Luke

#10,107 for girls in 2025, 9 births · #33 for boys in 2025, 6,948 births
Given to boys 99.8% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · boys
2014 · 10,523 births
Debut · boys
43 births
In top 100 · boys
36 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · boys
323,020
since 1880

Luke over time

boys

Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201956peak #28, 2014boys
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#10,1079#336,948
2024#12,1617#347,062
2023#317,251
2022#12,2437#347,393
2021#12,2067#327,711
2020#13,4536#317,784
2019#9,73610#328,442
2018#10,5459#308,624
2017#14,1246#309,224
2016#9,41111#2910,001
2015#11,8358#2810,294
2014#8,48513#2810,523
2013#16,5475#349,588
2012#12,1998#379,022
2011#12,1538#398,706
2010#14,9596#418,850
2009#478,625
2008#10,08411#439,424
2007#13,9247#469,609
2006#8,71513#4310,087
2005#7,13816#4110,011
2004#3,89836#419,598
2003#7,20715#469,304
2002#10,2469#468,692
2001#6,61916#508,008
2000#15,0315#597,148
1999#7,71612#676,137
1998#9,2609#755,284
1997#9,8028#784,953
1996#11,8076#755,017
1995#11,7836#824,629
1994#7,60411#914,095
1993#7,49811#874,357
1992#6,65213#934,066
1991#7,98710#1133,013
1990#10,1937#1182,883
1989#9,6817#1212,712
1988#3,89323#1192,619
1987#4,85716#1112,592
1986#4,96415#1062,654
1985#4,12619#1062,741
1984#3,42324#1102,471
1983#3,43123#1052,655
1982#4,02519#1192,478
1981#5,88511#1003,013
1980#3,71921#973,109
1979#5,75111#1102,470
1978#5,95810#1391,882
1977#9,6525#1901,242
1976#223913
1975#256778
1974#265725
1973#285633
1972#8,2925#319575
1971#5,5439#347530
1970#7,0706#351535
1969#367451
1968#396387
1967#409346
1966#398355
1965#392400
1964#374445
1963#386422
1962#392426
1961#393413
1960#383426
1959#424353
1958#429337
1957#452291
1956#486245
1955#500219
1954#516197
1953#544169
1952#556158
1951#525169
1950#514170
1949#533155
1948#532155
1947#548151
1946#562130
1945#554116
1944#559118
1943#565126
1942#598110
1941#535121
1940#545116
1939#533116
1938#522123
1937#547113
1936#529116
1935#525121
1934#530122
1933#543110
1932#438165
1931#474142
1930#503141
1929#474153
1928#495149
1927#481158
1926#472162
1925#467165
1924#424206
1923#449185
1922#440190
1921#476165
1920#472166
1919#459165
1918#447176
1917#443163
1916#411183
1915#432157
1914#365168
1913#402115
1912#42883
1911#34962
1910#29171
1909#30257
1908#30352
1907#31845
1906#26157
1905#27053
1904#31240
1903#27346
1902#29941
1901#28437
1900#24370
1899#29435
1898#30738
1897#26344
1896#27045
1895#24553
1894#30832
1893#25548
1892#27942
1891#35923
1890#26842
1889#24444
1888#26245
1887#23047
1886#23550
1885#23350
1884#27139
1883#26338
1882#25844
1881#23742
1880#25243
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Luke was already there! It came in at #252, and was given to 43 baby boys.


Quietest stretch: 1891, when fewer than 24 boys a year got the name.

Where Luke is popular in 1956

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedNDMinnesota: #317 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 6,663 boysMNIllinois: #322 for boys · 22 births · 1 in 5,105 boysILWisconsin: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedWIMichigan: #416 for boys · 11 births · 1 in 9,098 boysMINew York: #402 for boys · 23 births · 1 in 7,664 boysNYMassachusetts: #334 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 11,131 boysMARhode Island: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedIAIndiana: #366 for boys · 8 births · 1 in 6,911 boysINOhio: #643 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 23,135 boysOHPennsylvania: #352 for boys · 15 births · 1 in 8,207 boysPANew Jersey: #441 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 11,788 boysNJConnecticut: #272 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 4,944 boysCTCalifornia: #488 for boys · 19 births · 1 in 8,829 boysCAUtah: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedNEMissouri: #458 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 9,627 boysMOKentucky: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedWVVirginia: #472 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 8,886 boysVAMaryland: #353 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 6,313 boysMDDelaware: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedNMKansas: #330 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 4,954 boysKSArkansas: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedARTennessee: #442 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 8,193 boysTNNorth Carolina: #477 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 7,928 boysNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedOKLouisiana: #426 for boys · 9 births · 1 in 4,695 boysLAMississippi: #319 for boys · 9 births · 1 in 3,171 boysMSAlabama: #380 for boys · 8 births · 1 in 4,996 boysALGeorgia: #536 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 10,033 boysGAHawaii: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedHITexas: #585 for boys · 15 births · 1 in 8,259 boysTXFlorida: fewer than 5 boys named Luke, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · boys
  1. Connecticut#272 · 1 in 4,944
  2. Minnesota#317 · 1 in 6,663
  3. Mississippi#319 · 1 in 3,171
  4. Illinois#322 · 1 in 5,105
  5. Kansas#330 · 1 in 4,954

Best ever in a state: #4 in Louisiana, 2022.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Connecticut#27251 in 4,944
Minnesota#31761 in 6,663
Mississippi#31991 in 3,171
Illinois#322221 in 5,105
Kansas#33051 in 4,954
Massachusetts#33451 in 11,131
Pennsylvania#352151 in 8,207
Maryland#35351 in 6,313
Indiana#36681 in 6,911
Alabama#38081 in 4,996
New York#402231 in 7,664
Michigan#416111 in 9,098
Louisiana#42691 in 4,695
New Jersey#44151 in 11,788
Tennessee#44251 in 8,193
Missouri#45851 in 9,627
Virginia#47251 in 8,886
North Carolina#47771 in 7,928
California#488191 in 8,829
Georgia#53651 in 10,033
Texas#585151 in 8,259
Ohio#64351 in 23,135
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
Colorado
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Hawaii
Idaho
Iowa
Kentucky
Maine
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Mexico
North Dakota
Oklahoma
Oregon
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Utah
Vermont
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Luke
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
  • 1 spot since 2024 (#34#33)
  • 2 spots since 2020 (#31#33)
  • 5 spots since 2015 (#28#33)
  • Biggest jump: 80 spots in 1892 (#359#279)
  • Biggest drop: 105 spots in 1933 (#438#543)
Rise & fade · boys
134 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 2014 at #28 (10,523 births)
  • Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · boys
Top 100 for 36 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 36 yrs · run 1992–2025
  • Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 183
  • Highest: 1 in 183 boys born in 2014 were named Luke (0.55%)
  • Latest: 1 in 246 boys born in 2025 (0.41%)
Era · boys
The 2010s
  • 28.9% of all boys named Luke (93,274) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s442#230 (1887)#249
1890s402#245 (1895)#285
1900s498#243 (1900)#287
1910s1,343#291 (1910)#403
1920s1,699#424 (1924)#465
1930s1,269#438 (1932)#514
1940s1,298#532 (1948)#553
1950s2,308#424 (1959)#495
1960s4,071#367 (1969)#389
1970s10,283#110 (1979)#249
1980s27,044#97 (1980)#109
1990s44,434#67 (1999)#88
2000s90,506#41 (2005)#46
2010s93,274#28 (2014)#33
2020s44,149#31 (2020)#33

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Luke in 1956

boys
#486
245 births · 1 in 8,634 boys

Top boys' names in 1956

  1. #1Michael90,691
  2. #2James84,897
  3. #3Robert83,924
  4. #4David81,652
  5. #5John80,804
  6. #6William58,991
  7. #7Richard52,915
  8. #8Mark48,828
  9. #9Thomas44,836
  10. #10Steven38,413
  11. #486Luke245
More about 1956

boys

2,115,302 boys got a published name in 1956; 1 in 8,634 of them was named Luke, which outranked 89.1% of the 4,455 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 31.5% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Luke
  1. #483Stan247
  2. #484Eddy246
  3. #484Moses246
  4. #486Luke245
  5. #486Sandy245
  6. #486Seth245
  7. #489Dannie244
  8. #489Toby244
  9. #491Joshua239

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1955
Risers
  1. 1,847Jace#2,764#917
  2. 678Rich#1,572#894
  3. 590Broderick#1,273#683
  4. 559Elvis#921#362
  5. 513Tracey#1,419#906
Fallers
  1. 351Adolphus#906#1,257
  2. 336Randolf#949#1,285
  3. 279Cordell#792#1,071
  4. 272Rudolfo#885#1,157
  5. 269Aurelio#949#1,218

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1956