 2010 | #11,246 | 9 | #1,056 | 182 |
| 2009 | — | #978 | 203 | |
| 2008 | #12,579 | 8 | #1,037 | 183 |
| 2007 | #10,818 | 10 | #1,139 | 157 |
| 2006 | #9,286 | 12 | #1,194 | 140 |
| 2005 | #8,883 | 12 | #1,209 | 131 |
| 2004 | #12,761 | 7 | #1,379 | 104 |
| 2003 | #9,671 | 10 | #2,238 | 48 |
| 2002 | #15,432 | 5 | #2,817 | 33 |
| 2001 | — | #7,536 | 8 | |
| 2000 | — | #4,204 | 18 | |
| 1999 | — | #3,704 | 20 | |
| 1998 | — | #4,413 | 15 | |
| 1997 | #13,724 | 5 | #3,877 | 17 |
| 1996 | — | #4,878 | 12 | |
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Maddux! It came in at #4,878, and was given to 12 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 2001, when fewer than 9 boys a year got the name.
See more about Maddux
- 132 spots since 2024 (#1,397 → #1,529)
- 418 spots since 2020 (#1,111 → #1,529)
- 480 spots since 2015 (#1,049 → #1,529)
- Biggest jump: 171 spots in 2014 (#1,162 → #991)
- Biggest drop: 138 spots in 2019 (#942 → #1,080)
- Debuted 1996
- Peaked 2018 at #942 (222 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 5 yrs · run 2016–2018
- Highest: 1 in 8,181 boys born in 2018 were named Maddux (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 15,116 boys born in 2025 (0.01%)
- 48.5% of all boys named Maddux (1,858) were born in this decade
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 64 | #3,704 (1999) | #4,218 |
| 2000s | 1,025 | #978 (2009) | #2,373 |
| 2010s | 1,858 | #942 (2018) | #1,063 |
| 2020s | 886 | #1,111 (2020) | #1,300 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Maddux in 2019
Top girls' names in 2019
Top boys' names in 2019
More about 2019
girls
1,678,366 girls got a published name in 2019; 1 in 167,837 of them was named Maddux, which outranked 46.0% of the 18,024 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #9,112Zolah11
- #9,112Zowie11
- #9,112Zuly11
- #9,736Maddux10
- #9,736Aala10
- #9,736Aalyiah10
- #9,736Aashritha10
- #10,473Aadhyasri9
- #10,473Aaima9
- #10,473Aakriti9
Tied with 736 names at #9,736; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,794,216 boys got a published name in 2019; 1 in 9,698 of them was named Maddux, which outranked 92.4% of the 14,133 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 7.9% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #1,076Yitzchok187
- #1,078Cillian186
- #1,078Giancarlo186
- #1,080Maddux185
- #1,080Karsen185
- #1,080Laith185
- #1,080Murphy185
- #1,085Ander184
- #1,085Montgomery184
- #1,085Ocean184
Tied with 4 names at #1,080; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.