Layne
#1,396 for girls in 2025, 156 births · #662 for boys in 2025, 414 births
Given to boys 71.7% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1959 · 192 births
- Debut · boys
- 7 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 14,355since 1918
Layne over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,396 | 156 | #662 | 414 |
| 2024 | #1,275 | 182 | #695 | 389 |
| 2023 | #974 | 265 | #648 | 423 |
| 2022 | #923 | 293 | #666 | 410 |
| 2021 | #829 | 333 | #636 | 434 |
| 2020 | #929 | 278 | #663 | 397 |
| 2019 | #1,059 | 241 | #680 | 377 |
| 2018 | #2,217 | 83 | #693 | 350 |
| 2017 | #2,108 | 91 | #695 | 354 |
| 2016 | #2,463 | 74 | #720 | 340 |
| 2015 | #2,113 | 91 | #711 | 350 |
| 2014 | #2,096 | 92 | #628 | 419 |
| 2013 | #2,032 | 95 | #615 | 405 |
| 2012 | #2,336 | 80 | #591 | 432 |
| 2011 | #2,216 | 85 | #583 | 431 |
| 2010 | #2,136 | 92 | #606 | 411 |
| 2009 | #1,866 | 113 | #656 | 378 |
| 2008 | #2,419 | 79 | #624 | 395 |
| 2007 | #2,457 | 76 | #666 | 360 |
| 2006 | #1,709 | 122 | #694 | 320 |
| 2005 | #1,855 | 104 | #661 | 325 |
| 2004 | #1,756 | 109 | #645 | 320 |
| 2003 | #1,605 | 120 | #619 | 335 |
| 2002 | #1,683 | 109 | #691 | 263 |
| 2001 | #1,641 | 111 | #822 | 200 |
| 2000 | #1,817 | 95 | #779 | 213 |
| 1999 | #1,560 | 108 | #757 | 211 |
| 1998 | #1,709 | 93 | #736 | 221 |
| 1997 | #1,562 | 103 | #693 | 230 |
| 1996 | #1,466 | 112 | #707 | 224 |
| 1995 | #1,920 | 72 | #717 | 221 |
| 1994 | #1,728 | 85 | #924 | 141 |
| 1993 | #1,611 | 94 | #1,254 | 82 |
| 1992 | #2,059 | 66 | #1,255 | 81 |
| 1991 | #1,779 | 80 | #1,308 | 74 |
| 1990 | #1,989 | 68 | #1,336 | 69 |
| 1989 | #2,408 | 48 | #1,243 | 75 |
| 1988 | #2,152 | 53 | #1,501 | 50 |
| 1987 | #2,276 | 47 | #1,316 | 56 |
| 1986 | #2,420 | 41 | #1,385 | 51 |
| 1985 | #2,222 | 46 | #1,452 | 46 |
| 1984 | #1,922 | 54 | #1,198 | 58 |
| 1983 | #1,644 | 67 | #1,265 | 53 |
| 1982 | #1,755 | 63 | #1,382 | 47 |
| 1981 | #1,809 | 61 | #1,411 | 45 |
| 1980 | #3,719 | 21 | #1,313 | 51 |
| 1979 | #3,442 | 23 | #1,255 | 54 |
| 1978 | #3,924 | 18 | #1,393 | 44 |
| 1977 | #3,911 | 18 | #1,221 | 52 |
| 1976 | #3,095 | 23 | #1,123 | 57 |
| 1975 | #4,593 | 13 | #1,146 | 54 |
| 1974 | #3,695 | 17 | #1,370 | 39 |
| 1973 | #4,586 | 12 | #1,093 | 55 |
| 1972 | #3,894 | 15 | #1,177 | 48 |
| 1971 | #3,166 | 21 | #1,014 | 64 |
| 1970 | #3,030 | 22 | #895 | 81 |
| 1969 | #3,774 | 14 | #809 | 91 |
| 1968 | #3,315 | 16 | #765 | 94 |
| 1967 | #3,484 | 14 | #822 | 76 |
| 1966 | #3,400 | 14 | #835 | 76 |
| 1965 | #3,264 | 15 | #806 | 85 |
| 1964 | #2,915 | 19 | #753 | 103 |
| 1963 | #2,619 | 22 | #757 | 103 |
| 1962 | #2,922 | 18 | #657 | 139 |
| 1961 | #2,673 | 21 | #740 | 108 |
| 1960 | #2,369 | 25 | #635 | 150 |
| 1959 | #1,741 | 40 | #561 | 192 |
| 1958 | #2,449 | 22 | #796 | 88 |
| 1957 | #2,168 | 26 | #728 | 106 |
| 1956 | #1,738 | 37 | #880 | 72 |
| 1955 | #2,341 | 22 | #844 | 76 |
| 1954 | #2,779 | 16 | #813 | 79 |
| 1953 | #2,301 | 21 | #863 | 69 |
| 1952 | #1,978 | 26 | #814 | 74 |
| 1951 | #1,740 | 31 | #820 | 74 |
| 1950 | #1,871 | 26 | #960 | 52 |
| 1949 | #2,620 | 15 | #1,227 | 34 |
| 1948 | #2,589 | 15 | #1,194 | 36 |
| 1947 | #3,706 | 9 | #1,316 | 31 |
| 1946 | #2,597 | 14 | #1,884 | 15 |
| 1945 | #2,458 | 13 | #1,445 | 21 |
| 1944 | #4,054 | 6 | #1,525 | 20 |
| 1943 | #2,861 | 11 | #1,577 | 20 |
| 1942 | #4,622 | 5 | #1,946 | 14 |
| 1941 | #3,559 | 7 | #1,633 | 18 |
| 1940 | — | #1,368 | 24 | |
| 1939 | #3,782 | 6 | #1,636 | 17 |
| 1938 | — | #2,646 | 8 | |
| 1937 | — | #2,905 | 7 | |
| 1936 | — | #2,184 | 11 | |
| 1935 | — | #3,645 | 5 | |
| 1934 | — | #2,121 | 12 | |
| 1933 | — | #2,093 | 12 | |
| 1932 | — | #3,776 | 5 | |
| 1931 | — | #2,864 | 8 | |
| 1930 | — | #2,781 | 9 | |
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | #3,697 | 6 | |
| 1927 | — | #3,780 | 6 | |
| 1926 | — | #3,708 | 6 | |
| 1925 | — | #3,741 | 6 | |
| 1924 | — | #3,867 | 6 | |
| 1923 | — | #4,239 | 5 | |
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | #3,368 | 7 | |
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Layne! It came in at #3,368, and was given to 7 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1919–1923, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
See more about Layne
- 33 spots since 2024 (#695 → #662)
- 1 spot since 2020 (#663 → #662)
- 49 spots since 2015 (#711 → #662)
- Biggest jump: 330 spots in 1994 (#1,254 → #924)
- Biggest drop: 119 spots in 1971 (#895 → #1,014)
- Debuted 1918
- Peaked 1959 at #561 (192 births)
- Births halved by 1965, 6 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 53 yrs · run 1994–2025
- Highest: 1 in 4,031 boys born in 2021 were named Layne (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 4,126 boys born in 2025 (0.02%)
- Its best rank, #561 in 1959, was only 1 in 11,117 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 27.0% of all boys named Layne (3,869) were born in this decade
- Mostly girls until 1993, mostly boys since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 7 | #3,368 (1918) | #3,368 |
| 1920s | 35 | #3,697 (1928) | #3,839 |
| 1930s | 94 | #1,636 (1939) | #2,665 |
| 1940s | 233 | #1,194 (1948) | #1,512 |
| 1950s | 882 | #561 (1959) | #808 |
| 1960s | 1,025 | #635 (1960) | #758 |
| 1970s | 548 | #895 (1970) | #1,169 |
| 1980s | 532 | #1,198 (1984) | #1,347 |
| 1990s | 1,554 | #693 (1997) | #969 |
| 2000s | 3,109 | #619 (2003) | #686 |
| 2010s | 3,869 | #583 (2011) | #652 |
| 2020s | 2,467 | #636 (2021) | #662 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Layne in 1965
Top girls' names in 1965
Top boys' names in 1965
More about 1965
girls
1,765,164 girls got a published name in 1965; 1 in 117,678 of them was named Layne, which outranked 56.7% of the 7,535 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 16.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #3,149Zola16
- #3,149Zona16
- #3,149Zsazsa16
- #3,264Layne15
- #3,264Ailene15
- #3,264Amee15
- #3,264Amye15
- #3,402Adelle14
- #3,402Altagracia14
- #3,402Analisa14
Tied with 137 names at #3,264; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,860,143 boys got a published name in 1965; 1 in 21,884 of them was named Layne, which outranked 81.8% of the 4,425 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 28.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.