Lucinda

#1,747 for girls in 2025, 116 births · Last seen for boys in 1958 at #3,559
Given to girls >99.9% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1881 · 88 births
Debut · girls
63 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
38,401
since 1880

Lucinda over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Lucinda has never cracked the top 100 here.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201962peak #153, 1881girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#1,747116—
2024#1,681121—
2023#1,865107—
2022#1,870108—
2021#1,652126—
2020#1,587132—
2019#1,629130—
2018#1,616132—
2017#1,460154—
2016#1,267192—
2015#1,545143—
2014#1,519144—
2013#1,397165—
2012#1,279187—
2011#1,382165—
2010#1,253191—
2009#1,414166—
2008#1,339183—
2007#1,424166—
2006#1,574137—
2005#1,589128—
2004#1,654117—
2003#1,522128—
2002#1,338145—
2001#1,627112—
2000#1,602110—
1999#1,329135—
1998#2,01374—
1997#1,456113—
1996#1,64193—
1995#1,61492—
1994#1,56598—
1993#1,518103—
1992#1,452109—
1991#1,244136—
1990#1,104158—
1989#1,009170—
1988#1,033156—
1987#970163—
1986#832200—
1985#749231—
1984#723228—
1983#720231—
1982#710244—
1981#619293—
1980#634287—
1979#659265—
1978#644252—
1977#659242—
1976#572287—
1975#540319—
1974#503349—
1973#490359—
1972#447420—
1971#407527—
1970#381624—
1969#329756—
1968#374593—
1967#416504—
1966#405522—
1965#369613—
1964#360689—
1963#369679—
1962#354721—
1961#330812—
1960#331808—
1959#328823—
1958#298899#3,5596
1957#2721,025#3,9935
1956#294923—
1955#299846—
1954#264997—
1953#260978—
1952#265908—
1951#278797—
1950#272792—
1949#265843—
1948#279752—
1947#319596—
1946#374410—
1945#371360—
1944#404314—
1943#400334—
1942#429282—
1941#417273—
1940#471203—
1939#514169—
1938#544157—
1937#529156—
1936#586128—
1935#540141—
1934#559132—
1933#588120—
1932#580128—
1931#628111—
1930#574141—
1929#540159—
1928#558157—
1927#603139—
1926#554163—
1925#532179—
1924#570164—
1923#488201—
1922#515184—
1921#547168—
1920#483201—
1919#489188—
1918#499185—
1917#480186—
1916#427215—
1915#455182—
1914#466138—
1913#381159—
1912#379146—
1911#367120—
1910#357123—
1909#357103—
1908#336112—
1907#340105—
1906#328106—
1905#324107—
1904#323101—
1903#32292—
1902#32491—
1901#30595—
1900#298123—
1899#30494—
1898#281118—
1897#29596—
1896#256124—
1895#28298—
1894#271104—
1893#28987—
1892#239122—
1891#24498—
1890#246101—
1889#25684—
1888#23497—
1887#21692—
1886#21090—
1885#21584—
1884#20186—
1883#17492—
1882#16693—
1881#15388—
1880#19363—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Lucinda was already there! It came in at #193, and was given to 63 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1880–1887, when fewer than 94 girls a year got the name.

Where Lucinda is popular in 1962

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedAKMaine: #254 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 1,653 girlsMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedNHWashington: #345 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 2,312 girlsWAIdaho: #238 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 1,006 girlsIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedNDMinnesota: #417 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 4,737 girlsMNIllinois: #335 for girls · 39 births · 1 in 2,638 girlsILWisconsin: #428 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 5,292 girlsWIMichigan: #346 for girls · 27 births · 1 in 3,040 girlsMINew York: #394 for girls · 48 births · 1 in 3,404 girlsNYMassachusetts: #329 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 3,424 girlsMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedRIOregon: #359 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 2,567 girlsORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedSDIowa: #267 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 1,824 girlsIAIndiana: #246 for girls · 32 births · 1 in 1,513 girlsINOhio: #328 for girls · 35 births · 1 in 2,813 girlsOHPennsylvania: #280 for girls · 50 births · 1 in 2,087 girlsPANew Jersey: #532 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 6,339 girlsNJConnecticut: #290 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 2,367 girlsCTCalifornia: #422 for girls · 56 births · 1 in 3,098 girlsCAUtah: #352 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 2,111 girlsUTColorado: #303 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 1,744 girlsCONebraska: #253 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 1,593 girlsNEMissouri: #463 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 4,732 girlsMOKentucky: #419 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 3,852 girlsKYWest Virginia: #239 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 1,466 girlsWVVirginia: #305 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 2,235 girlsVAMaryland: #320 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 2,441 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedDEArizona: #241 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 1,102 girlsAZNew Mexico: #197 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 823 girlsNMKansas: #235 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 1,323 girlsKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedARTennessee: #303 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 2,225 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #316 for girls · 20 births · 1 in 2,384 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #240 for girls · 19 births · 1 in 1,336 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedDCOklahoma: #285 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 1,718 girlsOKLouisiana: #366 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 2,238 girlsLAMississippi: #423 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 3,089 girlsMSAlabama: #344 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 2,382 girlsALGeorgia: #405 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 3,360 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedHITexas: #355 for girls · 49 births · 1 in 2,256 girlsTXFlorida: #337 for girls · 21 births · 1 in 2,343 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. New Mexico#197 · 1 in 823
  2. Kansas#235 · 1 in 1,323
  3. Idaho#238 · 1 in 1,006
  4. West Virginia#239 · 1 in 1,466
  5. South Carolina#240 · 1 in 1,336

Best ever in a state: #101 in New Mexico, 1923.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
New Mexico#197141 in 823
Kansas#235151 in 1,323
Idaho#23861 in 1,006
West Virginia#239111 in 1,466
South Carolina#240191 in 1,336
Arizona#241141 in 1,102
Indiana#246321 in 1,513
Nebraska#25391 in 1,593
Maine#25461 in 1,653
Iowa#267151 in 1,824
Pennsylvania#280501 in 2,087
Oklahoma#285121 in 1,718
Connecticut#290101 in 2,367
Colorado#303111 in 1,744
Tennessee#303161 in 2,225
Virginia#305181 in 2,235
North Carolina#316201 in 2,384
Maryland#320121 in 2,441
Ohio#328351 in 2,813
Massachusetts#329151 in 3,424
Illinois#335391 in 2,638
Florida#337211 in 2,343
Alabama#344141 in 2,382
Washington#345121 in 2,312
Michigan#346271 in 3,040
Utah#35251 in 2,111
Texas#355491 in 2,256
Oregon#35961 in 2,567
Louisiana#366171 in 2,238
New York#394481 in 3,404
Georgia#405131 in 3,360
Minnesota#41781 in 4,737
Kentucky#41981 in 3,852
California#422561 in 3,098
Mississippi#42381 in 3,089
Wisconsin#42881 in 5,292
Missouri#46391 in 4,732
New Jersey#53291 in 6,339
Alaska———
Arkansas———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Hawaii———
Montana———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
North Dakota———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Vermont———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Lucinda
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 66 spots since 2024 (#1,681 → #1,747)
  • 160 spots since 2020 (#1,587 → #1,747)
  • 202 spots since 2015 (#1,545 → #1,747)
  • Biggest jump: 57 spots in 1937 (#586 → #529)
  • Biggest drop: 138 spots in 1987 (#832 → #970)
Rise & fade · girls
1 yr to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1881 at #153 (88 births)
  • Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 108 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 108 yrs · run 1880–1987
Share of babies · girls
1 in 1,045
  • Highest: 1 in 1,045 girls born in 1881 were named Lucinda (0.10%)
  • Latest: 1 in 13,856 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · girls
The 1950s
  • 23.4% of all girls named Lucinda (8,988) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s869#153 (1881)#202
1890s1,042#239 (1892)#271
1900s1,035#298 (1900)#326
1910s1,642#357 (1910)#430
1920s1,715#483 (1920)#539
1930s1,383#514 (1939)#564
1940s4,367#265 (1949)#373
1950s8,988#260 (1953)#283
1960s6,697#329 (1969)#364
1970s3,644#381 (1970)#530
1980s2,203#619 (1981)#800
1990s1,111#1,104 (1990)#1,494
2000s1,392#1,338 (2002)#1,508
2010s1,603#1,253 (2010)#1,435
2020s710#1,587 (2020)#1,734

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Lucinda in 1962

girls
#354
721 births · 1 in 2,728 girls

Top girls' names in 1962

  1. #1Lisa46,069
  2. #2Mary43,502
  3. #3Susan35,752
  4. #4Karen35,184
  5. #5Linda31,461
  6. #6Patricia26,532
  7. #7Donna25,719
  8. #8Cynthia24,025
  9. #9Deborah22,889
  10. #10Sandra22,420
  11. #354Lucinda721
More about 1962

girls

1,966,603 girls got a published name in 1962; 1 in 2,728 of them was named Lucinda, which outranked 95.3% of the 7,584 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 15.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Lucinda
  1. #350Vera730
  2. #352Faith729
  3. #353Trina727
  4. #354Lucinda721
  5. #355Trudy717
  6. #356Gladys714
  7. #357Alma713
Biggest movers since 1961
Risers
  1. ↑ 1,281Tiffany#2,070 → #789
  2. ↑ 879Whitney#1,627 → #748
  3. ↑ 541Zina#1,533 → #992
  4. ↑ 414Glynis#1,406 → #992
  5. ↑ 408Lolita#978 → #570
Fallers
  1. ↓ 300Fern#821 → #1,121
  2. ↓ 259Jacklyn#815 → #1,074
  3. ↓ 255Dorthy#929 → #1,184
  4. ↓ 224Laurene#943 → #1,167
  5. ↓ 215Jimmie#911 → #1,126

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1962 →