Laurie
#2,822 for girls in 2025, 60 births · Last seen for boys in 1990 at #8,117
Given to girls 98.8% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1960 · 10,143 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 19 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 166,488since 1882
Laurie over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,822 | 60 | — | |
| 2024 | #3,047 | 53 | — | |
| 2023 | #3,911 | 38 | — | |
| 2022 | #3,171 | 51 | — | |
| 2021 | #3,157 | 51 | — | |
| 2020 | #3,450 | 44 | — | |
| 2019 | #3,222 | 49 | — | |
| 2018 | #2,928 | 56 | — | |
| 2017 | #2,964 | 55 | — | |
| 2016 | #3,326 | 48 | — | |
| 2015 | #2,524 | 71 | — | |
| 2014 | #3,005 | 56 | — | |
| 2013 | #2,597 | 68 | — | |
| 2012 | #3,782 | 41 | — | |
| 2011 | #3,303 | 49 | — | |
| 2010 | #2,803 | 62 | — | |
| 2009 | #3,000 | 57 | — | |
| 2008 | #2,397 | 80 | — | |
| 2007 | #2,647 | 69 | — | |
| 2006 | #2,127 | 91 | — | |
| 2005 | #1,969 | 97 | — | |
| 2004 | #2,286 | 76 | — | |
| 2003 | #2,019 | 89 | — | |
| 2002 | #1,984 | 88 | — | |
| 2001 | #1,807 | 98 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,759 | 99 | — | |
| 1999 | #1,461 | 118 | — | |
| 1998 | #1,300 | 137 | — | |
| 1997 | #1,225 | 146 | — | |
| 1996 | #1,279 | 135 | — | |
| 1995 | #1,074 | 166 | — | |
| 1994 | #948 | 196 | — | |
| 1993 | #943 | 200 | — | |
| 1992 | #770 | 269 | — | |
| 1991 | #682 | 314 | — | |
| 1990 | #649 | 345 | #8,117 | 5 |
| 1989 | #521 | 448 | — | |
| 1988 | #478 | 476 | — | |
| 1987 | #431 | 519 | — | |
| 1986 | #391 | 591 | — | |
| 1985 | #311 | 779 | — | |
| 1984 | #291 | 817 | — | |
| 1983 | #247 | 952 | #5,484 | 6 |
| 1982 | #220 | 1,185 | #5,619 | 6 |
| 1981 | #214 | 1,224 | #3,601 | 11 |
| 1980 | #195 | 1,335 | #5,525 | 6 |
| 1979 | #176 | 1,581 | #5,355 | 6 |
| 1978 | #169 | 1,613 | #3,857 | 9 |
| 1977 | #153 | 1,765 | #4,582 | 7 |
| 1976 | #137 | 2,038 | #2,946 | 13 |
| 1975 | #125 | 2,284 | #3,246 | 11 |
| 1974 | #116 | 2,555 | #2,358 | 17 |
| 1973 | #106 | 2,897 | #2,124 | 19 |
| 1972 | #98 | 3,227 | #2,534 | 14 |
| 1971 | #96 | 3,749 | #2,366 | 16 |
| 1970 | #88 | 4,392 | #2,125 | 18 |
| 1969 | #79 | 4,627 | #2,130 | 16 |
| 1968 | #79 | 4,342 | #1,650 | 23 |
| 1967 | #72 | 4,921 | #1,974 | 16 |
| 1966 | #63 | 5,667 | #1,613 | 23 |
| 1965 | #60 | 6,533 | #1,483 | 27 |
| 1964 | #59 | 7,832 | #1,435 | 30 |
| 1963 | #47 | 9,276 | #1,279 | 37 |
| 1962 | #42 | 10,675 | #1,403 | 31 |
| 1961 | #43 | 10,435 | #1,349 | 35 |
| 1960 | #37 | 10,143 | #1,463 | 30 |
| 1959 | #56 | 7,535 | #1,360 | 33 |
| 1958 | #70 | 6,734 | #1,557 | 25 |
| 1957 | #73 | 6,543 | #1,634 | 24 |
| 1956 | #76 | 6,207 | #1,362 | 32 |
| 1955 | #91 | 4,954 | #1,503 | 26 |
| 1954 | #98 | 4,290 | #1,593 | 23 |
| 1953 | #103 | 3,686 | #1,378 | 30 |
| 1952 | #115 | 3,271 | #1,347 | 31 |
| 1951 | #139 | 2,353 | #1,519 | 24 |
| 1950 | #194 | 1,391 | #1,181 | 37 |
| 1949 | #224 | 1,103 | #1,097 | 41 |
| 1948 | #272 | 805 | #1,323 | 30 |
| 1947 | #273 | 789 | #1,081 | 45 |
| 1946 | #261 | 769 | #1,278 | 30 |
| 1945 | #285 | 592 | #1,227 | 29 |
| 1944 | #370 | 361 | #1,152 | 33 |
| 1943 | #459 | 258 | #1,214 | 32 |
| 1942 | #485 | 232 | #1,193 | 34 |
| 1941 | #521 | 178 | #1,300 | 26 |
| 1940 | #598 | 135 | #1,573 | 19 |
| 1939 | #574 | 137 | #1,168 | 31 |
| 1938 | #693 | 99 | #1,171 | 31 |
| 1937 | #751 | 82 | #1,119 | 34 |
| 1936 | #780 | 75 | #1,142 | 33 |
| 1935 | #834 | 68 | #1,295 | 27 |
| 1934 | #794 | 71 | #942 | 45 |
| 1933 | #1,085 | 41 | #1,202 | 30 |
| 1932 | #979 | 52 | #1,198 | 32 |
| 1931 | #1,060 | 44 | #1,589 | 20 |
| 1930 | #894 | 65 | #1,215 | 34 |
| 1929 | #1,032 | 50 | #1,339 | 28 |
| 1928 | #1,085 | 48 | #1,293 | 31 |
| 1927 | #1,023 | 56 | #1,350 | 30 |
| 1926 | #1,198 | 41 | #1,050 | 44 |
| 1925 | #1,324 | 36 | #1,184 | 36 |
| 1924 | #1,409 | 34 | #1,045 | 46 |
| 1923 | #1,129 | 46 | #1,177 | 37 |
| 1922 | #1,144 | 45 | #1,591 | 23 |
| 1921 | #1,148 | 44 | #1,296 | 32 |
| 1920 | #1,062 | 49 | #1,416 | 27 |
| 1919 | #1,369 | 32 | #1,351 | 28 |
| 1918 | #1,061 | 47 | #1,373 | 27 |
| 1917 | #1,079 | 43 | #1,264 | 29 |
| 1916 | #1,100 | 41 | #1,176 | 31 |
| 1915 | #1,094 | 38 | #1,372 | 24 |
| 1914 | #1,147 | 28 | #1,441 | 18 |
| 1913 | #1,176 | 22 | #1,173 | 19 |
| 1912 | #1,540 | 13 | #1,095 | 18 |
| 1911 | #1,241 | 14 | — | |
| 1910 | #1,030 | 18 | #1,193 | 8 |
| 1909 | #1,290 | 11 | #1,155 | 7 |
| 1908 | #970 | 17 | #1,373 | 5 |
| 1907 | #1,142 | 12 | #1,200 | 6 |
| 1906 | #1,154 | 11 | — | |
| 1905 | #1,696 | 6 | — | |
| 1904 | #1,877 | 5 | — | |
| 1903 | #1,440 | 7 | — | |
| 1902 | #1,219 | 9 | #1,137 | 5 |
| 1901 | #1,466 | 6 | #1,058 | 5 |
| 1900 | #1,053 | 13 | #785 | 11 |
| 1899 | #1,181 | 8 | #1,051 | 5 |
| 1898 | #1,700 | 5 | — | |
| 1897 | #1,263 | 7 | — | |
| 1896 | #950 | 12 | #982 | 6 |
| 1895 | #932 | 12 | — | |
| 1894 | #1,485 | 5 | — | |
| 1893 | #1,175 | 7 | #705 | 9 |
| 1892 | #1,085 | 8 | — | |
| 1891 | #796 | 12 | — | |
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | #950 | 8 | — | |
| 1888 | #959 | 8 | — | |
| 1887 | #788 | 9 | — | |
| 1886 | #897 | 7 | #845 | 6 |
| 1885 | #1,047 | 5 | — | |
| 1884 | #793 | 8 | — | |
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | #908 | 5 | — | |
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Laurie! It came in at #908, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1882–1883, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Laurie is popular in 1952
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Nevada#36 · 1 in 122
- Washington#41 · 1 in 186
- Connecticut#47 · 1 in 207
- Oregon#55 · 1 in 234
- Minnesota#55 · 1 in 237
Best ever in a state: #2 in Vermont, 1961.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nevada | #36 | 11 | 1 in 122 |
| Washington | #41 | 147 | 1 in 186 |
| Connecticut | #47 | 98 | 1 in 207 |
| Minnesota | #55 | 149 | 1 in 237 |
| Oregon | #55 | 71 | 1 in 234 |
| California | #56 | 490 | 1 in 268 |
| New York | #70 | 514 | 1 in 300 |
| Massachusetts | #72 | 141 | 1 in 343 |
| Utah | #75 | 33 | 1 in 290 |
| Montana | #79 | 22 | 1 in 291 |
| Michigan | #80 | 225 | 1 in 359 |
| North Dakota | #80 | 21 | 1 in 328 |
| Wyoming | #82 | 10 | 1 in 293 |
| Wisconsin | #84 | 104 | 1 in 385 |
| Vermont | #89 | 11 | 1 in 328 |
| South Dakota | #93 | 20 | 1 in 371 |
| Colorado | #94 | 39 | 1 in 417 |
| Nebraska | #94 | 33 | 1 in 438 |
| Rhode Island | #96 | 19 | 1 in 431 |
| Alaska | #103 | 5 | 1 in 366 |
| Maine | #104 | 21 | 1 in 426 |
| Hawaii | #106 | 17 | 1 in 345 |
| Illinois | #107 | 182 | 1 in 517 |
| New Jersey | #108 | 97 | 1 in 501 |
| Iowa | #111 | 53 | 1 in 537 |
| Delaware | #113 | 7 | 1 in 496 |
| Ohio | #121 | 147 | 1 in 646 |
| New Hampshire | #132 | 8 | 1 in 621 |
| Florida | #135 | 49 | 1 in 668 |
| Kansas | #145 | 25 | 1 in 824 |
| Arizona | #147 | 17 | 1 in 614 |
| Missouri | #147 | 46 | 1 in 899 |
| Idaho | #148 | 10 | 1 in 630 |
| District of Columbia | #158 | 16 | 1 in 817 |
| Maryland | #170 | 26 | 1 in 1,002 |
| Indiana | #183 | 37 | 1 in 1,259 |
| Pennsylvania | #184 | 95 | 1 in 1,169 |
| Texas | #192 | 106 | 1 in 1,005 |
| Oklahoma | #217 | 15 | 1 in 1,432 |
| New Mexico | #265 | 7 | 1 in 1,429 |
| Virginia | #272 | 18 | 1 in 2,148 |
| Tennessee | #280 | 16 | 1 in 2,315 |
| Mississippi | #332 | 11 | 1 in 2,562 |
| West Virginia | #332 | 7 | 1 in 3,173 |
| South Carolina | #333 | 11 | 1 in 2,661 |
| Louisiana | #336 | 15 | 1 in 2,369 |
| Arkansas | #352 | 7 | 1 in 2,845 |
| North Carolina | #364 | 15 | 1 in 3,405 |
| Georgia | #393 | 11 | 1 in 4,004 |
| Alabama | #400 | 9 | 1 in 4,092 |
| Kentucky | #410 | 7 | 1 in 4,812 |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Laurie
- 225 spots since 2024 (#3,047 → #2,822)
- 628 spots since 2020 (#3,450 → #2,822)
- 298 spots since 2015 (#2,524 → #2,822)
- Biggest jump: 553 spots in 1895 (#1,485 → #932)
- Biggest drop: 320 spots in 1909 (#970 → #1,290)
- Debuted 1882
- Peaked 1960 at #37 (10,143 births)
- Births halved by 1967, 7 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 19 yrs · run 1954–1972
- Top 1,000: 73 yrs · run 1934–1994
- Highest: 1 in 184 girls born in 1962 were named Laurie (0.54%)
- Latest: 1 in 26,788 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #37 in 1960, was only 1 in 199 (0.50%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 44.7% of all girls named Laurie (74,451) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 50 | #788 (1887) | #906 |
| 1890s | 76 | #796 (1891) | #1,174 |
| 1900s | 97 | #970 (1908) | #1,331 |
| 1910s | 296 | #1,030 (1910) | #1,184 |
| 1920s | 449 | #1,023 (1927) | #1,155 |
| 1930s | 734 | #574 (1939) | #844 |
| 1940s | 5,222 | #224 (1949) | #375 |
| 1950s | 46,964 | #56 (1959) | #102 |
| 1960s | 74,451 | #37 (1960) | #58 |
| 1970s | 26,101 | #88 (1970) | #126 |
| 1980s | 8,326 | #195 (1980) | #330 |
| 1990s | 2,026 | #649 (1990) | #1,033 |
| 2000s | 844 | #1,759 (2000) | #2,200 |
| 2010s | 555 | #2,524 (2015) | #3,045 |
| 2020s | 297 | #2,822 (2025) | #3,260 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Laurie in 1952
Top girls' names in 1952
Top boys' names in 1952
More about 1952
girls
1,854,335 girls got a published name in 1952; 1 in 567 of them was named Laurie, which outranked 98.2% of the 6,389 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,943,633 boys got a published name in 1952; 1 in 62,698 of them was named Laurie, which outranked 68.4% of the 4,257 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #1,323Vic32
- #1,323Wayland32
- #1,323Waymond32
- #1,347Laurie31
- #1,347Addison31
- #1,347Arvil31
- #1,347Author31
- #1,378Amado30
- #1,378Audrey30
- #1,378Augustin30
Tied with 30 names at #1,347; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.