Mabel
#201 for girls in 2025, 1,522 births · Last seen for boys in 1940 at #3,459
Given to girls 99.7% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1891 · 2,029 births
- Debut · girls
- 808 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 43 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 142,284since 1880
Mabel over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #201 | 1,522 | — | |
| 2024 | #222 | 1,385 | — | |
| 2023 | #278 | 1,131 | — | |
| 2022 | #310 | 1,027 | — | |
| 2021 | #375 | 831 | — | |
| 2020 | #428 | 718 | — | |
| 2019 | #440 | 712 | — | |
| 2018 | #439 | 727 | — | |
| 2017 | #451 | 703 | — | |
| 2016 | #515 | 605 | — | |
| 2015 | #578 | 529 | — | |
| 2014 | #668 | 427 | — | |
| 2013 | #711 | 393 | — | |
| 2012 | #1,044 | 241 | — | |
| 2011 | #1,224 | 196 | — | |
| 2010 | #1,328 | 177 | — | |
| 2009 | #1,538 | 147 | — | |
| 2008 | #1,631 | 139 | — | |
| 2007 | #1,713 | 127 | — | |
| 2006 | #1,788 | 116 | — | |
| 2005 | #1,838 | 106 | — | |
| 2004 | #2,030 | 90 | — | |
| 2003 | #1,885 | 97 | — | |
| 2002 | #1,897 | 93 | — | |
| 2001 | #2,035 | 83 | — | |
| 2000 | #2,141 | 75 | — | |
| 1999 | #1,770 | 90 | — | |
| 1998 | #1,958 | 77 | — | |
| 1997 | #2,874 | 42 | — | |
| 1996 | #2,282 | 58 | — | |
| 1995 | #2,421 | 53 | — | |
| 1994 | #1,862 | 76 | — | |
| 1993 | #2,090 | 65 | — | |
| 1992 | #1,798 | 80 | — | |
| 1991 | #1,877 | 75 | — | |
| 1990 | #1,828 | 78 | — | |
| 1989 | #1,981 | 64 | — | |
| 1988 | #1,354 | 105 | — | |
| 1987 | #1,498 | 86 | — | |
| 1986 | #1,638 | 72 | — | |
| 1985 | #1,710 | 67 | — | |
| 1984 | #1,511 | 75 | — | |
| 1983 | #1,531 | 73 | — | |
| 1982 | #1,566 | 75 | — | |
| 1981 | #1,423 | 86 | — | |
| 1980 | #1,542 | 76 | — | |
| 1979 | #1,605 | 70 | — | |
| 1978 | #1,690 | 62 | — | |
| 1977 | #1,637 | 64 | — | |
| 1976 | #1,397 | 76 | — | |
| 1975 | #1,498 | 68 | — | |
| 1974 | #1,300 | 82 | — | |
| 1973 | #1,458 | 65 | — | |
| 1972 | #1,432 | 68 | — | |
| 1971 | #1,405 | 75 | — | |
| 1970 | #1,584 | 60 | — | |
| 1969 | #1,201 | 86 | — | |
| 1968 | #1,311 | 71 | — | |
| 1967 | #1,269 | 72 | — | |
| 1966 | #1,161 | 84 | — | |
| 1965 | #1,079 | 94 | — | |
| 1964 | #945 | 124 | — | |
| 1963 | #959 | 122 | — | |
| 1962 | #945 | 126 | — | |
| 1961 | #914 | 140 | — | |
| 1960 | #915 | 134 | — | |
| 1959 | #871 | 140 | — | |
| 1958 | #888 | 132 | — | |
| 1957 | #754 | 175 | — | |
| 1956 | #715 | 181 | — | |
| 1955 | #672 | 194 | — | |
| 1954 | #706 | 173 | — | |
| 1953 | #636 | 197 | — | |
| 1952 | #592 | 216 | — | |
| 1951 | #608 | 200 | — | |
| 1950 | #547 | 228 | — | |
| 1949 | #514 | 253 | — | |
| 1948 | #453 | 311 | — | |
| 1947 | #443 | 345 | — | |
| 1946 | #421 | 334 | — | |
| 1945 | #379 | 344 | — | |
| 1944 | #351 | 387 | — | |
| 1943 | #319 | 478 | — | |
| 1942 | #304 | 513 | — | |
| 1941 | #285 | 507 | — | |
| 1940 | #265 | 548 | #3,459 | 5 |
| 1939 | #256 | 593 | — | |
| 1938 | #245 | 674 | — | |
| 1937 | #233 | 697 | #3,518 | 5 |
| 1936 | #221 | 743 | — | |
| 1935 | #208 | 826 | — | |
| 1934 | #209 | 850 | #3,277 | 6 |
| 1933 | #196 | 875 | #3,004 | 7 |
| 1932 | #171 | 1,111 | #3,361 | 6 |
| 1931 | #174 | 1,060 | #3,390 | 6 |
| 1930 | #150 | 1,369 | #2,781 | 9 |
| 1929 | #147 | 1,516 | #2,766 | 9 |
| 1928 | #135 | 1,742 | #3,357 | 7 |
| 1927 | #133 | 1,954 | #4,210 | 5 |
| 1926 | #127 | 2,076 | #3,139 | 8 |
| 1925 | #118 | 2,292 | #3,155 | 8 |
| 1924 | #108 | 2,652 | #4,347 | 5 |
| 1923 | #102 | 2,696 | #3,467 | 7 |
| 1922 | #99 | 2,894 | #3,872 | 6 |
| 1921 | #85 | 3,336 | #4,322 | 5 |
| 1920 | #83 | 3,364 | #2,967 | 9 |
| 1919 | #78 | 3,405 | #3,391 | 7 |
| 1918 | #74 | 3,636 | #2,882 | 9 |
| 1917 | #68 | 3,499 | #1,815 | 17 |
| 1916 | #65 | 3,680 | #3,516 | 6 |
| 1915 | #62 | 3,683 | #2,070 | 13 |
| 1914 | #58 | 3,131 | #1,868 | 12 |
| 1913 | #56 | 2,741 | #2,092 | 8 |
| 1912 | #46 | 2,714 | #1,223 | 15 |
| 1911 | #43 | 2,171 | #1,117 | 10 |
| 1910 | #45 | 2,123 | #1,045 | 10 |
| 1909 | #41 | 2,007 | #893 | 11 |
| 1908 | #37 | 2,096 | #779 | 12 |
| 1907 | #36 | 2,069 | #815 | 11 |
| 1906 | #34 | 2,054 | #798 | 10 |
| 1905 | #29 | 2,178 | #1,002 | 7 |
| 1904 | #27 | 2,172 | #686 | 12 |
| 1903 | #25 | 2,163 | #846 | 8 |
| 1902 | #24 | 2,280 | #651 | 12 |
| 1901 | #23 | 2,097 | #596 | 12 |
| 1900 | #25 | 2,509 | #968 | 8 |
| 1899 | #22 | 2,127 | #928 | 6 |
| 1898 | #23 | 2,331 | #885 | 7 |
| 1897 | #22 | 2,222 | #681 | 10 |
| 1896 | #21 | 2,283 | — | |
| 1895 | #20 | 2,359 | — | |
| 1894 | #20 | 2,221 | #954 | 6 |
| 1893 | #21 | 2,191 | #650 | 10 |
| 1892 | #19 | 2,170 | — | |
| 1891 | #15 | 2,029 | #700 | 8 |
| 1890 | #17 | 2,058 | #739 | 8 |
| 1889 | #16 | 1,947 | #789 | 7 |
| 1888 | #17 | 1,830 | — | |
| 1887 | #18 | 1,494 | #921 | 5 |
| 1886 | #20 | 1,422 | #845 | 6 |
| 1885 | #20 | 1,349 | #765 | 7 |
| 1884 | #20 | 1,270 | — | |
| 1883 | #23 | 1,086 | #799 | 6 |
| 1882 | #23 | 997 | — | |
| 1881 | #23 | 893 | — | |
| 1880 | #22 | 808 | — | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Mabel was already there! It came in at #22, and was given to 808 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1995–1997, when fewer than 59 girls a year got the name.
See more about Mabel
- 21 spots since 2024 (#222 → #201)
- 227 spots since 2020 (#428 → #201)
- 377 spots since 2015 (#578 → #201)
- Biggest jump: 333 spots in 2013 (#1,044 → #711)
- Biggest drop: 134 spots in 1958 (#754 → #888)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1891 at #15 (2,029 births)
- Births halved by 1933, 42 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 43 yrs · run 1880–1922
- Top 1,000: 98 yrs · run 1880–1964
- Highest: 1 in 91 girls born in 1891 were named Mabel (1.1%)
- Latest: 1 in 1,056 girls born in 2025 (0.09%)
- 21.6% of all girls named Mabel (30,783) were born in this decade
- Comeback: #15 (1891) → #2,874 (1997) → #201 (2025)
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 13,096 | #16 (1889) | #20 |
| 1890s | 21,991 | #15 (1891) | #20 |
| 1900s | 21,625 | #23 (1901) | #30 |
| 1910s | 30,783 | #43 (1911) | #60 |
| 1920s | 24,522 | #83 (1920) | #114 |
| 1930s | 8,798 | #150 (1930) | #206 |
| 1940s | 4,020 | #265 (1940) | #373 |
| 1950s | 1,836 | #547 (1950) | #699 |
| 1960s | 1,053 | #914 (1961) | #1,070 |
| 1970s | 690 | #1,300 (1974) | #1,501 |
| 1980s | 779 | #1,354 (1988) | #1,575 |
| 1990s | 694 | #1,770 (1999) | #2,076 |
| 2000s | 1,073 | #1,538 (2009) | #1,850 |
| 2010s | 4,710 | #439 (2018) | #740 |
| 2020s | 6,614 | #201 (2025) | #302 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Mabel in 1932
Top girls' names in 1932
Top boys' names in 1932
More about 1932
girls
1,067,148 girls got a published name in 1932; 1 in 961 of them was named Mabel, which outranked 96.6% of the 5,098 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,044,157 boys got a published name in 1932; 1 in 174,026 of them was named Mabel, which outranked 21.5% of the 4,284 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.6% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #3,092Yasuo7
- #3,092Yates7
- #3,092Ysabel7
- #3,361Mabel6
- #3,361Able6
- #3,361Acencion6
- #3,361Achille6
- #3,776Abdon5
- #3,776Adel5
- #3,776Adelino5
Tied with 414 names at #3,361; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.