Liam
#4,758 for girls in 2025, 28 births · #1 for boys in 2025, 20,818 births
Given to boys 99.8% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 2024 · 22,252 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 20 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 358,536since 1947
Liam over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #4,758 | 28 | #1 | 20,818 |
| 2024 | #4,039 | 36 | #1 | 22,252 |
| 2023 | #4,565 | 30 | #1 | 20,904 |
| 2022 | #5,028 | 26 | #1 | 20,579 |
| 2021 | #4,507 | 30 | #1 | 20,424 |
| 2020 | #4,169 | 33 | #1 | 19,865 |
| 2019 | #4,546 | 30 | #1 | 20,631 |
| 2018 | #5,315 | 24 | #1 | 19,977 |
| 2017 | #3,919 | 38 | #1 | 18,874 |
| 2016 | #6,401 | 19 | #2 | 18,277 |
| 2015 | #6,036 | 21 | #2 | 18,410 |
| 2014 | #4,455 | 32 | #2 | 18,488 |
| 2013 | #5,834 | 22 | #3 | 18,153 |
| 2012 | #5,710 | 23 | #6 | 16,824 |
| 2011 | #8,614 | 13 | #15 | 13,450 |
| 2010 | #5,977 | 22 | #30 | 10,933 |
| 2009 | #6,317 | 21 | #49 | 8,567 |
| 2008 | #10,084 | 11 | #75 | 5,982 |
| 2007 | #10,129 | 11 | #89 | 5,141 |
| 2006 | #9,901 | 11 | #98 | 4,514 |
| 2005 | #10,921 | 9 | #104 | 4,152 |
| 2004 | #7,391 | 15 | #112 | 3,827 |
| 2003 | #6,576 | 17 | #114 | 3,565 |
| 2002 | — | #113 | 3,382 | |
| 2001 | — | #131 | 3,029 | |
| 2000 | #8,027 | 12 | #140 | 2,781 |
| 1999 | #10,345 | 8 | #141 | 2,709 |
| 1998 | — | #155 | 2,209 | |
| 1997 | — | #162 | 2,112 | |
| 1996 | — | #184 | 1,748 | |
| 1995 | #10,514 | 7 | #239 | 1,206 |
| 1994 | — | #360 | 668 | |
| 1993 | — | #514 | 400 | |
| 1992 | — | #590 | 305 | |
| 1991 | — | #620 | 270 | |
| 1990 | — | #602 | 277 | |
| 1989 | — | #668 | 224 | |
| 1988 | — | #718 | 171 | |
| 1987 | — | #752 | 147 | |
| 1986 | — | #733 | 152 | |
| 1985 | — | #721 | 150 | |
| 1984 | — | #723 | 145 | |
| 1983 | — | #714 | 145 | |
| 1982 | — | #695 | 156 | |
| 1981 | — | #784 | 123 | |
| 1980 | — | #823 | 114 | |
| 1979 | — | #798 | 118 | |
| 1978 | — | #803 | 112 | |
| 1977 | — | #863 | 97 | |
| 1976 | — | #996 | 70 | |
| 1975 | — | #906 | 82 | |
| 1974 | — | #961 | 72 | |
| 1973 | — | #1,037 | 61 | |
| 1972 | — | #1,014 | 63 | |
| 1971 | — | #1,047 | 60 | |
| 1970 | — | #1,178 | 49 | |
| 1969 | — | #1,136 | 47 | |
| 1968 | — | #1,006 | 54 | |
| 1967 | — | #931 | 60 | |
| 1966 | — | #1,073 | 47 | |
| 1965 | — | #1,271 | 36 | |
| 1964 | — | #1,263 | 38 | |
| 1963 | — | #1,175 | 43 | |
| 1962 | — | #1,625 | 24 | |
| 1961 | — | #1,552 | 27 | |
| 1960 | — | #1,658 | 24 | |
| 1959 | — | #1,974 | 17 | |
| 1958 | — | #1,593 | 24 | |
| 1957 | — | #1,487 | 28 | |
| 1956 | — | #1,886 | 18 | |
| 1955 | — | #2,302 | 12 | |
| 1954 | — | #2,942 | 8 | |
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | #2,438 | 10 | |
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | #3,733 | 5 | |
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1947
The first year at least five boys were named Liam! It came in at #3,733, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1947–1949, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
See more about Liam
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
- Held #1 since 2020
- 1 spot since 2015 (#2 → #1)
- Biggest jump: 154 spots in 1994 (#514 → #360)
- Biggest drop: 90 spots in 1976 (#906 → #996)
Rise & fade · boys
77 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1947
- Peaked 2024 at #1 (22,252 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · boys
Top 10 for 14 yrs
- Top 10: 14 yrs · run 2012–2025
- Top 100: 20 yrs · run 2006–2025
- Top 1,000: 53 yrs · run 1974–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 77
- Highest: 1 in 77 boys born in 2024 were named Liam (1.3%)
- Latest: 1 in 82 boys born in 2025 (1.2%)
Era · boys
The 2010s
- 48.5% of all boys named Liam (174,017) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 5 | #3,733 (1947) | #3,733 |
| 1950s | 117 | #1,487 (1957) | #2,089 |
| 1960s | 400 | #931 (1967) | #1,269 |
| 1970s | 784 | #798 (1979) | #960 |
| 1980s | 1,527 | #668 (1989) | #733 |
| 1990s | 11,904 | #141 (1999) | #357 |
| 2000s | 44,940 | #49 (2009) | #103 |
| 2010s | 174,017 | #1 (2019) | #6 |
| 2020s | 124,842 | #1 (2024) | #1 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Liam ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: