Lindsay
#2,194 for girls in 2025, 84 births · Last seen for boys in 2021 at #9,714
Given to girls 96.2% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1983 · 8,622 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 16 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 130,365since 1916
Lindsay over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,194 | 84 | — | |
| 2024 | #1,980 | 99 | — | |
| 2023 | #2,076 | 93 | — | |
| 2022 | #1,763 | 117 | — | |
| 2021 | #1,450 | 148 | #9,714 | 7 |
| 2020 | #1,654 | 124 | — | |
| 2019 | #1,508 | 144 | — | |
| 2018 | #1,310 | 174 | — | |
| 2017 | #1,141 | 217 | #10,775 | 6 |
| 2016 | #1,022 | 259 | — | |
| 2015 | #852 | 328 | #8,040 | 9 |
| 2014 | #660 | 433 | #8,781 | 8 |
| 2013 | #687 | 412 | — | |
| 2012 | #710 | 396 | — | |
| 2011 | #654 | 435 | #10,808 | 6 |
| 2010 | #597 | 492 | — | |
| 2009 | #527 | 575 | #12,491 | 5 |
| 2008 | #382 | 848 | — | |
| 2007 | #316 | 1,067 | #7,590 | 10 |
| 2006 | #263 | 1,248 | #8,732 | 8 |
| 2005 | #240 | 1,398 | #6,226 | 12 |
| 2004 | #241 | 1,354 | #7,536 | 9 |
| 2003 | #260 | 1,229 | #9,581 | 6 |
| 2002 | #255 | 1,241 | — | |
| 2001 | #210 | 1,502 | #6,935 | 9 |
| 2000 | #179 | 1,800 | #5,588 | 12 |
| 1999 | #169 | 1,849 | #4,162 | 17 |
| 1998 | #161 | 1,939 | #6,314 | 9 |
| 1997 | #149 | 2,086 | #6,618 | 8 |
| 1996 | #134 | 2,397 | #3,293 | 21 |
| 1995 | #125 | 2,562 | #3,100 | 22 |
| 1994 | #107 | 3,100 | #4,094 | 15 |
| 1993 | #88 | 3,664 | #3,042 | 22 |
| 1992 | #81 | 4,262 | #2,599 | 27 |
| 1991 | #77 | 4,483 | #2,295 | 31 |
| 1990 | #69 | 5,040 | #1,909 | 40 |
| 1989 | #63 | 5,525 | #1,615 | 49 |
| 1988 | #57 | 6,025 | #1,553 | 47 |
| 1987 | #49 | 6,530 | #1,295 | 57 |
| 1986 | #46 | 6,952 | #1,227 | 61 |
| 1985 | #40 | 7,871 | #984 | 86 |
| 1984 | #36 | 8,510 | #1,042 | 73 |
| 1983 | #36 | 8,622 | #924 | 91 |
| 1982 | #39 | 8,260 | #981 | 84 |
| 1981 | #47 | 5,843 | #1,199 | 58 |
| 1980 | #71 | 4,353 | #1,291 | 52 |
| 1979 | #88 | 3,466 | #1,255 | 54 |
| 1978 | #95 | 3,123 | #1,326 | 47 |
| 1977 | #110 | 2,635 | #1,093 | 63 |
| 1976 | #133 | 2,070 | #1,225 | 50 |
| 1975 | #396 | 515 | #2,065 | 22 |
| 1974 | #690 | 213 | #1,439 | 36 |
| 1973 | #1,015 | 115 | #1,928 | 22 |
| 1972 | #1,516 | 62 | #1,441 | 35 |
| 1971 | #1,376 | 77 | #1,378 | 38 |
| 1970 | #1,306 | 82 | #1,297 | 41 |
| 1969 | #1,517 | 61 | #1,198 | 43 |
| 1968 | #1,324 | 70 | #1,083 | 47 |
| 1967 | #1,640 | 48 | #1,165 | 41 |
| 1966 | #1,430 | 59 | #968 | 56 |
| 1965 | #1,575 | 50 | #854 | 74 |
| 1964 | #1,559 | 53 | #929 | 67 |
| 1963 | #1,330 | 69 | #792 | 92 |
| 1962 | #1,419 | 61 | #709 | 117 |
| 1961 | #1,465 | 58 | #684 | 125 |
| 1960 | #1,501 | 54 | #631 | 152 |
| 1959 | #1,292 | 69 | #716 | 115 |
| 1958 | #1,180 | 81 | #786 | 90 |
| 1957 | #1,051 | 98 | #766 | 96 |
| 1956 | #1,133 | 83 | #749 | 96 |
| 1955 | #1,050 | 92 | #660 | 122 |
| 1954 | #1,123 | 77 | #739 | 94 |
| 1953 | #981 | 95 | #627 | 130 |
| 1952 | #811 | 125 | #695 | 101 |
| 1951 | #846 | 112 | #677 | 106 |
| 1950 | #809 | 116 | #695 | 97 |
| 1949 | #982 | 83 | #856 | 64 |
| 1948 | #1,070 | 68 | #846 | 65 |
| 1947 | #1,170 | 59 | #889 | 61 |
| 1946 | #1,583 | 31 | #878 | 56 |
| 1945 | #1,993 | 18 | #899 | 50 |
| 1944 | #1,808 | 22 | #1,085 | 37 |
| 1943 | #2,352 | 15 | #933 | 51 |
| 1942 | #2,666 | 12 | #1,110 | 38 |
| 1941 | #3,030 | 9 | #1,066 | 37 |
| 1940 | #2,737 | 10 | #1,031 | 39 |
| 1939 | #4,250 | 5 | #1,033 | 38 |
| 1938 | #3,847 | 6 | #927 | 46 |
| 1937 | #3,146 | 8 | #967 | 42 |
| 1936 | #2,032 | 15 | #924 | 44 |
| 1935 | — | #1,098 | 35 | |
| 1934 | — | #982 | 42 | |
| 1933 | — | #1,144 | 33 | |
| 1932 | — | #1,035 | 41 | |
| 1931 | — | #1,128 | 36 | |
| 1930 | — | #1,093 | 40 | |
| 1929 | — | #1,026 | 44 | |
| 1928 | #3,743 | 7 | #927 | 53 |
| 1927 | — | #1,128 | 40 | |
| 1926 | #3,873 | 7 | #1,192 | 36 |
| 1925 | — | #956 | 50 | |
| 1924 | — | #980 | 52 | |
| 1923 | — | #1,057 | 45 | |
| 1922 | — | #1,140 | 39 | |
| 1921 | #5,099 | 5 | #1,122 | 40 |
| 1920 | — | #903 | 58 | |
| 1919 | — | #1,159 | 36 | |
| 1918 | — | #1,112 | 38 | |
| 1917 | — | #964 | 45 | |
| 1916 | #3,919 | 6 | #984 | 42 |
| 1915 | — | #996 | 40 | |
| 1914 | — | #884 | 38 | |
| 1913 | — | #950 | 27 | |
| 1912 | — | #1,137 | 17 | |
| 1911 | — | #1,190 | 9 | |
| 1910 | — | #928 | 12 | |
| 1909 | — | #893 | 11 | |
| 1908 | — | #1,021 | 8 | |
| 1907 | — | #930 | 9 | |
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | #836 | 9 | |
| 1904 | — | #647 | 13 | |
| 1903 | — | #734 | 10 | |
| 1902 | — | #794 | 9 | |
| 1901 | — | #1,058 | 5 | |
| 1900 | — | #649 | 15 | |
| 1899 | — | #661 | 10 | |
| 1898 | — | #1,121 | 5 | |
| 1897 | — | #852 | 7 | |
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | #640 | 11 | |
| 1894 | — | #1,074 | 5 | |
| 1893 | — | #391 | 21 | |
| 1892 | — | #1,066 | 5 | |
| 1891 | — | #841 | 6 | |
| 1890 | — | #533 | 13 | |
| 1889 | — | #628 | 10 | |
| 1888 | — | #755 | 8 | |
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | #959 | 5 | |
| 1885 | — | #836 | 6 | |
| 1884 | — | #663 | 9 | |
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | #652 | 9 | |
| 1881 | — | #653 | 8 | |
| 1880 | — | #745 | 7 | |
First appearance
1916
The first year at least five girls were named Lindsay! It came in at #3,919, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1917–1925, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Lindsay is popular in 2010
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- New Jersey#282 · 1 in 1,379
- Massachusetts#341 · 1 in 1,598
- New York#355 · 1 in 1,789
- Nebraska#410 · 1 in 1,576
- Utah#420 · 1 in 1,816
Best ever in a state: #22 in Maine, 1982.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Jersey | #282 | 27 | 1 in 1,379 |
| Massachusetts | #341 | 16 | 1 in 1,598 |
| New York | #355 | 52 | 1 in 1,789 |
| Nebraska | #410 | 5 | 1 in 1,576 |
| Utah | #420 | 10 | 1 in 1,816 |
| Maryland | #423 | 13 | 1 in 1,872 |
| Virginia | #425 | 18 | 1 in 1,980 |
| Pennsylvania | #427 | 25 | 1 in 2,117 |
| Georgia | #494 | 21 | 1 in 2,284 |
| Oregon | #513 | 7 | 1 in 2,154 |
| North Carolina | #517 | 18 | 1 in 2,497 |
| Colorado | #521 | 10 | 1 in 2,285 |
| Wisconsin | #541 | 9 | 1 in 2,608 |
| California | #550 | 70 | 1 in 3,014 |
| South Carolina | #567 | 7 | 1 in 2,526 |
| Kentucky | #594 | 6 | 1 in 3,059 |
| Indiana | #654 | 9 | 1 in 3,369 |
| Texas | #670 | 44 | 1 in 3,628 |
| Oklahoma | #749 | 5 | 1 in 3,383 |
| Ohio | #756 | 12 | 1 in 4,314 |
| Alabama | #762 | 5 | 1 in 3,783 |
| Michigan | #798 | 9 | 1 in 4,622 |
| Missouri | #815 | 6 | 1 in 4,558 |
| Florida | #817 | 17 | 1 in 4,681 |
| Illinois | #829 | 13 | 1 in 4,678 |
| Minnesota | #838 | 5 | 1 in 4,853 |
| Tennessee | #872 | 6 | 1 in 4,889 |
| Washington | #930 | 6 | 1 in 5,054 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Lindsay
Momentum · girls
Falling
- 214 spots since 2024 (#1,980 → #2,194)
- 540 spots since 2020 (#1,654 → #2,194)
- 1,342 spots since 2015 (#852 → #2,194)
- Biggest jump: 325 spots in 1974 (#1,015 → #690)
- Biggest drop: 192 spots in 2015 (#660 → #852)
Rise & fade · girls
67 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1916
- Peaked 1983 at #36 (8,622 births)
- Births halved by 1992, 9 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 16 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 16 yrs · run 1978–1993
- Top 1,000: 47 yrs · run 1974–2015
Share of babies · girls
1 in 194
- Highest: 1 in 194 girls born in 1983 were named Lindsay (0.52%)
- Latest: 1 in 19,134 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · girls
The 1980s
- 52.5% of all girls named Lindsay (68,491) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 6 | #3,919 (1916) | #3,919 |
| 1920s | 19 | #3,743 (1928) | #4,238 |
| 1930s | 34 | #2,032 (1936) | #3,319 |
| 1940s | 327 | #982 (1949) | #1,939 |
| 1950s | 948 | #809 (1950) | #1,028 |
| 1960s | 583 | #1,324 (1968) | #1,476 |
| 1970s | 12,358 | #88 (1979) | #673 |
| 1980s | 68,491 | #36 (1983) | #48 |
| 1990s | 31,382 | #69 (1990) | #116 |
| 2000s | 12,262 | #179 (2000) | #287 |
| 2010s | 3,290 | #597 (2010) | #914 |
| 2020s | 665 | #1,450 (2021) | #1,853 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Lindsay in 2010
girls
#597
492 births · 1 in 3,613 girls
Top girls' names in 2010
More about 2010
girls
1,777,595 girls got a published name in 2010; 1 in 3,613 of them was named Lindsay, which outranked 97.0% of the 19,841 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Lindsay
Biggest movers since 2009
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.