Loretta

#606 for girls in 2025, 485 births · Last seen for boys in 1981 at #6,262
Given to girls 99.7% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1938 · 3,913 births
Debut · girls
41 births
In top 100 · girls
14 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
177,564
since 1880

Loretta over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020202004peak #62, 1938girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#606485
2024#677423
2023#757371
2022#810346
2021#901300
2020#942272
2019#1,020252
2018#1,085232
2017#1,102229
2016#1,082240
2015#1,154219
2014#1,321179
2013#1,713121
2012#1,690124
2011#1,817111
2010#2,04397
2009#2,31684
2008#1,890112
2007#1,957105
2006#1,809113
2005#1,878103
2004#2,03090
2003#2,16780
2002#2,17876
2001#2,12677
2000#1,85592
1999#1,636102
1998#1,597102
1997#1,496109
1996#1,256139
1995#1,330124
1994#1,264135
1993#1,254137
1992#1,231141
1991#1,009184
1990#921207
1989#907201
1988#747251
1987#686269
1986#624297
1985#644287
1984#587309
1983#540347
1982#492413
1981#439487#6,2625
1980#494418
1979#422495
1978#420481
1977#374571
1976#333671
1975#301778
1974#266956
1973#257972
1972#2581,047
1971#2281,304#4,9075
1970#2311,365#4,7245
1969#2041,541#3,5957
1968#1941,627#3,1078
1967#1771,803#3,9665
1966#1751,899#2,46511
1965#1851,839#3,9305
1964#1742,228#3,0508
1963#1612,507#4,0485
1962#1602,513#2,50411
1961#1482,922#3,3567
1960#1383,191#2,31513
1959#1363,156#2,03316
1958#1323,314#3,2757
1957#1313,350#2,8229
1956#1263,407#2,7989
1955#1233,431#2,43511
1954#1253,245#3,1767
1953#1362,666
1952#1362,616#3,3736
1951#1352,489#2,8448
1950#1202,720#3,0217
1949#1172,776
1948#1152,868#3,3166
1947#1133,001#2,8628
1946#1112,892#2,40310
1945#1072,661#2,5748
1944#982,746#2,4679
1943#893,169#3,5385
1942#793,406#2,26811
1941#813,100#1,82115
1940#693,502#2,17911
1939#653,769#1,71216
1938#623,913#1,61318
1937#633,673#1,99213
1936#703,325#1,63917
1935#693,365#1,92914
1934#832,978#1,93214
1933#872,705#1,49821
1932#892,746#2,46510
1931#962,581#2,6519
1930#1052,482#2,17813
1929#1271,939#2,19913
1928#1231,996#2,65910
1927#1272,018#4,2105
1926#1262,108#3,7086
1925#1222,255#2,9369
1924#1242,261#3,2608
1923#1242,143
1922#1252,095#3,8726
1921#1222,134#4,3225
1920#1202,122
1919#1182,067#3,7366
1918#1162,051
1917#1141,970
1916#1131,903#3,1777
1915#1151,810#3,8255
1914#1221,323#2,9156
1913#1181,074
1912#119978#2,2696
1911#118739#1,3877
1910#124655
1909#123573
1908#119566
1907#126520
1906#120520
1905#121527
1904#116506
1903#114505
1902#124461
1901#118438
1900#121535
1899#119410
1898#118454
1897#123406
1896#122391
1895#126365
1894#131330
1893#132323
1892#152263
1891#159212
1890#156228
1889#170172
1888#177157
1887#174134
1886#164141
1885#19791
1884#18794
1883#19476
1882#19472
1881#19658
1880#24041
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Loretta was already there! It came in at #240, and was given to 41 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1880–1881, when fewer than 59 girls a year got the name.

Where Loretta is popular in 2004

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedMNIllinois: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedMINew York: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedIAIndiana: #596 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 3,613 girlsINOhio: #1,036 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 8,217 girlsOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #2,139 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 22,883 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedNEMissouri: #854 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 5,677 girlsMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedHITexas: #2,280 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 22,754 girlsTXFlorida: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Indiana#596 · 1 in 3,613
  2. Missouri#854 · 1 in 5,677
  3. Ohio#1,036 · 1 in 8,217
  4. California#2,139 · 1 in 22,883
  5. Texas#2,280 · 1 in 22,754

Best ever in a state: #20 in Nevada, 1938.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Indiana#59691 in 3,613
Missouri#85451 in 5,677
Ohio#1,03671 in 8,217
California#2,139101 in 22,883
Texas#2,28071 in 22,754
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Loretta
Momentum · girls
Rising
  • 71 spots since 2024 (#677#606)
  • 336 spots since 2020 (#942#606)
  • 548 spots since 2015 (#1,154#606)
  • Biggest jump: 91 spots in 2022 (#901#810)
  • Biggest drop: 160 spots in 1989 (#747#907)
Rise & fade · girls
58 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1938 at #62 (3,913 births)
  • Births halved by 1965, 27 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 14 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 14 yrs · run 1931–1944
  • Top 1,000: 117 yrs · run 1880–1990
Share of babies · girls
1 in 282
  • Highest: 1 in 282 girls born in 1938 were named Loretta (0.35%)
  • Latest: 1 in 3,314 girls born in 2025 (0.03%)
Era · girls
The 1930s
  • 17.8% of all girls named Loretta (31,537) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s1,036#164 (1886)#189
1890s3,382#118 (1898)#134
1900s5,151#114 (1903)#120
1910s14,570#113 (1916)#118
1920s21,071#120 (1920)#124
1930s31,537#62 (1938)#79
1940s30,121#69 (1940)#98
1950s30,394#120 (1950)#130
1960s22,070#138 (1960)#172
1970s8,640#228 (1971)#309
1980s3,279#439 (1981)#616
1990s1,380#921 (1990)#1,299
2000s932#1,809 (2006)#2,021
2010s1,804#1,020 (2019)#1,403
2020s2,197#606 (2025)#782

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Loretta in 2004

girls
#2,030
90 births · 1 in 20,403 girls

Top girls' names in 2004

  1. #1Emily25,042
  2. #2Emma21,625
  3. #3Madison20,628
  4. #4Olivia16,108
  5. #5Hannah15,614
  6. #6Abigail15,436
  7. #7Isabella15,021
  8. #8Ashley14,377
  9. #9Samantha13,786
  10. #10Elizabeth13,577
  11. #2,030Loretta90
More about 2004

girls

1,836,250 girls got a published name in 2004; 1 in 20,403 of them was named Loretta, which outranked 89.2% of the 18,835 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Loretta
  1. #2,020Odalis91
  2. #2,020Veronika91
  3. #2,020Vivien91
  4. #2,030Loretta90
  5. #2,030Audrianna90
  6. #2,030Jessalyn90
  7. #2,030Kamaria90
  8. #2,044Anayah89
  9. #2,044Araya89
  10. #2,044Breeanna89

Tied with 13 names at #2,030; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 2003
Risers
  1. 948Rubi#1,561#613
  2. 607Kaydence#984#377
  3. 548Marin#1,383#835
  4. 543Diya#1,416#873
  5. 479Kadence#869#390
Fallers
  1. 1,607Arly#949#2,556
  2. 433Shakira#747#1,180
  3. 414Anais#990#1,404
  4. 365Lisbeth#742#1,107
  5. 274Reanna#990#1,264

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 2004