Liliana
#78 for girls in 2025, 3,118 births · Last seen for boys in 2007 at #12,367
Given to girls 99.8% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2025 · 3,118 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 4 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 74,990since 1950
Liliana over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #78 | 3,118 | — | |
| 2024 | #80 | 3,022 | — | |
| 2023 | #88 | 2,807 | — | |
| 2022 | #97 | 2,789 | — | |
| 2021 | #104 | 2,609 | — | |
| 2020 | #110 | 2,479 | — | |
| 2019 | #109 | 2,603 | — | |
| 2018 | #109 | 2,798 | — | |
| 2017 | #109 | 2,765 | — | |
| 2016 | #123 | 2,645 | — | |
| 2015 | #127 | 2,566 | — | |
| 2014 | #119 | 2,640 | — | |
| 2013 | #124 | 2,618 | — | |
| 2012 | #117 | 2,623 | — | |
| 2011 | #115 | 2,664 | — | |
| 2010 | #124 | 2,519 | — | |
| 2009 | #120 | 2,653 | — | |
| 2008 | #150 | 2,296 | — | |
| 2007 | #151 | 2,321 | #12,367 | 5 |
| 2006 | #151 | 2,271 | — | |
| 2005 | #191 | 1,797 | #10,151 | 6 |
| 2004 | #223 | 1,519 | #11,356 | 5 |
| 2003 | #244 | 1,346 | — | |
| 2002 | #259 | 1,211 | — | |
| 2001 | #277 | 1,141 | — | |
| 2000 | #300 | 1,065 | #10,349 | 5 |
| 1999 | #306 | 1,005 | #9,912 | 5 |
| 1998 | #344 | 847 | — | |
| 1997 | #342 | 820 | #7,281 | 7 |
| 1996 | #344 | 811 | — | |
| 1995 | #332 | 802 | — | |
| 1994 | #335 | 798 | #6,968 | 7 |
| 1993 | #331 | 792 | #7,638 | 6 |
| 1992 | #345 | 755 | #5,236 | 10 |
| 1991 | #345 | 751 | #5,096 | 10 |
| 1990 | #368 | 721 | #4,167 | 13 |
| 1989 | #459 | 527 | #3,618 | 15 |
| 1988 | #507 | 436 | #4,450 | 10 |
| 1987 | #527 | 385 | #6,089 | 6 |
| 1986 | #516 | 402 | #4,130 | 10 |
| 1985 | #516 | 390 | #4,698 | 8 |
| 1984 | #556 | 336 | — | |
| 1983 | #524 | 361 | #3,884 | 10 |
| 1982 | #524 | 374 | #6,385 | 5 |
| 1981 | #459 | 466 | #4,509 | 8 |
| 1980 | #639 | 285 | — | |
| 1979 | #728 | 228 | #6,056 | 5 |
| 1978 | #858 | 171 | — | |
| 1977 | #905 | 156 | — | |
| 1976 | #703 | 210 | — | |
| 1975 | #790 | 177 | — | |
| 1974 | #811 | 166 | — | |
| 1973 | #808 | 162 | — | |
| 1972 | #937 | 131 | — | |
| 1971 | #1,041 | 116 | — | |
| 1970 | #1,052 | 116 | — | |
| 1969 | #1,480 | 63 | — | |
| 1968 | #1,855 | 41 | — | |
| 1967 | #2,039 | 33 | — | |
| 1966 | #1,827 | 39 | — | |
| 1965 | #2,031 | 33 | — | |
| 1964 | #2,195 | 30 | — | |
| 1963 | #1,981 | 35 | — | |
| 1962 | #2,814 | 19 | — | |
| 1961 | #2,839 | 19 | — | |
| 1960 | #2,820 | 19 | — | |
| 1959 | #4,031 | 10 | — | |
| 1958 | #4,520 | 8 | — | |
| 1957 | #5,377 | 6 | — | |
| 1956 | #4,161 | 9 | — | |
| 1955 | #3,377 | 12 | — | |
| 1954 | #4,655 | 7 | — | |
| 1953 | #5,040 | 6 | — | |
| 1952 | #4,123 | 8 | — | |
| 1951 | #5,414 | 5 | — | |
| 1950 | #4,738 | 6 | — | |
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Liliana! It came in at #4,738, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1950–1951, when fewer than 7 girls a year got the name.
Where Liliana is popular in 2011
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- New Mexico#53 · 1 in 244
- Hawaii#57 · 1 in 224
- Nevada#64 · 1 in 292
- Rhode Island#68 · 1 in 243
- Arizona#68 · 1 in 343
Best ever in a state: #18 in Hawaii, 2024.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Mexico | #53 | 30 | 1 in 244 |
| Hawaii | #57 | 15 | 1 in 224 |
| Nevada | #64 | 36 | 1 in 292 |
| Arizona | #68 | 89 | 1 in 343 |
| Rhode Island | #68 | 12 | 1 in 243 |
| California | #77 | 505 | 1 in 411 |
| Delaware | #77 | 11 | 1 in 251 |
| Wisconsin | #80 | 63 | 1 in 372 |
| Illinois | #81 | 142 | 1 in 419 |
| Connecticut | #86 | 31 | 1 in 389 |
| Massachusetts | #87 | 63 | 1 in 405 |
| Texas | #88 | 310 | 1 in 503 |
| Oregon | #93 | 37 | 1 in 401 |
| New Jersey | #95 | 80 | 1 in 462 |
| Maine | #96 | 11 | 1 in 333 |
| Vermont | #101 | 5 | 1 in 257 |
| Washington | #101 | 65 | 1 in 465 |
| New York | #103 | 171 | 1 in 543 |
| Florida | #108 | 148 | 1 in 537 |
| Michigan | #114 | 79 | 1 in 524 |
| District of Columbia | #123 | 8 | 1 in 368 |
| Oklahoma | #128 | 29 | 1 in 564 |
| North Carolina | #131 | 76 | 1 in 581 |
| Pennsylvania | #135 | 85 | 1 in 621 |
| Kansas | #138 | 24 | 1 in 529 |
| Colorado | #141 | 38 | 1 in 589 |
| Idaho | #154 | 11 | 1 in 558 |
| Indiana | #154 | 46 | 1 in 660 |
| Iowa | #154 | 21 | 1 in 592 |
| Minnesota | #173 | 33 | 1 in 725 |
| Maryland | #176 | 34 | 1 in 705 |
| Virginia | #178 | 46 | 1 in 784 |
| Ohio | #181 | 63 | 1 in 819 |
| Alaska | #182 | 5 | 1 in 505 |
| Utah | #182 | 25 | 1 in 718 |
| Missouri | #192 | 32 | 1 in 845 |
| Nebraska | #192 | 11 | 1 in 708 |
| Georgia | #211 | 50 | 1 in 954 |
| West Virginia | #224 | 8 | 1 in 818 |
| Alabama | #234 | 18 | 1 in 1,038 |
| Kentucky | #260 | 16 | 1 in 1,149 |
| Tennessee | #264 | 25 | 1 in 1,184 |
| South Carolina | #268 | 16 | 1 in 1,092 |
| Arkansas | #413 | 7 | 1 in 1,645 |
| Louisiana | #421 | 11 | 1 in 1,775 |
| Mississippi | #475 | 6 | 1 in 1,855 |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Liliana
- 2 spots since 2024 (#80 → #78)
- 32 spots since 2020 (#110 → #78)
- 49 spots since 2015 (#127 → #78)
- Biggest jump: 180 spots in 1981 (#639 → #459)
- Biggest drop: 202 spots in 1977 (#703 → #905)
- Debuted 1950
- Peaked 2025 at #78 (3,118 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 4 yrs · run 2022–2025
- Top 1,000: 54 yrs · run 1972–2025
- Highest: 1 in 515 girls born in 2025 were named Liliana (0.19%)
- 35.3% of all girls named Liliana (26,441) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 77 | #3,377 (1955) | #4,544 |
| 1960s | 331 | #1,480 (1969) | #2,188 |
| 1970s | 1,633 | #703 (1976) | #863 |
| 1980s | 3,962 | #459 (1989) | #523 |
| 1990s | 8,102 | #306 (1999) | #339 |
| 2000s | 17,620 | #120 (2009) | #207 |
| 2010s | 26,441 | #109 (2018) | #118 |
| 2020s | 16,824 | #78 (2025) | #93 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Liliana in 2011
Top girls' names in 2011
More about 2011
girls
1,759,066 girls got a published name in 2011; 1 in 660 of them was named Liliana, which outranked 99.4% of the 19,590 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).