Kacee
Last seen for girls in 2024 at #7,967 · Last seen for boys in 2024 at #6,199
Given to girls 88.5% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1989 · 93 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 2,235since 1966
Kacee over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | #7,967 | 13 | #6,199 | 14 |
| 2023 | #6,409 | 18 | #5,075 | 19 |
| 2022 | #9,680 | 10 | #5,633 | 16 |
| 2021 | #7,250 | 15 | #6,032 | 14 |
| 2020 | #5,487 | 22 | #6,296 | 13 |
| 2019 | #4,343 | 32 | — | |
| 2018 | #4,458 | 31 | #10,760 | 6 |
| 2017 | #4,304 | 33 | #9,696 | 7 |
| 2016 | #4,250 | 34 | — | |
| 2015 | #5,653 | 23 | #9,568 | 7 |
| 2014 | #4,455 | 32 | — | |
| 2013 | #5,143 | 26 | #8,789 | 8 |
| 2012 | #5,114 | 27 | #9,709 | 7 |
| 2011 | #6,564 | 19 | #12,287 | 5 |
| 2010 | #4,023 | 37 | — | |
| 2009 | #4,931 | 29 | #12,491 | 5 |
| 2008 | #3,377 | 49 | #12,553 | 5 |
| 2007 | #4,808 | 30 | #10,921 | 6 |
| 2006 | #3,017 | 56 | — | |
| 2005 | #4,029 | 35 | #7,640 | 9 |
| 2004 | #4,816 | 27 | #11,356 | 5 |
| 2003 | #5,586 | 21 | #10,894 | 5 |
| 2002 | #2,976 | 49 | #9,392 | 6 |
| 2001 | #4,209 | 29 | #9,243 | 6 |
| 2000 | #2,777 | 52 | #8,209 | 7 |
| 1999 | #2,501 | 57 | #7,874 | 7 |
| 1998 | #2,124 | 68 | #5,840 | 10 |
| 1997 | #2,259 | 60 | #7,281 | 7 |
| 1996 | #2,372 | 55 | #6,496 | 8 |
| 1995 | #1,939 | 71 | #7,792 | 6 |
| 1994 | #2,142 | 63 | #7,770 | 6 |
| 1993 | #1,629 | 93 | #5,002 | 11 |
| 1992 | #1,761 | 83 | #6,128 | 8 |
| 1991 | #1,933 | 72 | #6,519 | 7 |
| 1990 | #1,769 | 82 | #4,673 | 11 |
| 1989 | #1,532 | 93 | #5,615 | 8 |
| 1988 | #1,587 | 82 | #4,450 | 10 |
| 1987 | #1,570 | 80 | #5,459 | 7 |
| 1986 | #1,910 | 58 | #4,457 | 9 |
| 1985 | #1,948 | 56 | — | |
| 1984 | #2,081 | 48 | — | |
| 1983 | #1,887 | 55 | — | |
| 1982 | #2,369 | 41 | — | |
| 1981 | #2,085 | 49 | — | |
| 1980 | #2,308 | 42 | #6,250 | 5 |
| 1979 | #2,621 | 34 | — | |
| 1978 | #3,283 | 23 | — | |
| 1977 | #3,366 | 22 | — | |
| 1976 | #3,812 | 17 | — | |
| 1975 | #2,969 | 24 | — | |
| 1974 | #3,695 | 17 | — | |
| 1973 | #5,580 | 9 | — | |
| 1972 | #4,091 | 14 | — | |
| 1971 | #6,619 | 7 | — | |
| 1970 | #7,070 | 6 | — | |
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | #6,564 | 5 | — | |
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Kacee! It came in at #6,564, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1966–1969, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
See more about Kacee
- Not published in 2025; last seen 2024
- Debuted 1966
- Peaked 1989 at #1,532 (93 births)
- Births halved by 2001, 12 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 19,452 girls born in 1993 were named Kacee (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 124,630 girls born in 2024 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #1,532 in 1989, was only 1 in 19,823 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 31.5% of all girls named Kacee (704) were born in this decade
- Mostly girls until 2021, mostly boys since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5 | #6,564 (1966) | #6,564 |
| 1970s | 173 | #2,621 (1979) | #4,311 |
| 1980s | 604 | #1,532 (1989) | #1,928 |
| 1990s | 704 | #1,629 (1993) | #2,043 |
| 2000s | 377 | #2,777 (2000) | #4,053 |
| 2010s | 294 | #4,023 (2010) | #4,831 |
| 2020s | 78 | #5,487 (2020) | #7,359 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Kacee in 1989
Top girls' names in 1989
Top boys' names in 1989
More about 1989
girls
1,843,552 girls got a published name in 1989; 1 in 19,823 of them was named Kacee, which outranked 89.5% of the 14,550 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 16.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,523Rashida94
- #1,523Shavonne94
- #1,523William94
- #1,532Kacee93
- #1,532Latifah93
- #1,532Magaly93
- #1,532Sammantha93
- #1,540Analisa92
- #1,540Chelsee92
- #1,540Courteney92
Tied with 7 names at #1,532; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
2,000,928 boys got a published name in 1989; 1 in 250,116 of them was named Kacee, which outranked 39.2% of the 9,232 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 20.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).