Lucinda

#1,747 for girls in 2025, 116 births · Last seen for boys in 1958 at #3,559
Given to girls >99.9% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1881 · 88 births
Debut · girls
63 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
38,401
since 1880

Lucinda over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Lucinda has never cracked the top 100 here.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020202012peak #153, 1881girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#1,747116—
2024#1,681121—
2023#1,865107—
2022#1,870108—
2021#1,652126—
2020#1,587132—
2019#1,629130—
2018#1,616132—
2017#1,460154—
2016#1,267192—
2015#1,545143—
2014#1,519144—
2013#1,397165—
2012#1,279187—
2011#1,382165—
2010#1,253191—
2009#1,414166—
2008#1,339183—
2007#1,424166—
2006#1,574137—
2005#1,589128—
2004#1,654117—
2003#1,522128—
2002#1,338145—
2001#1,627112—
2000#1,602110—
1999#1,329135—
1998#2,01374—
1997#1,456113—
1996#1,64193—
1995#1,61492—
1994#1,56598—
1993#1,518103—
1992#1,452109—
1991#1,244136—
1990#1,104158—
1989#1,009170—
1988#1,033156—
1987#970163—
1986#832200—
1985#749231—
1984#723228—
1983#720231—
1982#710244—
1981#619293—
1980#634287—
1979#659265—
1978#644252—
1977#659242—
1976#572287—
1975#540319—
1974#503349—
1973#490359—
1972#447420—
1971#407527—
1970#381624—
1969#329756—
1968#374593—
1967#416504—
1966#405522—
1965#369613—
1964#360689—
1963#369679—
1962#354721—
1961#330812—
1960#331808—
1959#328823—
1958#298899#3,5596
1957#2721,025#3,9935
1956#294923—
1955#299846—
1954#264997—
1953#260978—
1952#265908—
1951#278797—
1950#272792—
1949#265843—
1948#279752—
1947#319596—
1946#374410—
1945#371360—
1944#404314—
1943#400334—
1942#429282—
1941#417273—
1940#471203—
1939#514169—
1938#544157—
1937#529156—
1936#586128—
1935#540141—
1934#559132—
1933#588120—
1932#580128—
1931#628111—
1930#574141—
1929#540159—
1928#558157—
1927#603139—
1926#554163—
1925#532179—
1924#570164—
1923#488201—
1922#515184—
1921#547168—
1920#483201—
1919#489188—
1918#499185—
1917#480186—
1916#427215—
1915#455182—
1914#466138—
1913#381159—
1912#379146—
1911#367120—
1910#357123—
1909#357103—
1908#336112—
1907#340105—
1906#328106—
1905#324107—
1904#323101—
1903#32292—
1902#32491—
1901#30595—
1900#298123—
1899#30494—
1898#281118—
1897#29596—
1896#256124—
1895#28298—
1894#271104—
1893#28987—
1892#239122—
1891#24498—
1890#246101—
1889#25684—
1888#23497—
1887#21692—
1886#21090—
1885#21584—
1884#20186—
1883#17492—
1882#16693—
1881#15388—
1880#19363—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Lucinda was already there! It came in at #193, and was given to 63 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1880–1887, when fewer than 94 girls a year got the name.

Where Lucinda is popular in 2012

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedMNIllinois: #1,071 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 6,528 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedWIMichigan: #799 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 4,574 girlsMINew York: #1,283 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 8,388 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedIAIndiana: #599 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 3,003 girlsINOhio: #1,008 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 6,447 girlsOHPennsylvania: #729 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 4,396 girlsPANew Jersey: #1,170 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 7,303 girlsNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #1,190 for girls · 25 births · 1 in 8,363 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedUTColorado: #696 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 3,200 girlsCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedNEMissouri: #720 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 3,846 girlsMOKentucky: #613 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 3,024 girlsKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedWVVirginia: #1,158 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 7,277 girlsVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: #1,179 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 7,326 girlsNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedHITexas: #2,294 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 19,789 girlsTXFlorida: #1,988 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 15,925 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Indiana#599 · 1 in 3,003
  2. Kentucky#613 · 1 in 3,024
  3. Colorado#696 · 1 in 3,200
  4. Missouri#720 · 1 in 3,846
  5. Pennsylvania#729 · 1 in 4,396

Best ever in a state: #101 in New Mexico, 1923.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Indiana#599101 in 3,003
Kentucky#61361 in 3,024
Colorado#69671 in 3,200
Missouri#72071 in 3,846
Pennsylvania#729121 in 4,396
Michigan#79991 in 4,574
Ohio#1,00881 in 6,447
Illinois#1,07191 in 6,528
Virginia#1,15851 in 7,277
New Jersey#1,17051 in 7,303
North Carolina#1,17961 in 7,326
California#1,190251 in 8,363
New York#1,283111 in 8,388
Florida#1,98851 in 15,925
Texas#2,29481 in 19,789
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Lucinda
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 66 spots since 2024 (#1,681 → #1,747)
  • 160 spots since 2020 (#1,587 → #1,747)
  • 202 spots since 2015 (#1,545 → #1,747)
  • Biggest jump: 57 spots in 1937 (#586 → #529)
  • Biggest drop: 138 spots in 1987 (#832 → #970)
Rise & fade · girls
1 yr to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1881 at #153 (88 births)
  • Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 108 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 108 yrs · run 1880–1987
Share of babies · girls
1 in 1,045
  • Highest: 1 in 1,045 girls born in 1881 were named Lucinda (0.10%)
  • Latest: 1 in 13,856 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · girls
The 1950s
  • 23.4% of all girls named Lucinda (8,988) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s869#153 (1881)#202
1890s1,042#239 (1892)#271
1900s1,035#298 (1900)#326
1910s1,642#357 (1910)#430
1920s1,715#483 (1920)#539
1930s1,383#514 (1939)#564
1940s4,367#265 (1949)#373
1950s8,988#260 (1953)#283
1960s6,697#329 (1969)#364
1970s3,644#381 (1970)#530
1980s2,203#619 (1981)#800
1990s1,111#1,104 (1990)#1,494
2000s1,392#1,338 (2002)#1,508
2010s1,603#1,253 (2010)#1,435
2020s710#1,587 (2020)#1,734

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Lucinda in 2012

girls
#1,279
187 births · 1 in 9,417 girls

Top girls' names in 2012

  1. #1Sophia22,336
  2. #2Emma20,976
  3. #3Isabella19,138
  4. #4Olivia17,333
  5. #5Ava15,549
  6. #6Emily13,666
  7. #7Abigail12,730
  8. #8Mia12,039
  9. #9Madison11,417
  10. #10Elizabeth9,730
  11. #1,279Lucinda187
More about 2012

girls

1,761,053 girls got a published name in 2012; 1 in 9,417 of them was named Lucinda, which outranked 93.5% of the 19,534 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.8% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Lucinda
  1. #1,273Evalynn188
  2. #1,273Lorena188
  3. #1,273Maxine188
  4. #1,279Lucinda187
  5. #1,279Areli187
  6. #1,279Maylin187
  7. #1,279Peighton187
  8. #1,284Brittney186
  9. #1,284Kamya186
  10. #1,284Maite186

Tied with 4 names at #1,279; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 2011
Risers
  1. ↑ 4,327Cataleya#4,807 → #480
  2. ↑ 1,931Adley#2,664 → #733
  3. ↑ 917Litzy#1,515 → #598
  4. ↑ 784Kenia#1,427 → #643
  5. ↑ 580Monroe#1,531 → #951
Fallers
  1. ↓ 429Jaden#979 → #1,408
  2. ↓ 365Payten#994 → #1,359
  3. ↓ 326Yamilet#925 → #1,251
  4. ↓ 316Shaniya#915 → #1,231
  5. ↓ 264Shania#898 → #1,162

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 2012 →