Maddix
#10,107 for girls in 2025, 9 births · #2,833 for boys in 2025, 44 births
Given to boys 84.5% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2015 · 135 births
- Debut · boys
- 6 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 2,099since 2002
Maddix over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #10,107 | 9 | #2,833 | 44 |
| 2024 | #6,394 | 18 | #2,133 | 69 |
| 2023 | #7,247 | 15 | #1,954 | 79 |
| 2022 | #5,793 | 21 | #2,060 | 73 |
| 2021 | #7,250 | 15 | #2,109 | 68 |
| 2020 | #5,003 | 25 | #1,694 | 92 |
| 2019 | #5,449 | 23 | #1,698 | 93 |
| 2018 | #5,785 | 21 | #1,375 | 128 |
| 2017 | #4,695 | 29 | #1,439 | 119 |
| 2016 | #4,734 | 29 | #1,329 | 134 |
| 2015 | #6,452 | 19 | #1,307 | 135 |
| 2014 | #6,451 | 19 | #1,492 | 108 |
| 2013 | #7,031 | 17 | #1,427 | 116 |
| 2012 | #6,872 | 18 | #1,383 | 121 |
| 2011 | #13,347 | 7 | #1,459 | 112 |
| 2010 | #12,276 | 8 | #1,383 | 121 |
| 2009 | #8,454 | 14 | #1,518 | 109 |
| 2008 | #7,073 | 18 | #1,425 | 118 |
| 2007 | #10,818 | 10 | #1,912 | 74 |
| 2006 | #5,906 | 22 | #1,967 | 68 |
| 2005 | #8,330 | 13 | #2,129 | 57 |
| 2004 | #10,690 | 9 | #3,074 | 32 |
| 2003 | #13,844 | 6 | #3,732 | 23 |
| 2002 | — | #9,392 | 6 | |
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Maddix! It came in at #9,392, and was given to 6 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 2002, when fewer than 7 boys a year got the name.
Where Maddix is popular in 2009
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- West Virginia#306 · 1 in 1,715
- Utah#511 · 1 in 2,873
- North Carolina#897 · 1 in 7,691
- Washington#901 · 1 in 7,392
- Ohio#1,048 · 1 in 10,442
Best ever in a state: #296 in West Virginia, 2018.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| West Virginia | #306 | 5 | 1 in 1,715 |
| Utah | #511 | 8 | 1 in 2,873 |
| North Carolina | #897 | 7 | 1 in 7,691 |
| Washington | #901 | 5 | 1 in 7,392 |
| Ohio | #1,048 | 6 | 1 in 10,442 |
| California | #1,297 | 14 | 1 in 17,296 |
| Texas | #2,255 | 5 | 1 in 37,292 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Maddix
- 700 spots since 2024 (#2,133 → #2,833)
- 1,139 spots since 2020 (#1,694 → #2,833)
- 1,526 spots since 2015 (#1,307 → #2,833)
- Debuted 2002
- Peaked 2015 at #1,307 (135 births)
- Births halved by 2025, 10 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 14,162 boys born in 2016 were named Maddix (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 38,820 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #1,307 in 2015, was only 1 in 14,198 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 56.6% of all boys named Maddix (1,187) were born in this decade
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 487 | #1,425 (2008) | #3,144 |
| 2010s | 1,187 | #1,307 (2015) | #1,429 |
| 2020s | 425 | #1,694 (2020) | #2,131 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Maddix in 2009
Top girls' names in 2009
Top boys' names in 2009
More about 2009
girls
1,837,114 girls got a published name in 2009; 1 in 131,222 of them was named Maddix, which outranked 58.1% of the 20,199 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.6% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #8,058Zoelle15
- #8,058Zorah15
- #8,058Zuleima15
- #8,454Maddix14
- #8,454Aarianna14
- #8,454Abagayle14
- #8,454Abigayl14
- #8,888Aarika13
- #8,888Abbigal13
- #8,888Abrey13
Tied with 433 names at #8,454; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,983,573 boys got a published name in 2009; 1 in 18,198 of them was named Maddix, which outranked 89.6% of the 14,540 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.2% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #1,511Josias110
- #1,511Nolen110
- #1,511Rogan110
- #1,518Maddix109
- #1,518Antwon109
- #1,518Avrohom109
- #1,518Clint109
- #1,529Ahmir108
- #1,529Braydin108
- #1,529Daron108
Tied with 10 names at #1,518; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.