Leanna
#890 for girls in 2025, 300 births · Last seen for boys in 1987 at #6,951
Given to girls >99.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1989 · 659 births
- Debut · girls
- 7 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 25,932since 1880
Leanna over time
Rank among girls' names. Leanna has never cracked the top 300 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #890 | 300 | — | |
| 2024 | #904 | 293 | — | |
| 2023 | #985 | 260 | — | |
| 2022 | #946 | 287 | — | |
| 2021 | #910 | 295 | — | |
| 2020 | #884 | 302 | — | |
| 2019 | #854 | 313 | — | |
| 2018 | #819 | 331 | — | |
| 2017 | #736 | 384 | — | |
| 2016 | #801 | 355 | — | |
| 2015 | #760 | 371 | — | |
| 2014 | #725 | 386 | — | |
| 2013 | #693 | 408 | — | |
| 2012 | #741 | 375 | — | |
| 2011 | #686 | 409 | — | |
| 2010 | #705 | 406 | — | |
| 2009 | #709 | 406 | — | |
| 2008 | #726 | 410 | — | |
| 2007 | #746 | 391 | — | |
| 2006 | #751 | 369 | — | |
| 2005 | #747 | 361 | — | |
| 2004 | #754 | 346 | — | |
| 2003 | #713 | 365 | — | |
| 2002 | #678 | 371 | — | |
| 2001 | #625 | 400 | — | |
| 2000 | #613 | 414 | — | |
| 1999 | #633 | 372 | — | |
| 1998 | #574 | 428 | — | |
| 1997 | #524 | 457 | — | |
| 1996 | #519 | 453 | — | |
| 1995 | #551 | 427 | — | |
| 1994 | #550 | 440 | — | |
| 1993 | #526 | 460 | — | |
| 1992 | #485 | 510 | — | |
| 1991 | #426 | 598 | — | |
| 1990 | #389 | 675 | — | |
| 1989 | #384 | 659 | — | |
| 1988 | #449 | 504 | — | |
| 1987 | #589 | 332 | #6,951 | 5 |
| 1986 | #598 | 323 | — | |
| 1985 | #574 | 339 | — | |
| 1984 | #561 | 330 | — | |
| 1983 | #621 | 279 | — | |
| 1982 | #583 | 312 | — | |
| 1981 | #599 | 307 | — | |
| 1980 | #600 | 309 | — | |
| 1979 | #602 | 299 | — | |
| 1978 | #648 | 250 | — | |
| 1977 | #661 | 241 | — | |
| 1976 | #723 | 202 | — | |
| 1975 | #724 | 203 | — | |
| 1974 | #725 | 198 | — | |
| 1973 | #718 | 201 | — | |
| 1972 | #678 | 218 | — | |
| 1971 | #707 | 216 | — | |
| 1970 | #681 | 233 | — | |
| 1969 | #679 | 214 | — | |
| 1968 | #676 | 206 | — | |
| 1967 | #709 | 190 | — | |
| 1966 | #717 | 187 | — | |
| 1965 | #718 | 190 | — | |
| 1964 | #793 | 172 | — | |
| 1963 | #737 | 194 | — | |
| 1962 | #737 | 196 | — | |
| 1961 | #799 | 171 | — | |
| 1960 | #865 | 143 | — | |
| 1959 | #871 | 140 | — | |
| 1958 | #755 | 173 | — | |
| 1957 | #878 | 135 | — | |
| 1956 | #977 | 107 | — | |
| 1955 | #967 | 105 | — | |
| 1954 | #841 | 125 | — | |
| 1953 | #849 | 120 | — | |
| 1952 | #811 | 125 | — | |
| 1951 | #726 | 144 | — | |
| 1950 | #667 | 163 | — | |
| 1949 | #813 | 115 | — | |
| 1948 | #964 | 82 | — | |
| 1947 | #745 | 132 | — | |
| 1946 | #796 | 107 | — | |
| 1945 | #873 | 74 | — | |
| 1944 | #797 | 92 | — | |
| 1943 | #844 | 85 | — | |
| 1942 | #752 | 101 | — | |
| 1941 | #689 | 104 | — | |
| 1940 | #795 | 79 | — | |
| 1939 | #868 | 65 | — | |
| 1938 | #914 | 60 | — | |
| 1937 | #841 | 67 | — | |
| 1936 | #1,135 | 39 | — | |
| 1935 | #1,018 | 46 | — | |
| 1934 | #981 | 49 | — | |
| 1933 | #1,224 | 34 | — | |
| 1932 | #1,162 | 38 | — | |
| 1931 | #899 | 59 | — | |
| 1930 | #1,041 | 50 | — | |
| 1929 | #1,137 | 42 | — | |
| 1928 | #924 | 64 | — | |
| 1927 | #839 | 77 | — | |
| 1926 | #1,032 | 52 | — | |
| 1925 | #1,196 | 42 | — | |
| 1924 | #999 | 58 | — | |
| 1923 | #1,054 | 52 | — | |
| 1922 | #1,089 | 49 | — | |
| 1921 | #1,205 | 41 | — | |
| 1920 | #1,312 | 35 | — | |
| 1919 | #1,075 | 46 | — | |
| 1918 | #1,255 | 36 | — | |
| 1917 | #1,079 | 43 | — | |
| 1916 | #1,246 | 33 | — | |
| 1915 | #1,153 | 35 | — | |
| 1914 | #1,262 | 24 | — | |
| 1913 | #1,465 | 16 | — | |
| 1912 | #1,003 | 26 | — | |
| 1911 | #1,007 | 19 | — | |
| 1910 | #970 | 20 | — | |
| 1909 | #1,219 | 12 | — | |
| 1908 | #1,135 | 13 | — | |
| 1907 | #739 | 26 | — | |
| 1906 | #1,229 | 10 | — | |
| 1905 | #900 | 17 | — | |
| 1904 | #1,364 | 8 | — | |
| 1903 | #931 | 14 | — | |
| 1902 | #1,075 | 11 | — | |
| 1901 | #1,227 | 8 | — | |
| 1900 | #860 | 19 | — | |
| 1899 | #1,034 | 10 | — | |
| 1898 | #920 | 14 | — | |
| 1897 | #982 | 11 | — | |
| 1896 | #813 | 16 | — | |
| 1895 | #770 | 17 | — | |
| 1894 | #850 | 13 | — | |
| 1893 | #1,023 | 9 | — | |
| 1892 | #685 | 18 | — | |
| 1891 | #796 | 12 | — | |
| 1890 | #758 | 13 | — | |
| 1889 | #1,147 | 6 | — | |
| 1888 | #690 | 14 | — | |
| 1887 | #1,147 | 5 | — | |
| 1886 | #606 | 14 | — | |
| 1885 | #745 | 9 | — | |
| 1884 | #793 | 8 | — | |
| 1883 | #651 | 9 | — | |
| 1882 | #596 | 10 | — | |
| 1881 | #623 | 8 | — | |
| 1880 | #679 | 7 | — | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Leanna was already there! It came in at #679, and was given to 7 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1887, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Leanna is popular in 1951
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Kansas#192 · 1 in 1,302
- Colorado#270 · 1 in 1,950
- Indiana#331 · 1 in 3,778
- Iowa#351 · 1 in 4,206
- Washington#366 · 1 in 3,687
Best ever in a state: #145 in Delaware, 2018.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kansas | #192 | 15 | 1 in 1,302 |
| Colorado | #270 | 8 | 1 in 1,950 |
| Indiana | #331 | 12 | 1 in 3,778 |
| Iowa | #351 | 7 | 1 in 4,206 |
| Washington | #366 | 7 | 1 in 3,687 |
| Illinois | #533 | 11 | 1 in 8,352 |
| Pennsylvania | #647 | 8 | 1 in 13,561 |
| California | #769 | 10 | 1 in 12,092 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Leanna
- 14 spots since 2024 (#904 → #890)
- 6 spots since 2020 (#884 → #890)
- 130 spots since 2015 (#760 → #890)
- Biggest jump: 490 spots in 1907 (#1,229 → #739)
- Biggest drop: 541 spots in 1887 (#606 → #1,147)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1989 at #384 (659 births)
- Births halved by 2019, 30 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 115 yrs · run 1937–2025
- Highest: 1 in 2,797 girls born in 1989 were named Leanna (0.04%)
- Latest: 1 in 5,358 girls born in 2025 (0.02%)
- 18.6% of all girls named Leanna (4,820) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 90 | #596 (1882) | #768 |
| 1890s | 133 | #685 (1892) | #863 |
| 1900s | 138 | #739 (1907) | #1,068 |
| 1910s | 298 | #970 (1910) | #1,152 |
| 1920s | 512 | #839 (1927) | #1,079 |
| 1930s | 507 | #841 (1937) | #1,008 |
| 1940s | 971 | #689 (1941) | #807 |
| 1950s | 1,337 | #667 (1950) | #834 |
| 1960s | 1,863 | #676 (1968) | #743 |
| 1970s | 2,261 | #602 (1979) | #687 |
| 1980s | 3,694 | #384 (1989) | #556 |
| 1990s | 4,820 | #389 (1990) | #518 |
| 2000s | 3,833 | #613 (2000) | #706 |
| 2010s | 3,738 | #686 (2011) | #752 |
| 2020s | 1,737 | #884 (2020) | #920 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Leanna in 1951
Top girls' names in 1951
More about 1951
girls
1,800,859 girls got a published name in 1951; 1 in 12,506 of them was named Leanna, which outranked 88.3% of the 6,213 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 24.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).