Kimberley
#5,722 for girls in 2025, 21 births · Last seen for boys in 1974 at #4,634
Given to girls 99.4% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1967 · 2,003 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 38,043since 1941
Kimberley over time
Rank among girls' names. Kimberley has never cracked the top 100 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #5,722 | 21 | — | |
| 2024 | #5,021 | 26 | — | |
| 2023 | #5,960 | 20 | — | |
| 2022 | #7,631 | 14 | — | |
| 2021 | #5,573 | 22 | — | |
| 2020 | #5,168 | 24 | — | |
| 2019 | #5,041 | 26 | — | |
| 2018 | #3,918 | 37 | — | |
| 2017 | #5,191 | 25 | — | |
| 2016 | #3,656 | 42 | — | |
| 2015 | #3,533 | 44 | — | |
| 2014 | #2,922 | 58 | — | |
| 2013 | #2,837 | 60 | — | |
| 2012 | #3,040 | 55 | — | |
| 2011 | #2,763 | 63 | — | |
| 2010 | #2,642 | 68 | — | |
| 2009 | #2,425 | 79 | — | |
| 2008 | #2,718 | 67 | — | |
| 2007 | #2,071 | 98 | — | |
| 2006 | #2,098 | 93 | — | |
| 2005 | #2,088 | 89 | — | |
| 2004 | #1,820 | 104 | — | |
| 2003 | #2,203 | 78 | — | |
| 2002 | #2,251 | 73 | — | |
| 2001 | #1,713 | 105 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,518 | 120 | — | |
| 1999 | #1,378 | 128 | — | |
| 1998 | #1,330 | 132 | — | |
| 1997 | #1,145 | 163 | — | |
| 1996 | #990 | 190 | — | |
| 1995 | #1,006 | 185 | — | |
| 1994 | #901 | 213 | — | |
| 1993 | #857 | 225 | — | |
| 1992 | #854 | 233 | — | |
| 1991 | #720 | 290 | — | |
| 1990 | #666 | 324 | — | |
| 1989 | #684 | 295 | — | |
| 1988 | #681 | 284 | — | |
| 1987 | #640 | 294 | — | |
| 1986 | #554 | 366 | — | |
| 1985 | #569 | 344 | — | |
| 1984 | #565 | 327 | — | |
| 1983 | #503 | 387 | — | |
| 1982 | #471 | 446 | — | |
| 1981 | #455 | 473 | — | |
| 1980 | #397 | 572 | — | |
| 1979 | #385 | 575 | — | |
| 1978 | #372 | 570 | — | |
| 1977 | #352 | 629 | — | |
| 1976 | #315 | 719 | — | |
| 1975 | #279 | 871 | — | |
| 1974 | #255 | 1,006 | #4,634 | 6 |
| 1973 | #236 | 1,091 | — | |
| 1972 | #219 | 1,272 | #4,986 | 5 |
| 1971 | #192 | 1,610 | #3,370 | 9 |
| 1970 | #185 | 1,770 | #3,836 | 7 |
| 1969 | #179 | 1,806 | #3,062 | 9 |
| 1968 | #175 | 1,855 | #3,107 | 8 |
| 1967 | #166 | 2,003 | #3,966 | 5 |
| 1966 | #171 | 1,987 | #2,784 | 9 |
| 1965 | #189 | 1,799 | #2,476 | 11 |
| 1964 | #219 | 1,549 | #3,050 | 8 |
| 1963 | #233 | 1,412 | #2,673 | 10 |
| 1962 | #224 | 1,441 | #2,364 | 12 |
| 1961 | #255 | 1,210 | #4,065 | 5 |
| 1960 | #257 | 1,199 | #3,665 | 6 |
| 1959 | #307 | 892 | #3,988 | 5 |
| 1958 | #336 | 789 | #3,033 | 8 |
| 1957 | #339 | 720 | #2,494 | 11 |
| 1956 | #357 | 596 | #2,168 | 14 |
| 1955 | #461 | 384 | #1,791 | 19 |
| 1954 | #539 | 272 | #1,496 | 26 |
| 1953 | #646 | 191 | #1,958 | 16 |
| 1952 | #836 | 120 | #2,376 | 11 |
| 1951 | #1,090 | 73 | #2,844 | 8 |
| 1950 | #1,192 | 60 | — | |
| 1949 | #1,210 | 56 | #3,019 | 7 |
| 1948 | #1,285 | 51 | — | |
| 1947 | #1,488 | 40 | — | |
| 1946 | #1,919 | 23 | — | |
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | #4,574 | 5 | — | |
| 1943 | #4,691 | 5 | — | |
| 1942 | #4,622 | 5 | — | |
| 1941 | #4,420 | 5 | — | |
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Kimberley! It came in at #4,420, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1941–1945, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Kimberley is popular in 1958
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Vermont#87 · 1 in 299
- Oregon#163 · 1 in 760
- Maine#170 · 1 in 800
- Rhode Island#185 · 1 in 1,341
- Indiana#222 · 1 in 1,441
Best ever in a state: #75 in Vermont, 1965.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vermont | #87 | 12 | 1 in 299 |
| Oregon | #163 | 20 | 1 in 760 |
| Maine | #170 | 12 | 1 in 800 |
| Rhode Island | #185 | 6 | 1 in 1,341 |
| Indiana | #222 | 35 | 1 in 1,441 |
| Massachusetts | #227 | 28 | 1 in 1,914 |
| West Virginia | #227 | 13 | 1 in 1,487 |
| North Dakota | #229 | 5 | 1 in 1,326 |
| Washington | #231 | 24 | 1 in 1,186 |
| Iowa | #232 | 18 | 1 in 1,528 |
| Michigan | #235 | 54 | 1 in 1,703 |
| Missouri | #236 | 26 | 1 in 1,713 |
| Kansas | #248 | 13 | 1 in 1,619 |
| Colorado | #257 | 13 | 1 in 1,427 |
| Virginia | #261 | 22 | 1 in 1,857 |
| Tennessee | #264 | 19 | 1 in 1,929 |
| Ohio | #269 | 51 | 1 in 2,095 |
| Pennsylvania | #273 | 55 | 1 in 2,107 |
| Minnesota | #280 | 16 | 1 in 2,360 |
| Maryland | #290 | 13 | 1 in 2,309 |
| Kentucky | #293 | 14 | 1 in 2,351 |
| Arizona | #304 | 9 | 1 in 1,560 |
| California | #305 | 85 | 1 in 1,917 |
| Connecticut | #320 | 8 | 1 in 3,033 |
| Illinois | #321 | 40 | 1 in 2,656 |
| New Jersey | #339 | 17 | 1 in 3,380 |
| Oklahoma | #354 | 8 | 1 in 2,665 |
| Florida | #376 | 16 | 1 in 2,966 |
| Texas | #385 | 40 | 1 in 2,807 |
| North Carolina | #395 | 14 | 1 in 3,515 |
| New York | #505 | 29 | 1 in 5,849 |
| Georgia | #672 | 5 | 1 in 9,024 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Kimberley
- 701 spots since 2024 (#5,021 → #5,722)
- 554 spots since 2020 (#5,168 → #5,722)
- 2,189 spots since 2015 (#3,533 → #5,722)
- Biggest jump: 254 spots in 1952 (#1,090 → #836)
- Biggest drop: 155 spots in 1997 (#990 → #1,145)
- Debuted 1941
- Peaked 1967 at #166 (2,003 births)
- Births halved by 1975, 8 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 44 yrs · run 1952–1994
- Highest: 1 in 824 girls born in 1967 were named Kimberley (0.12%)
- Latest: 1 in 76,537 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 42.7% of all girls named Kimberley (16,261) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 190 | #1,210 (1949) | #3,026 |
| 1950s | 4,097 | #307 (1959) | #610 |
| 1960s | 16,261 | #166 (1967) | #207 |
| 1970s | 10,113 | #185 (1970) | #279 |
| 1980s | 3,788 | #397 (1980) | #552 |
| 1990s | 2,083 | #666 (1990) | #985 |
| 2000s | 906 | #1,518 (2000) | #2,091 |
| 2010s | 478 | #2,642 (2010) | #3,554 |
| 2020s | 127 | #5,021 (2024) | #5,846 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Kimberley in 1958
Top girls' names in 1958
Top boys' names in 1958
More about 1958
girls
2,011,619 girls got a published name in 1958; 1 in 2,550 of them was named Kimberley, which outranked 95.2% of the 7,030 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 18.6% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
2,122,409 boys got a published name in 1958; 1 in 265,301 of them was named Kimberley, which outranked 32.6% of the 4,502 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 30.0% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #2,818Yves9
- #2,818Zackary9
- #2,818Zvi9
- #3,033Kimberley8
- #3,033Addie8
- #3,033Adolf8
- #3,033Adonis8
- #3,275Able7
- #3,275Abran7
- #3,275Acey7
Tied with 241 names at #3,033; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.