Lannie
Last seen for girls in 2024 at #13,477 · Last seen for boys in 1998 at #8,479
Given to boys 54.3% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1949 · 139 births
- Debut · boys
- 6 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 1,858since 1892
Lannie over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | #13,477 | 6 | — | |
| 2023 | #11,169 | 8 | — | |
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | #11,146 | 8 | — | |
| 2020 | #12,142 | 7 | — | |
| 2019 | #12,448 | 7 | — | |
| 2018 | #9,806 | 10 | — | |
| 2017 | #15,902 | 5 | — | |
| 2016 | #14,331 | 6 | — | |
| 2015 | #13,006 | 7 | — | |
| 2014 | #14,558 | 6 | — | |
| 2013 | #16,547 | 5 | — | |
| 2012 | #12,199 | 8 | — | |
| 2011 | #12,153 | 8 | — | |
| 2010 | #10,451 | 10 | — | |
| 2009 | #17,294 | 5 | — | |
| 2008 | #8,965 | 13 | — | |
| 2007 | #10,129 | 11 | — | |
| 2006 | #8,715 | 13 | — | |
| 2005 | #8,883 | 12 | — | |
| 2004 | #9,264 | 11 | — | |
| 2003 | #7,580 | 14 | — | |
| 2002 | #7,816 | 13 | — | |
| 2001 | #13,521 | 6 | — | |
| 2000 | #13,154 | 6 | — | |
| 1999 | #11,385 | 7 | — | |
| 1998 | #10,122 | 8 | #8,479 | 6 |
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | #13,386 | 5 | — | |
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | #9,559 | 8 | — | |
| 1992 | #11,738 | 6 | — | |
| 1991 | #6,976 | 12 | #5,942 | 8 |
| 1990 | #11,409 | 6 | — | |
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | #5,751 | 7 | |
| 1987 | #11,325 | 5 | #6,951 | 5 |
| 1986 | — | #3,882 | 11 | |
| 1985 | — | #5,147 | 7 | |
| 1984 | — | #3,459 | 12 | |
| 1983 | #9,015 | 6 | #3,230 | 13 |
| 1982 | #6,371 | 10 | #4,234 | 9 |
| 1981 | #10,411 | 5 | #3,412 | 12 |
| 1980 | #6,789 | 9 | #3,098 | 14 |
| 1979 | #10,210 | 5 | #2,568 | 18 |
| 1978 | #8,562 | 6 | #3,614 | 10 |
| 1977 | #9,652 | 5 | #3,386 | 11 |
| 1976 | #3,678 | 18 | #2,709 | 15 |
| 1975 | #5,984 | 9 | #2,065 | 22 |
| 1974 | #6,258 | 8 | #2,199 | 19 |
| 1973 | #6,666 | 7 | #2,124 | 19 |
| 1972 | — | #2,659 | 13 | |
| 1971 | #8,324 | 5 | #1,916 | 22 |
| 1970 | #5,061 | 10 | #1,939 | 21 |
| 1969 | #5,057 | 9 | #2,046 | 17 |
| 1968 | #3,789 | 13 | #2,030 | 16 |
| 1967 | #6,042 | 6 | #1,906 | 17 |
| 1966 | — | #1,814 | 18 | |
| 1965 | #4,494 | 9 | #1,483 | 27 |
| 1964 | #3,879 | 12 | #1,793 | 20 |
| 1963 | #3,336 | 15 | #1,238 | 39 |
| 1962 | #3,033 | 17 | #1,403 | 31 |
| 1961 | #4,546 | 9 | #1,349 | 35 |
| 1960 | #5,168 | 7 | #1,320 | 36 |
| 1959 | #3,254 | 14 | #1,559 | 26 |
| 1958 | #2,972 | 16 | #1,396 | 31 |
| 1957 | #2,486 | 21 | #1,457 | 29 |
| 1956 | #2,249 | 24 | #999 | 56 |
| 1955 | #2,553 | 19 | #1,054 | 51 |
| 1954 | #2,592 | 18 | #952 | 60 |
| 1953 | #2,699 | 16 | #1,214 | 38 |
| 1952 | #2,502 | 18 | #1,002 | 51 |
| 1951 | #2,182 | 21 | #760 | 85 |
| 1950 | #2,002 | 23 | #721 | 90 |
| 1949 | #2,274 | 19 | #569 | 139 |
| 1948 | #2,126 | 21 | #1,107 | 41 |
| 1947 | #2,354 | 18 | #1,053 | 47 |
| 1946 | #1,723 | 27 | #1,045 | 43 |
| 1945 | #2,149 | 16 | #1,122 | 34 |
| 1944 | #1,545 | 28 | #1,255 | 28 |
| 1943 | #1,751 | 24 | #1,431 | 24 |
| 1942 | #2,046 | 18 | #1,026 | 43 |
| 1941 | #1,882 | 19 | #1,051 | 38 |
| 1940 | #1,745 | 21 | #1,251 | 29 |
| 1939 | #1,947 | 17 | #1,532 | 19 |
| 1938 | #2,113 | 15 | #1,689 | 17 |
| 1937 | #2,101 | 15 | #1,265 | 28 |
| 1936 | #3,103 | 8 | #1,872 | 14 |
| 1935 | #1,449 | 26 | #1,837 | 15 |
| 1934 | #2,087 | 15 | #2,022 | 13 |
| 1933 | #2,161 | 14 | #2,738 | 8 |
| 1932 | #1,634 | 22 | #2,638 | 9 |
| 1931 | #2,205 | 14 | #3,095 | 7 |
| 1930 | #2,023 | 17 | #2,781 | 9 |
| 1929 | #1,953 | 18 | #2,766 | 9 |
| 1928 | #2,194 | 16 | #2,522 | 11 |
| 1927 | #2,026 | 19 | #1,959 | 17 |
| 1926 | #1,830 | 22 | #2,302 | 13 |
| 1925 | #1,795 | 23 | #2,936 | 9 |
| 1924 | #1,723 | 25 | #2,641 | 11 |
| 1923 | #2,465 | 14 | #2,224 | 14 |
| 1922 | #1,730 | 24 | #4,307 | 5 |
| 1921 | #1,988 | 20 | #3,517 | 7 |
| 1920 | #2,357 | 15 | #2,459 | 12 |
| 1919 | #1,855 | 20 | #2,265 | 13 |
| 1918 | #2,102 | 17 | #3,368 | 7 |
| 1917 | #1,605 | 23 | #2,562 | 10 |
| 1916 | #1,867 | 18 | #3,516 | 6 |
| 1915 | #1,738 | 19 | #2,070 | 13 |
| 1914 | #1,541 | 18 | #2,457 | 8 |
| 1913 | #1,883 | 11 | — | |
| 1912 | #1,719 | 11 | #1,417 | 12 |
| 1911 | #1,372 | 12 | #1,740 | 5 |
| 1910 | #914 | 22 | — | |
| 1909 | #1,763 | 7 | #1,277 | 6 |
| 1908 | #1,261 | 11 | — | |
| 1907 | #1,289 | 10 | — | |
| 1906 | #1,553 | 7 | — | |
| 1905 | #1,420 | 8 | — | |
| 1904 | #965 | 14 | — | |
| 1903 | #1,792 | 5 | #1,130 | 5 |
| 1902 | #1,133 | 10 | — | |
| 1901 | #1,136 | 9 | — | |
| 1900 | #941 | 16 | — | |
| 1899 | #1,181 | 8 | — | |
| 1898 | #963 | 13 | — | |
| 1897 | #1,037 | 10 | — | |
| 1896 | #1,047 | 10 | — | |
| 1895 | #1,592 | 5 | #872 | 7 |
| 1894 | #1,353 | 6 | — | |
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | #956 | 6 | |
| 1891 | #1,332 | 5 | — | |
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | #950 | 8 | — | |
| 1888 | #1,136 | 6 | — | |
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | #830 | 5 | — | |
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Lannie! It came in at #956, and was given to 6 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1893–1894, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Lannie is popular in 1881
The SSA only publishes names by state from 1910 on.
See more about Lannie
- Not published in 2025; last seen 1998
- Biggest jump: 538 spots in 1949 (#1,107 → #569)
- Biggest drop: 458 spots in 1957 (#999 → #1,457)
- Debuted 1892
- Peaked 1949 at #569 (139 births)
- Births halved by 1952, 3 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 7 yrs · run 1949–1951
- Highest: 1 in 12,762 boys born in 1949 were named Lannie (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 318,561 boys born in 1998 (0.00%)
- 27.8% of all boys named Lannie (517) were born in this decade
- Mostly boys until 1989, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 13 | #872 (1895) | #914 |
| 1900s | 11 | #1,130 (1903) | #1,204 |
| 1910s | 74 | #1,417 (1912) | #2,424 |
| 1920s | 108 | #1,959 (1927) | #2,763 |
| 1930s | 139 | #1,265 (1937) | #2,147 |
| 1940s | 466 | #569 (1949) | #1,091 |
| 1950s | 517 | #721 (1950) | #1,111 |
| 1960s | 256 | #1,238 (1963) | #1,638 |
| 1970s | 170 | #1,916 (1971) | #2,518 |
| 1980s | 90 | #3,098 (1980) | #4,352 |
| 1990s | 14 | #5,942 (1991) | #7,211 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Lannie in 1881
Top girls' names in 1881
More about 1881
girls
91,953 girls got a published name in 1881; 1 in 18,391 of them was named Lannie, which outranked 11.5% of the 938 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 24.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Tied with 108 names at #830; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
- ↓ 381Avis#449 → #830
- ↓ 365Clementine#375 → #740
- ↓ 364Eleanore#466 → #830
- ↓ 364Lonnie#466 → #830
- ↓ 319Luvenia#421 → #740
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.