Lottie
#527 for girls in 2025, 570 births · Last seen for boys in 1943 at #3,538
Given to girls 99.7% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1886 · 450 births
- Debut · girls
- 245 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 19 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 48,352since 1880
Lottie over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #527 | 570 | — | |
| 2024 | #676 | 424 | — | |
| 2023 | #776 | 363 | — | |
| 2022 | #950 | 285 | — | |
| 2021 | #1,091 | 227 | — | |
| 2020 | #1,552 | 136 | — | |
| 2019 | #1,629 | 130 | — | |
| 2018 | #1,840 | 110 | — | |
| 2017 | #2,236 | 84 | — | |
| 2016 | #1,972 | 101 | — | |
| 2015 | #2,340 | 79 | — | |
| 2014 | #2,582 | 68 | — | |
| 2013 | #3,314 | 48 | — | |
| 2012 | #2,901 | 59 | — | |
| 2011 | #3,916 | 38 | — | |
| 2010 | #4,494 | 32 | — | |
| 2009 | #4,482 | 33 | — | |
| 2008 | #4,761 | 31 | — | |
| 2007 | #6,093 | 22 | — | |
| 2006 | #6,592 | 19 | — | |
| 2005 | #6,245 | 19 | — | |
| 2004 | #5,555 | 22 | — | |
| 2003 | #4,418 | 29 | — | |
| 2002 | #5,254 | 22 | — | |
| 2001 | #6,067 | 18 | — | |
| 2000 | #7,580 | 13 | — | |
| 1999 | #4,870 | 22 | — | |
| 1998 | #5,583 | 18 | — | |
| 1997 | #4,660 | 22 | — | |
| 1996 | #5,065 | 19 | — | |
| 1995 | #4,846 | 20 | — | |
| 1994 | #6,319 | 14 | — | |
| 1993 | #4,524 | 22 | — | |
| 1992 | #3,773 | 28 | — | |
| 1991 | #3,936 | 26 | — | |
| 1990 | #3,714 | 28 | — | |
| 1989 | #3,893 | 25 | — | |
| 1988 | #3,095 | 32 | — | |
| 1987 | #3,743 | 23 | — | |
| 1986 | #2,973 | 31 | — | |
| 1985 | #3,419 | 25 | — | |
| 1984 | #2,781 | 32 | — | |
| 1983 | #3,151 | 26 | — | |
| 1982 | #2,532 | 37 | — | |
| 1981 | #3,253 | 26 | — | |
| 1980 | #2,537 | 37 | — | |
| 1979 | #3,236 | 25 | — | |
| 1978 | #3,196 | 24 | — | |
| 1977 | #2,162 | 43 | — | |
| 1976 | #2,135 | 40 | — | |
| 1975 | #2,357 | 34 | — | |
| 1974 | #1,667 | 55 | — | |
| 1973 | #2,349 | 32 | — | |
| 1972 | #1,698 | 52 | — | |
| 1971 | #1,560 | 62 | — | |
| 1970 | #1,653 | 56 | — | |
| 1969 | #1,609 | 55 | — | |
| 1968 | #1,279 | 74 | — | |
| 1967 | #1,281 | 71 | — | |
| 1966 | #1,320 | 67 | — | |
| 1965 | #1,194 | 81 | — | |
| 1964 | #1,112 | 97 | — | |
| 1963 | #1,119 | 95 | — | |
| 1962 | #1,152 | 90 | — | |
| 1961 | #1,012 | 115 | — | |
| 1960 | #1,007 | 114 | — | |
| 1959 | #901 | 134 | — | |
| 1958 | #870 | 137 | — | |
| 1957 | #897 | 129 | — | |
| 1956 | #779 | 160 | — | |
| 1955 | #788 | 148 | — | |
| 1954 | #652 | 198 | — | |
| 1953 | #697 | 171 | — | |
| 1952 | #616 | 202 | — | |
| 1951 | #626 | 190 | — | |
| 1950 | #574 | 211 | — | |
| 1949 | #508 | 256 | — | |
| 1948 | #503 | 264 | — | |
| 1947 | #509 | 263 | — | |
| 1946 | #534 | 218 | — | |
| 1945 | #444 | 256 | — | |
| 1944 | #428 | 280 | — | |
| 1943 | #439 | 284 | #3,538 | 5 |
| 1942 | #402 | 319 | — | |
| 1941 | #372 | 332 | #3,133 | 6 |
| 1940 | #361 | 327 | — | |
| 1939 | #335 | 357 | — | |
| 1938 | #368 | 315 | — | |
| 1937 | #327 | 365 | — | |
| 1936 | #321 | 369 | — | |
| 1935 | #316 | 393 | — | |
| 1934 | #290 | 445 | #3,277 | 6 |
| 1933 | #278 | 467 | — | |
| 1932 | #291 | 462 | #3,092 | 7 |
| 1931 | #276 | 508 | — | |
| 1930 | #267 | 556 | #4,001 | 5 |
| 1929 | #234 | 674 | #2,589 | 10 |
| 1928 | #244 | 658 | — | |
| 1927 | #234 | 769 | #2,912 | 9 |
| 1926 | #231 | 773 | — | |
| 1925 | #220 | 851 | #4,197 | 5 |
| 1924 | #203 | 978 | — | |
| 1923 | #193 | 1,099 | — | |
| 1922 | #192 | 1,090 | #4,307 | 5 |
| 1921 | #183 | 1,208 | #3,869 | 6 |
| 1920 | #177 | 1,240 | — | |
| 1919 | #162 | 1,368 | #3,391 | 7 |
| 1918 | #162 | 1,378 | — | |
| 1917 | #153 | 1,362 | #2,956 | 8 |
| 1916 | #143 | 1,389 | #2,926 | 8 |
| 1915 | #153 | 1,237 | #3,392 | 6 |
| 1914 | #142 | 1,053 | #2,651 | 7 |
| 1913 | #143 | 837 | #2,273 | 7 |
| 1912 | #142 | 772 | — | |
| 1911 | #135 | 620 | — | |
| 1910 | #127 | 634 | #1,589 | 5 |
| 1909 | #121 | 583 | #1,440 | 5 |
| 1908 | #116 | 580 | — | |
| 1907 | #130 | 512 | #1,345 | 5 |
| 1906 | #118 | 529 | — | |
| 1905 | #116 | 547 | — | |
| 1904 | #118 | 497 | — | |
| 1903 | #113 | 509 | — | |
| 1902 | #111 | 537 | — | |
| 1901 | #106 | 498 | — | |
| 1900 | #97 | 690 | — | |
| 1899 | #93 | 584 | — | |
| 1898 | #102 | 586 | — | |
| 1897 | #102 | 523 | — | |
| 1896 | #92 | 574 | — | |
| 1895 | #95 | 553 | — | |
| 1894 | #87 | 597 | — | |
| 1893 | #92 | 532 | — | |
| 1892 | #89 | 547 | #1,066 | 5 |
| 1891 | #88 | 501 | — | |
| 1890 | #88 | 502 | — | |
| 1889 | #81 | 498 | — | |
| 1888 | #81 | 511 | #917 | 6 |
| 1887 | #81 | 414 | — | |
| 1886 | #75 | 450 | — | |
| 1885 | #80 | 393 | — | |
| 1884 | #76 | 397 | — | |
| 1883 | #76 | 372 | — | |
| 1882 | #82 | 319 | — | |
| 1881 | #80 | 289 | — | |
| 1880 | #88 | 245 | — | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Lottie was already there! It came in at #88, and was given to 245 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 2000–2001, when fewer than 19 girls a year got the name.
Where Lottie is popular in 1916
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- South Carolina#76 · 1 in 275
- Georgia#85 · 1 in 333
- Michigan#86 · 1 in 375
- Florida#97 · 1 in 362
- Illinois#100 · 1 in 432
Best ever in a state: #58 in Wyoming, 2025.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| South Carolina | #76 | 70 | 1 in 275 |
| Georgia | #85 | 94 | 1 in 333 |
| Michigan | #86 | 86 | 1 in 375 |
| Florida | #97 | 24 | 1 in 362 |
| Illinois | #100 | 134 | 1 in 432 |
| Mississippi | #102 | 44 | 1 in 409 |
| North Carolina | #103 | 74 | 1 in 413 |
| Kentucky | #109 | 53 | 1 in 454 |
| Alabama | #111 | 60 | 1 in 431 |
| Virginia | #115 | 51 | 1 in 476 |
| New Jersey | #124 | 45 | 1 in 638 |
| Arkansas | #129 | 32 | 1 in 512 |
| Pennsylvania | #132 | 112 | 1 in 797 |
| Idaho | #141 | 7 | 1 in 514 |
| Tennessee | #151 | 35 | 1 in 660 |
| Missouri | #155 | 34 | 1 in 848 |
| Indiana | #156 | 26 | 1 in 912 |
| Ohio | #157 | 50 | 1 in 960 |
| Louisiana | #158 | 27 | 1 in 657 |
| New York | #159 | 108 | 1 in 870 |
| Texas | #159 | 67 | 1 in 672 |
| West Virginia | #168 | 18 | 1 in 844 |
| Maryland | #169 | 11 | 1 in 1,095 |
| Oklahoma | #170 | 23 | 1 in 797 |
| Maine | #189 | 6 | 1 in 953 |
| Connecticut | #205 | 8 | 1 in 1,634 |
| Wisconsin | #208 | 15 | 1 in 1,568 |
| Massachusetts | #219 | 14 | 1 in 2,376 |
| Nebraska | #237 | 7 | 1 in 1,609 |
| Kansas | #242 | 9 | 1 in 1,644 |
| Iowa | #277 | 9 | 1 in 2,300 |
| California | #323 | 7 | 1 in 2,794 |
| Minnesota | #348 | 7 | 1 in 3,093 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Lottie
- 149 spots since 2024 (#676 → #527)
- 1,025 spots since 2020 (#1,552 → #527)
- 1,813 spots since 2015 (#2,340 → #527)
- Biggest jump: 174 spots in 2023 (#950 → #776)
- Biggest drop: 136 spots in 1955 (#652 → #788)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1886 at #75 (450 births)
- Births halved by 1946, 60 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 19 yrs · run 1880–1896
- Top 1,000: 84 yrs · run 1880–1959
- Highest: 1 in 302 girls born in 1883 were named Lottie (0.33%)
- Latest: 1 in 2,820 girls born in 2025 (0.04%)
- Its best rank, #75 in 1886, was only 1 in 321 (0.31%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 22.0% of all girls named Lottie (10,650) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 3,888 | #75 (1886) | #80 |
| 1890s | 5,499 | #87 (1894) | #93 |
| 1900s | 5,482 | #97 (1900) | #115 |
| 1910s | 10,650 | #127 (1910) | #146 |
| 1920s | 9,340 | #177 (1920) | #211 |
| 1930s | 4,237 | #267 (1930) | #307 |
| 1940s | 2,799 | #361 (1940) | #450 |
| 1950s | 1,680 | #574 (1950) | #740 |
| 1960s | 859 | #1,007 (1960) | #1,209 |
| 1970s | 423 | #1,560 (1971) | #2,201 |
| 1980s | 294 | #2,532 (1982) | #3,138 |
| 1990s | 219 | #3,714 (1990) | #4,729 |
| 2000s | 228 | #4,418 (2003) | #5,705 |
| 2010s | 749 | #1,629 (2019) | #2,722 |
| 2020s | 2,005 | #527 (2025) | #929 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Lottie in 1916
Top girls' names in 1916
Top boys' names in 1916
More about 1916
girls
1,044,334 girls got a published name in 1916; 1 in 752 of them was named Lottie, which outranked 97.2% of the 5,161 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
890,080 boys got a published name in 1916; 1 in 111,260 of them was named Lottie, which outranked 35.5% of the 4,535 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 30.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).