Juliet
#274 for girls in 2025, 1,136 births · Last seen for boys in 2016 at #12,185
Given to girls >99.9% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2017 · 1,380 births
- Debut · girls
- 10 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 37,966since 1880
Juliet over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Juliet has never cracked the top 200 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #274 | 1,136 | — | |
| 2024 | #282 | 1,122 | — | |
| 2023 | #293 | 1,063 | — | |
| 2022 | #293 | 1,076 | — | |
| 2021 | #295 | 1,078 | — | |
| 2020 | #306 | 1,038 | — | |
| 2019 | #269 | 1,231 | — | |
| 2018 | #243 | 1,348 | — | |
| 2017 | #227 | 1,380 | — | |
| 2016 | #228 | 1,397 | #12,185 | 5 |
| 2015 | #240 | 1,357 | — | |
| 2014 | #259 | 1,268 | — | |
| 2013 | #238 | 1,334 | — | |
| 2012 | #254 | 1,271 | — | |
| 2011 | #249 | 1,276 | — | |
| 2010 | #285 | 1,142 | — | |
| 2009 | #318 | 1,024 | — | |
| 2008 | #453 | 697 | — | |
| 2007 | #517 | 609 | — | |
| 2006 | #582 | 503 | — | |
| 2005 | #589 | 484 | — | |
| 2004 | #650 | 422 | — | |
| 2003 | #603 | 452 | — | |
| 2002 | #602 | 428 | — | |
| 2001 | #562 | 460 | — | |
| 2000 | #623 | 405 | — | |
| 1999 | #612 | 396 | — | |
| 1998 | #606 | 397 | — | |
| 1997 | #617 | 365 | — | |
| 1996 | #824 | 244 | — | |
| 1995 | #1,049 | 171 | — | |
| 1994 | #1,038 | 176 | — | |
| 1993 | #1,089 | 166 | — | |
| 1992 | #1,076 | 168 | — | |
| 1991 | #1,044 | 175 | — | |
| 1990 | #1,120 | 156 | — | |
| 1989 | #960 | 181 | — | |
| 1988 | #1,077 | 146 | — | |
| 1987 | #1,052 | 146 | — | |
| 1986 | #1,080 | 139 | — | |
| 1985 | #933 | 168 | — | |
| 1984 | #1,091 | 127 | — | |
| 1983 | #910 | 165 | — | |
| 1982 | #886 | 173 | — | |
| 1981 | #866 | 179 | — | |
| 1980 | #853 | 181 | — | |
| 1979 | #869 | 178 | — | |
| 1978 | #919 | 154 | — | |
| 1977 | #979 | 140 | — | |
| 1976 | #858 | 159 | — | |
| 1975 | #687 | 218 | — | |
| 1974 | #714 | 203 | — | |
| 1973 | #623 | 245 | — | |
| 1972 | #613 | 256 | — | |
| 1971 | #508 | 370 | — | |
| 1970 | #504 | 393 | — | |
| 1969 | #579 | 291 | — | |
| 1968 | #727 | 182 | — | |
| 1967 | #720 | 185 | — | |
| 1966 | #708 | 192 | — | |
| 1965 | #687 | 205 | — | |
| 1964 | #736 | 200 | — | |
| 1963 | #689 | 215 | — | |
| 1962 | #646 | 245 | — | |
| 1961 | #744 | 195 | — | |
| 1960 | #779 | 172 | — | |
| 1959 | #829 | 153 | — | |
| 1958 | #892 | 131 | — | |
| 1957 | #818 | 154 | — | |
| 1956 | #897 | 124 | — | |
| 1955 | #879 | 122 | — | |
| 1954 | #838 | 126 | — | |
| 1953 | #932 | 103 | — | |
| 1952 | #975 | 93 | — | |
| 1951 | #961 | 93 | — | |
| 1950 | #916 | 94 | — | |
| 1949 | #935 | 90 | — | |
| 1948 | #967 | 81 | — | |
| 1947 | #984 | 80 | — | |
| 1946 | #867 | 91 | — | |
| 1945 | #968 | 64 | — | |
| 1944 | #808 | 89 | — | |
| 1943 | #861 | 82 | — | |
| 1942 | #873 | 78 | — | |
| 1941 | #768 | 88 | — | |
| 1940 | #790 | 80 | — | |
| 1939 | #838 | 69 | — | |
| 1938 | #756 | 84 | — | |
| 1937 | #804 | 73 | — | |
| 1936 | #1,062 | 43 | — | |
| 1935 | #954 | 53 | — | |
| 1934 | #1,148 | 38 | — | |
| 1933 | #1,024 | 46 | — | |
| 1932 | #875 | 63 | — | |
| 1931 | #899 | 59 | — | |
| 1930 | #1,041 | 50 | — | |
| 1929 | #876 | 66 | — | |
| 1928 | #896 | 67 | — | |
| 1927 | #904 | 68 | — | |
| 1926 | #769 | 88 | — | |
| 1925 | #853 | 76 | — | |
| 1924 | #777 | 92 | — | |
| 1923 | #769 | 90 | — | |
| 1922 | #831 | 78 | — | |
| 1921 | #804 | 83 | — | |
| 1920 | #739 | 95 | — | |
| 1919 | #785 | 81 | — | |
| 1918 | #721 | 100 | — | |
| 1917 | #753 | 85 | — | |
| 1916 | #687 | 99 | — | |
| 1915 | #809 | 66 | — | |
| 1914 | #676 | 74 | — | |
| 1913 | #748 | 49 | — | |
| 1912 | #770 | 42 | — | |
| 1911 | #676 | 41 | — | |
| 1910 | #877 | 24 | — | |
| 1909 | #731 | 30 | — | |
| 1908 | #709 | 30 | — | |
| 1907 | #637 | 34 | — | |
| 1906 | #742 | 24 | — | |
| 1905 | #926 | 16 | — | |
| 1904 | #773 | 21 | — | |
| 1903 | #896 | 15 | — | |
| 1902 | #716 | 23 | — | |
| 1901 | #795 | 17 | — | |
| 1900 | #941 | 16 | — | |
| 1899 | #791 | 17 | — | |
| 1898 | #886 | 15 | — | |
| 1897 | #715 | 19 | — | |
| 1896 | #670 | 22 | — | |
| 1895 | #703 | 20 | — | |
| 1894 | #744 | 16 | — | |
| 1893 | #901 | 11 | — | |
| 1892 | #908 | 11 | — | |
| 1891 | #1,213 | 6 | — | |
| 1890 | #693 | 15 | — | |
| 1889 | #1,025 | 7 | — | |
| 1888 | #753 | 12 | — | |
| 1887 | #693 | 11 | — | |
| 1886 | #439 | 24 | — | |
| 1885 | #745 | 9 | — | |
| 1884 | #583 | 13 | — | |
| 1883 | #615 | 10 | — | |
| 1882 | #740 | 7 | — | |
| 1881 | #582 | 9 | — | |
| 1880 | #547 | 10 | — | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Juliet was already there! It came in at #547, and was given to 10 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1891, when fewer than 7 girls a year got the name.
Where Juliet is popular in 2009
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Delaware#148 · 1 in 457
- District of Columbia#181 · 1 in 500
- Massachusetts#184 · 1 in 820
- New York#199 · 1 in 987
- New Jersey#214 · 1 in 1,036
Best ever in a state: #78 in Rhode Island, 2025.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Delaware | #148 | 6 | 1 in 457 |
| District of Columbia | #181 | 6 | 1 in 500 |
| Massachusetts | #184 | 32 | 1 in 820 |
| New York | #199 | 96 | 1 in 987 |
| New Jersey | #214 | 37 | 1 in 1,036 |
| Maryland | #217 | 28 | 1 in 883 |
| California | #231 | 199 | 1 in 1,097 |
| Florida | #263 | 63 | 1 in 1,307 |
| Arizona | #278 | 27 | 1 in 1,242 |
| Utah | #279 | 17 | 1 in 1,120 |
| Texas | #287 | 120 | 1 in 1,389 |
| Oregon | #289 | 14 | 1 in 1,117 |
| Connecticut | #308 | 9 | 1 in 1,402 |
| Idaho | #319 | 6 | 1 in 1,129 |
| Virginia | #333 | 24 | 1 in 1,529 |
| Minnesota | #338 | 17 | 1 in 1,458 |
| Pennsylvania | #342 | 33 | 1 in 1,655 |
| Colorado | #358 | 16 | 1 in 1,490 |
| Nevada | #358 | 8 | 1 in 1,433 |
| Kansas | #369 | 9 | 1 in 1,529 |
| Tennessee | #371 | 18 | 1 in 1,695 |
| Kentucky | #375 | 11 | 1 in 1,753 |
| South Carolina | #389 | 11 | 1 in 1,687 |
| Washington | #396 | 18 | 1 in 1,742 |
| North Carolina | #412 | 23 | 1 in 2,018 |
| Louisiana | #436 | 11 | 1 in 1,878 |
| Oklahoma | #462 | 9 | 1 in 1,913 |
| Georgia | #473 | 23 | 1 in 2,205 |
| Illinois | #482 | 26 | 1 in 2,432 |
| Arkansas | #486 | 6 | 1 in 1,967 |
| Ohio | #492 | 21 | 1 in 2,593 |
| Iowa | #506 | 6 | 1 in 2,204 |
| Michigan | #523 | 15 | 1 in 2,850 |
| Indiana | #532 | 12 | 1 in 2,642 |
| Alabama | #611 | 7 | 1 in 2,859 |
| Wisconsin | #663 | 7 | 1 in 3,501 |
| Missouri | #737 | 7 | 1 in 4,001 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Juliet
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 8 spots since 2024 (#282 → #274)
- 32 spots since 2020 (#306 → #274)
- 34 spots since 2015 (#240 → #274)
- Biggest jump: 332 spots in 1890 (#1,025 → #693)
- Biggest drop: 520 spots in 1891 (#693 → #1,213)
Rise & fade · girls
137 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 2017 at #227 (1,380 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 130 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 130 yrs · run 1937–1983
Share of babies · girls
1 in 1,251
- Highest: 1 in 1,251 girls born in 2017 were named Juliet (0.08%)
- Latest: 1 in 1,415 girls born in 2025 (0.07%)
Era · girls
The 2010s
- 34.3% of all girls named Juliet (13,004) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 112 | #439 (1886) | #672 |
| 1890s | 152 | #670 (1896) | #822 |
| 1900s | 226 | #637 (1907) | #787 |
| 1910s | 661 | #676 (1914) | #750 |
| 1920s | 803 | #739 (1920) | #822 |
| 1930s | 578 | #756 (1938) | #940 |
| 1940s | 823 | #768 (1941) | #882 |
| 1950s | 1,193 | #818 (1957) | #894 |
| 1960s | 2,082 | #579 (1969) | #702 |
| 1970s | 2,316 | #504 (1970) | #727 |
| 1980s | 1,605 | #853 (1980) | #971 |
| 1990s | 2,414 | #606 (1998) | #908 |
| 2000s | 5,484 | #318 (2009) | #550 |
| 2010s | 13,004 | #227 (2017) | #249 |
| 2020s | 6,513 | #274 (2025) | #291 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Juliet in 2009
girls
#318
1,024 births · 1 in 1,794 girls
Top girls' names in 2009
More about 2009
girls
1,837,114 girls got a published name in 2009; 1 in 1,794 of them was named Juliet, which outranked 98.4% of the 20,199 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.6% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Juliet
Biggest movers since 2008
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.