Julio
Last seen for girls in 2005 at #14,502 · #641 for boys in 2025, 436 births
Given to boys 99.3% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1990 · 1,556 births
- Debut · boys
- 6 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 63,775since 1888
Julio over time
Rank among boys' names. Julio has never cracked the top 100 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #641 | 436 | |
| 2024 | — | #600 | 475 | |
| 2023 | — | #573 | 511 | |
| 2022 | — | #555 | 538 | |
| 2021 | — | #606 | 458 | |
| 2020 | — | #542 | 522 | |
| 2019 | — | #529 | 540 | |
| 2018 | — | #524 | 541 | |
| 2017 | — | #499 | 581 | |
| 2016 | — | #488 | 626 | |
| 2015 | — | #458 | 664 | |
| 2014 | — | #453 | 655 | |
| 2013 | — | #410 | 718 | |
| 2012 | — | #383 | 776 | |
| 2011 | — | #363 | 819 | |
| 2010 | — | #338 | 928 | |
| 2009 | — | #304 | 1,061 | |
| 2008 | — | #284 | 1,200 | |
| 2007 | — | #266 | 1,306 | |
| 2006 | — | #240 | 1,415 | |
| 2005 | #14,502 | 6 | #227 | 1,517 |
| 2004 | — | #268 | 1,222 | |
| 2003 | #13,844 | 6 | #271 | 1,158 |
| 2002 | — | #255 | 1,274 | |
| 2001 | #15,352 | 5 | #254 | 1,320 |
| 2000 | #13,154 | 6 | #256 | 1,306 |
| 1999 | — | #252 | 1,244 | |
| 1998 | #14,122 | 5 | #250 | 1,192 |
| 1997 | #9,017 | 9 | #238 | 1,288 |
| 1996 | #7,574 | 11 | #213 | 1,451 |
| 1995 | #7,514 | 11 | #233 | 1,284 |
| 1994 | #9,586 | 8 | #220 | 1,316 |
| 1993 | #7,038 | 12 | #206 | 1,455 |
| 1992 | #5,267 | 18 | #201 | 1,543 |
| 1991 | #5,181 | 18 | #204 | 1,512 |
| 1990 | #9,247 | 8 | #194 | 1,556 |
| 1989 | #5,286 | 16 | #229 | 1,186 |
| 1988 | #5,065 | 16 | #236 | 1,024 |
| 1987 | #7,353 | 9 | #232 | 1,009 |
| 1986 | #6,612 | 10 | #234 | 994 |
| 1985 | #5,348 | 13 | #256 | 887 |
| 1984 | #4,166 | 18 | #235 | 948 |
| 1983 | #4,884 | 14 | #270 | 768 |
| 1982 | #5,534 | 12 | #263 | 830 |
| 1981 | #10,411 | 5 | #249 | 887 |
| 1980 | #5,912 | 11 | #270 | 797 |
| 1979 | #5,092 | 13 | #257 | 825 |
| 1978 | #5,214 | 12 | #265 | 743 |
| 1977 | #6,340 | 9 | #272 | 718 |
| 1976 | #8,156 | 6 | #258 | 760 |
| 1975 | #5,161 | 11 | #259 | 764 |
| 1974 | #6,900 | 7 | #264 | 726 |
| 1973 | #6,666 | 7 | #282 | 652 |
| 1972 | #5,959 | 8 | #302 | 614 |
| 1971 | #6,006 | 8 | #312 | 604 |
| 1970 | #4,761 | 11 | #307 | 644 |
| 1969 | — | #320 | 578 | |
| 1968 | — | #359 | 466 | |
| 1967 | #6,042 | 6 | #345 | 466 |
| 1966 | #6,564 | 5 | #404 | 351 |
| 1965 | — | #406 | 375 | |
| 1964 | — | #404 | 391 | |
| 1963 | — | #400 | 406 | |
| 1962 | — | #436 | 335 | |
| 1961 | #5,851 | 6 | #434 | 339 |
| 1960 | #5,168 | 7 | #433 | 345 |
| 1959 | — | #465 | 294 | |
| 1958 | #5,408 | 6 | #452 | 301 |
| 1957 | — | #446 | 298 | |
| 1956 | — | #451 | 282 | |
| 1955 | #5,208 | 6 | #460 | 259 |
| 1954 | — | #460 | 249 | |
| 1953 | — | #449 | 255 | |
| 1952 | — | #453 | 245 | |
| 1951 | #4,385 | 7 | #492 | 190 |
| 1950 | — | #481 | 193 | |
| 1949 | — | #502 | 176 | |
| 1948 | — | #492 | 179 | |
| 1947 | — | #584 | 135 | |
| 1946 | — | #548 | 135 | |
| 1945 | — | #504 | 140 | |
| 1944 | — | #633 | 94 | |
| 1943 | #4,691 | 5 | #568 | 125 |
| 1942 | — | #637 | 100 | |
| 1941 | — | #624 | 94 | |
| 1940 | — | #554 | 114 | |
| 1939 | — | #621 | 88 | |
| 1938 | — | #601 | 97 | |
| 1937 | — | #532 | 118 | |
| 1936 | — | #632 | 84 | |
| 1935 | — | #575 | 101 | |
| 1934 | — | #568 | 108 | |
| 1933 | — | #572 | 101 | |
| 1932 | — | #515 | 125 | |
| 1931 | — | #501 | 131 | |
| 1930 | #4,550 | 5 | #470 | 158 |
| 1929 | — | #488 | 145 | |
| 1928 | #4,195 | 6 | #521 | 134 |
| 1927 | #3,561 | 8 | #498 | 148 |
| 1926 | — | #523 | 133 | |
| 1925 | #4,973 | 5 | #516 | 140 |
| 1924 | — | #522 | 146 | |
| 1923 | #2,917 | 11 | #523 | 135 |
| 1922 | — | #586 | 120 | |
| 1921 | — | #583 | 118 | |
| 1920 | — | #635 | 98 | |
| 1919 | — | #603 | 100 | |
| 1918 | — | #658 | 88 | |
| 1917 | — | #680 | 78 | |
| 1916 | — | #685 | 75 | |
| 1915 | — | #705 | 69 | |
| 1914 | — | #777 | 46 | |
| 1913 | — | #658 | 46 | |
| 1912 | — | #918 | 24 | |
| 1911 | — | #624 | 24 | |
| 1910 | — | #859 | 13 | |
| 1909 | — | #653 | 17 | |
| 1908 | — | #685 | 15 | |
| 1907 | — | #1,094 | 7 | |
| 1906 | — | #852 | 9 | |
| 1905 | — | #836 | 9 | |
| 1904 | — | #966 | 7 | |
| 1903 | — | #696 | 11 | |
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | #1,051 | 5 | |
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | #917 | 6 | |
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Julio! It came in at #917, and was given to 6 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1889–1902, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Julio is popular in 1989
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- California#127 · 1 in 577
- Connecticut#128 · 1 in 963
- New York#145 · 1 in 985
- Texas#149 · 1 in 737
- Massachusetts#157 · 1 in 1,326
Best ever in a state: #68 in Arizona, 1917.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| California | #127 | 466 | 1 in 577 |
| Connecticut | #128 | 23 | 1 in 963 |
| New York | #145 | 137 | 1 in 985 |
| Texas | #149 | 201 | 1 in 737 |
| Massachusetts | #157 | 33 | 1 in 1,326 |
| Arizona | #171 | 34 | 1 in 891 |
| Florida | #175 | 82 | 1 in 1,089 |
| Nevada | #191 | 7 | 1 in 1,142 |
| New Jersey | #203 | 37 | 1 in 1,489 |
| New Mexico | #218 | 10 | 1 in 1,163 |
| Illinois | #237 | 53 | 1 in 1,638 |
| Washington | #324 | 12 | 1 in 2,834 |
| Utah | #364 | 5 | 1 in 3,313 |
| Virginia | #400 | 10 | 1 in 4,186 |
| Colorado | #451 | 5 | 1 in 4,837 |
| Ohio | #472 | 11 | 1 in 7,100 |
| Pennsylvania | #472 | 12 | 1 in 6,784 |
| Maryland | #493 | 5 | 1 in 6,417 |
| District of Columbia | #530 | 5 | 1 in 2,627 |
| Michigan | #765 | 5 | 1 in 13,886 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Julio
- 41 spots since 2024 (#600 → #641)
- 99 spots since 2020 (#542 → #641)
- 183 spots since 2015 (#458 → #641)
- Biggest jump: 409 spots in 1908 (#1,094 → #685)
- Biggest drop: 294 spots in 1912 (#624 → #918)
- Debuted 1888
- Peaked 1990 at #194 (1,556 births)
- Births halved by 2012, 22 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 123 yrs · run 1908–2025
- Highest: 1 in 1,294 boys born in 1992 were named Julio (0.08%)
- Latest: 1 in 3,918 boys born in 2025 (0.03%)
- Its best rank, #194 in 1990, was only 1 in 1,320 (0.08%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 21.7% of all boys named Julio (13,841) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 6 | #917 (1888) | #917 |
| 1890s | 5 | #1,051 (1899) | #1,051 |
| 1900s | 75 | #653 (1909) | #826 |
| 1910s | 563 | #603 (1919) | #717 |
| 1920s | 1,317 | #488 (1929) | #540 |
| 1930s | 1,111 | #470 (1930) | #559 |
| 1940s | 1,292 | #492 (1948) | #565 |
| 1950s | 2,566 | #446 (1957) | #461 |
| 1960s | 4,052 | #320 (1969) | #394 |
| 1970s | 7,050 | #257 (1979) | #278 |
| 1980s | 9,330 | #229 (1989) | #247 |
| 1990s | 13,841 | #194 (1990) | #221 |
| 2000s | 12,779 | #227 (2005) | #263 |
| 2010s | 6,848 | #338 (2010) | #445 |
| 2020s | 2,940 | #542 (2020) | #586 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Julio in 1989
Top girls' names in 1989
Top boys' names in 1989
More about 1989
girls
1,843,552 girls got a published name in 1989; 1 in 115,222 of them was named Julio, which outranked 63.7% of the 14,550 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 16.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #5,049Xochilt17
- #5,049Zarina17
- #5,049Zoey17
- #5,286Julio16
- #5,286Abena16
- #5,286Adair16
- #5,286Adasha16
- #5,545Abrielle15
- #5,545Adelita15
- #5,545Aislynn15
Tied with 258 names at #5,286; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
2,000,928 boys got a published name in 1989; 1 in 1,687 of them was named Julio, which outranked 97.5% of the 9,232 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 20.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.