Julio
Last seen for girls in 2005 at #14,502 · #641 for boys in 2025, 436 births
Given to boys 99.3% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1990 · 1,556 births
- Debut · boys
- 6 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 63,775since 1888
Julio over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Julio has never cracked the top 100 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #641 | 436 | |
| 2024 | — | #600 | 475 | |
| 2023 | — | #573 | 511 | |
| 2022 | — | #555 | 538 | |
| 2021 | — | #606 | 458 | |
| 2020 | — | #542 | 522 | |
| 2019 | — | #529 | 540 | |
| 2018 | — | #524 | 541 | |
| 2017 | — | #499 | 581 | |
| 2016 | — | #488 | 626 | |
| 2015 | — | #458 | 664 | |
| 2014 | — | #453 | 655 | |
| 2013 | — | #410 | 718 | |
| 2012 | — | #383 | 776 | |
| 2011 | — | #363 | 819 | |
| 2010 | — | #338 | 928 | |
| 2009 | — | #304 | 1,061 | |
| 2008 | — | #284 | 1,200 | |
| 2007 | — | #266 | 1,306 | |
| 2006 | — | #240 | 1,415 | |
| 2005 | #14,502 | 6 | #227 | 1,517 |
| 2004 | — | #268 | 1,222 | |
| 2003 | #13,844 | 6 | #271 | 1,158 |
| 2002 | — | #255 | 1,274 | |
| 2001 | #15,352 | 5 | #254 | 1,320 |
| 2000 | #13,154 | 6 | #256 | 1,306 |
| 1999 | — | #252 | 1,244 | |
| 1998 | #14,122 | 5 | #250 | 1,192 |
| 1997 | #9,017 | 9 | #238 | 1,288 |
| 1996 | #7,574 | 11 | #213 | 1,451 |
| 1995 | #7,514 | 11 | #233 | 1,284 |
| 1994 | #9,586 | 8 | #220 | 1,316 |
| 1993 | #7,038 | 12 | #206 | 1,455 |
| 1992 | #5,267 | 18 | #201 | 1,543 |
| 1991 | #5,181 | 18 | #204 | 1,512 |
| 1990 | #9,247 | 8 | #194 | 1,556 |
| 1989 | #5,286 | 16 | #229 | 1,186 |
| 1988 | #5,065 | 16 | #236 | 1,024 |
| 1987 | #7,353 | 9 | #232 | 1,009 |
| 1986 | #6,612 | 10 | #234 | 994 |
| 1985 | #5,348 | 13 | #256 | 887 |
| 1984 | #4,166 | 18 | #235 | 948 |
| 1983 | #4,884 | 14 | #270 | 768 |
| 1982 | #5,534 | 12 | #263 | 830 |
| 1981 | #10,411 | 5 | #249 | 887 |
| 1980 | #5,912 | 11 | #270 | 797 |
| 1979 | #5,092 | 13 | #257 | 825 |
| 1978 | #5,214 | 12 | #265 | 743 |
| 1977 | #6,340 | 9 | #272 | 718 |
| 1976 | #8,156 | 6 | #258 | 760 |
| 1975 | #5,161 | 11 | #259 | 764 |
| 1974 | #6,900 | 7 | #264 | 726 |
| 1973 | #6,666 | 7 | #282 | 652 |
| 1972 | #5,959 | 8 | #302 | 614 |
| 1971 | #6,006 | 8 | #312 | 604 |
| 1970 | #4,761 | 11 | #307 | 644 |
| 1969 | — | #320 | 578 | |
| 1968 | — | #359 | 466 | |
| 1967 | #6,042 | 6 | #345 | 466 |
| 1966 | #6,564 | 5 | #404 | 351 |
| 1965 | — | #406 | 375 | |
| 1964 | — | #404 | 391 | |
| 1963 | — | #400 | 406 | |
| 1962 | — | #436 | 335 | |
| 1961 | #5,851 | 6 | #434 | 339 |
| 1960 | #5,168 | 7 | #433 | 345 |
| 1959 | — | #465 | 294 | |
| 1958 | #5,408 | 6 | #452 | 301 |
| 1957 | — | #446 | 298 | |
| 1956 | — | #451 | 282 | |
| 1955 | #5,208 | 6 | #460 | 259 |
| 1954 | — | #460 | 249 | |
| 1953 | — | #449 | 255 | |
| 1952 | — | #453 | 245 | |
| 1951 | #4,385 | 7 | #492 | 190 |
| 1950 | — | #481 | 193 | |
| 1949 | — | #502 | 176 | |
| 1948 | — | #492 | 179 | |
| 1947 | — | #584 | 135 | |
| 1946 | — | #548 | 135 | |
| 1945 | — | #504 | 140 | |
| 1944 | — | #633 | 94 | |
| 1943 | #4,691 | 5 | #568 | 125 |
| 1942 | — | #637 | 100 | |
| 1941 | — | #624 | 94 | |
| 1940 | — | #554 | 114 | |
| 1939 | — | #621 | 88 | |
| 1938 | — | #601 | 97 | |
| 1937 | — | #532 | 118 | |
| 1936 | — | #632 | 84 | |
| 1935 | — | #575 | 101 | |
| 1934 | — | #568 | 108 | |
| 1933 | — | #572 | 101 | |
| 1932 | — | #515 | 125 | |
| 1931 | — | #501 | 131 | |
| 1930 | #4,550 | 5 | #470 | 158 |
| 1929 | — | #488 | 145 | |
| 1928 | #4,195 | 6 | #521 | 134 |
| 1927 | #3,561 | 8 | #498 | 148 |
| 1926 | — | #523 | 133 | |
| 1925 | #4,973 | 5 | #516 | 140 |
| 1924 | — | #522 | 146 | |
| 1923 | #2,917 | 11 | #523 | 135 |
| 1922 | — | #586 | 120 | |
| 1921 | — | #583 | 118 | |
| 1920 | — | #635 | 98 | |
| 1919 | — | #603 | 100 | |
| 1918 | — | #658 | 88 | |
| 1917 | — | #680 | 78 | |
| 1916 | — | #685 | 75 | |
| 1915 | — | #705 | 69 | |
| 1914 | — | #777 | 46 | |
| 1913 | — | #658 | 46 | |
| 1912 | — | #918 | 24 | |
| 1911 | — | #624 | 24 | |
| 1910 | — | #859 | 13 | |
| 1909 | — | #653 | 17 | |
| 1908 | — | #685 | 15 | |
| 1907 | — | #1,094 | 7 | |
| 1906 | — | #852 | 9 | |
| 1905 | — | #836 | 9 | |
| 1904 | — | #966 | 7 | |
| 1903 | — | #696 | 11 | |
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | #1,051 | 5 | |
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | #917 | 6 | |
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1888
The first year at least five boys were named Julio! It came in at #917, and was given to 6 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1889–1902, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Julio is popular in 2009
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- Texas#186 · 1 in 800
- Nevada#190 · 1 in 756
- Arizona#197 · 1 in 783
- California#202 · 1 in 921
- New Jersey#242 · 1 in 1,352
Best ever in a state: #68 in Arizona, 1917.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas | #186 | 233 | 1 in 800 |
| Nevada | #190 | 19 | 1 in 756 |
| Arizona | #197 | 51 | 1 in 783 |
| California | #202 | 263 | 1 in 921 |
| New Jersey | #242 | 33 | 1 in 1,352 |
| Florida | #278 | 59 | 1 in 1,615 |
| Illinois | #300 | 43 | 1 in 1,687 |
| New York | #318 | 57 | 1 in 1,890 |
| South Carolina | #318 | 13 | 1 in 1,669 |
| Connecticut | #320 | 8 | 1 in 1,912 |
| North Carolina | #323 | 29 | 1 in 1,856 |
| Colorado | #328 | 18 | 1 in 1,597 |
| Nebraska | #331 | 7 | 1 in 1,482 |
| Idaho | #348 | 6 | 1 in 1,461 |
| Oregon | #357 | 11 | 1 in 1,756 |
| Massachusetts | #405 | 11 | 1 in 2,823 |
| Minnesota | #405 | 12 | 1 in 2,434 |
| New Mexico | #409 | 5 | 1 in 2,120 |
| Kansas | #411 | 8 | 1 in 2,093 |
| Wisconsin | #422 | 11 | 1 in 2,609 |
| Georgia | #423 | 25 | 1 in 2,361 |
| Pennsylvania | #471 | 18 | 1 in 3,451 |
| Tennessee | #480 | 12 | 1 in 3,027 |
| Utah | #511 | 8 | 1 in 2,873 |
| Arkansas | #524 | 5 | 1 in 3,005 |
| Virginia | #524 | 12 | 1 in 3,513 |
| Oklahoma | #531 | 7 | 1 in 3,065 |
| Alabama | #595 | 6 | 1 in 4,027 |
| Washington | #603 | 9 | 1 in 4,107 |
| Indiana | #633 | 8 | 1 in 4,673 |
| Maryland | #664 | 6 | 1 in 4,793 |
| Ohio | #665 | 12 | 1 in 5,221 |
| Michigan | #700 | 9 | 1 in 5,484 |
| Missouri | #807 | 5 | 1 in 6,692 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Julio
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
- 41 spots since 2024 (#600 → #641)
- 99 spots since 2020 (#542 → #641)
- 183 spots since 2015 (#458 → #641)
- Biggest jump: 409 spots in 1908 (#1,094 → #685)
- Biggest drop: 294 spots in 1912 (#624 → #918)
Rise & fade · boys
102 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1888
- Peaked 1990 at #194 (1,556 births)
- Births halved by 2012, 22 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 123 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 123 yrs · run 1908–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 1,294
- Highest: 1 in 1,294 boys born in 1992 were named Julio (0.08%)
- Latest: 1 in 3,918 boys born in 2025 (0.03%)
- Its best rank, #194 in 1990, was only 1 in 1,320 (0.08%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · boys
The 1990s
- 21.7% of all boys named Julio (13,841) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 6 | #917 (1888) | #917 |
| 1890s | 5 | #1,051 (1899) | #1,051 |
| 1900s | 75 | #653 (1909) | #826 |
| 1910s | 563 | #603 (1919) | #717 |
| 1920s | 1,317 | #488 (1929) | #540 |
| 1930s | 1,111 | #470 (1930) | #559 |
| 1940s | 1,292 | #492 (1948) | #565 |
| 1950s | 2,566 | #446 (1957) | #461 |
| 1960s | 4,052 | #320 (1969) | #394 |
| 1970s | 7,050 | #257 (1979) | #278 |
| 1980s | 9,330 | #229 (1989) | #247 |
| 1990s | 13,841 | #194 (1990) | #221 |
| 2000s | 12,779 | #227 (2005) | #263 |
| 2010s | 6,848 | #338 (2010) | #445 |
| 2020s | 2,940 | #542 (2020) | #586 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Julio in 2009
boys
#304
1,061 births · 1 in 1,870 boys
Top boys' names in 2009
More about 2009
boys
1,983,573 boys got a published name in 2009; 1 in 1,870 of them was named Julio, which outranked 97.9% of the 14,540 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.2% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).