Lewis
Last seen for girls in 2004 at #14,179 · #433 for boys in 2025, 736 births
Given to boys 99.4% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1880 · 517 births
- Debut · boys
- 517 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 56 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 155,766since 1880
Lewis over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #433 | 736 | |
| 2024 | — | #431 | 734 | |
| 2023 | — | #470 | 648 | |
| 2022 | — | #489 | 623 | |
| 2021 | — | #485 | 609 | |
| 2020 | — | #497 | 588 | |
| 2019 | — | #556 | 507 | |
| 2018 | — | #547 | 510 | |
| 2017 | — | #542 | 521 | |
| 2016 | — | #506 | 592 | |
| 2015 | — | #568 | 495 | |
| 2014 | — | #594 | 463 | |
| 2013 | — | #634 | 389 | |
| 2012 | — | #636 | 378 | |
| 2011 | — | #630 | 371 | |
| 2010 | — | #714 | 326 | |
| 2009 | — | #725 | 326 | |
| 2008 | — | #636 | 386 | |
| 2007 | — | #694 | 340 | |
| 2006 | — | #678 | 333 | |
| 2005 | — | #656 | 328 | |
| 2004 | #14,179 | 6 | #624 | 338 |
| 2003 | — | #633 | 324 | |
| 2002 | — | #591 | 353 | |
| 2001 | — | #588 | 339 | |
| 2000 | — | #572 | 357 | |
| 1999 | — | #516 | 412 | |
| 1998 | — | #555 | 354 | |
| 1997 | — | #534 | 372 | |
| 1996 | — | #493 | 428 | |
| 1995 | — | #521 | 378 | |
| 1994 | — | #487 | 432 | |
| 1993 | — | #458 | 460 | |
| 1992 | — | #412 | 544 | |
| 1991 | — | #395 | 574 | |
| 1990 | — | #398 | 579 | |
| 1989 | — | #391 | 560 | |
| 1988 | #11,798 | 5 | #358 | 571 |
| 1987 | #8,778 | 7 | #346 | 573 |
| 1986 | #7,134 | 9 | #335 | 581 |
| 1985 | — | #341 | 559 | |
| 1984 | #6,291 | 10 | #334 | 556 |
| 1983 | #7,312 | 8 | #322 | 593 |
| 1982 | #8,224 | 7 | #321 | 594 |
| 1981 | #5,254 | 13 | #313 | 608 |
| 1980 | — | #305 | 646 | |
| 1979 | #6,189 | 10 | #287 | 701 |
| 1978 | #6,385 | 9 | #299 | 625 |
| 1977 | #8,444 | 6 | #294 | 665 |
| 1976 | #5,215 | 11 | #281 | 679 |
| 1975 | #5,516 | 10 | #290 | 660 |
| 1974 | #5,776 | 9 | #270 | 706 |
| 1973 | #6,666 | 7 | #260 | 748 |
| 1972 | — | #253 | 799 | |
| 1971 | #5,543 | 9 | #244 | 935 |
| 1970 | #4,492 | 12 | #236 | 999 |
| 1969 | #3,619 | 15 | #239 | 943 |
| 1968 | #4,489 | 10 | #230 | 961 |
| 1967 | #6,804 | 5 | #213 | 1,061 |
| 1966 | #4,198 | 10 | #214 | 1,056 |
| 1965 | — | #216 | 1,117 | |
| 1964 | #3,692 | 13 | #217 | 1,248 |
| 1963 | #5,891 | 6 | #217 | 1,285 |
| 1962 | #5,860 | 6 | #216 | 1,276 |
| 1961 | #4,239 | 10 | #212 | 1,338 |
| 1960 | #4,184 | 10 | #204 | 1,398 |
| 1959 | #3,254 | 14 | #192 | 1,534 |
| 1958 | #5,408 | 6 | #177 | 1,669 |
| 1957 | — | #182 | 1,672 | |
| 1956 | #3,048 | 15 | #168 | 1,767 |
| 1955 | #3,571 | 11 | #160 | 1,782 |
| 1954 | #4,278 | 8 | #156 | 1,838 |
| 1953 | #5,040 | 6 | #155 | 1,852 |
| 1952 | #3,372 | 11 | #145 | 1,995 |
| 1951 | #3,482 | 10 | #135 | 1,997 |
| 1950 | — | #132 | 2,027 | |
| 1949 | #3,393 | 10 | #132 | 2,081 |
| 1948 | #3,883 | 8 | #130 | 2,143 |
| 1947 | #2,769 | 14 | #118 | 2,439 |
| 1946 | #4,417 | 6 | #118 | 2,154 |
| 1945 | #2,598 | 12 | #123 | 1,836 |
| 1944 | #2,096 | 17 | #112 | 2,044 |
| 1943 | #2,558 | 13 | #115 | 2,181 |
| 1942 | #2,986 | 10 | #112 | 2,180 |
| 1941 | #2,668 | 11 | #109 | 1,973 |
| 1940 | #3,208 | 8 | #107 | 1,900 |
| 1939 | #2,736 | 10 | #106 | 1,856 |
| 1938 | #2,579 | 11 | #109 | 1,882 |
| 1937 | #2,448 | 12 | #104 | 1,836 |
| 1936 | #3,376 | 7 | #101 | 1,855 |
| 1935 | #2,439 | 12 | #98 | 1,974 |
| 1934 | #2,187 | 14 | #94 | 2,062 |
| 1933 | #2,540 | 11 | #91 | 2,037 |
| 1932 | #1,957 | 17 | #91 | 2,112 |
| 1931 | #2,205 | 14 | #87 | 2,160 |
| 1930 | #1,934 | 18 | #87 | 2,243 |
| 1929 | #2,587 | 12 | #84 | 2,228 |
| 1928 | #1,784 | 22 | #86 | 2,339 |
| 1927 | #1,935 | 20 | #82 | 2,497 |
| 1926 | #1,932 | 20 | #82 | 2,444 |
| 1925 | #2,378 | 15 | #79 | 2,577 |
| 1924 | #2,514 | 14 | #77 | 2,670 |
| 1923 | #2,917 | 11 | #74 | 2,618 |
| 1922 | #1,957 | 20 | #75 | 2,555 |
| 1921 | #2,048 | 19 | #71 | 2,712 |
| 1920 | #3,097 | 10 | #72 | 2,688 |
| 1919 | #1,801 | 21 | #74 | 2,429 |
| 1918 | #2,102 | 17 | #74 | 2,593 |
| 1917 | #1,605 | 23 | #70 | 2,477 |
| 1916 | #3,031 | 9 | #71 | 2,374 |
| 1915 | #3,434 | 7 | #70 | 2,307 |
| 1914 | #1,896 | 13 | #72 | 1,767 |
| 1913 | #2,164 | 9 | #72 | 1,384 |
| 1912 | #2,144 | 8 | #68 | 1,247 |
| 1911 | #1,545 | 10 | #66 | 654 |
| 1910 | #1,935 | 7 | #65 | 555 |
| 1909 | #1,763 | 7 | #64 | 477 |
| 1908 | — | #61 | 489 | |
| 1907 | — | #66 | 427 | |
| 1906 | — | #69 | 365 | |
| 1905 | #1,696 | 6 | #65 | 384 |
| 1904 | — | #59 | 402 | |
| 1903 | #1,792 | 5 | #65 | 335 |
| 1902 | — | #58 | 385 | |
| 1901 | — | #63 | 309 | |
| 1900 | — | #52 | 469 | |
| 1899 | — | #54 | 352 | |
| 1898 | — | #62 | 352 | |
| 1897 | #1,555 | 5 | #54 | 378 |
| 1896 | — | #56 | 386 | |
| 1895 | #1,592 | 5 | #57 | 377 |
| 1894 | — | #59 | 359 | |
| 1893 | — | #57 | 364 | |
| 1892 | #1,278 | 6 | #55 | 399 |
| 1891 | — | #50 | 357 | |
| 1890 | — | #51 | 375 | |
| 1889 | — | #47 | 414 | |
| 1888 | — | #50 | 412 | |
| 1887 | — | #49 | 343 | |
| 1886 | — | #43 | 431 | |
| 1885 | — | #42 | 437 | |
| 1884 | — | #39 | 476 | |
| 1883 | — | #38 | 431 | |
| 1882 | — | #38 | 441 | |
| 1881 | — | #35 | 439 | |
| 1880 | — | #30 | 517 | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Lewis was already there! It came in at #30, and was given to 517 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1901–1907, when fewer than 430 boys a year got the name.
Where Lewis is popular in 2013
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- North Dakota#228 · 1 in 775
- Minnesota#233 · 1 in 1,000
- Oregon#357 · 1 in 1,635
- Washington#370 · 1 in 1,877
- Utah#405 · 1 in 1,964
Best ever in a state: #29 in Florida, 1912.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| North Dakota | #228 | 5 | 1 in 775 |
| Minnesota | #233 | 28 | 1 in 1,000 |
| Oregon | #357 | 11 | 1 in 1,635 |
| Washington | #370 | 19 | 1 in 1,877 |
| Utah | #405 | 11 | 1 in 1,964 |
| Wisconsin | #458 | 10 | 1 in 2,712 |
| Missouri | #470 | 12 | 1 in 2,646 |
| Ohio | #476 | 19 | 1 in 3,141 |
| Pennsylvania | #481 | 18 | 1 in 3,320 |
| Iowa | #482 | 6 | 1 in 2,544 |
| Kansas | #488 | 6 | 1 in 2,600 |
| Virginia | #494 | 13 | 1 in 3,209 |
| Michigan | #505 | 15 | 1 in 3,199 |
| Colorado | #509 | 9 | 1 in 2,980 |
| Kentucky | #524 | 6 | 1 in 3,701 |
| Arizona | #555 | 10 | 1 in 3,679 |
| Indiana | #594 | 9 | 1 in 3,961 |
| Tennessee | #629 | 8 | 1 in 4,446 |
| New Jersey | #634 | 9 | 1 in 4,614 |
| Maryland | #759 | 5 | 1 in 5,496 |
| Florida | #761 | 16 | 1 in 5,838 |
| California | #784 | 32 | 1 in 7,095 |
| Texas | #839 | 25 | 1 in 7,210 |
| North Carolina | #846 | 7 | 1 in 7,201 |
| New York | #851 | 15 | 1 in 6,832 |
| Illinois | #890 | 9 | 1 in 7,323 |
| Georgia | #962 | 7 | 1 in 7,669 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Lewis
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
- 2 spots since 2024 (#431 → #433)
- 64 spots since 2020 (#497 → #433)
- 135 spots since 2015 (#568 → #433)
- Biggest jump: 84 spots in 2011 (#714 → #630)
- Biggest drop: 89 spots in 2009 (#636 → #725)
Rise & fade · boys
Peaked on debut
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1880 at #30 (517 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · boys
Top 100 for 56 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 56 yrs · run 1880–1935
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 214
- Highest: 1 in 214 boys born in 1880 were named Lewis (0.47%)
- Latest: 1 in 2,321 boys born in 2025 (0.04%)
Era · boys
The 1920s
- 16.3% of all boys named Lewis (25,328) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 4,341 | #30 (1880) | #41 |
| 1890s | 3,699 | #50 (1891) | #56 |
| 1900s | 4,042 | #52 (1900) | #62 |
| 1910s | 17,787 | #65 (1910) | #70 |
| 1920s | 25,328 | #71 (1921) | #78 |
| 1930s | 20,017 | #87 (1930) | #97 |
| 1940s | 20,931 | #107 (1940) | #118 |
| 1950s | 18,133 | #132 (1950) | #160 |
| 1960s | 11,683 | #204 (1960) | #218 |
| 1970s | 7,517 | #236 (1970) | #271 |
| 1980s | 5,841 | #305 (1980) | #337 |
| 1990s | 4,533 | #395 (1991) | #477 |
| 2000s | 3,424 | #572 (2000) | #640 |
| 2010s | 4,552 | #506 (2016) | #593 |
| 2020s | 3,938 | #431 (2024) | #468 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Lewis in 2013
boys
#634
389 births · 1 in 4,863 boys
Top boys' names in 2013
More about 2013
boys
1,891,581 boys got a published name in 2013; 1 in 4,863 of them was named Lewis, which outranked 95.5% of the 14,070 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).