Loyce
Last seen for girls in 1981 at #8,128 · Last seen for boys in 1977 at #5,123
Given to girls 81.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1933 · 107 births
- Debut · girls
- 9 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 3,503since 1901
Loyce over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | — | — | ||
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | — | — | ||
| 2018 | — | — | ||
| 2017 | — | — | ||
| 2016 | — | — | ||
| 2015 | — | — | ||
| 2014 | — | — | ||
| 2013 | — | — | ||
| 2012 | — | — | ||
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | — | — | ||
| 2009 | — | — | ||
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | — | — | ||
| 2005 | — | — | ||
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | #8,128 | 7 | — | |
| 1980 | #9,095 | 6 | — | |
| 1979 | #10,210 | 5 | — | |
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | #5,123 | 6 | |
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | #9,067 | 5 | — | |
| 1974 | — | #5,227 | 5 | |
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | #7,292 | 6 | #4,986 | 5 |
| 1971 | #5,136 | 10 | — | |
| 1970 | #5,818 | 8 | #4,724 | 5 |
| 1969 | #3,958 | 13 | #3,595 | 7 |
| 1968 | #4,000 | 12 | — | |
| 1967 | #3,656 | 13 | #3,966 | 5 |
| 1966 | #2,839 | 19 | #3,948 | 5 |
| 1965 | #3,402 | 14 | — | |
| 1964 | #4,096 | 11 | — | |
| 1963 | #3,635 | 13 | #3,044 | 8 |
| 1962 | #2,539 | 23 | #2,848 | 9 |
| 1961 | #2,004 | 34 | — | |
| 1960 | #2,013 | 32 | #3,665 | 6 |
| 1959 | #1,918 | 34 | #3,988 | 5 |
| 1958 | #1,469 | 53 | #3,559 | 6 |
| 1957 | #1,904 | 33 | #3,993 | 5 |
| 1956 | #1,796 | 35 | #2,628 | 10 |
| 1955 | #1,667 | 38 | #2,764 | 9 |
| 1954 | #1,677 | 37 | #2,942 | 8 |
| 1953 | #1,318 | 54 | #3,425 | 6 |
| 1952 | #1,578 | 37 | #2,680 | 9 |
| 1951 | #1,170 | 64 | #1,904 | 16 |
| 1950 | #1,183 | 61 | #2,770 | 8 |
| 1949 | #1,135 | 64 | #2,802 | 8 |
| 1948 | #1,057 | 69 | #1,943 | 15 |
| 1947 | #1,031 | 74 | #2,671 | 9 |
| 1946 | #1,058 | 64 | #2,271 | 11 |
| 1945 | #954 | 65 | #2,743 | 7 |
| 1944 | #909 | 71 | #2,080 | 12 |
| 1943 | #1,036 | 59 | #1,910 | 15 |
| 1942 | #844 | 82 | #1,946 | 14 |
| 1941 | #934 | 62 | #2,083 | 12 |
| 1940 | #854 | 70 | #1,894 | 14 |
| 1939 | #775 | 77 | #1,636 | 17 |
| 1938 | #713 | 92 | #1,818 | 15 |
| 1937 | #882 | 61 | #2,088 | 12 |
| 1936 | #780 | 75 | #1,723 | 16 |
| 1935 | #769 | 77 | #2,951 | 7 |
| 1934 | #756 | 78 | #1,783 | 16 |
| 1933 | #633 | 107 | #1,405 | 23 |
| 1932 | #686 | 98 | #2,191 | 12 |
| 1931 | #761 | 77 | #1,394 | 25 |
| 1930 | #786 | 80 | #1,602 | 21 |
| 1929 | #886 | 65 | #2,589 | 10 |
| 1928 | #742 | 91 | #1,647 | 21 |
| 1927 | #863 | 73 | #1,692 | 21 |
| 1926 | #814 | 80 | #1,846 | 18 |
| 1925 | #779 | 90 | #1,806 | 19 |
| 1924 | #853 | 77 | #1,380 | 29 |
| 1923 | #852 | 74 | #1,644 | 22 |
| 1922 | #766 | 91 | #1,952 | 17 |
| 1921 | #804 | 83 | #1,648 | 22 |
| 1920 | #843 | 74 | #1,505 | 25 |
| 1919 | #800 | 77 | #1,576 | 22 |
| 1918 | #879 | 66 | #1,648 | 21 |
| 1917 | #978 | 51 | #2,280 | 12 |
| 1916 | #856 | 63 | #1,771 | 17 |
| 1915 | #839 | 60 | #1,410 | 23 |
| 1914 | #1,147 | 28 | #1,608 | 15 |
| 1913 | #1,067 | 26 | #1,580 | 12 |
| 1912 | #903 | 31 | #1,746 | 9 |
| 1911 | #1,113 | 16 | #1,038 | 11 |
| 1910 | #1,110 | 16 | — | |
| 1909 | #935 | 19 | — | |
| 1908 | #1,261 | 11 | — | |
| 1907 | #990 | 15 | — | |
| 1906 | #1,553 | 7 | #1,253 | 5 |
| 1905 | #1,538 | 7 | — | |
| 1904 | #1,364 | 8 | — | |
| 1903 | #862 | 16 | — | |
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | #1,136 | 9 | — | |
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Loyce! It came in at #1,136, and was given to 9 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1902, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
See more about Loyce
- Not published in 2025; last seen 1981
- Biggest jump: 563 spots in 1907 (#1,553 → #990)
- Biggest drop: 502 spots in 1904 (#862 → #1,364)
- Debuted 1901
- Peaked 1933 at #633 (107 births)
- Births halved by 1952, 19 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 34 yrs · run 1915–1942
- Highest: 1 in 9,420 girls born in 1933 were named Loyce (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 238,294 girls born in 1981 (0.00%)
- 23.5% of all girls named Loyce (822) were born in this decade
- Mostly boys until 1978, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 92 | #862 (1903) | #1,205 |
| 1910s | 434 | #800 (1919) | #969 |
| 1920s | 798 | #742 (1928) | #820 |
| 1930s | 822 | #633 (1933) | #754 |
| 1940s | 680 | #844 (1942) | #981 |
| 1950s | 446 | #1,170 (1951) | #1,568 |
| 1960s | 184 | #2,004 (1961) | #3,214 |
| 1970s | 34 | #5,136 (1971) | #7,505 |
| 1980s | 13 | #8,128 (1981) | #8,612 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Loyce in 1907
Top girls' names in 1907
More about 1907
girls
318,564 girls got a published name in 1907; 1 in 21,238 of them was named Loyce, which outranked 58.7% of the 2,399 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 20.4% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).