Leann
#4,172 for girls in 2025, 34 births · Last seen for boys in 1981 at #4,961
Given to girls >99.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1968 · 620 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 24,356since 1925
Leann over time
Rank among girls' names. Leann has never cracked the top 300 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #4,172 | 34 | — | |
| 2024 | #3,758 | 40 | — | |
| 2023 | #4,655 | 29 | — | |
| 2022 | #3,703 | 41 | — | |
| 2021 | #3,491 | 44 | — | |
| 2020 | #2,931 | 55 | — | |
| 2019 | #2,729 | 62 | — | |
| 2018 | #3,107 | 52 | — | |
| 2017 | #3,053 | 53 | — | |
| 2016 | #2,594 | 68 | — | |
| 2015 | #2,294 | 81 | — | |
| 2014 | #1,908 | 105 | — | |
| 2013 | #1,900 | 105 | — | |
| 2012 | #1,719 | 120 | — | |
| 2011 | #1,708 | 122 | — | |
| 2010 | #1,720 | 121 | — | |
| 2009 | #1,676 | 133 | — | |
| 2008 | #1,547 | 149 | — | |
| 2007 | #1,560 | 145 | — | |
| 2006 | #1,366 | 168 | — | |
| 2005 | #1,333 | 164 | — | |
| 2004 | #1,314 | 162 | — | |
| 2003 | #1,154 | 187 | — | |
| 2002 | #1,129 | 184 | — | |
| 2001 | #1,025 | 210 | — | |
| 2000 | #975 | 217 | — | |
| 1999 | #838 | 258 | — | |
| 1998 | #622 | 381 | — | |
| 1997 | #686 | 315 | — | |
| 1996 | #995 | 189 | — | |
| 1995 | #1,063 | 168 | — | |
| 1994 | #961 | 193 | — | |
| 1993 | #930 | 203 | — | |
| 1992 | #813 | 247 | — | |
| 1991 | #787 | 260 | — | |
| 1990 | #693 | 306 | — | |
| 1989 | #610 | 348 | — | |
| 1988 | #515 | 428 | — | |
| 1987 | #519 | 401 | — | |
| 1986 | #522 | 394 | — | |
| 1985 | #477 | 440 | — | |
| 1984 | #474 | 435 | — | |
| 1983 | #462 | 440 | — | |
| 1982 | #432 | 506 | — | |
| 1981 | #475 | 446 | #4,961 | 7 |
| 1980 | #442 | 484 | — | |
| 1979 | #430 | 482 | — | |
| 1978 | #550 | 321 | — | |
| 1977 | #519 | 359 | — | |
| 1976 | #514 | 346 | — | |
| 1975 | #504 | 354 | — | |
| 1974 | #493 | 356 | — | |
| 1973 | #461 | 397 | — | |
| 1972 | #452 | 413 | — | |
| 1971 | #403 | 532 | — | |
| 1970 | #403 | 580 | — | |
| 1969 | #367 | 636 | — | |
| 1968 | #358 | 620 | — | |
| 1967 | #368 | 600 | — | |
| 1966 | #361 | 635 | — | |
| 1965 | #367 | 617 | — | |
| 1964 | #394 | 607 | — | |
| 1963 | #383 | 636 | — | |
| 1962 | #399 | 577 | — | |
| 1961 | #415 | 549 | — | |
| 1960 | #396 | 580 | — | |
| 1959 | #424 | 502 | — | |
| 1958 | #436 | 471 | — | |
| 1957 | #402 | 522 | — | |
| 1956 | #445 | 424 | — | |
| 1955 | #469 | 375 | — | |
| 1954 | #514 | 299 | — | |
| 1953 | #520 | 271 | — | |
| 1952 | #625 | 198 | — | |
| 1951 | #619 | 193 | — | |
| 1950 | #686 | 156 | — | |
| 1949 | #675 | 153 | — | |
| 1948 | #790 | 118 | — | |
| 1947 | #820 | 114 | — | |
| 1946 | #867 | 91 | — | |
| 1945 | #954 | 65 | — | |
| 1944 | #964 | 65 | — | |
| 1943 | #1,022 | 61 | — | |
| 1942 | #1,006 | 60 | — | |
| 1941 | #986 | 55 | — | |
| 1940 | #1,242 | 35 | — | |
| 1939 | #1,039 | 47 | — | |
| 1938 | #1,343 | 30 | — | |
| 1937 | #1,493 | 25 | — | |
| 1936 | #1,296 | 31 | — | |
| 1935 | #1,550 | 23 | — | |
| 1934 | #1,440 | 26 | — | |
| 1933 | #2,052 | 15 | — | |
| 1932 | #3,274 | 8 | — | |
| 1931 | #2,972 | 9 | — | |
| 1930 | #3,658 | 7 | — | |
| 1929 | #3,682 | 7 | — | |
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | #4,851 | 5 | — | |
| 1925 | #4,973 | 5 | — | |
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Leann! It came in at #4,973, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1925–1928, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Leann is popular in 1992
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- New Mexico#393 · 1 in 1,854
- Colorado#480 · 1 in 3,019
- Tennessee#502 · 1 in 3,718
- Pennsylvania#523 · 1 in 4,279
- North Carolina#525 · 1 in 3,983
Best ever in a state: #78 in North Dakota, 1966.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Mexico | #393 | 5 | 1 in 1,854 |
| Colorado | #480 | 7 | 1 in 3,019 |
| Tennessee | #502 | 8 | 1 in 3,718 |
| Pennsylvania | #523 | 16 | 1 in 4,279 |
| North Carolina | #525 | 10 | 1 in 3,983 |
| Indiana | #544 | 8 | 1 in 4,155 |
| Missouri | #572 | 7 | 1 in 4,417 |
| New Jersey | #625 | 9 | 1 in 5,060 |
| Florida | #688 | 14 | 1 in 5,363 |
| Ohio | #699 | 11 | 1 in 6,177 |
| Virginia | #708 | 6 | 1 in 6,083 |
| Georgia | #750 | 7 | 1 in 5,899 |
| Michigan | #873 | 7 | 1 in 8,152 |
| Texas | #873 | 20 | 1 in 6,879 |
| Illinois | #874 | 10 | 1 in 7,528 |
| New York | #1,008 | 13 | 1 in 8,931 |
| California | #1,052 | 27 | 1 in 9,511 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Leann
- 414 spots since 2024 (#3,758 → #4,172)
- 1,241 spots since 2020 (#2,931 → #4,172)
- 1,878 spots since 2015 (#2,294 → #4,172)
- Biggest jump: 309 spots in 1997 (#995 → #686)
- Biggest drop: 216 spots in 1999 (#622 → #838)
- Debuted 1925
- Peaked 1968 at #358 (620 births)
- Births halved by 1990, 22 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 57 yrs · run 1944–1994
- Highest: 1 in 2,646 girls born in 1968 were named Leann (0.04%)
- Latest: 1 in 47,273 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 24.9% of all girls named Leann (6,057) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 17 | #3,682 (1929) | #4,502 |
| 1930s | 221 | #1,039 (1939) | #2,012 |
| 1940s | 817 | #675 (1949) | #933 |
| 1950s | 3,411 | #402 (1957) | #514 |
| 1960s | 6,057 | #358 (1968) | #381 |
| 1970s | 4,140 | #403 (1970) | #473 |
| 1980s | 4,322 | #432 (1982) | #493 |
| 1990s | 2,520 | #622 (1998) | #839 |
| 2000s | 1,719 | #975 (2000) | #1,308 |
| 2010s | 889 | #1,708 (2011) | #2,273 |
| 2020s | 243 | #2,931 (2020) | #3,785 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Leann in 1992
Top girls' names in 1992
More about 1992
girls
1,843,931 girls got a published name in 1992; 1 in 7,465 of them was named Leann, which outranked 94.8% of the 15,610 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 13.8% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).