Lydia
#92 for girls in 2025, 2,692 births · Last seen for boys in 2020 at #10,605
Given to girls 99.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1883 · 378 births
- Debut · girls
- 302 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 35 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 187,039since 1880
Lydia over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #92 | 2,692 | — | |
| 2024 | #97 | 2,678 | — | |
| 2023 | #94 | 2,735 | — | |
| 2022 | #93 | 2,818 | — | |
| 2021 | #89 | 2,935 | — | |
| 2020 | #95 | 2,804 | #10,605 | 6 |
| 2019 | #94 | 3,015 | — | |
| 2018 | #89 | 3,213 | — | |
| 2017 | #85 | 3,341 | #9,696 | 7 |
| 2016 | #80 | 3,625 | — | |
| 2015 | #80 | 3,514 | — | |
| 2014 | #84 | 3,652 | — | |
| 2013 | #95 | 3,262 | #12,136 | 5 |
| 2012 | #95 | 3,176 | — | |
| 2011 | #96 | 3,092 | — | |
| 2010 | #110 | 2,840 | #10,766 | 6 |
| 2009 | #117 | 2,830 | — | |
| 2008 | #120 | 2,876 | — | |
| 2007 | #124 | 2,773 | — | |
| 2006 | #130 | 2,668 | #12,055 | 5 |
| 2005 | #119 | 2,785 | #8,299 | 8 |
| 2004 | #126 | 2,636 | #5,007 | 16 |
| 2003 | #127 | 2,647 | — | |
| 2002 | #137 | 2,512 | — | |
| 2001 | #140 | 2,364 | — | |
| 2000 | #146 | 2,321 | — | |
| 1999 | #148 | 2,189 | — | |
| 1998 | #153 | 2,071 | — | |
| 1997 | #160 | 1,937 | — | |
| 1996 | #173 | 1,813 | — | |
| 1995 | #169 | 1,759 | — | |
| 1994 | #188 | 1,603 | — | |
| 1993 | #206 | 1,421 | — | |
| 1992 | #201 | 1,414 | — | |
| 1991 | #214 | 1,378 | — | |
| 1990 | #204 | 1,406 | — | |
| 1989 | #217 | 1,262 | #7,905 | 5 |
| 1988 | #221 | 1,174 | — | |
| 1987 | #219 | 1,209 | #4,239 | 10 |
| 1986 | #229 | 1,129 | #3,440 | 13 |
| 1985 | #212 | 1,220 | — | |
| 1984 | #217 | 1,201 | #4,552 | 8 |
| 1983 | #239 | 1,023 | #6,238 | 5 |
| 1982 | #240 | 1,051 | #6,385 | 5 |
| 1981 | #265 | 940 | — | |
| 1980 | #287 | 862 | #6,250 | 5 |
| 1979 | #296 | 803 | #6,056 | 5 |
| 1978 | #323 | 708 | #5,772 | 5 |
| 1977 | #311 | 765 | — | |
| 1976 | #307 | 747 | — | |
| 1975 | #333 | 669 | #4,309 | 7 |
| 1974 | #316 | 722 | — | |
| 1973 | #329 | 677 | — | |
| 1972 | #319 | 753 | #3,963 | 7 |
| 1971 | #314 | 844 | — | |
| 1970 | #307 | 924 | #4,724 | 5 |
| 1969 | #320 | 807 | — | |
| 1968 | #300 | 863 | — | |
| 1967 | #289 | 877 | — | |
| 1966 | #273 | 954 | #3,948 | 5 |
| 1965 | #263 | 1,079 | #3,244 | 7 |
| 1964 | #258 | 1,183 | — | |
| 1963 | #246 | 1,291 | #4,048 | 5 |
| 1962 | #226 | 1,412 | #4,033 | 5 |
| 1961 | #214 | 1,573 | — | |
| 1960 | #205 | 1,670 | #3,665 | 6 |
| 1959 | #210 | 1,561 | #3,988 | 5 |
| 1958 | #207 | 1,577 | #3,559 | 6 |
| 1957 | #206 | 1,621 | #3,552 | 6 |
| 1956 | #206 | 1,545 | #3,942 | 5 |
| 1955 | #200 | 1,585 | — | |
| 1954 | #197 | 1,560 | — | |
| 1953 | #201 | 1,560 | — | |
| 1952 | #213 | 1,327 | — | |
| 1951 | #225 | 1,150 | — | |
| 1950 | #223 | 1,127 | — | |
| 1949 | #214 | 1,241 | — | |
| 1948 | #209 | 1,222 | — | |
| 1947 | #230 | 1,050 | — | |
| 1946 | #239 | 886 | — | |
| 1945 | #224 | 856 | — | |
| 1944 | #233 | 807 | — | |
| 1943 | #228 | 864 | #2,964 | 7 |
| 1942 | #225 | 854 | #3,560 | 5 |
| 1941 | #247 | 682 | #2,333 | 10 |
| 1940 | #234 | 726 | #3,459 | 5 |
| 1939 | #238 | 680 | #3,480 | 5 |
| 1938 | #242 | 677 | — | |
| 1937 | #237 | 687 | #2,479 | 9 |
| 1936 | #237 | 688 | #2,854 | 7 |
| 1935 | #244 | 669 | #2,396 | 10 |
| 1934 | #248 | 632 | — | |
| 1933 | #237 | 668 | — | |
| 1932 | #246 | 630 | — | |
| 1931 | #235 | 646 | — | |
| 1930 | #233 | 687 | #4,001 | 5 |
| 1929 | #223 | 745 | #3,959 | 5 |
| 1928 | #219 | 815 | #4,151 | 5 |
| 1927 | #217 | 876 | #3,451 | 7 |
| 1926 | #223 | 813 | — | |
| 1925 | #207 | 954 | — | |
| 1924 | #214 | 912 | #4,347 | 5 |
| 1923 | #204 | 966 | — | |
| 1922 | #199 | 1,025 | — | |
| 1921 | #197 | 1,052 | — | |
| 1920 | #185 | 1,118 | #4,286 | 5 |
| 1919 | #186 | 1,059 | — | |
| 1918 | #179 | 1,148 | — | |
| 1917 | #169 | 1,180 | — | |
| 1916 | #168 | 1,148 | — | |
| 1915 | #169 | 1,086 | — | |
| 1914 | #168 | 839 | — | |
| 1913 | #154 | 759 | — | |
| 1912 | #152 | 701 | — | |
| 1911 | #142 | 568 | — | |
| 1910 | #152 | 537 | — | |
| 1909 | #142 | 503 | — | |
| 1908 | #140 | 499 | — | |
| 1907 | #130 | 512 | — | |
| 1906 | #132 | 477 | — | |
| 1905 | #123 | 518 | — | |
| 1904 | #112 | 545 | — | |
| 1903 | #116 | 502 | — | |
| 1902 | #112 | 535 | #1,137 | 5 |
| 1901 | #103 | 507 | — | |
| 1900 | #104 | 644 | — | |
| 1899 | #97 | 566 | — | |
| 1898 | #88 | 677 | — | |
| 1897 | #83 | 642 | — | |
| 1896 | #91 | 580 | — | |
| 1895 | #85 | 656 | — | |
| 1894 | #85 | 618 | — | |
| 1893 | #81 | 598 | — | |
| 1892 | #93 | 522 | — | |
| 1891 | #86 | 507 | — | |
| 1890 | #78 | 576 | — | |
| 1889 | #83 | 496 | — | |
| 1888 | #85 | 472 | — | |
| 1887 | #76 | 448 | — | |
| 1886 | #87 | 392 | — | |
| 1885 | #77 | 404 | — | |
| 1884 | #80 | 369 | — | |
| 1883 | #75 | 378 | — | |
| 1882 | #76 | 342 | — | |
| 1881 | #77 | 299 | — | |
| 1880 | #77 | 302 | — | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Lydia was already there! It came in at #77, and was given to 302 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1887, when fewer than 450 girls a year got the name.
Where Lydia is popular in 1942
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- New Mexico#59 · 1 in 234
- Texas#100 · 1 in 447
- Arizona#105 · 1 in 365
- California#144 · 1 in 776
- New York#147 · 1 in 883
Best ever in a state: #11 in South Dakota, 2019.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Mexico | #59 | 25 | 1 in 234 |
| Texas | #100 | 150 | 1 in 447 |
| Arizona | #105 | 16 | 1 in 365 |
| California | #144 | 89 | 1 in 776 |
| New York | #147 | 128 | 1 in 883 |
| Connecticut | #166 | 13 | 1 in 1,203 |
| Hawaii | #167 | 6 | 1 in 621 |
| South Dakota | #168 | 5 | 1 in 940 |
| Louisiana | #182 | 32 | 1 in 821 |
| New Jersey | #197 | 23 | 1 in 1,551 |
| Maryland | #203 | 13 | 1 in 1,361 |
| Illinois | #215 | 37 | 1 in 1,906 |
| Massachusetts | #218 | 16 | 1 in 2,367 |
| District of Columbia | #222 | 5 | 1 in 1,721 |
| Nebraska | #224 | 6 | 1 in 1,645 |
| Florida | #225 | 15 | 1 in 1,186 |
| North Carolina | #239 | 24 | 1 in 1,746 |
| Colorado | #241 | 6 | 1 in 1,652 |
| Indiana | #245 | 14 | 1 in 2,283 |
| Kentucky | #245 | 18 | 1 in 1,630 |
| Pennsylvania | #248 | 36 | 1 in 2,502 |
| Michigan | #263 | 21 | 1 in 2,654 |
| Virginia | #265 | 14 | 1 in 2,086 |
| Mississippi | #299 | 12 | 1 in 2,028 |
| Wisconsin | #304 | 7 | 1 in 4,036 |
| South Carolina | #306 | 10 | 1 in 2,380 |
| Georgia | #307 | 14 | 1 in 2,513 |
| Ohio | #308 | 18 | 1 in 3,660 |
| Tennessee | #323 | 10 | 1 in 3,133 |
| Alabama | #347 | 10 | 1 in 3,308 |
| Missouri | #367 | 8 | 1 in 4,044 |
| Arkansas | #382 | 6 | 1 in 3,395 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Lydia
- 5 spots since 2024 (#97 → #92)
- 3 spots since 2020 (#95 → #92)
- 12 spots since 2015 (#80 → #92)
- Biggest jump: 27 spots in 1979 (#323 → #296)
- Biggest drop: 20 spots in 1963 (#226 → #246)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1883 at #75 (378 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 35 yrs · run 1880–1899
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
- Highest: 1 in 297 girls born in 1883 were named Lydia (0.34%)
- Latest: 1 in 597 girls born in 2025 (0.17%)
- 17.5% of all girls named Lydia (32,730) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 3,902 | #75 (1883) | #79 |
| 1890s | 5,942 | #78 (1890) | #87 |
| 1900s | 5,242 | #103 (1901) | #121 |
| 1910s | 9,025 | #142 (1911) | #164 |
| 1920s | 9,276 | #185 (1920) | #209 |
| 1930s | 6,664 | #233 (1930) | #240 |
| 1940s | 9,188 | #209 (1948) | #228 |
| 1950s | 14,613 | #197 (1954) | #209 |
| 1960s | 11,709 | #205 (1960) | #259 |
| 1970s | 7,612 | #296 (1979) | #316 |
| 1980s | 11,071 | #212 (1985) | #235 |
| 1990s | 16,991 | #148 (1999) | #182 |
| 2000s | 26,412 | #117 (2009) | #129 |
| 2010s | 32,730 | #80 (2016) | #91 |
| 2020s | 16,662 | #89 (2021) | #93 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Lydia in 1942
Top girls' names in 1942
Top boys' names in 1942
More about 1942
girls
1,350,719 girls got a published name in 1942; 1 in 1,582 of them was named Lydia, which outranked 95.8% of the 5,378 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 24.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,381,161 boys got a published name in 1942; 1 in 276,232 of them was named Lydia, which outranked 12.0% of the 4,044 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Tied with 484 names at #3,560; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.