Kaitlynn
#3,645 for girls in 2025, 41 births · Last seen for boys in 2004 at #11,356
Given to girls >99.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1998 · 809 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 16,419since 1982
Kaitlynn over time
Rank among girls' names. Kaitlynn has never cracked the top 300 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #3,645 | 41 | — | |
| 2024 | #3,459 | 45 | — | |
| 2023 | #3,640 | 42 | — | |
| 2022 | #2,720 | 63 | — | |
| 2021 | #3,002 | 55 | — | |
| 2020 | #1,924 | 99 | — | |
| 2019 | #1,833 | 111 | — | |
| 2018 | #1,852 | 109 | — | |
| 2017 | #1,524 | 145 | — | |
| 2016 | #1,371 | 171 | — | |
| 2015 | #989 | 273 | — | |
| 2014 | #929 | 290 | — | |
| 2013 | #842 | 312 | — | |
| 2012 | #695 | 404 | — | |
| 2011 | #732 | 377 | — | |
| 2010 | #715 | 395 | — | |
| 2009 | #634 | 471 | — | |
| 2008 | #544 | 565 | — | |
| 2007 | #497 | 651 | — | |
| 2006 | #527 | 574 | — | |
| 2005 | #476 | 647 | — | |
| 2004 | #453 | 670 | #11,356 | 5 |
| 2003 | #440 | 680 | — | |
| 2002 | #399 | 731 | — | |
| 2001 | #368 | 808 | — | |
| 2000 | #368 | 801 | — | |
| 1999 | #361 | 822 | — | |
| 1998 | #356 | 809 | — | |
| 1997 | #366 | 754 | — | |
| 1996 | #365 | 745 | — | |
| 1995 | #378 | 698 | — | |
| 1994 | #413 | 602 | — | |
| 1993 | #420 | 595 | — | |
| 1992 | #452 | 551 | — | |
| 1991 | #619 | 364 | — | |
| 1990 | #655 | 340 | — | |
| 1989 | #785 | 246 | — | |
| 1988 | #996 | 165 | — | |
| 1987 | #1,433 | 91 | — | |
| 1986 | #1,838 | 61 | — | |
| 1985 | #3,517 | 24 | — | |
| 1984 | #4,318 | 17 | — | |
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | #10,517 | 5 | — | |
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Kaitlynn! It came in at #10,517, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1982–1983, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Kaitlynn is popular in 2000
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- West Virginia#159 · 1 in 661
- Arkansas#186 · 1 in 760
- Indiana#191 · 1 in 925
- Kentucky#197 · 1 in 974
- Tennessee#205 · 1 in 1,005
Best ever in a state: #100 in North Dakota, 2002.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| West Virginia | #159 | 11 | 1 in 661 |
| Arkansas | #186 | 16 | 1 in 760 |
| Indiana | #191 | 36 | 1 in 925 |
| Kentucky | #197 | 21 | 1 in 974 |
| Tennessee | #205 | 31 | 1 in 1,005 |
| Missouri | #223 | 27 | 1 in 1,090 |
| Idaho | #231 | 7 | 1 in 868 |
| Nebraska | #249 | 8 | 1 in 1,045 |
| Ohio | #259 | 44 | 1 in 1,409 |
| Louisiana | #264 | 18 | 1 in 1,217 |
| Michigan | #272 | 36 | 1 in 1,445 |
| Oregon | #272 | 14 | 1 in 1,176 |
| Virginia | #279 | 26 | 1 in 1,366 |
| Iowa | #286 | 10 | 1 in 1,418 |
| Colorado | #310 | 17 | 1 in 1,416 |
| Washington | #310 | 21 | 1 in 1,398 |
| Oklahoma | #324 | 11 | 1 in 1,525 |
| Texas | #364 | 80 | 1 in 1,915 |
| Arizona | #365 | 19 | 1 in 1,681 |
| Pennsylvania | #372 | 27 | 1 in 2,150 |
| Florida | #373 | 36 | 1 in 2,147 |
| Alabama | #380 | 11 | 1 in 1,920 |
| Kansas | #397 | 7 | 1 in 1,906 |
| Connecticut | #405 | 6 | 1 in 2,528 |
| Wisconsin | #408 | 11 | 1 in 2,318 |
| South Carolina | #417 | 8 | 1 in 2,113 |
| Minnesota | #418 | 10 | 1 in 2,563 |
| Maryland | #436 | 10 | 1 in 2,460 |
| Illinois | #437 | 28 | 1 in 2,544 |
| Utah | #440 | 8 | 1 in 2,130 |
| North Carolina | #479 | 16 | 1 in 2,818 |
| Mississippi | #492 | 5 | 1 in 2,405 |
| Georgia | #517 | 16 | 1 in 3,004 |
| California | #521 | 71 | 1 in 3,153 |
| New York | #529 | 31 | 1 in 3,240 |
| New Jersey | #613 | 10 | 1 in 4,176 |
| Massachusetts | #672 | 6 | 1 in 5,234 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Kaitlynn
- 186 spots since 2024 (#3,459 → #3,645)
- 1,721 spots since 2020 (#1,924 → #3,645)
- 2,656 spots since 2015 (#989 → #3,645)
- Biggest jump: 437 spots in 1988 (#1,433 → #996)
- Biggest drop: 382 spots in 2016 (#989 → #1,371)
- Debuted 1982
- Peaked 1998 at #356 (809 births)
- Births halved by 2010, 12 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 28 yrs · run 1988–2015
- Highest: 1 in 2,158 girls born in 1999 were named Kaitlynn (0.05%)
- Latest: 1 in 39,202 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #356 in 1998, was only 1 in 2,184 (0.05%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 40.2% of all girls named Kaitlynn (6,598) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 609 | #785 (1989) | #3,343 |
| 1990s | 6,280 | #356 (1998) | #439 |
| 2000s | 6,598 | #368 (2001) | #471 |
| 2010s | 2,587 | #695 (2012) | #1,148 |
| 2020s | 345 | #1,924 (2020) | #3,065 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Kaitlynn in 2000
Top girls' names in 2000
More about 2000
girls
1,816,036 girls got a published name in 2000; 1 in 2,267 of them was named Kaitlynn, which outranked 97.9% of the 17,660 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 10.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.