Juliann
#10,107 for girls in 2025, 9 births · Last seen for boys in 2021 at #7,587
Given to girls 99.0% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1961 · 163 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 7,462since 1900
Juliann over time
Rank among girls' names. Juliann has never cracked the top 800 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #10,107 | 9 | — | |
| 2024 | #8,443 | 12 | — | |
| 2023 | #6,922 | 16 | — | |
| 2022 | #9,056 | 11 | — | |
| 2021 | #8,464 | 12 | #7,587 | 10 |
| 2020 | #8,953 | 11 | #7,034 | 11 |
| 2019 | #5,612 | 22 | #7,643 | 10 |
| 2018 | #6,010 | 20 | #8,154 | 9 |
| 2017 | #4,695 | 29 | #9,696 | 7 |
| 2016 | #4,850 | 28 | #9,664 | 7 |
| 2015 | #5,288 | 25 | #10,644 | 6 |
| 2014 | #3,652 | 42 | #9,642 | 7 |
| 2013 | #4,887 | 28 | — | |
| 2012 | #3,419 | 47 | #10,770 | 6 |
| 2011 | #3,496 | 45 | — | |
| 2010 | #3,360 | 48 | — | |
| 2009 | #2,531 | 74 | — | |
| 2008 | #2,855 | 62 | — | |
| 2007 | #2,568 | 72 | — | |
| 2006 | #2,728 | 65 | #12,055 | 5 |
| 2005 | #2,969 | 54 | — | |
| 2004 | #2,679 | 61 | — | |
| 2003 | #1,925 | 94 | — | |
| 2002 | #1,915 | 92 | — | |
| 2001 | #1,713 | 105 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,558 | 114 | — | |
| 1999 | #1,654 | 100 | — | |
| 1998 | #1,392 | 123 | — | |
| 1997 | #1,696 | 92 | — | |
| 1996 | #1,947 | 73 | — | |
| 1995 | #2,052 | 66 | — | |
| 1994 | #1,714 | 86 | — | |
| 1993 | #2,033 | 68 | — | |
| 1992 | #1,499 | 105 | — | |
| 1991 | #1,478 | 107 | — | |
| 1990 | #1,594 | 94 | — | |
| 1989 | #1,405 | 106 | — | |
| 1988 | #1,320 | 109 | — | |
| 1987 | #1,240 | 114 | — | |
| 1986 | #1,459 | 87 | — | |
| 1985 | #1,193 | 118 | — | |
| 1984 | #1,381 | 85 | — | |
| 1983 | #1,400 | 84 | — | |
| 1982 | #1,566 | 75 | — | |
| 1981 | #1,767 | 63 | — | |
| 1980 | #1,704 | 66 | — | |
| 1979 | #1,770 | 61 | — | |
| 1978 | #1,707 | 61 | — | |
| 1977 | #1,976 | 49 | — | |
| 1976 | #1,996 | 44 | — | |
| 1975 | #1,672 | 57 | — | |
| 1974 | #1,351 | 77 | — | |
| 1973 | #1,510 | 62 | — | |
| 1972 | #1,248 | 83 | — | |
| 1971 | #1,133 | 103 | — | |
| 1970 | #867 | 154 | — | |
| 1969 | #985 | 120 | — | |
| 1968 | #917 | 127 | — | |
| 1967 | #919 | 124 | — | |
| 1966 | #879 | 130 | — | |
| 1965 | #829 | 144 | — | |
| 1964 | #869 | 142 | — | |
| 1963 | #878 | 143 | — | |
| 1962 | #855 | 152 | — | |
| 1961 | #825 | 163 | — | |
| 1960 | #915 | 134 | — | |
| 1959 | #963 | 120 | — | |
| 1958 | #892 | 131 | — | |
| 1957 | #924 | 123 | — | |
| 1956 | #888 | 126 | — | |
| 1955 | #890 | 120 | — | |
| 1954 | #958 | 102 | — | |
| 1953 | #934 | 102 | — | |
| 1952 | #902 | 105 | — | |
| 1951 | #982 | 90 | — | |
| 1950 | #924 | 93 | — | |
| 1949 | #889 | 98 | — | |
| 1948 | #896 | 94 | — | |
| 1947 | #1,079 | 68 | — | |
| 1946 | #985 | 72 | — | |
| 1945 | #1,232 | 42 | — | |
| 1944 | #1,029 | 58 | — | |
| 1943 | #1,048 | 58 | — | |
| 1942 | #902 | 75 | — | |
| 1941 | #858 | 72 | — | |
| 1940 | #979 | 53 | — | |
| 1939 | #1,149 | 40 | — | |
| 1938 | #1,079 | 44 | — | |
| 1937 | #1,070 | 44 | — | |
| 1936 | #1,096 | 41 | — | |
| 1935 | #1,418 | 27 | — | |
| 1934 | #1,190 | 36 | — | |
| 1933 | #1,835 | 18 | — | |
| 1932 | #1,634 | 22 | — | |
| 1931 | #1,549 | 24 | — | |
| 1930 | #1,934 | 18 | — | |
| 1929 | #1,953 | 18 | — | |
| 1928 | #3,743 | 7 | — | |
| 1927 | #2,339 | 15 | — | |
| 1926 | #2,474 | 14 | — | |
| 1925 | #2,489 | 14 | — | |
| 1924 | #2,661 | 13 | — | |
| 1923 | #2,587 | 13 | — | |
| 1922 | #2,387 | 15 | — | |
| 1921 | #2,762 | 12 | — | |
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | #2,640 | 12 | — | |
| 1918 | #3,024 | 10 | — | |
| 1917 | #2,428 | 13 | — | |
| 1916 | #3,031 | 9 | — | |
| 1915 | #3,434 | 7 | — | |
| 1914 | #2,434 | 9 | — | |
| 1913 | #3,187 | 5 | — | |
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | #1,792 | 5 | — | |
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | #1,723 | 6 | — | |
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Juliann! It came in at #1,723, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1901–1913, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Juliann is popular in 1946
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Wisconsin#419 · 1 in 6,561
- Illinois#568 · 1 in 9,770
- Ohio#571 · 1 in 10,981
- Pennsylvania#635 · 1 in 14,178
- New York#849 · 1 in 22,088
Best ever in a state: #256 in Minnesota, 1941.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wisconsin | #419 | 5 | 1 in 6,561 |
| Illinois | #568 | 8 | 1 in 9,770 |
| Ohio | #571 | 7 | 1 in 10,981 |
| Pennsylvania | #635 | 7 | 1 in 14,178 |
| New York | #849 | 6 | 1 in 22,088 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Juliann
- 1,664 spots since 2024 (#8,443 → #10,107)
- 1,154 spots since 2020 (#8,953 → #10,107)
- 4,819 spots since 2015 (#5,288 → #10,107)
- Biggest jump: 247 spots in 1946 (#1,232 → #985)
- Biggest drop: 266 spots in 1971 (#867 → #1,133)
- Debuted 1900
- Peaked 1961 at #825 (163 births)
- Births halved by 1973, 12 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 27 yrs · run 1948–1970
- Highest: 1 in 11,352 girls born in 1970 were named Juliann (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 178,585 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #825 in 1961, was only 1 in 12,383 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 18.5% of all girls named Juliann (1,379) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 11 | #1,723 (1900) | #1,758 |
| 1910s | 65 | #2,428 (1917) | #2,883 |
| 1920s | 121 | #1,953 (1929) | #2,599 |
| 1930s | 314 | #1,070 (1937) | #1,395 |
| 1940s | 690 | #858 (1941) | #990 |
| 1950s | 1,112 | #888 (1956) | #926 |
| 1960s | 1,379 | #825 (1961) | #887 |
| 1970s | 751 | #867 (1970) | #1,523 |
| 1980s | 907 | #1,193 (1985) | #1,444 |
| 1990s | 914 | #1,392 (1998) | #1,706 |
| 2000s | 793 | #1,558 (2000) | #2,344 |
| 2010s | 334 | #3,360 (2010) | #4,527 |
| 2020s | 71 | #6,922 (2023) | #8,658 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Juliann in 1946
Top girls' names in 1946
More about 1946
girls
1,571,305 girls got a published name in 1946; 1 in 21,824 of them was named Juliann, which outranked 82.7% of the 5,686 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 24.5% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).