Maddux
#9,457 for girls in 2025, 10 births · #1,529 for boys in 2025, 113 births
Given to boys 93.5% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2018 · 222 births
- Debut · boys
- 12 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 3,833since 1996
Maddux over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #9,457 | 10 | #1,529 | 113 |
| 2024 | #7,251 | 15 | #1,397 | 134 |
| 2023 | #11,169 | 8 | #1,271 | 151 |
| 2022 | #9,056 | 11 | #1,237 | 159 |
| 2021 | #8,978 | 11 | #1,253 | 152 |
| 2020 | #8,953 | 11 | #1,111 | 177 |
| 2019 | #9,736 | 10 | #1,080 | 185 |
| 2018 | #9,151 | 11 | #942 | 222 |
| 2017 | #6,044 | 20 | #972 | 213 |
| 2016 | #6,663 | 18 | #985 | 207 |
| 2015 | #6,721 | 18 | #1,049 | 189 |
| 2014 | #7,636 | 15 | #991 | 209 |
| 2013 | #8,135 | 14 | #1,162 | 155 |
| 2012 | #16,869 | 5 | #1,212 | 147 |
| 2011 | #10,374 | 10 | #1,183 | 149 |
| 2010 | #11,246 | 9 | #1,056 | 182 |
| 2009 | — | #978 | 203 | |
| 2008 | #12,579 | 8 | #1,037 | 183 |
| 2007 | #10,818 | 10 | #1,139 | 157 |
| 2006 | #9,286 | 12 | #1,194 | 140 |
| 2005 | #8,883 | 12 | #1,209 | 131 |
| 2004 | #12,761 | 7 | #1,379 | 104 |
| 2003 | #9,671 | 10 | #2,238 | 48 |
| 2002 | #15,432 | 5 | #2,817 | 33 |
| 2001 | — | #7,536 | 8 | |
| 2000 | — | #4,204 | 18 | |
| 1999 | — | #3,704 | 20 | |
| 1998 | — | #4,413 | 15 | |
| 1997 | #13,724 | 5 | #3,877 | 17 |
| 1996 | — | #4,878 | 12 | |
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Maddux! It came in at #4,878, and was given to 12 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 2001, when fewer than 9 boys a year got the name.
See more about Maddux
- 132 spots since 2024 (#1,397 → #1,529)
- 418 spots since 2020 (#1,111 → #1,529)
- 480 spots since 2015 (#1,049 → #1,529)
- Biggest jump: 171 spots in 2014 (#1,162 → #991)
- Biggest drop: 138 spots in 2019 (#942 → #1,080)
- Debuted 1996
- Peaked 2018 at #942 (222 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 5 yrs · run 2016–2018
- Highest: 1 in 8,181 boys born in 2018 were named Maddux (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 15,116 boys born in 2025 (0.01%)
- 48.5% of all boys named Maddux (1,858) were born in this decade
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 64 | #3,704 (1999) | #4,218 |
| 2000s | 1,025 | #978 (2009) | #2,373 |
| 2010s | 1,858 | #942 (2018) | #1,063 |
| 2020s | 886 | #1,111 (2020) | #1,300 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Maddux in 2015
Top girls' names in 2015
Top boys' names in 2015
More about 2015
girls
1,785,098 girls got a published name in 2015; 1 in 99,172 of them was named Maddux, which outranked 64.9% of the 19,130 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.4% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #6,452Zuleyma19
- #6,452Zuriel19
- #6,452Zurisadai19
- #6,721Maddux18
- #6,721Aberdeen18
- #6,721Abi18
- #6,721Adaliah18
- #6,977Aalani17
- #6,977Aaniya17
- #6,977Abbigayle17
Tied with 255 names at #6,721; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,916,743 boys got a published name in 2015; 1 in 10,141 of them was named Maddux, which outranked 92.5% of the 14,059 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.3% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #1,046Jamar191
- #1,046Mccoy191
- #1,048Krish190
- #1,049Maddux189
- #1,049Ahmir189
- #1,049Darien189
- #1,049Denzel189
- #1,057Branden188
- #1,057Brayson188
- #1,057Camryn188
Tied with 7 names at #1,049; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.