Kinsley
#93 for girls in 2025, 2,671 births · #6,803 for boys in 2025, 12 births
Given to girls 99.5% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2021 · 3,885 births
- Debut · girls
- 8 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 10 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 50,016since 1978
Kinsley over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #93 | 2,671 | #6,803 | 12 |
| 2024 | #85 | 2,937 | #7,257 | 11 |
| 2023 | #67 | 3,204 | #10,821 | 6 |
| 2022 | #61 | 3,705 | #5,633 | 16 |
| 2021 | #57 | 3,885 | #6,032 | 14 |
| 2020 | #59 | 3,780 | #5,451 | 16 |
| 2019 | #74 | 3,510 | #7,173 | 11 |
| 2018 | #63 | 3,881 | #6,703 | 12 |
| 2017 | #59 | 4,053 | #6,338 | 13 |
| 2016 | #86 | 3,378 | — | |
| 2015 | #113 | 2,788 | #9,568 | 7 |
| 2014 | #131 | 2,448 | #8,781 | 8 |
| 2013 | #161 | 1,981 | #7,026 | 11 |
| 2012 | #179 | 1,760 | #8,864 | 8 |
| 2011 | #218 | 1,461 | #12,287 | 5 |
| 2010 | #307 | 1,046 | #8,139 | 9 |
| 2009 | #428 | 743 | — | |
| 2008 | #562 | 547 | #11,037 | 6 |
| 2007 | #757 | 386 | — | |
| 2006 | #881 | 301 | #12,055 | 5 |
| 2005 | #945 | 262 | — | |
| 2004 | #1,201 | 186 | — | |
| 2003 | #1,235 | 170 | — | |
| 2002 | #1,303 | 150 | #10,667 | 5 |
| 2001 | #1,444 | 130 | #10,556 | 5 |
| 2000 | #1,602 | 110 | — | |
| 1999 | #1,940 | 81 | — | |
| 1998 | #2,244 | 63 | — | |
| 1997 | #2,002 | 71 | #6,100 | 9 |
| 1996 | #3,302 | 35 | — | |
| 1995 | #2,788 | 43 | #8,868 | 5 |
| 1994 | #2,988 | 39 | #8,800 | 5 |
| 1993 | #4,393 | 23 | — | |
| 1992 | #3,773 | 28 | — | |
| 1991 | #4,208 | 24 | — | |
| 1990 | #5,060 | 18 | — | |
| 1989 | #4,358 | 21 | — | |
| 1988 | #6,277 | 12 | — | |
| 1987 | #4,283 | 19 | #6,951 | 5 |
| 1986 | #7,749 | 8 | — | |
| 1985 | #4,860 | 15 | — | |
| 1984 | #8,153 | 7 | #5,561 | 6 |
| 1983 | #8,047 | 7 | #5,484 | 6 |
| 1982 | #7,469 | 8 | #5,619 | 6 |
| 1981 | #9,110 | 6 | #6,262 | 5 |
| 1980 | #8,178 | 7 | — | |
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | #6,948 | 8 | — | |
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Kinsley! It came in at #6,948, and was given to 8 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1979, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Kinsley is popular in 2009
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Alabama#102 · 1 in 455
- South Carolina#121 · 1 in 530
- Kansas#142 · 1 in 550
- Mississippi#144 · 1 in 588
- Tennessee#152 · 1 in 694
Best ever in a state: #4 in Mississippi, 2020.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | #102 | 44 | 1 in 455 |
| South Carolina | #121 | 35 | 1 in 530 |
| Kansas | #142 | 25 | 1 in 550 |
| Mississippi | #144 | 20 | 1 in 588 |
| Tennessee | #152 | 44 | 1 in 694 |
| Oklahoma | #153 | 28 | 1 in 615 |
| Louisiana | #160 | 30 | 1 in 688 |
| Nebraska | #167 | 14 | 1 in 586 |
| Arkansas | #199 | 15 | 1 in 787 |
| Kentucky | #201 | 22 | 1 in 877 |
| South Dakota | #209 | 5 | 1 in 606 |
| Idaho | #214 | 9 | 1 in 752 |
| Georgia | #226 | 48 | 1 in 1,057 |
| West Virginia | #261 | 7 | 1 in 970 |
| North Carolina | #273 | 37 | 1 in 1,255 |
| Iowa | #336 | 10 | 1 in 1,323 |
| Texas | #343 | 99 | 1 in 1,684 |
| Missouri | #350 | 17 | 1 in 1,648 |
| Indiana | #401 | 17 | 1 in 1,865 |
| Florida | #416 | 38 | 1 in 2,167 |
| Utah | #422 | 10 | 1 in 1,904 |
| Virginia | #455 | 17 | 1 in 2,158 |
| Colorado | #460 | 12 | 1 in 1,987 |
| Nevada | #468 | 6 | 1 in 1,910 |
| Maryland | #608 | 8 | 1 in 3,090 |
| Ohio | #657 | 15 | 1 in 3,630 |
| Arizona | #753 | 9 | 1 in 3,725 |
| Wisconsin | #755 | 6 | 1 in 4,085 |
| Illinois | #756 | 15 | 1 in 4,216 |
| Washington | #767 | 8 | 1 in 3,920 |
| Michigan | #817 | 9 | 1 in 4,749 |
| California | #1,094 | 30 | 1 in 7,276 |
| Pennsylvania | #1,100 | 7 | 1 in 7,804 |
| New York | #2,264 | 5 | 1 in 18,955 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Kinsley
- 8 spots since 2024 (#85 → #93)
- 34 spots since 2020 (#59 → #93)
- 20 spots since 2015 (#113 → #93)
- Biggest jump: 256 spots in 2005 (#1,201 → #945)
- Biggest drop: 18 spots in 2024 (#67 → #85)
- Debuted 1978
- Peaked 2021 at #57 (3,885 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 10 yrs · run 2016–2025
- Top 1,000: 21 yrs · run 2005–2025
- Highest: 1 in 422 girls born in 2021 were named Kinsley (0.24%)
- Latest: 1 in 602 girls born in 2025 (0.17%)
- 52.6% of all girls named Kinsley (26,306) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 8 | #6,948 (1978) | #6,948 |
| 1980s | 110 | #4,283 (1987) | #6,848 |
| 1990s | 425 | #1,940 (1999) | #3,270 |
| 2000s | 2,985 | #428 (2009) | #1,036 |
| 2010s | 26,306 | #59 (2017) | #139 |
| 2020s | 20,182 | #57 (2021) | #70 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Kinsley in 2009
Top girls' names in 2009
More about 2009
girls
1,837,114 girls got a published name in 2009; 1 in 2,473 of them was named Kinsley, which outranked 97.9% of the 20,199 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.6% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.