Lannie
Last seen for girls in 2024 at #13,477 · Last seen for boys in 1998 at #8,479
Given to boys 54.3% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1949 · 139 births
- Debut · boys
- 6 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 1,858since 1892
Lannie over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | #13,477 | 6 | — | |
| 2023 | #11,169 | 8 | — | |
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | #11,146 | 8 | — | |
| 2020 | #12,142 | 7 | — | |
| 2019 | #12,448 | 7 | — | |
| 2018 | #9,806 | 10 | — | |
| 2017 | #15,902 | 5 | — | |
| 2016 | #14,331 | 6 | — | |
| 2015 | #13,006 | 7 | — | |
| 2014 | #14,558 | 6 | — | |
| 2013 | #16,547 | 5 | — | |
| 2012 | #12,199 | 8 | — | |
| 2011 | #12,153 | 8 | — | |
| 2010 | #10,451 | 10 | — | |
| 2009 | #17,294 | 5 | — | |
| 2008 | #8,965 | 13 | — | |
| 2007 | #10,129 | 11 | — | |
| 2006 | #8,715 | 13 | — | |
| 2005 | #8,883 | 12 | — | |
| 2004 | #9,264 | 11 | — | |
| 2003 | #7,580 | 14 | — | |
| 2002 | #7,816 | 13 | — | |
| 2001 | #13,521 | 6 | — | |
| 2000 | #13,154 | 6 | — | |
| 1999 | #11,385 | 7 | — | |
| 1998 | #10,122 | 8 | #8,479 | 6 |
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | #13,386 | 5 | — | |
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | #9,559 | 8 | — | |
| 1992 | #11,738 | 6 | — | |
| 1991 | #6,976 | 12 | #5,942 | 8 |
| 1990 | #11,409 | 6 | — | |
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | #5,751 | 7 | |
| 1987 | #11,325 | 5 | #6,951 | 5 |
| 1986 | — | #3,882 | 11 | |
| 1985 | — | #5,147 | 7 | |
| 1984 | — | #3,459 | 12 | |
| 1983 | #9,015 | 6 | #3,230 | 13 |
| 1982 | #6,371 | 10 | #4,234 | 9 |
| 1981 | #10,411 | 5 | #3,412 | 12 |
| 1980 | #6,789 | 9 | #3,098 | 14 |
| 1979 | #10,210 | 5 | #2,568 | 18 |
| 1978 | #8,562 | 6 | #3,614 | 10 |
| 1977 | #9,652 | 5 | #3,386 | 11 |
| 1976 | #3,678 | 18 | #2,709 | 15 |
| 1975 | #5,984 | 9 | #2,065 | 22 |
| 1974 | #6,258 | 8 | #2,199 | 19 |
| 1973 | #6,666 | 7 | #2,124 | 19 |
| 1972 | — | #2,659 | 13 | |
| 1971 | #8,324 | 5 | #1,916 | 22 |
| 1970 | #5,061 | 10 | #1,939 | 21 |
| 1969 | #5,057 | 9 | #2,046 | 17 |
| 1968 | #3,789 | 13 | #2,030 | 16 |
| 1967 | #6,042 | 6 | #1,906 | 17 |
| 1966 | — | #1,814 | 18 | |
| 1965 | #4,494 | 9 | #1,483 | 27 |
| 1964 | #3,879 | 12 | #1,793 | 20 |
| 1963 | #3,336 | 15 | #1,238 | 39 |
| 1962 | #3,033 | 17 | #1,403 | 31 |
| 1961 | #4,546 | 9 | #1,349 | 35 |
| 1960 | #5,168 | 7 | #1,320 | 36 |
| 1959 | #3,254 | 14 | #1,559 | 26 |
| 1958 | #2,972 | 16 | #1,396 | 31 |
| 1957 | #2,486 | 21 | #1,457 | 29 |
| 1956 | #2,249 | 24 | #999 | 56 |
| 1955 | #2,553 | 19 | #1,054 | 51 |
| 1954 | #2,592 | 18 | #952 | 60 |
| 1953 | #2,699 | 16 | #1,214 | 38 |
| 1952 | #2,502 | 18 | #1,002 | 51 |
| 1951 | #2,182 | 21 | #760 | 85 |
| 1950 | #2,002 | 23 | #721 | 90 |
| 1949 | #2,274 | 19 | #569 | 139 |
| 1948 | #2,126 | 21 | #1,107 | 41 |
| 1947 | #2,354 | 18 | #1,053 | 47 |
| 1946 | #1,723 | 27 | #1,045 | 43 |
| 1945 | #2,149 | 16 | #1,122 | 34 |
| 1944 | #1,545 | 28 | #1,255 | 28 |
| 1943 | #1,751 | 24 | #1,431 | 24 |
| 1942 | #2,046 | 18 | #1,026 | 43 |
| 1941 | #1,882 | 19 | #1,051 | 38 |
| 1940 | #1,745 | 21 | #1,251 | 29 |
| 1939 | #1,947 | 17 | #1,532 | 19 |
| 1938 | #2,113 | 15 | #1,689 | 17 |
| 1937 | #2,101 | 15 | #1,265 | 28 |
| 1936 | #3,103 | 8 | #1,872 | 14 |
| 1935 | #1,449 | 26 | #1,837 | 15 |
| 1934 | #2,087 | 15 | #2,022 | 13 |
| 1933 | #2,161 | 14 | #2,738 | 8 |
| 1932 | #1,634 | 22 | #2,638 | 9 |
| 1931 | #2,205 | 14 | #3,095 | 7 |
| 1930 | #2,023 | 17 | #2,781 | 9 |
| 1929 | #1,953 | 18 | #2,766 | 9 |
| 1928 | #2,194 | 16 | #2,522 | 11 |
| 1927 | #2,026 | 19 | #1,959 | 17 |
| 1926 | #1,830 | 22 | #2,302 | 13 |
| 1925 | #1,795 | 23 | #2,936 | 9 |
| 1924 | #1,723 | 25 | #2,641 | 11 |
| 1923 | #2,465 | 14 | #2,224 | 14 |
| 1922 | #1,730 | 24 | #4,307 | 5 |
| 1921 | #1,988 | 20 | #3,517 | 7 |
| 1920 | #2,357 | 15 | #2,459 | 12 |
| 1919 | #1,855 | 20 | #2,265 | 13 |
| 1918 | #2,102 | 17 | #3,368 | 7 |
| 1917 | #1,605 | 23 | #2,562 | 10 |
| 1916 | #1,867 | 18 | #3,516 | 6 |
| 1915 | #1,738 | 19 | #2,070 | 13 |
| 1914 | #1,541 | 18 | #2,457 | 8 |
| 1913 | #1,883 | 11 | — | |
| 1912 | #1,719 | 11 | #1,417 | 12 |
| 1911 | #1,372 | 12 | #1,740 | 5 |
| 1910 | #914 | 22 | — | |
| 1909 | #1,763 | 7 | #1,277 | 6 |
| 1908 | #1,261 | 11 | — | |
| 1907 | #1,289 | 10 | — | |
| 1906 | #1,553 | 7 | — | |
| 1905 | #1,420 | 8 | — | |
| 1904 | #965 | 14 | — | |
| 1903 | #1,792 | 5 | #1,130 | 5 |
| 1902 | #1,133 | 10 | — | |
| 1901 | #1,136 | 9 | — | |
| 1900 | #941 | 16 | — | |
| 1899 | #1,181 | 8 | — | |
| 1898 | #963 | 13 | — | |
| 1897 | #1,037 | 10 | — | |
| 1896 | #1,047 | 10 | — | |
| 1895 | #1,592 | 5 | #872 | 7 |
| 1894 | #1,353 | 6 | — | |
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | #956 | 6 | |
| 1891 | #1,332 | 5 | — | |
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | #950 | 8 | — | |
| 1888 | #1,136 | 6 | — | |
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | #830 | 5 | — | |
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Lannie! It came in at #956, and was given to 6 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1893–1894, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Lannie is popular in 1955
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Kentucky#331 · 1 in 4,567
- Georgia#530 · 1 in 9,806
Best ever in a state: #218 in Kentucky, 1949.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kentucky | #331 | 8 | 1 in 4,567 |
| Georgia | #530 | 5 | 1 in 9,806 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Lannie
- Not published in 2025; last seen 1998
- Biggest jump: 538 spots in 1949 (#1,107 → #569)
- Biggest drop: 458 spots in 1957 (#999 → #1,457)
- Debuted 1892
- Peaked 1949 at #569 (139 births)
- Births halved by 1952, 3 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 7 yrs · run 1949–1951
- Highest: 1 in 12,762 boys born in 1949 were named Lannie (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 318,561 boys born in 1998 (0.00%)
- 27.8% of all boys named Lannie (517) were born in this decade
- Mostly boys until 1989, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 13 | #872 (1895) | #914 |
| 1900s | 11 | #1,130 (1903) | #1,204 |
| 1910s | 74 | #1,417 (1912) | #2,424 |
| 1920s | 108 | #1,959 (1927) | #2,763 |
| 1930s | 139 | #1,265 (1937) | #2,147 |
| 1940s | 466 | #569 (1949) | #1,091 |
| 1950s | 517 | #721 (1950) | #1,111 |
| 1960s | 256 | #1,238 (1963) | #1,638 |
| 1970s | 170 | #1,916 (1971) | #2,518 |
| 1980s | 90 | #3,098 (1980) | #4,352 |
| 1990s | 14 | #5,942 (1991) | #7,211 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Lannie in 1955
Top girls' names in 1955
Top boys' names in 1955
More about 1955
girls
1,955,277 girls got a published name in 1955; 1 in 102,909 of them was named Lannie, which outranked 62.1% of the 6,732 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #2,472Yvonna20
- #2,472Zana20
- #2,472Zulema20
- #2,553Lannie19
- #2,553Angella19
- #2,553Barry19
- #2,553Bonney19
- #2,635Adriene18
- #2,635Alvera18
- #2,635Alvin18
Tied with 81 names at #2,553; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
2,059,889 boys got a published name in 1955; 1 in 40,390 of them was named Lannie, which outranked 76.0% of the 4,400 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 32.1% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #1,047Lorenza52
- #1,047Marcellus52
- #1,047Richie52
- #1,054Lannie51
- #1,054Arlan51
- #1,054Genaro51
- #1,054Leonel51
- #1,066Alvaro50
- #1,066Antone50
- #1,066Gerold50
Tied with 11 names at #1,054; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.