Lucile
#4,987 for girls in 2025, 26 births · Last seen for boys in 1936 at #3,549
Given to girls 99.7% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1908 · 592 births
- Debut · girls
- 40 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 34,887since 1880
Lucile over time
Rank among girls' names. Lucile has never cracked the top 100 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #4,987 | 26 | — | |
| 2024 | #4,387 | 32 | — | |
| 2023 | #3,274 | 49 | — | |
| 2022 | #4,582 | 30 | — | |
| 2021 | #5,398 | 23 | — | |
| 2020 | #5,487 | 22 | — | |
| 2019 | #4,162 | 34 | — | |
| 2018 | #4,001 | 36 | — | |
| 2017 | #4,695 | 29 | — | |
| 2016 | #4,157 | 35 | — | |
| 2015 | #3,842 | 39 | — | |
| 2014 | #4,455 | 32 | — | |
| 2013 | #4,645 | 30 | — | |
| 2012 | #4,601 | 31 | — | |
| 2011 | #5,207 | 26 | — | |
| 2010 | #5,977 | 22 | — | |
| 2009 | #4,571 | 32 | — | |
| 2008 | #6,559 | 20 | — | |
| 2007 | #5,709 | 24 | — | |
| 2006 | #4,165 | 35 | — | |
| 2005 | #5,800 | 21 | — | |
| 2004 | #4,707 | 28 | — | |
| 2003 | #6,885 | 16 | — | |
| 2002 | #5,254 | 22 | — | |
| 2001 | #7,724 | 13 | — | |
| 2000 | #5,312 | 21 | — | |
| 1999 | #8,223 | 11 | — | |
| 1998 | #7,532 | 12 | — | |
| 1997 | #7,283 | 12 | — | |
| 1996 | #8,132 | 10 | — | |
| 1995 | #7,041 | 12 | — | |
| 1994 | #7,097 | 12 | — | |
| 1993 | #9,559 | 8 | — | |
| 1992 | #7,067 | 12 | — | |
| 1991 | #7,430 | 11 | — | |
| 1990 | #11,409 | 6 | — | |
| 1989 | #6,531 | 12 | — | |
| 1988 | #9,244 | 7 | — | |
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | #7,749 | 8 | — | |
| 1985 | #8,318 | 7 | — | |
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | #7,312 | 8 | — | |
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | #9,110 | 6 | — | |
| 1980 | #9,095 | 6 | — | |
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | #6,385 | 9 | — | |
| 1977 | #6,340 | 9 | — | |
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | #4,593 | 13 | — | |
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | #4,362 | 13 | — | |
| 1972 | #4,523 | 12 | — | |
| 1971 | #4,810 | 11 | — | |
| 1970 | #4,246 | 13 | — | |
| 1969 | #5,456 | 8 | — | |
| 1968 | #2,969 | 19 | — | |
| 1967 | #4,053 | 11 | — | |
| 1966 | #2,357 | 26 | — | |
| 1965 | #3,549 | 13 | — | |
| 1964 | #2,475 | 25 | — | |
| 1963 | #2,704 | 21 | — | |
| 1962 | #2,539 | 23 | — | |
| 1961 | #1,955 | 35 | — | |
| 1960 | #1,855 | 37 | — | |
| 1959 | #1,617 | 45 | — | |
| 1958 | #1,606 | 44 | — | |
| 1957 | #1,407 | 56 | — | |
| 1956 | #1,228 | 72 | — | |
| 1955 | #1,175 | 72 | — | |
| 1954 | #1,140 | 75 | — | |
| 1953 | #1,054 | 84 | — | |
| 1952 | #973 | 94 | — | |
| 1951 | #1,057 | 77 | — | |
| 1950 | #948 | 89 | — | |
| 1949 | #879 | 100 | — | |
| 1948 | #821 | 112 | — | |
| 1947 | #747 | 131 | — | |
| 1946 | #791 | 108 | — | |
| 1945 | #680 | 119 | — | |
| 1944 | #643 | 131 | — | |
| 1943 | #624 | 147 | — | |
| 1942 | #598 | 155 | — | |
| 1941 | #512 | 181 | — | |
| 1940 | #532 | 165 | — | |
| 1939 | #489 | 188 | — | |
| 1938 | #482 | 190 | — | |
| 1937 | #423 | 233 | — | |
| 1936 | #423 | 234 | #3,549 | 5 |
| 1935 | #394 | 266 | #2,719 | 8 |
| 1934 | #381 | 281 | — | |
| 1933 | #361 | 306 | — | |
| 1932 | #332 | 367 | — | |
| 1931 | #335 | 361 | — | |
| 1930 | #302 | 487 | — | |
| 1929 | #275 | 543 | #3,959 | 5 |
| 1928 | #253 | 638 | — | |
| 1927 | #243 | 716 | #3,780 | 6 |
| 1926 | #224 | 805 | #3,139 | 8 |
| 1925 | #212 | 900 | — | |
| 1924 | #211 | 927 | — | |
| 1923 | #198 | 1,055 | #2,950 | 9 |
| 1922 | #189 | 1,130 | #4,307 | 5 |
| 1921 | #178 | 1,242 | — | |
| 1920 | #166 | 1,358 | #4,286 | 5 |
| 1919 | #152 | 1,447 | #4,168 | 5 |
| 1918 | #156 | 1,448 | #3,728 | 6 |
| 1917 | #142 | 1,516 | — | |
| 1916 | #139 | 1,483 | #3,177 | 7 |
| 1915 | #135 | 1,441 | #2,829 | 8 |
| 1914 | #129 | 1,166 | — | |
| 1913 | #128 | 1,003 | #2,092 | 8 |
| 1912 | #129 | 882 | — | |
| 1911 | #128 | 654 | #1,537 | 6 |
| 1910 | #118 | 698 | — | |
| 1909 | #124 | 570 | — | |
| 1908 | #115 | 592 | #1,373 | 5 |
| 1907 | #133 | 508 | — | |
| 1906 | #130 | 485 | — | |
| 1905 | #131 | 479 | — | |
| 1904 | #133 | 433 | — | |
| 1903 | #145 | 370 | — | |
| 1902 | #142 | 388 | — | |
| 1901 | #142 | 346 | — | |
| 1900 | #147 | 395 | — | |
| 1899 | #151 | 305 | — | |
| 1898 | #153 | 330 | — | |
| 1897 | #166 | 269 | — | |
| 1896 | #156 | 300 | — | |
| 1895 | #169 | 248 | — | |
| 1894 | #171 | 239 | — | |
| 1893 | #181 | 194 | — | |
| 1892 | #179 | 201 | — | |
| 1891 | #180 | 177 | — | |
| 1890 | #196 | 149 | — | |
| 1889 | #195 | 135 | — | |
| 1888 | #239 | 94 | — | |
| 1887 | #225 | 85 | — | |
| 1886 | #245 | 71 | — | |
| 1885 | #222 | 78 | — | |
| 1884 | #263 | 55 | — | |
| 1883 | #257 | 49 | — | |
| 1882 | #226 | 58 | — | |
| 1881 | #268 | 36 | — | |
| 1880 | #247 | 40 | — | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Lucile was already there! It came in at #247, and was given to 40 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1974, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Lucile is popular in 1920
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Georgia#48 · 1 in 183
- Alabama#66 · 1 in 244
- Utah#67 · 1 in 242
- South Carolina#73 · 1 in 255
- Florida#83 · 1 in 319
Best ever in a state: #36 in Georgia, 1917.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Georgia | #48 | 204 | 1 in 183 |
| Alabama | #66 | 126 | 1 in 244 |
| Utah | #67 | 21 | 1 in 242 |
| South Carolina | #73 | 97 | 1 in 255 |
| Florida | #83 | 33 | 1 in 319 |
| Mississippi | #93 | 60 | 1 in 357 |
| Nebraska | #104 | 27 | 1 in 469 |
| Oregon | #105 | 14 | 1 in 427 |
| Tennessee | #106 | 66 | 1 in 422 |
| Montana | #113 | 10 | 1 in 504 |
| Idaho | #122 | 9 | 1 in 484 |
| Iowa | #124 | 37 | 1 in 601 |
| Vermont | #124 | 5 | 1 in 519 |
| North Carolina | #125 | 70 | 1 in 533 |
| Washington | #135 | 14 | 1 in 750 |
| Wisconsin | #141 | 32 | 1 in 763 |
| Indiana | #151 | 29 | 1 in 913 |
| Michigan | #151 | 41 | 1 in 921 |
| Colorado | #156 | 11 | 1 in 810 |
| Virginia | #157 | 34 | 1 in 845 |
| Kansas | #158 | 21 | 1 in 788 |
| South Dakota | #159 | 9 | 1 in 754 |
| Texas | #165 | 82 | 1 in 695 |
| Oklahoma | #167 | 32 | 1 in 797 |
| Arkansas | #182 | 25 | 1 in 831 |
| Minnesota | #187 | 18 | 1 in 1,273 |
| California | #197 | 26 | 1 in 1,082 |
| Illinois | #200 | 41 | 1 in 1,443 |
| Louisiana | #205 | 23 | 1 in 985 |
| Ohio | #233 | 27 | 1 in 2,049 |
| Kentucky | #237 | 18 | 1 in 1,607 |
| Missouri | #247 | 18 | 1 in 1,703 |
| New York | #322 | 24 | 1 in 4,115 |
| Massachusetts | #341 | 7 | 1 in 5,177 |
| Pennsylvania | #383 | 15 | 1 in 6,498 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Lucile
- 600 spots since 2024 (#4,387 → #4,987)
- 500 spots since 2020 (#5,487 → #4,987)
- 1,145 spots since 2015 (#3,842 → #4,987)
- Biggest jump: 84 spots in 1952 (#1,057 → #973)
- Biggest drop: 111 spots in 1946 (#680 → #791)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1908 at #115 (592 births)
- Births halved by 1934, 26 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 72 yrs · run 1880–1950
- Highest: 1 in 565 girls born in 1908 were named Lucile (0.18%)
- Latest: 1 in 61,818 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 33.6% of all girls named Lucile (11,738) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 701 | #195 (1889) | #239 |
| 1890s | 2,412 | #151 (1899) | #170 |
| 1900s | 4,566 | #115 (1908) | #134 |
| 1910s | 11,738 | #118 (1910) | #136 |
| 1920s | 9,314 | #166 (1920) | #215 |
| 1930s | 2,913 | #302 (1930) | #392 |
| 1940s | 1,349 | #512 (1941) | #683 |
| 1950s | 708 | #948 (1950) | #1,221 |
| 1960s | 218 | #1,855 (1960) | #2,991 |
| 1970s | 80 | #4,246 (1970) | #5,037 |
| 1980s | 54 | #6,531 (1989) | #8,194 |
| 1990s | 106 | #7,041 (1995) | #8,077 |
| 2000s | 232 | #4,165 (2006) | #5,669 |
| 2010s | 314 | #3,842 (2015) | #4,574 |
| 2020s | 182 | #3,274 (2023) | #4,686 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Lucile in 1920
Top girls' names in 1920
Top boys' names in 1920
More about 1920
girls
1,198,289 girls got a published name in 1920; 1 in 882 of them was named Lucile, which outranked 97.1% of the 5,767 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,064,356 boys got a published name in 1920; 1 in 212,871 of them was named Lucile, which outranked 14.1% of the 4,989 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 31.6% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Tied with 703 names at #4,286; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.