Lucretia
#10,917 for girls in 2025, 8 births
- Peak · girls
- 1882 · 65 births
- Debut · girls
- 29 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 10,430since 1880
Lucretia over time
Rank among girls' names. Lucretia has never cracked the top 200 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | #10,917 | 8 |
| 2024 | — | |
| 2023 | — | |
| 2022 | — | |
| 2021 | — | |
| 2020 | — | |
| 2019 | — | |
| 2018 | #12,464 | 7 |
| 2017 | #14,124 | 6 |
| 2016 | #16,215 | 5 |
| 2015 | — | |
| 2014 | — | |
| 2013 | — | |
| 2012 | #12,199 | 8 |
| 2011 | #14,824 | 6 |
| 2010 | #12,276 | 8 |
| 2009 | #15,242 | 6 |
| 2008 | #15,405 | 6 |
| 2007 | #11,630 | 9 |
| 2006 | #17,168 | 5 |
| 2005 | — | |
| 2004 | #14,179 | 6 |
| 2003 | #13,844 | 6 |
| 2002 | #8,280 | 12 |
| 2001 | #12,056 | 7 |
| 2000 | #7,580 | 13 |
| 1999 | #7,239 | 13 |
| 1998 | #4,955 | 21 |
| 1997 | #4,660 | 22 |
| 1996 | #4,883 | 20 |
| 1995 | #4,099 | 25 |
| 1994 | #3,234 | 35 |
| 1993 | #2,882 | 41 |
| 1992 | #2,433 | 53 |
| 1991 | #2,073 | 65 |
| 1990 | #1,952 | 70 |
| 1989 | #1,910 | 68 |
| 1988 | #1,757 | 72 |
| 1987 | #1,776 | 66 |
| 1986 | #1,572 | 76 |
| 1985 | #1,621 | 73 |
| 1984 | #1,633 | 67 |
| 1983 | #1,389 | 85 |
| 1982 | #1,171 | 117 |
| 1981 | #1,165 | 114 |
| 1980 | #1,250 | 104 |
| 1979 | #1,193 | 110 |
| 1978 | #1,063 | 125 |
| 1977 | #971 | 142 |
| 1976 | #909 | 144 |
| 1975 | #904 | 145 |
| 1974 | #746 | 190 |
| 1973 | #774 | 173 |
| 1972 | #792 | 173 |
| 1971 | #769 | 189 |
| 1970 | #789 | 177 |
| 1969 | #907 | 136 |
| 1968 | #893 | 133 |
| 1967 | #951 | 114 |
| 1966 | #774 | 161 |
| 1965 | #811 | 150 |
| 1964 | #793 | 172 |
| 1963 | #819 | 161 |
| 1962 | #806 | 168 |
| 1961 | #785 | 178 |
| 1960 | #761 | 179 |
| 1959 | #904 | 133 |
| 1958 | #937 | 121 |
| 1957 | #897 | 129 |
| 1956 | #826 | 143 |
| 1955 | #814 | 141 |
| 1954 | #782 | 143 |
| 1953 | #787 | 136 |
| 1952 | #878 | 110 |
| 1951 | #813 | 121 |
| 1950 | #742 | 134 |
| 1949 | #823 | 113 |
| 1948 | #764 | 125 |
| 1947 | #803 | 118 |
| 1946 | #720 | 126 |
| 1945 | #765 | 96 |
| 1944 | #685 | 119 |
| 1943 | #668 | 128 |
| 1942 | #603 | 152 |
| 1941 | #548 | 165 |
| 1940 | #579 | 146 |
| 1939 | #652 | 108 |
| 1938 | #731 | 88 |
| 1937 | #720 | 88 |
| 1936 | #695 | 92 |
| 1935 | #751 | 81 |
| 1934 | #839 | 66 |
| 1933 | #782 | 71 |
| 1932 | #656 | 104 |
| 1931 | #777 | 75 |
| 1930 | #867 | 68 |
| 1929 | #835 | 72 |
| 1928 | #765 | 87 |
| 1927 | #706 | 105 |
| 1926 | #696 | 107 |
| 1925 | #837 | 79 |
| 1924 | #777 | 92 |
| 1923 | #845 | 75 |
| 1922 | #780 | 87 |
| 1921 | #742 | 97 |
| 1920 | #720 | 101 |
| 1919 | #806 | 76 |
| 1918 | #743 | 92 |
| 1917 | #784 | 78 |
| 1916 | #721 | 89 |
| 1915 | #689 | 92 |
| 1914 | #736 | 61 |
| 1913 | #748 | 49 |
| 1912 | #704 | 51 |
| 1911 | #686 | 40 |
| 1910 | #794 | 29 |
| 1909 | #644 | 37 |
| 1908 | #649 | 35 |
| 1907 | #694 | 30 |
| 1906 | #661 | 30 |
| 1905 | #579 | 36 |
| 1904 | #586 | 33 |
| 1903 | #574 | 32 |
| 1902 | #623 | 28 |
| 1901 | #559 | 30 |
| 1900 | #676 | 28 |
| 1899 | #565 | 29 |
| 1898 | #631 | 26 |
| 1897 | #537 | 30 |
| 1896 | #538 | 31 |
| 1895 | #547 | 29 |
| 1894 | #516 | 31 |
| 1893 | #535 | 27 |
| 1892 | #479 | 32 |
| 1891 | #423 | 35 |
| 1890 | #462 | 32 |
| 1889 | #439 | 30 |
| 1888 | #420 | 35 |
| 1887 | #424 | 27 |
| 1886 | #378 | 32 |
| 1885 | #341 | 34 |
| 1884 | #391 | 26 |
| 1883 | #294 | 35 |
| 1882 | #205 | 65 |
| 1881 | #208 | 52 |
| 1880 | #288 | 29 |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Lucretia was already there! It came in at #288, and was given to 29 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 2005–2006, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
See more about Lucretia
- Biggest jump: 143 spots in 1960 (#904 → #761)
- Biggest drop: 177 spots in 1967 (#774 → #951)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1882 at #205 (65 births)
- Births halved by 1884, 2 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 98 yrs · run 1880–1977
- Highest: 1 in 1,659 girls born in 1882 were named Lucretia (0.06%)
- Latest: 1 in 200,908 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 15.0% of all girls named Lucretia (1,568) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 365 | #205 (1882) | #339 |
| 1890s | 302 | #423 (1891) | #523 |
| 1900s | 319 | #559 (1901) | #625 |
| 1910s | 657 | #686 (1911) | #741 |
| 1920s | 902 | #696 (1926) | #770 |
| 1930s | 841 | #652 (1939) | #747 |
| 1940s | 1,288 | #548 (1941) | #696 |
| 1950s | 1,311 | #742 (1950) | #838 |
| 1960s | 1,552 | #761 (1960) | #830 |
| 1970s | 1,568 | #746 (1974) | #891 |
| 1980s | 842 | #1,165 (1981) | #1,524 |
| 1990s | 365 | #1,952 (1990) | #3,841 |
| 2000s | 70 | #7,580 (2000) | #12,820 |
| 2010s | 40 | #12,199 (2012) | #13,684 |
| 2020s | 8 | #10,917 (2025) | #10,917 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Lucretia in 1950
Top girls' names in 1950
More about 1950
girls
1,713,054 girls got a published name in 1950; 1 in 12,784 of them was named Lucretia, which outranked 87.9% of the 6,109 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 24.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).