Lupe
#13,208 for girls in 2025, 6 births · #9,714 for boys in 2025, 7 births
Given to girls 75.6% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1927 · 443 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 18,621since 1885
Lupe over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #13,208 | 6 | #9,714 | 7 |
| 2024 | #10,271 | 9 | #9,894 | 7 |
| 2023 | — | — | ||
| 2022 | #15,306 | 5 | — | |
| 2021 | #13,464 | 6 | — | |
| 2020 | #15,088 | 5 | — | |
| 2019 | #13,799 | 6 | #9,756 | 7 |
| 2018 | #12,464 | 7 | #8,819 | 8 |
| 2017 | #11,615 | 8 | — | |
| 2016 | #11,781 | 8 | #10,744 | 6 |
| 2015 | #11,835 | 8 | — | |
| 2014 | #8,485 | 13 | #12,108 | 5 |
| 2013 | — | — | ||
| 2012 | #10,429 | 10 | #10,770 | 6 |
| 2011 | #14,824 | 6 | — | |
| 2010 | #12,276 | 8 | #10,766 | 6 |
| 2009 | #8,058 | 15 | — | |
| 2008 | #9,476 | 12 | #6,763 | 12 |
| 2007 | #7,733 | 16 | #9,788 | 7 |
| 2006 | #7,482 | 16 | — | |
| 2005 | #7,138 | 16 | #7,096 | 10 |
| 2004 | #5,969 | 20 | #5,246 | 15 |
| 2003 | #15,784 | 5 | #7,831 | 8 |
| 2002 | #7,816 | 13 | #9,392 | 6 |
| 2001 | #4,834 | 24 | #8,339 | 7 |
| 2000 | #6,808 | 15 | #5,040 | 14 |
| 1999 | #7,239 | 13 | #8,704 | 6 |
| 1998 | #5,123 | 20 | #5,840 | 10 |
| 1997 | #3,547 | 32 | #4,246 | 15 |
| 1996 | #4,059 | 26 | #5,535 | 10 |
| 1995 | #4,348 | 23 | #2,923 | 24 |
| 1994 | #3,234 | 35 | #4,537 | 13 |
| 1993 | #2,882 | 41 | #4,697 | 12 |
| 1992 | #2,576 | 48 | #4,872 | 11 |
| 1991 | #2,703 | 44 | #3,813 | 15 |
| 1990 | #2,523 | 47 | #3,166 | 19 |
| 1989 | #2,931 | 37 | #3,809 | 14 |
| 1988 | #2,744 | 38 | #3,523 | 14 |
| 1987 | #2,852 | 34 | #3,072 | 16 |
| 1986 | #2,228 | 46 | #2,779 | 18 |
| 1985 | #2,484 | 39 | #2,828 | 17 |
| 1984 | #1,961 | 52 | #2,036 | 26 |
| 1983 | #2,022 | 50 | #1,955 | 27 |
| 1982 | #1,769 | 62 | #1,815 | 31 |
| 1981 | #1,700 | 67 | #1,811 | 31 |
| 1980 | #1,408 | 88 | #1,726 | 33 |
| 1979 | #1,496 | 79 | #1,833 | 30 |
| 1978 | #1,461 | 78 | #1,760 | 30 |
| 1977 | #1,303 | 89 | #1,645 | 33 |
| 1976 | #1,273 | 87 | #1,390 | 41 |
| 1975 | #1,100 | 106 | #1,170 | 52 |
| 1974 | #1,323 | 80 | #1,351 | 40 |
| 1973 | #1,066 | 108 | #1,238 | 44 |
| 1972 | #1,127 | 98 | #1,364 | 38 |
| 1971 | #1,021 | 121 | #1,526 | 32 |
| 1970 | #1,042 | 118 | #1,142 | 52 |
| 1969 | #907 | 136 | #1,000 | 59 |
| 1968 | #846 | 145 | #1,026 | 52 |
| 1967 | #826 | 147 | #1,018 | 51 |
| 1966 | #792 | 155 | #926 | 62 |
| 1965 | #734 | 184 | #948 | 60 |
| 1964 | #738 | 198 | #936 | 66 |
| 1963 | #699 | 211 | #773 | 97 |
| 1962 | #627 | 259 | #802 | 89 |
| 1961 | #617 | 272 | #797 | 91 |
| 1960 | #618 | 264 | #813 | 88 |
| 1959 | #607 | 269 | #742 | 106 |
| 1958 | #618 | 255 | #796 | 88 |
| 1957 | #636 | 237 | #842 | 80 |
| 1956 | #673 | 204 | #889 | 71 |
| 1955 | #683 | 188 | #933 | 64 |
| 1954 | #607 | 224 | #819 | 78 |
| 1953 | #583 | 229 | #798 | 80 |
| 1952 | #624 | 200 | #801 | 77 |
| 1951 | #560 | 228 | #740 | 88 |
| 1950 | #511 | 253 | #681 | 100 |
| 1949 | #451 | 313 | #649 | 111 |
| 1948 | #408 | 376 | #554 | 146 |
| 1947 | #426 | 366 | #558 | 146 |
| 1946 | #372 | 414 | #519 | 153 |
| 1945 | #358 | 376 | #496 | 146 |
| 1944 | #328 | 434 | #514 | 138 |
| 1943 | #388 | 353 | #521 | 144 |
| 1942 | #424 | 290 | #587 | 112 |
| 1941 | #389 | 312 | #589 | 101 |
| 1940 | #353 | 333 | #591 | 100 |
| 1939 | #379 | 302 | #587 | 96 |
| 1938 | #346 | 344 | #522 | 123 |
| 1937 | #354 | 327 | #593 | 95 |
| 1936 | #350 | 326 | #617 | 89 |
| 1935 | #349 | 335 | #605 | 92 |
| 1934 | #326 | 367 | #592 | 99 |
| 1933 | #322 | 376 | #536 | 113 |
| 1932 | #328 | 376 | #535 | 120 |
| 1931 | #318 | 403 | #507 | 128 |
| 1930 | #326 | 405 | #572 | 109 |
| 1929 | #318 | 425 | #575 | 108 |
| 1928 | #354 | 370 | #629 | 96 |
| 1927 | #317 | 443 | #584 | 112 |
| 1926 | #340 | 384 | #637 | 98 |
| 1925 | #355 | 367 | #670 | 90 |
| 1924 | #353 | 377 | #647 | 98 |
| 1923 | #380 | 309 | #711 | 83 |
| 1922 | #352 | 342 | #914 | 58 |
| 1921 | #384 | 302 | #729 | 82 |
| 1920 | #390 | 284 | #865 | 62 |
| 1919 | #388 | 280 | #747 | 74 |
| 1918 | #457 | 215 | #902 | 54 |
| 1917 | #520 | 164 | #1,238 | 30 |
| 1916 | #581 | 134 | #1,120 | 34 |
| 1915 | #626 | 110 | #1,159 | 31 |
| 1914 | #574 | 97 | #1,260 | 22 |
| 1913 | #579 | 77 | #1,205 | 18 |
| 1912 | #608 | 65 | #1,095 | 18 |
| 1911 | #617 | 48 | #1,190 | 9 |
| 1910 | #610 | 47 | #1,193 | 8 |
| 1909 | #662 | 36 | #1,440 | 5 |
| 1908 | #698 | 31 | — | |
| 1907 | #666 | 32 | #1,094 | 7 |
| 1906 | #742 | 24 | — | |
| 1905 | #587 | 35 | — | |
| 1904 | #727 | 23 | #1,064 | 6 |
| 1903 | #836 | 17 | #910 | 7 |
| 1902 | #1,075 | 11 | #862 | 8 |
| 1901 | #857 | 15 | — | |
| 1900 | #885 | 18 | #902 | 9 |
| 1899 | #906 | 13 | #1,051 | 5 |
| 1898 | #840 | 16 | — | |
| 1897 | #895 | 13 | — | |
| 1896 | #1,583 | 5 | — | |
| 1895 | #893 | 13 | — | |
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | #1,278 | 6 | — | |
| 1891 | #1,093 | 7 | — | |
| 1890 | #1,210 | 6 | — | |
| 1889 | #1,147 | 6 | — | |
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | #1,047 | 5 | — | |
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Lupe! It came in at #1,047, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1885–1888, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
See more about Lupe
- 2,937 spots since 2024 (#10,271 → #13,208)
- 1,880 spots since 2020 (#15,088 → #13,208)
- 1,373 spots since 2015 (#11,835 → #13,208)
- Biggest jump: 688 spots in 1897 (#1,583 → #895)
- Biggest drop: 690 spots in 1896 (#893 → #1,583)
- Debuted 1885
- Peaked 1927 at #317 (443 births)
- Births halved by 1952, 25 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 73 yrs · run 1903–1969
- Highest: 1 in 2,627 girls born in 1929 were named Lupe (0.04%)
- Latest: 1 in 267,878 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #317 in 1927, was only 1 in 2,692 (0.04%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 19.3% of all girls named Lupe (3,603) were born in this decade
- Mostly girls until 2024, mostly boys since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 11 | #1,047 (1885) | #1,097 |
| 1890s | 79 | #840 (1898) | #1,087 |
| 1900s | 242 | #587 (1905) | #774 |
| 1910s | 1,237 | #388 (1919) | #556 |
| 1920s | 3,603 | #317 (1927) | #354 |
| 1930s | 3,561 | #318 (1931) | #340 |
| 1940s | 3,567 | #328 (1944) | #390 |
| 1950s | 2,287 | #511 (1950) | #610 |
| 1960s | 1,971 | #617 (1961) | #740 |
| 1970s | 964 | #1,021 (1971) | #1,221 |
| 1980s | 513 | #1,408 (1980) | #2,210 |
| 1990s | 329 | #2,523 (1990) | #3,823 |
| 2000s | 152 | #4,834 (2001) | #8,110 |
| 2010s | 74 | #8,485 (2014) | #11,945 |
| 2020s | 31 | #10,271 (2024) | #13,467 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Lupe in 1932
Top girls' names in 1932
Top boys' names in 1932
More about 1932
girls
1,067,148 girls got a published name in 1932; 1 in 2,838 of them was named Lupe, which outranked 93.6% of the 5,098 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,044,157 boys got a published name in 1932; 1 in 8,701 of them was named Lupe, which outranked 87.5% of the 4,284 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.6% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).