Luann
#11,932 for girls in 2025, 7 births · Last seen for boys in 1954 at #3,452
Given to girls >99.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1954 · 1,638 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 15,506since 1921
Luann over time
Rank among girls' names. Luann has never cracked the top 100 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #11,932 | 7 | — | |
| 2024 | #12,161 | 7 | — | |
| 2023 | #10,312 | 9 | — | |
| 2022 | #7,631 | 14 | — | |
| 2021 | #7,630 | 14 | — | |
| 2020 | #10,250 | 9 | — | |
| 2019 | #9,736 | 10 | — | |
| 2018 | #8,146 | 13 | — | |
| 2017 | #9,341 | 11 | — | |
| 2016 | #9,411 | 11 | — | |
| 2015 | #13,006 | 7 | — | |
| 2014 | #14,558 | 6 | — | |
| 2013 | #10,235 | 10 | — | |
| 2012 | #6,576 | 19 | — | |
| 2011 | #16,764 | 5 | — | |
| 2010 | #12,276 | 8 | — | |
| 2009 | #10,679 | 10 | — | |
| 2008 | #8,109 | 15 | — | |
| 2007 | #15,491 | 6 | — | |
| 2006 | #9,901 | 11 | — | |
| 2005 | #10,128 | 10 | — | |
| 2004 | #12,761 | 7 | — | |
| 2003 | #9,048 | 11 | — | |
| 2002 | #7,816 | 13 | — | |
| 2001 | #7,317 | 14 | — | |
| 2000 | #8,534 | 11 | — | |
| 1999 | #6,484 | 15 | — | |
| 1998 | #12,426 | 6 | — | |
| 1997 | #7,742 | 11 | — | |
| 1996 | #11,807 | 6 | — | |
| 1995 | #5,958 | 15 | — | |
| 1994 | #7,604 | 11 | — | |
| 1993 | #5,419 | 17 | — | |
| 1992 | #5,267 | 18 | — | |
| 1991 | #7,430 | 11 | — | |
| 1990 | #4,694 | 20 | — | |
| 1989 | #5,286 | 16 | — | |
| 1988 | #4,496 | 19 | — | |
| 1987 | #4,283 | 19 | — | |
| 1986 | #3,645 | 23 | — | |
| 1985 | #3,621 | 23 | — | |
| 1984 | #3,329 | 25 | — | |
| 1983 | #3,555 | 22 | — | |
| 1982 | #3,172 | 27 | — | |
| 1981 | #3,147 | 27 | — | |
| 1980 | #2,391 | 40 | — | |
| 1979 | #3,147 | 26 | — | |
| 1978 | #2,191 | 42 | — | |
| 1977 | #1,736 | 59 | — | |
| 1976 | #1,883 | 48 | — | |
| 1975 | #1,689 | 56 | — | |
| 1974 | #1,499 | 65 | — | |
| 1973 | #1,239 | 84 | — | |
| 1972 | #1,212 | 88 | — | |
| 1971 | #988 | 127 | — | |
| 1970 | #821 | 168 | — | |
| 1969 | #733 | 190 | — | |
| 1968 | #674 | 207 | — | |
| 1967 | #680 | 203 | — | |
| 1966 | #588 | 258 | — | |
| 1965 | #510 | 345 | — | |
| 1964 | #465 | 433 | — | |
| 1963 | #451 | 458 | — | |
| 1962 | #411 | 562 | — | |
| 1961 | #354 | 729 | — | |
| 1960 | #359 | 731 | — | |
| 1959 | #326 | 830 | — | |
| 1958 | #297 | 908 | — | |
| 1957 | #279 | 994 | — | |
| 1956 | #239 | 1,201 | — | |
| 1955 | #219 | 1,356 | — | |
| 1954 | #192 | 1,638 | #3,452 | 6 |
| 1953 | #229 | 1,197 | — | |
| 1952 | #616 | 202 | — | |
| 1951 | #701 | 155 | — | |
| 1950 | #723 | 140 | — | |
| 1949 | #787 | 120 | — | |
| 1948 | #904 | 93 | — | |
| 1947 | #810 | 116 | — | |
| 1946 | #818 | 102 | — | |
| 1945 | #941 | 66 | — | |
| 1944 | #855 | 79 | — | |
| 1943 | #916 | 72 | — | |
| 1942 | #913 | 74 | — | |
| 1941 | #812 | 79 | — | |
| 1940 | #879 | 66 | — | |
| 1939 | #824 | 70 | — | |
| 1938 | #955 | 55 | — | |
| 1937 | #882 | 61 | — | |
| 1936 | #862 | 62 | — | |
| 1935 | #874 | 62 | — | |
| 1934 | #871 | 61 | — | |
| 1933 | #1,442 | 26 | — | |
| 1932 | #1,346 | 30 | — | |
| 1931 | #1,941 | 17 | — | |
| 1930 | #2,202 | 15 | — | |
| 1929 | #2,301 | 14 | — | |
| 1928 | #2,623 | 12 | — | |
| 1927 | #4,805 | 5 | — | |
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | #5,061 | 5 | — | |
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | #5,099 | 5 | — | |
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Luann! It came in at #5,099, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1921–1927, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Luann is popular in 1962
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Iowa#162 · 1 in 782
- Minnesota#170 · 1 in 902
- Wisconsin#205 · 1 in 1,366
- Nebraska#229 · 1 in 1,303
- Pennsylvania#229 · 1 in 1,449
Best ever in a state: #50 in Iowa, 1954.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iowa | #162 | 35 | 1 in 782 |
| Minnesota | #170 | 42 | 1 in 902 |
| Wisconsin | #205 | 31 | 1 in 1,366 |
| Nebraska | #229 | 11 | 1 in 1,303 |
| Pennsylvania | #229 | 72 | 1 in 1,449 |
| Connecticut | #263 | 13 | 1 in 1,821 |
| Michigan | #289 | 38 | 1 in 2,160 |
| Ohio | #305 | 40 | 1 in 2,462 |
| Indiana | #309 | 20 | 1 in 2,420 |
| Kansas | #312 | 10 | 1 in 1,984 |
| Colorado | #359 | 8 | 1 in 2,398 |
| New York | #364 | 54 | 1 in 3,025 |
| Massachusetts | #370 | 12 | 1 in 4,281 |
| Washington | #384 | 10 | 1 in 2,775 |
| New Jersey | #386 | 16 | 1 in 3,566 |
| Illinois | #402 | 28 | 1 in 3,674 |
| Kentucky | #452 | 7 | 1 in 4,402 |
| Arizona | #464 | 5 | 1 in 3,086 |
| Maryland | #467 | 6 | 1 in 4,881 |
| North Carolina | #495 | 9 | 1 in 5,298 |
| Missouri | #572 | 6 | 1 in 7,099 |
| Tennessee | #572 | 5 | 1 in 7,119 |
| Alabama | #604 | 5 | 1 in 6,669 |
| Virginia | #607 | 5 | 1 in 8,047 |
| California | #912 | 13 | 1 in 13,345 |
| Texas | #1,304 | 5 | 1 in 22,111 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Luann
- 229 spots since 2024 (#12,161 → #11,932)
- 1,682 spots since 2020 (#10,250 → #11,932)
- 1,074 spots since 2015 (#13,006 → #11,932)
- Biggest jump: 571 spots in 1934 (#1,442 → #871)
- Biggest drop: 224 spots in 1972 (#988 → #1,212)
- Debuted 1921
- Peaked 1954 at #192 (1,638 births)
- Births halved by 1960, 6 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 38 yrs · run 1934–1971
- Highest: 1 in 1,186 girls born in 1954 were named Luann (0.08%)
- Latest: 1 in 229,610 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 55.6% of all girls named Luann (8,621) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 41 | #2,301 (1929) | #3,978 |
| 1930s | 459 | #824 (1939) | #1,220 |
| 1940s | 867 | #787 (1949) | #864 |
| 1950s | 8,621 | #192 (1954) | #382 |
| 1960s | 4,116 | #354 (1961) | #523 |
| 1970s | 763 | #821 (1970) | #1,641 |
| 1980s | 241 | #2,391 (1980) | #3,693 |
| 1990s | 130 | #4,694 (1990) | #7,483 |
| 2000s | 108 | #7,317 (2001) | #9,978 |
| 2010s | 100 | #6,576 (2012) | #11,005 |
| 2020s | 60 | #7,630 (2021) | #9,986 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Luann in 1962
Top girls' names in 1962
More about 1962
girls
1,966,603 girls got a published name in 1962; 1 in 3,499 of them was named Luann, which outranked 94.6% of the 7,584 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 15.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.