Laurence

#14,942 for girls in 2025, 5 births · #1,743 for boys in 2025, 93 births
Given to boys 98.8% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · boys
1903 · 77 births
Debut · boys
25 births
In top 100 · boys
never
of 146 years
Total births · boys
39,720
since 1880

Laurence over time

boys

Rank among boys' names. Laurence has never cracked the top 200 here.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201932peak #201, 1903boys
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#14,9425#1,74393
2024—#2,16967
2023—#2,12968
2022#15,3065#2,51754
2021#15,2515#2,25362
2020#12,1427#1,97772
2019#15,5395#2,26561
2018#13,7936#2,23061
2017—#1,97772
2016—#2,33556
2015—#2,23460
2014—#2,25659
2013—#2,62345
2012—#2,44851
2011—#2,54748
2010—#2,87441
2009—#2,32056
2008—#2,40553
2007—#2,33755
2006#17,1685#1,89371
2005—#2,03561
2004—#1,76371
2003—#1,56181
2002#15,4325#1,62074
2001—#1,69968
2000#13,1546#1,64171
1999—#1,37486
1998—#1,24697
1997#12,0706#1,26391
1996#13,5185#1,101109
1995—#997124
1994—#1,113103
1993—#1,118101
1992—#967124
1991—#995116
1990#7,30311#933122
1989#9,6817#825145
1988#8,3918#929106
1987#11,3255#870115
1986—#831119
1985#10,6775#759138
1984—#706153
1983—#747134
1982—#676164
1981—#663167
1980—#683161
1979—#693152
1978#8,5626#713139
1977#8,4446#672158
1976—#621174
1975—#607179
1974—#587184
1973—#552204
1972—#543214
1971—#529231
1970—#466303
1969#6,6176#447302
1968#4,7799#429321
1967#4,9828#407348
1966#6,5645#406350
1965#5,8176#411364
1964#5,4747#364456
1963#5,2967#345503
1962—#342519
1961#3,79312#337540
1960—#344513
1959—#341518
1958—#331541
1957#6,0865#308607
1956—#288651
1955—#284641
1954—#263709
1953#4,5957#250748
1952#3,37211#231845
1951#4,8336#229822
1950—#227807
1949—#226802
1948#4,6516#233768
1947—#232778
1946—#224708
1945—#227591
1944—#233581
1943—#225648
1942#4,6225#219666
1941#4,4205#244524
1940—#211604
1939—#220549
1938#3,8476#246478
1937—#254448
1936—#258432
1935—#261427
1934—#236489
1933—#254426
1932—#244479
1931#3,2268#228518
1930#3,6587#226562
1929#4,0536#217586
1928#2,62312#229573
1927#4,2866#228583
1926—#221610
1925#2,11918#239551
1924#4,4346#237575
1923#3,9717#241543
1922#2,78012#230580
1921#2,94111#223599
1920#2,89911#228550
1919#2,15616#227531
1918#3,02410#222557
1917#3,3448#222495
1916#3,0319#227470
1915#2,9009#222462
1914#3,6185#213379
1913#2,8276#209314
1912#2,6346#204271
1911#1,9567#232121
1910#1,6349#217114
1909#2,2085#23489
1908#1,8626#21791
1907#1,8216#23078
1906#1,4168#21881
1905#1,9315#21877
1904#1,4867#21673
1903—#20177
1902#1,5946#21171
1901—#22360
1900#1,9325#21981
1899#1,1818#20863
1898#1,1719#20174
1897—#20469
1896#1,5835#23559
1895—#23058
1894—#25646
1893#1,4375#23653
1892—#26645
1891#1,0937#25739
1890#1,3385#26842
1889—#30532
1888—#28638
1887—#31128
1886—#25843
1885—#29033
1884—#36024
1883—#30928
1882—#36524
1881—#30728
1880—#34125
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Laurence was already there! It came in at #341, and was given to 25 baby boys.


Quietest stretch: 1880–1885, when fewer than 34 boys a year got the name.

Where Laurence is popular in 1932

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 boys named Laurence, so not publishedAKMaine: #116 for boys · 12 births · 1 in 541 boysMEVermont: #103 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 486 boysVTNew Hampshire: #94 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 612 boysNHWashington: #177 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 1,293 boysWAIdaho: #149 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 685 boysIDMontana: fewer than 5 boys named Laurence, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Laurence, so not publishedNDMinnesota: #153 for boys · 17 births · 1 in 1,168 boysMNIllinois: #173 for boys · 37 births · 1 in 1,397 boysILWisconsin: #142 for boys · 22 births · 1 in 1,053 boysWIMichigan: #142 for boys · 35 births · 1 in 1,074 boysMINew York: #147 for boys · 62 births · 1 in 1,429 boysNYMassachusetts: #97 for boys · 33 births · 1 in 903 boysMARhode Island: fewer than 5 boys named Laurence, so not publishedRIOregon: #165 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 1,051 boysORNevada: fewer than 5 boys named Laurence, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 boys named Laurence, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Laurence, so not publishedSDIowa: #182 for boys · 14 births · 1 in 1,305 boysIAIndiana: #285 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 3,851 boysINOhio: #265 for boys · 12 births · 1 in 3,842 boysOHPennsylvania: #225 for boys · 23 births · 1 in 3,203 boysPANew Jersey: #146 for boys · 18 births · 1 in 1,472 boysNJConnecticut: #151 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 1,664 boysCTCalifornia: #188 for boys · 27 births · 1 in 1,307 boysCAUtah: fewer than 5 boys named Laurence, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 boys named Laurence, so not publishedCONebraska: #228 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 1,824 boysNEMissouri: #307 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 3,949 boysMOKentucky: fewer than 5 boys named Laurence, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 boys named Laurence, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 boys named Laurence, so not publishedVAMaryland: #167 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 1,675 boysMDDelaware: fewer than 5 boys named Laurence, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 boys named Laurence, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 boys named Laurence, so not publishedNMKansas: #218 for boys · 8 births · 1 in 1,743 boysKSArkansas: fewer than 5 boys named Laurence, so not publishedARTennessee: #395 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 5,113 boysTNNorth Carolina: #362 for boys · 8 births · 1 in 4,250 boysNCSouth Carolina: #288 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 2,702 boysSCDistrict of Columbia: #90 for boys · 8 births · 1 in 478 boysDCOklahoma: #373 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 4,344 boysOKLouisiana: #344 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 2,764 boysLAMississippi: fewer than 5 boys named Laurence, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 boys named Laurence, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 boys named Laurence, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 boys named Laurence, so not publishedHITexas: #560 for boys · 10 births · 1 in 5,618 boysTXFlorida: fewer than 5 boys named Laurence, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · boys
  1. District of Columbia#90 · 1 in 478
  2. New Hampshire#94 · 1 in 612
  3. Massachusetts#97 · 1 in 903
  4. Vermont#103 · 1 in 486
  5. Maine#116 · 1 in 541

Best ever in a state: #58 in Vermont, 1914.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
District of Columbia#9081 in 478
New Hampshire#9451 in 612
Massachusetts#97331 in 903
Vermont#10351 in 486
Maine#116121 in 541
Michigan#142351 in 1,074
Wisconsin#142221 in 1,053
New Jersey#146181 in 1,472
New York#147621 in 1,429
Idaho#14951 in 685
Connecticut#15161 in 1,664
Minnesota#153171 in 1,168
Oregon#16551 in 1,051
Maryland#16771 in 1,675
Illinois#173371 in 1,397
Washington#17771 in 1,293
Iowa#182141 in 1,305
California#188271 in 1,307
Kansas#21881 in 1,743
Pennsylvania#225231 in 3,203
Nebraska#22861 in 1,824
Ohio#265121 in 3,842
Indiana#28561 in 3,851
South Carolina#28871 in 2,702
Missouri#30771 in 3,949
Louisiana#34471 in 2,764
North Carolina#36281 in 4,250
Oklahoma#37351 in 4,344
Tennessee#39551 in 5,113
Texas#560101 in 5,618
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Delaware———
Florida———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Kentucky———
Mississippi———
Montana———
Nevada———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Utah———
Virginia———
West Virginia———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Laurence
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
  • 426 spots since 2024 (#2,169 → #1,743)
  • 234 spots since 2020 (#1,977 → #1,743)
  • 491 spots since 2015 (#2,234 → #1,743)
  • Biggest jump: 116 spots in 1995 (#1,113 → #997)
  • Biggest drop: 151 spots in 1993 (#967 → #1,118)
Rise & fade · boys
23 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1903 at #201 (77 births)
  • Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 114 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 114 yrs · run 1880–1992
Share of babies · boys
1 in 1,548
  • Highest: 1 in 1,548 boys born in 1903 were named Laurence (0.06%)
  • Latest: 1 in 18,366 boys born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · boys
The 1950s
  • 17.3% of all boys named Laurence (6,889) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s303#258 (1886)#313
1890s548#201 (1898)#236
1900s778#201 (1903)#219
1910s3,714#204 (1912)#220
1920s5,750#217 (1929)#229
1930s4,808#220 (1939)#243
1940s6,670#211 (1940)#227
1950s6,889#227 (1950)#275
1960s4,216#337 (1961)#383
1970s1,938#466 (1970)#598
1980s1,402#663 (1981)#769
1990s1,073#933 (1990)#1,111
2000s661#1,561 (2003)#1,927
2010s554#1,977 (2017)#2,379
2020s416#1,743 (2025)#2,131

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Laurence in 1932

boys
#244
479 births · 1 in 2,180 boys

Top boys' names in 1932

  1. #1Robert59,268
  2. #2James51,930
  3. #3John48,624
  4. #4William42,124
  5. #5Richard31,809
  6. #6Charles31,092
  7. #7Donald29,794
  8. #8George20,439
  9. #9Joseph18,566
  10. #10Thomas16,834
  11. #244Laurence479
More about 1932

boys

1,044,157 boys got a published name in 1932; 1 in 2,180 of them was named Laurence, which outranked 94.3% of the 4,284 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.6% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Laurence
  1. #241Nick490
  2. #242Fredrick487
  3. #243Nathan486
  4. #244Laurence479
  5. #245Byron471
  6. #246Norbert470
  7. #247Ruben469
Biggest movers since 1931
Risers
  1. ↑ 2,418Delano#3,095 → #677
  2. ↑ 969Garner#1,643 → #674
  3. ↑ 868Ronny#1,770 → #902
  4. ↑ 713Darryl#1,693 → #980
  5. ↑ 609Marc#1,589 → #980
Fallers
  1. ↓ 467Jones#959 → #1,426
  2. ↓ 455Hamilton#831 → #1,286
  3. ↓ 393Hyman#697 → #1,090
  4. ↓ 373Davey#983 → #1,356
  5. ↓ 341Hayes#983 → #1,324

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1932 →